Impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study

Abstract Aims Data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are scarce. Therefore, the impact of frailty on AF-related outcomes and benefit–risk profiles of NOACs in patients with frailty were investigated. Methods and results...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes 2024-01, Vol.10 (1), p.55-65
Hauptverfasser: Grymonprez, Maxim, Petrovic, Mirko, De Backer, Tine L, Steurbaut, Stephane, Lahousse, Lies
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes
container_volume 10
creator Grymonprez, Maxim
Petrovic, Mirko
De Backer, Tine L
Steurbaut, Stephane
Lahousse, Lies
description Abstract Aims Data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are scarce. Therefore, the impact of frailty on AF-related outcomes and benefit–risk profiles of NOACs in patients with frailty were investigated. Methods and results AF patients initiating anticoagulation between 2013 and 2019 were included using Belgian nationwide data. Frailty was assessed with the Claims-based Frailty Indicator. Among 254 478 anticoagulated AF patients, 71 638 (28.2%) had frailty. Frailty was associated with higher all-cause mortality risks [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.43–1.54)], but not with thromboembolism or bleeding. Among subjects with frailty (78 080 person-years of follow-up), NOACs were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) [aHR 0.77, 95%CI (0.70–0.86)], all-cause mortality [aHR 0.88, 95%CI (0.84–0.92)], and intracranial bleeding [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.66–0.91)], a similar major bleeding risk [aHR 1.01, 95%CI (0.93–1.09)], and higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk [aHR 1.19, 95%CI (1.06–1.33)] compared with VKAs. Major bleeding risks were lower with apixaban [aHR 0.84, 95%CI (0.76–0.93)], similar with edoxaban [aHR 0.91, 95%CI (0.73–1.14)], and higher with dabigatran [aHR 1.16, 95%CI (1.03–1.30)] and rivaroxaban [aHR 1.11, 95%CI (1.02–1.21)] compared with VKAs. Apixaban was associated with lower major bleeding risks compared with dabigatran [aHR 0.72, 95%CI (0.65–0.80)], rivaroxaban [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.72–0.84)] and edoxaban [aHR 0.74, 95%CI (0.65–0.84)], but mortality risk was higher compared with dabigatran and edoxaban. Conclusion Frailty was an independent risk factor of death. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants had better benefit–risk profiles than VKAs in patients with frailty, especially apixaban, followed by edoxaban. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract AF: atrial fibrillation; aHR: adjusted hazard ratio; Api: apixaban; CI: confidence interval; Dabi: dabigatran; Edo: edoxaban; IPTW: inverse probability of treatment weighting; NOAC: non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; OAC: oral anticoagulant; Ref: reference category; Riva: rivaroxaban; SE: systemic embolism; VKA: vitamin K antagonist.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2789234463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad019</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2789234463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7cf9d648bcb22313044bb3423c672020749627db7bf6bb13aa0741b6b397fd593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uGyEUhVHVqrHSrLurWLqRpubP4OkustI2SpRskvUIGIiJZmAMjC0_Ut6yOJ52mxWHe757dKUDwFeMfmBU04XZvGy1Doutli3C9QcwI2i5qrBg5OOkl4Qsz8BFSi8IIcypwJh_BmeU1wxjwmfg9aYfpM4wWGijdF0-wOBh3hhorDU6u53xJiUofQuTtOboW-iDr3Yuy955eFu8LJ-Dd6nERNkd_04H-Tx2RSU4v3-4WqfvsLCDzM4cZ3uXN1Dm6ApunYqu64oV_E8ooX9Te9caqMMmxAxTHtvDF_DJyi6Zi-k9B0-_rh_Xf6q7h98366u7SlNBcyW0rVvOVkorQiimiDGlKCNUc0EQQYLVnIhWCWW5UphKWUZYcUVrYdtlTc_B_JQ7xLAdTcpN75I25UBvwpgaIlY1oYxxWtDFCdUxpBSNbYboehkPDUbNsaJmqqiZKiob36bwUfWm_c__K6QAlycgjMO7aX8BypGghA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2789234463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Grymonprez, Maxim ; Petrovic, Mirko ; De Backer, Tine L ; Steurbaut, Stephane ; Lahousse, Lies</creator><creatorcontrib>Grymonprez, Maxim ; Petrovic, Mirko ; De Backer, Tine L ; Steurbaut, Stephane ; Lahousse, Lies</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Aims Data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are scarce. Therefore, the impact of frailty on AF-related outcomes and benefit–risk profiles of NOACs in patients with frailty were investigated. Methods and results AF patients initiating anticoagulation between 2013 and 2019 were included using Belgian nationwide data. Frailty was assessed with the Claims-based Frailty Indicator. Among 254 478 anticoagulated AF patients, 71 638 (28.2%) had frailty. Frailty was associated with higher all-cause mortality risks [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.43–1.54)], but not with thromboembolism or bleeding. Among subjects with frailty (78 080 person-years of follow-up), NOACs were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) [aHR 0.77, 95%CI (0.70–0.86)], all-cause mortality [aHR 0.88, 95%CI (0.84–0.92)], and intracranial bleeding [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.66–0.91)], a similar major bleeding risk [aHR 1.01, 95%CI (0.93–1.09)], and higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk [aHR 1.19, 95%CI (1.06–1.33)] compared with VKAs. Major bleeding risks were lower with apixaban [aHR 0.84, 95%CI (0.76–0.93)], similar with edoxaban [aHR 0.91, 95%CI (0.73–1.14)], and higher with dabigatran [aHR 1.16, 95%CI (1.03–1.30)] and rivaroxaban [aHR 1.11, 95%CI (1.02–1.21)] compared with VKAs. Apixaban was associated with lower major bleeding risks compared with dabigatran [aHR 0.72, 95%CI (0.65–0.80)], rivaroxaban [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.72–0.84)] and edoxaban [aHR 0.74, 95%CI (0.65–0.84)], but mortality risk was higher compared with dabigatran and edoxaban. Conclusion Frailty was an independent risk factor of death. