Radical prostatectomy trends between 2010 and 2020 in Ehime, Japan, identified using data from the Medical Investigation Cancer Network (MICAN) study

Objectives The use of radical prostatectomy is increasing with the rising incidence of prostate cancer. We assessed the surgical trends related to radical prostatectomy using data from a multi‐center, retrospective cohort study, the MICAN (Medical Investigation Cancer Network) study, which was condu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of urology 2023-06, Vol.30 (6), p.547-553
Hauptverfasser: Hashine, Katsuyoshi, Yamashita, Natsumi, Tachou, Takatoshi, Kan, Masaharu, Yanagaki, Takahiro, Oka, Akihiro, Takeda, Hajime, Shirato, Akitomi, Watanabe, Uichi, Miura, Noriyoshi, Saika, Takashi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 553
container_issue 6
container_start_page 547
container_title International journal of urology
container_volume 30
creator Hashine, Katsuyoshi
Yamashita, Natsumi
Tachou, Takatoshi
Kan, Masaharu
Yanagaki, Takahiro
Oka, Akihiro
Takeda, Hajime
Shirato, Akitomi
Watanabe, Uichi
Miura, Noriyoshi
Saika, Takashi
description Objectives The use of radical prostatectomy is increasing with the rising incidence of prostate cancer. We assessed the surgical trends related to radical prostatectomy using data from a multi‐center, retrospective cohort study, the MICAN (Medical Investigation Cancer Network) study, which was conducted in all the urology‐related medical facilities in Ehime Prefecture, Japan. Methods We compared data from the MICAN study with prostate biopsy registry data collected in Ehime between 2010 and 2020 and recorded the surgical trends. Results There was a significant increase in the mean age of patients with positive biopsies, and the positivity rate increased from 46.3% in 2010 to 60.5% in 2020, while the number of biopsies obtained decreased. The number of radical prostatectomies performed increased over the years, with robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy becoming the predominant procedure. In 2020, robot‐assisted radical prostatectomies accounted for 96.0% of the surgeries performed. The age at surgery also gradually increased. Of the registered patients aged ≤75 years, 40.5% underwent surgery in 2010, compared with 83.1% in 2020. The prevalence of surgery also increased from 4.6% to 29.8% in patients aged >75 years. There was a gradual increase in the proportion of high‐risk cases, from 29.3% to 44.0%, but a decrease in that of low‐risk cases, from 23.8% in 2010 to 11.4% in 2020. Conclusions We have shown that the number of radical prostatectomies performed in Ehime is increasing in patients aged both ≤75 and >75 years. The proportion of low‐risk cases has decreased, while that of high‐risk cases has increased.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iju.15178
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2789234231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2789234231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-4add5fcb01b98779e23630b199050b0e7e1f2c188b675e025f2fafc76069ec3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U9vFCEYBnBiNHZbPfgFDImXNum0_JkZ4Gg2Vbdpa2LsmTDwTss6w6zA2OwH6fcVnerBRC5w-OV5gQehN5Sc0bLO_XY-ow0V8hla0bpmFSM1e45WRFFVSSrYATpMaUsI5YzKl-iAt6qmRNYr9PjFOG_NgHdxStlksHka9zhHCC7hDvIDQMCMUIJNcOXACPYBX9z7EU7xpdmZcIq9g5B978HhOflwh53JBvdxGnG-B3wNy4hN-AEp-zuT_RTw2gQLEd-UEVP8ho-vN-v3Nyc45dntX6EXvRkSvH7aj9Dth4uv60_V1eePhV1Vlgshq9o41_S2I7RTUggFjLecdFQp0pCOgADaM0ul7FrRAGFNz3rTW9GSVoHlwI_Q8ZJbXv99LpfTo08WhsEEmOakmZCK8ZpxWui7f-h2mmMot9NMMkbauuCiThZly3emCL3eRT-auNeU6F9d6dKV_t1VsW-fEuduBPdX_imngPMFPPgB9v9P0pvL2yXyJ97bnBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2822064278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radical prostatectomy trends between 2010 and 2020 in Ehime, Japan, identified using data from the Medical Investigation Cancer Network (MICAN) study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Hashine, Katsuyoshi ; Yamashita, Natsumi ; Tachou, Takatoshi ; Kan, Masaharu ; Yanagaki, Takahiro ; Oka, Akihiro ; Takeda, Hajime ; Shirato, Akitomi ; Watanabe, Uichi ; Miura, Noriyoshi ; Saika, Takashi</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashine, Katsuyoshi ; Yamashita, Natsumi ; Tachou, Takatoshi ; Kan, Masaharu ; Yanagaki, Takahiro ; Oka, Akihiro ; Takeda, Hajime ; Shirato, Akitomi ; Watanabe, Uichi ; Miura, Noriyoshi ; Saika, Takashi</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The use of radical prostatectomy is increasing with the rising incidence of prostate cancer. We assessed the surgical trends related to radical prostatectomy using data from a multi‐center, retrospective cohort study, the MICAN (Medical Investigation Cancer Network) study, which was conducted in all the urology‐related medical facilities in Ehime Prefecture, Japan. Methods We compared data from the MICAN study with prostate biopsy registry data collected in Ehime between 2010 and 2020 and recorded the surgical trends. Results There was a significant increase in the mean age of patients with positive biopsies, and the positivity rate increased from 46.3% in 2010 to 60.5% in 2020, while the number of biopsies obtained decreased. The number of radical prostatectomies performed increased over the years, with robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy becoming the predominant procedure. In 2020, robot‐assisted radical prostatectomies accounted for 96.0% of the surgeries performed. The age at surgery also gradually increased. Of the registered patients aged ≤75 years, 40.5% underwent surgery in 2010, compared with 