Field comparison of network Sun photometers

Measurements of aerosol optical depth have become more numerous since the mid‐1990s with the onset of commercially available, high‐quality, low‐maintenance automatic instrumentation. The development of several networks for aerosol measurements, and the next day availability of preliminary data for s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres 2003-10, Vol.108 (D19), p.AAC1.1-n/a
Hauptverfasser: McArthur, L. J. Bruce, Halliwell, David H., Niebergall, Ormanda J., O'Neill, Norm T., Slusser, James R., Wehrli, Christoph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue D19
container_start_page AAC1.1
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres
container_volume 108
creator McArthur, L. J. Bruce
Halliwell, David H.
Niebergall, Ormanda J.
O'Neill, Norm T.
Slusser, James R.
Wehrli, Christoph
description Measurements of aerosol optical depth have become more numerous since the mid‐1990s with the onset of commercially available, high‐quality, low‐maintenance automatic instrumentation. The development of several networks for aerosol measurements, and the next day availability of preliminary data for some, have further enhanced interest in the products this type of measurement can provide. With several networks operating globally and others operating either regionally or continentally within North America the comparability of the data emanating from the various archive centers is an important issue. The Bratt's Lake Observatory operates four separate types of Sun photometers in conjunction with three different networks: Aerosols in Canada, Global Atmosphere Watch, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture UV‐B Monitoring Program. Data collected during the summer of 2001, following the protocols established by the networks and the Meteorological Service of Canada, were analyzed to determine the comparability among these networks. As the instruments and conversion algorithms are similar to other networks from around the globe, it is believed that the results of this comparison can be transferred, at least in part, to other operational networks. The results of the 3‐month study indicate that the data obtained from the networks that operate direct‐pointing instruments are very comparable, being within ±0.01 of an optical depth for instantaneous measurements during cloud‐free line‐of‐sight conditions. Over the length of the comparison the root mean square difference of aerosol optical depth at 500 nm between the direct sun‐pointing instruments was 0.0069. The rotating shadowband instruments did not perform as well. These results indicate that the data from well‐maintained networks of direct sun‐pointing photometers can provide data of the quality necessary to compare stations from across the globe.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2002JD002964
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27876013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27876013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4738-45d1cab6a401ce86fd6dec9734b039139a5c503882a70108b616c4459619029c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PAjEQhhujiQS9-QP2ohdd7ffH0YisIkGDGI9NKd24umyxXYL8e2sg6knnMJNMnvedyQvAEYLnCGJ1gSHEg15qitMd0MGI8RxjiHdBByIqc4ix2AeHMb7CVJRxClEHnPYrV88y6-cLE6rom8yXWePalQ9v2eOyyRYvvvVz17oQD8BeaeroDrezC57615Orm3x4X9xeXQ5zSwWROWUzZM2Um3TAOsnLGZ85qwShU0gUIsowyyCREhsBEZRTjrillCmOVPreki442fgugn9futjqeRWtq2vTOL-MGgspOETkXxCpFIqkKoFnG9AGH2NwpV6Eam7CWiOov9LTv9NL-PHW10Rr6jKYxlbxR8MIZEzIxJENt6pqt_7TUw-KcS9t8Zcq36iq2LqPb5UJb5oLIph-HhV6PGIPd6NC6Qn5BAKaiXM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19200849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field comparison of network Sun photometers</title><source>Wiley Free Archive</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McArthur, L. J. Bruce ; Halliwell, David H. ; Niebergall, Ormanda J. ; O'Neill, Norm T. ; Slusser, James R. ; Wehrli, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>McArthur, L. J. Bruce ; Halliwell, David H. ; Niebergall, Ormanda J. ; O'Neill, Norm T. ; Slusser, James R. ; Wehrli, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Measurements of aerosol optical depth have become more numerous since the mid‐1990s with the onset of commercially available, high‐quality, low‐maintenance automatic instrumentation. The development of several networks for aerosol measurements, and the next day availability of preliminary data for some, have further enhanced interest in the products this type of measurement can provide. With several networks operating globally and others operating either regionally or continentally within North America the comparability of the data emanating from the various archive centers is an important issue. The Bratt's Lake Observatory operates four separate types of Sun photometers in conjunction with three different networks: Aerosols in Canada, Global Atmosphere Watch, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture UV‐B Monitoring Program. Data collected during the summer of 2001, following the protocols established by the networks and the Meteorological Service of Canada, were analyzed to determine the comparability among these networks. As the instruments and conversion algorithms are similar to other networks from around the globe, it is believed that the results of this comparison can be transferred, at least in part, to other operational networks. The results of the 3‐month study indicate that the data obtained from the networks that operate direct‐pointing instruments are very comparable, being within ±0.01 of an optical depth for instantaneous measurements during cloud‐free line‐of‐sight conditions. Over the length of the comparison the root mean square difference of aerosol optical depth at 500 nm between the direct sun‐pointing instruments was 0.0069. The rotating shadowband instruments did not perform as well. These results indicate that the data from well‐maintained networks of direct sun‐pointing photometers can provide data of the quality necessary to compare stations from across the globe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2002JD002964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>AOD ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Sun photometer ; Ångström coefficient</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2003-10, Vol.108 (D19), p.AAC1.1-n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4738-45d1cab6a401ce86fd6dec9734b039139a5c503882a70108b616c4459619029c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4738-45d1cab6a401ce86fd6dec9734b039139a5c503882a70108b616c4459619029c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2002JD002964$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2002JD002964$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,1434,11516,27926,27927,45576,45577,46411,46470,46835,46894</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15305578$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McArthur, L. J. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliwell, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niebergall, Ormanda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Norm T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slusser, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wehrli, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>Field comparison of network Sun photometers</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Measurements of aerosol optical depth have become more numerous since the mid‐1990s with the onset of commercially available, high‐quality, low‐maintenance automatic instrumentation. The development of several networks for aerosol measurements, and the next day availability of preliminary data for some, have further enhanced interest in the products this type of measurement can provide. With several networks operating globally and others operating either regionally or continentally within North America the comparability of the data emanating from the various archive centers is an important issue. The Bratt's Lake Observatory operates four separate types of Sun photometers in conjunction with three different networks: Aerosols in Canada, Global Atmosphere Watch, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture UV‐B Monitoring Program. Data collected during the summer of 2001, following the protocols established by the networks and the Meteorological Service of Canada, were analyzed to determine the comparability among these networks. As the instruments and conversion algorithms are similar to other networks from around the globe, it is believed that the results of this comparison can be transferred, at least in part, to other operational networks. The results of the 3‐month study indicate that the data obtained from the networks that operate direct‐pointing instruments are very comparable, being within ±0.01 of an optical depth for instantaneous measurements during cloud‐free line‐of‐sight conditions. Over the length of the comparison the root mean square difference of aerosol optical depth at 500 nm between the direct sun‐pointing instruments was 0.0069. The rotating shadowband instruments did not perform as well. These results indicate that the data from well‐maintained networks of direct sun‐pointing photometers can provide data of the quality necessary to compare stations from across the globe.</description><subject>AOD</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Sun photometer</subject><subject>Ångström coefficient</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PAjEQhhujiQS9-QP2ohdd7ffH0YisIkGDGI9NKd24umyxXYL8e2sg6knnMJNMnvedyQvAEYLnCGJ1gSHEg15qitMd0MGI8RxjiHdBByIqc4ix2AeHMb7CVJRxClEHnPYrV88y6-cLE6rom8yXWePalQ9v2eOyyRYvvvVz17oQD8BeaeroDrezC57615Orm3x4X9xeXQ5zSwWROWUzZM2Um3TAOsnLGZ85qwShU0gUIsowyyCREhsBEZRTjrillCmOVPreki442fgugn9futjqeRWtq2vTOL-MGgspOETkXxCpFIqkKoFnG9AGH2NwpV6Eam7CWiOov9LTv9NL-PHW10Rr6jKYxlbxR8MIZEzIxJENt6pqt_7TUw-KcS9t8Zcq36iq2LqPb5UJb5oLIph-HhV6PGIPd6NC6Qn5BAKaiXM</recordid><startdate>20031016</startdate><enddate>20031016</enddate><creator>McArthur, L. J. Bruce</creator><creator>Halliwell, David H.</creator><creator>Niebergall, Ormanda J.</creator><creator>O'Neill, Norm T.</creator><creator>Slusser, James R.</creator><creator>Wehrli, Christoph</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031016</creationdate><title>Field comparison of network Sun photometers</title><author>McArthur, L. J. Bruce ; Halliwell, David H. ; Niebergall, Ormanda J. ; O'Neill, Norm T. ; Slusser, James R. ; Wehrli, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4738-45d1cab6a401ce86fd6dec9734b039139a5c503882a70108b616c4459619029c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>AOD</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Sun photometer</topic><topic>Ångström coefficient</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McArthur, L. J. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliwell, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niebergall, Ormanda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Norm T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slusser, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wehrli, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McArthur, L. J. Bruce</au><au>Halliwell, David H.</au><au>Niebergall, Ormanda J.</au><au>O'Neill, Norm T.</au><au>Slusser, James R.</au><au>Wehrli, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field comparison of network Sun photometers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2003-10-16</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>D19</issue><spage>AAC1.1</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>AAC1.1-n/a</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Measurements of aerosol optical depth have become more numerous since the mid‐1990s with the onset of commercially available, high‐quality, low‐maintenance automatic instrumentation. The development of several networks for aerosol measurements, and the next day availability of preliminary data for some, have further enhanced interest in the products this type of measurement can provide. With several networks operating globally and others operating either regionally or continentally within North America the comparability of the data emanating from the various archive centers is an important issue. The Bratt's Lake Observatory operates four separate types of Sun photometers in conjunction with three different networks: Aerosols in Canada, Global Atmosphere Watch, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture UV‐B Monitoring Program. Data collected during the summer of 2001, following the protocols established by the networks and the Meteorological Service of Canada, were analyzed to determine the comparability among these networks. As the instruments and conversion algorithms are similar to other networks from around the globe, it is believed that the results of this comparison can be transferred, at least in part, to other operational networks. The results of the 3‐month study indicate that the data obtained from the networks that operate direct‐pointing instruments are very comparable, being within ±0.01 of an optical depth for instantaneous measurements during cloud‐free line‐of‐sight conditions. Over the length of the comparison the root mean square difference of aerosol optical depth at 500 nm between the direct sun‐pointing instruments was 0.0069. The rotating shadowband instruments did not perform as well. These results indicate that the data from well‐maintained networks of direct sun‐pointing photometers can provide data of the quality necessary to compare stations from across the globe.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2002JD002964</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2003-10, Vol.108 (D19), p.AAC1.1-n/a
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27876013
source Wiley Free Archive; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects AOD
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Sun photometer
Ångström coefficient
title Field comparison of network Sun photometers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T18%3A57%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20comparison%20of%20network%20Sun%20photometers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20D.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=McArthur,%20L.%20J.%20Bruce&rft.date=2003-10-16&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=D19&rft.spage=AAC1.1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=AAC1.1-n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2002JD002964&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27876013%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19200849&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true