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants had better benefit–risk profiles than VKAs in patients with frailty, especially apixaban, followed by edoxaban. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract AF: atrial fibrillation; aHR: adjusted hazard ratio; Api: apixaban; CI: confidence interval; Dabi: dabigatran; Edo: edoxaban; IPTW: inverse probability of treatment weighting; NOAC: non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; OAC: oral anticoagulant; Ref: reference category; Riva: rivaroxaban; SE: systemic embolism; VKA: vitamin K antagonist.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2058-5225</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2058-1742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36941126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>European heart journal. Quality of care &amp; clinical outcomes, 2024-01, Vol.10 (1), p.55-65</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7cf9d648bcb22313044bb3423c672020749627db7bf6bb13aa0741b6b397fd593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7cf9d648bcb22313044bb3423c672020749627db7bf6bb13aa0741b6b397fd593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0145-6486 ; 0000-0002-3494-4363</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grymonprez, Maxim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Mirko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Backer, Tine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steurbaut, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahousse, Lies</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study</title><title>European heart journal. Quality of care &amp; clinical outcomes</title><addtitle>Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes</addtitle><description>Abstract Aims Data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are scarce. Therefore, the impact of frailty on AF-related outcomes and benefit–risk profiles of NOACs in patients with frailty were investigated. Methods and results AF patients initiating anticoagulation between 2013 and 2019 were included using Belgian nationwide data. Frailty was assessed with the Claims-based Frailty Indicator. Among 254 478 anticoagulated AF patients, 71 638 (28.2%) had frailty. Frailty was associated with higher all-cause mortality risks [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.43–1.54)], but not with thromboembolism or bleeding. Among subjects with frailty (78 080 person-years of follow-up), NOACs were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) [aHR 0.77, 95%CI (0.70–0.86)], all-cause mortality [aHR 0.88, 95%CI (0.84–0.92)], and intracranial bleeding [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.66–0.91)], a similar major bleeding risk [aHR 1.01, 95%CI (0.93–1.09)], and higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk [aHR 1.19, 95%CI (1.06–1.33)] compared with VKAs. Major bleeding risks were lower with apixaban [aHR 0.84, 95%CI (0.76–0.93)], similar with edoxaban [aHR 0.91, 95%CI (0.73–1.14)], and higher with dabigatran [aHR 1.16, 95%CI (1.03–1.30)] and rivaroxaban [aHR 1.11, 95%CI (1.02–1.21)] compared with VKAs. Apixaban was associated with lower major bleeding risks compared with dabigatran [aHR 0.72, 95%CI (0.65–0.80)], rivaroxaban [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.72–0.84)] and edoxaban [aHR 0.74, 95%CI (0.65–0.84)], but mortality risk was higher compared with dabigatran and edoxaban. Conclusion Frailty was an independent risk factor of death. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants had better benefit–risk profiles than VKAs in patients with frailty, especially apixaban, followed by edoxaban. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract AF: atrial fibrillation; aHR: adjusted hazard ratio; Api: apixaban; CI: confidence interval; Dabi: dabigatran; Edo: edoxaban; IPTW: inverse probability of treatment weighting; NOAC: non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; OAC: oral anticoagulant; Ref: reference category; Riva: rivaroxaban; SE: systemic embolism; VKA: vitamin K antagonist.