83.1% in 2020. The prevalence of surgery also increased from 4.6% to 29.8% in patients aged &gt;75 years. There was a gradual increase in the proportion of high‐risk cases, from 29.3% to 44.0%, but a decrease in that of low‐risk cases, from 23.8% in 2010 to 11.4% in 2020. Conclusions We have shown that the number of radical prostatectomies performed in Ehime is increasing in patients aged both ≤75 and &gt;75 years. The proportion of low‐risk cases has decreased, while that of high‐risk cases has increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0919-8172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-2042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iju.15178</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36941084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Cancer ; Cohort analysis ; Humans ; Japan ; Japan - epidemiology ; Male ; Patients ; Prostate ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - methods ; prostatic neoplasm ; Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; radical prostatectomy ; retrospective cohort study ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Surgery ; surgical trend ; Trends</subject><ispartof>International journal of urology, 2023-06, Vol.30 (6), p.547-553</ispartof><rights>2023 The Japanese Urological Association.</rights><rights>2023 The Japanese Urological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-4add5fcb01b98779e23630b199050b0e7e1f2c188b675e025f2fafc76069ec3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-4add5fcb01b98779e23630b199050b0e7e1f2c188b675e025f2fafc76069ec3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1770-5758</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fiju.15178$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fiju.15178$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashine, Katsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Natsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachou, Takatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kan, Masaharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagaki, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeda, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirato, Akitomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Uichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Noriyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saika, Takashi</creatorcontrib><title>Radical prostatectomy trends between 2010 and 2020 in Ehime, Japan, identified using data from the Medical Investigation Cancer Network (MICAN) study</title><title>International journal of urology</title><addtitle>Int J Urol</addtitle><description>Objectives The use of radical prostatectomy is increasing with the rising incidence of prostate cancer. We assessed the surgical trends related to radical prostatectomy using data from a multi‐center, retrospective cohort study, the MICAN (Medical Investigation Cancer Network) study, which was conducted in all the urology‐related medical facilities in Ehime Prefecture, Japan. Methods We compared data from the MICAN study with prostate biopsy registry data collected in Ehime between 2010 and 2020 and recorded the surgical trends. Results There was a significant increase in the mean age of patients with positive biopsies, and the positivity rate increased from 46.3% in 2010 to 60.5% in 2020, while the number of biopsies obtained decreased. The number of radical prostatectomies performed increased over the years, with robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy becoming the predominant procedure. In 2020, robot‐assisted radical prostatectomies accounted for 96.0% of the surgeries performed. The age at surgery also gradually increased. Of the registered patients aged ≤75 years, 40.5% underwent surgery in 2010, compared with 83.1% in 2020. The prevalence of surgery also increased from 4.6% to 29.8% in patients aged &gt;75 years. There was a gradual increase in the proportion of high‐risk cases, from 29.3% to 44.0%, but a decrease in that of low‐risk cases, from 23.8% in 2010 to 11.4% in 2020. Conclusions We have shown that the number of radical prostatectomies performed in Ehime is increasing in patients aged both ≤75 and &gt;75 years. The proportion of low‐risk cases has decreased, while that of high‐risk cases has increased.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Japan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>prostatic neoplasm</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>retrospective cohort study</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgical trend</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0919-8172</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U9vFCEYBnBiNHZbPfgFDImXNum0_JkZ4Gg2Vbdpa2LsmTDwTss6w6zA2OwH6fcVnerBRC5w-OV5gQehN5Sc0bLO_XY-ow0V8hla0bpmFSM1e45WRFFVSSrYATpMaUsI5YzKl-iAt6qmRNYr9PjFOG_NgHdxStlksHka9zhHCC7hDvIDQMCMUIJNcOXACPYBX9z7EU7xpdmZcIq9g5B978HhOflwh53JBvdxGnG-B3wNy4hN-AEp-zuT_RTw2gQLEd-UEVP8ho-vN-v3Nyc45dntX6EXvRkSvH7aj9Dth4uv60_V1eePhV1Vlgshq9o41_S2I7RTUggFjLecdFQp0pCOgADaM0ul7FrRAGFNz3rTW9GSVoHlwI_Q8ZJbXv99LpfTo08WhsEEmOakmZCK8ZpxWui7f-h2mmMot9NMMkbauuCiThZly3emCL3eRT-auNeU6F9d6dKV_t1VsW-fEuduBPdX_imngPMFPPgB9v9P0pvL2yXyJ97bnBQ</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Hashine, Katsuyoshi</creator><creator>Yamashita, Natsumi</creator><creator>Tachou, Takatoshi</creator><creator>Kan, Masaharu</creator><creator>Yanagaki, Takahiro</creator><creator>Oka, Akihiro</creator><creator>Takeda, Hajime</creator><creator>Shirato, Akitomi</creator><creator>Watanabe, Uichi</creator><creator>Miura, Noriyoshi</creator><creator>Saika, Takashi</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1770-5758</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Radical