</description><issn>2058-5225</issn><issn>2058-1742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uGyEUhVHVqrHSrLurWLqRpubP4OkustI2SpRskvUIGIiJZmAMjC0_Ut6yOJ52mxWHe757dKUDwFeMfmBU04XZvGy1Doutli3C9QcwI2i5qrBg5OOkl4Qsz8BFSi8IIcypwJh_BmeU1wxjwmfg9aYfpM4wWGijdF0-wOBh3hhorDU6u53xJiUofQuTtOboW-iDr3Yuy955eFu8LJ-Dd6nERNkd_04H-Tx2RSU4v3-4WqfvsLCDzM4cZ3uXN1Dm6ApunYqu64oV_E8ooX9Te9caqMMmxAxTHtvDF_DJyi6Zi-k9B0-_rh_Xf6q7h98366u7SlNBcyW0rVvOVkorQiimiDGlKCNUc0EQQYLVnIhWCWW5UphKWUZYcUVrYdtlTc_B_JQ7xLAdTcpN75I25UBvwpgaIlY1oYxxWtDFCdUxpBSNbYboehkPDUbNsaJmqqiZKiob36bwUfWm_c__K6QAlycgjMO7aX8BypGghA</recordid><startdate>20240112</startdate><enddate>20240112</enddate><creator>Grymonprez, Maxim</creator><creator>Petrovic, Mirko</creator><creator>De Backer, Tine L</creator><creator>Steurbaut, Stephane</creator><creator>Lahousse, Lies</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0145-6486</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-4363</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240112</creationdate><title>Impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study</title><author>Grymonprez, Maxim ; Petrovic, Mirko ; De Backer, Tine L ; Steurbaut, Stephane ; Lahousse, Lies</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7cf9d648bcb22313044bb3423c672020749627db7bf6bb13aa0741b6b397fd593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grymonprez, Maxim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Mirko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Backer, Tine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steurbaut, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahousse, Lies</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European heart journal. Quality of care &amp; clinical outcomes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grymonprez, Maxim</au><au>Petrovic, Mirko</au><au>De Backer, Tine L</au><au>Steurbaut, Stephane</au><au>Lahousse, Lies</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal. Quality of care &amp; clinical outcomes</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes</addtitle><date>2024-01-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>55-65</pages><issn>2058-5225</issn><eissn>2058-1742</eissn><abstract>Abstract Aims Data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are scarce. Therefore, the impact of frailty on AF-related outcomes and benefit–risk profiles of NOACs in patients with frailty were investigated. Methods and results AF patients initiating anticoagulation between 2013 and 2019 were included using Belgian nationwide data. Frailty was assessed with the Claims-based Frailty Indicator. Among 254 478 anticoagulated AF patients, 71 638 (28.2%) had frailty. Frailty was associated with higher all-cause mortality risks [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.43–1.54)], but not with thromboembolism or bleeding. Among subjects with frailty (78 080 person-years of follow-up), NOACs were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) [aHR 0.77, 95%CI (0.70–0.86)], all-cause mortality [aHR 0.88, 95%CI (0.84–0.92)], and intracranial bleeding [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.66–0.91)], a similar major bleeding risk [aHR 1.01, 95%CI (0.93–1.09)], and higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk [aHR 1.19, 95%CI (1.06–1.33)] compared with VKAs. Major bleeding risks were lower with apixaban [aHR 0.84, 95%CI (0.76–0.93)], similar with edoxaban [aHR 0.91, 95%CI (0.73–1.14)], and higher with dabigatran [aHR 1.16, 95%CI (1.03–1.30)] and rivaroxaban [aHR 1.11, 95%CI (1.02–1.21)] compared with VKAs. Apixaban was associated with lower major bleeding risks compared with dabigatran [aHR 0.72, 95%CI (0.65–0.80)], rivaroxaban [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.72–0.84)] and edoxaban [aHR 0.74, 95%CI (0.65–0.84)], but mortality risk was higher compared with dabigatran and edoxaban. Conclusion Frailty was an independent risk factor of death. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants had better benefit–risk profiles than VKAs in patients with frailty, especially apixaban, followed by edoxaban. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract AF: atrial fibrillation; aHR: adjusted hazard ratio; Api: apixaban; CI: confidence interval; Dabi: dabigatran; Edo: edoxaban; IPTW: inverse probability of treatment weighting; NOAC: non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; OAC: oral anticoagulant; Ref: reference category; Riva: rivaroxaban; SE: systemic embolism; VKA: vitamin K antagonist.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36941126</pmid><doi>10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad019</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0145-6486</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-4363</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2058-5225
ispartof European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2024-01, Vol.10 (1), p.55-65
issn 2058-5225
2058-1742
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2789234463
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A17%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20frailty%20on%20the%20effectiveness%20and%20safety%20of%20non-vitamin%20K%20antagonist%20oral%20anticoagulants%20(NOACs)%20in%20patients%20with%20atrial%20fibrillation:%20a%20nationwide%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal.%20Quality%20of%20care%20&%20clinical%20outcomes&rft.au=Grymonprez,%20Maxim&rft.date=2024-01-12&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=55-65&rft.issn=2058-5225&rft.eissn=2058-1742&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2789234463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2789234463&rft_id=info:pmid/36941126&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad019&rfr_iscdi=true