prostatectomy trends between 2010 and 2020 in Ehime, Japan, identified using data from the Medical Investigation Cancer Network (MICAN) study</title><author>Hashine, Katsuyoshi ; Yamashita, Natsumi ; Tachou, Takatoshi ; Kan, Masaharu ; Yanagaki, Takahiro ; Oka, Akihiro ; Takeda, Hajime ; Shirato, Akitomi ; Watanabe, Uichi ; Miura, Noriyoshi ; Saika, Takashi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3778-4add5fcb01b98779e23630b199050b0e7e1f2c188b675e025f2fafc76069ec3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Japan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>prostatic neoplasm</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>retrospective cohort study</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgical trend</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashine, Katsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Natsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachou, Takatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kan, Masaharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagaki, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeda, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirato, Akitomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Uichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Noriyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saika, Takashi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashine, Katsuyoshi</au><au>Yamashita, Natsumi</au><au>Tachou, Takatoshi</au><au>Kan, Masaharu</au><au>Yanagaki, Takahiro</au><au>Oka, Akihiro</au><au>Takeda, Hajime</au><au>Shirato, Akitomi</au><au>Watanabe, Uichi</au><au>Miura, Noriyoshi</au><au>Saika, Takashi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radical prostatectomy trends between 2010 and 2020 in Ehime, Japan, identified using data from the Medical Investigation Cancer Network (MICAN) study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Urol</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>553</epage><pages>547-553</pages><issn>0919-8172</issn><eissn>1442-2042</eissn><abstract>Objectives The use of radical prostatectomy is increasing with the rising incidence of prostate cancer. We assessed the surgical trends related to radical prostatectomy using data from a multi‐center, retrospective cohort study, the MICAN (Medical Investigation Cancer Network) study, which was conducted in all the urology‐related medical facilities in Ehime Prefecture, Japan. Methods We compared data from the MICAN study with prostate biopsy registry data collected in Ehime between 2010 and 2020 and recorded the surgical trends. Results There was a significant increase in the mean age of patients with positive biopsies, and the positivity rate increased from 46.3% in 2010 to 60.5% in 2020, while the number of biopsies obtained decreased. The number of radical prostatectomies performed increased over the years, with robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy becoming the predominant procedure. In 2020, robot‐assisted radical prostatectomies accounted for 96.0% of the surgeries performed. The age at surgery also gradually increased. Of the registered patients aged ≤75 years, 40.5% underwent surgery in 2010, compared with 83.1% in 2020. The prevalence of surgery also increased from 4.6% to 29.8% in patients aged &gt;75 years. There was a gradual increase in the proportion of high‐risk cases, from 29.3% to 44.0%, but a decrease in that of low‐risk cases, from 23.8% in 2010 to 11.4% in 2020. Conclusions We have shown that the number of radical prostatectomies performed in Ehime is increasing in patients aged both ≤75 and &gt;75 years. The proportion of low‐risk cases has decreased, while that of high‐risk cases has increased.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36941084</pmid><doi>10.1111/iju.15178</doi><tpages>553</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1770-5758</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0919-8172
ispartof International journal of urology, 2023-06, Vol.30 (6), p.547-553
issn 0919-8172
1442-2042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2789234231
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Biopsy
Cancer
Cohort analysis
Humans
Japan
Japan - epidemiology
Male
Patients
Prostate
Prostate - pathology
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Prostatectomy - methods
prostatic neoplasm
Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
radical prostatectomy
retrospective cohort study
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Surgery
surgical trend
Trends
title Radical prostatectomy trends between 2010 and 2020 in Ehime, Japan, identified using data from the Medical Investigation Cancer Network (MICAN) study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A26%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radical%20prostatectomy%20trends%20between%202010%20and%202020%20in%20Ehime,%20Japan,%20identified%20using%20data%20from%20the%20Medical%20Investigation%20Cancer%20Network%20(MICAN)%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Hashine,%20Katsuyoshi&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=553&rft.pages=547-553&rft.issn=0919-8172&rft.eissn=1442-2042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iju.15178&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2789234231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2822064278&rft_id=info:pmid/36941084&rfr_iscdi=true