Quantitative Imaging Analysis Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Validation for Clinical HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer

Quantitative imaging is a promising tool that is gaining wide use across several areas of pathology. Although there has been increasing adoption of morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis, the adoption for evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2023-12, Vol.147 (12), p.1402-1412
Hauptverfasser: Wilcock, Diane M, Moore, Kristina H, Rowe, Leslie, Mahlow, Jonathan, Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta, Cleary, Allison S, Lomo, Lesley, Ruano, Ana L, Gering, Maarika, Bradshaw, Derek, Maughan, Meghan, Tran, Phuong, Burlingame, Jesse, Davis, Richard, Affolter, Kajsa, Albertson, Daniel J, Adelhardt, Parisa, Kim, Jong Take, Coleman, Joshua F, Deftereos, Georgios, Gulbahce, Evin H, Sirohi, Deepika
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1412
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1402
container_title Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)
container_volume 147
creator Wilcock, Diane M
Moore, Kristina H
Rowe, Leslie
Mahlow, Jonathan
Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta
Cleary, Allison S
Lomo, Lesley
Ruano, Ana L
Gering, Maarika
Bradshaw, Derek
Maughan, Meghan
Tran, Phuong
Burlingame, Jesse
Davis, Richard
Affolter, Kajsa
Albertson, Daniel J
Adelhardt, Parisa
Kim, Jong Take
Coleman, Joshua F
Deftereos, Georgios
Gulbahce, Evin H
Sirohi, Deepika
description Quantitative imaging is a promising tool that is gaining wide use across several areas of pathology. Although there has been increasing adoption of morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis, the adoption for evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue has been limited because of complexity and lack of practice guidelines. To perform HER2 FISH validation in breast carcinoma in accordance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2018 guideline. Clinical validation of HER2 FISH was performed using the US Food and Drug Administration-approved, dual-probe HER2 IQFISH (Dako, Carpinteria, California) with digital scanning performed on a PathFusion (Applied Spectral Imaging, Carlsbad, California) system. Validation parameters evaluated included: z-stacking, classifier, accuracy, precision, software, and hardware settings. Finally, we evaluated the performance of digital enumeration on clinical samples in a real-world setting. The accuracy samples showed a final concordance of 95.3% to 100% across HER2 groups 1 to 5. During clinical implementation for HER2 groups 2, 3, and 4, we achieved a final concordance of 76% (95 of 125). Of these, only 8% (10 of 125) of the cases had discordances with clinical impact that can be identified algorithmically and triaged for manual review. Digital FISH enumeration is a useful tool to improve the efficacy of HER2 FISH enumeration and capture genetic heterogeneity across HER2 signals. Excluding cases with high background or poor image quality and manual review for cases with ASCO/CAP group discordances can further improve the efficiency of digital HER2 FISH enumeration.
doi_str_mv 10.5858/arpa.2022-0372-OA
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2787213562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A777599740</galeid><sourcerecordid>A777599740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-709a4ea047ab731b4385b86fcd6fcad2af377d5aa2b1af2981ec6434e92c76073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhoModq3-AG8kIIg3s-ZjZjK5HJfWLRQWtXobzmQy25RssiYzhfXXm2HrR2UJIR_neQ8nJy9CrylZVk3VfIC4hyUjjBWEC1Zs2idoQauSF4zW1VO0IITwQsqmOkMvUrrLR8kYfY7OeC0ZIYws0P3nCfxoRxjtvcFXO9hav8WtB3dINuFLN4VokjZe56jHX-044fWhi7a3P7MmePwdnO2P2yFEvHLWWw0Ory--MHxj0jgntB5_jAbSiFeQU8WX6NkALplXD-s5-nZ5cbNaF9ebT1er9rrQZU3GQhAJpQFSCugEp13Jm6pr6kH3eULPYOBC9BUA6ygMTDbU6LrkpZFMi5oIfo7eH_PuY_gx5WLUzubXOAfehCkpJhrBKK9qltG3_6F3YYq5EZmSJFdSCSH-UltwRlk_hDGCnpOqNscrKUVJMlWcoLbGmwgueDPYfP2IX57g8-jNzuqTgnf_CG4NuPE2BTfN35Aeg_QI6hhSimZQ-2h3EA-KEjWbSM0mUrOJ1GwitWmz5s1DJ6ZuZ_o_it-u4b8AZcDA9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2907095777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Imaging Analysis Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Validation for Clinical HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer</title><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wilcock, Diane M ; Moore, Kristina H ; Rowe, Leslie ; Mahlow, Jonathan ; Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta ; Cleary, Allison S ; Lomo, Lesley ; Ruano, Ana L ; Gering, Maarika ; Bradshaw, Derek ; Maughan, Meghan ; Tran, Phuong ; Burlingame, Jesse ; Davis, Richard ; Affolter, Kajsa ; Albertson, Daniel J ; Adelhardt, Parisa ; Kim, Jong Take ; Coleman, Joshua F ; Deftereos, Georgios ; Gulbahce, Evin H ; Sirohi, Deepika</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Diane M ; Moore, Kristina H ; Rowe, Leslie ; Mahlow, Jonathan ; Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta ; Cleary, Allison S ; Lomo, Lesley ; Ruano, Ana L ; Gering, Maarika ; Bradshaw, Derek ; Maughan, Meghan ; Tran, Phuong ; Burlingame, Jesse ; Davis, Richard ; Affolter, Kajsa ; Albertson, Daniel J ; Adelhardt, Parisa ; Kim, Jong Take ; Coleman, Joshua F ; Deftereos, Georgios ; Gulbahce, Evin H ; Sirohi, Deepika</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative imaging is a promising tool that is gaining wide use across several areas of pathology. Although there has been increasing adoption of morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis, the adoption for evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue has been limited because of complexity and lack of practice guidelines. To perform HER2 FISH validation in breast carcinoma in accordance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2018 guideline. Clinical validation of HER2 FISH was performed using the US Food and Drug Administration-approved, dual-probe HER2 IQFISH (Dako, Carpinteria, California) with digital scanning performed on a PathFusion (Applied Spectral Imaging, Carlsbad, California) system. Validation parameters evaluated included: z-stacking, classifier, accuracy, precision, software, and hardware settings. Finally, we evaluated the performance of digital enumeration on clinical samples in a real-world setting. The accuracy samples showed a final concordance of 95.3% to 100% across HER2 groups 1 to 5. During clinical implementation for HER2 groups 2, 3, and 4, we achieved a final concordance of 76% (95 of 125). Of these, only 8% (10 of 125) of the cases had discordances with clinical impact that can be identified algorithmically and triaged for manual review. Digital FISH enumeration is a useful tool to improve the efficacy of HER2 FISH enumeration and capture genetic heterogeneity across HER2 signals. Excluding cases with high background or poor image quality and manual review for cases with ASCO/CAP group discordances can further improve the efficiency of digital HER2 FISH enumeration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0372-OA</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36920020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: College of American Pathologists</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Automation ; Breast cancer ; Breast carcinoma ; Classification ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic immunohistochemistry ; Enumeration ; Epidermal growth factor ; ErbB-2 protein ; FDA approval ; Fluorescence in situ hybridization ; Hybridization ; Image processing ; Immunohistochemistry ; Methods ; Oncology ; Pathology ; Stacking</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976), 2023-12, Vol.147 (12), p.1402-1412</ispartof><rights>2023 College of American Pathologists.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 College of American Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright College of American Pathologists Dec 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-709a4ea047ab731b4385b86fcd6fcad2af377d5aa2b1af2981ec6434e92c76073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36920020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Diane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Kristina H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahlow, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Allison S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomo, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruano, Ana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gering, Maarika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maughan, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Phuong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burlingame, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Affolter, Kajsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albertson, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelhardt, Parisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jong Take</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Joshua F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deftereos, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulbahce, Evin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirohi, Deepika</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Imaging Analysis Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Validation for Clinical HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer</title><title>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</title><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><description>Quantitative imaging is a promising tool that is gaining wide use across several areas of pathology. Although there has been increasing adoption of morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis, the adoption for evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue has been limited because of complexity and lack of practice guidelines. To perform HER2 FISH validation in breast carcinoma in accordance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2018 guideline. Clinical validation of HER2 FISH was performed using the US Food and Drug Administration-approved, dual-probe HER2 IQFISH (Dako, Carpinteria, California) with digital scanning performed on a PathFusion (Applied Spectral Imaging, Carlsbad, California) system. Validation parameters evaluated included: z-stacking, classifier, accuracy, precision, software, and hardware settings. Finally, we evaluated the performance of digital enumeration on clinical samples in a real-world setting. The accuracy samples showed a final concordance of 95.3% to 100% across HER2 groups 1 to 5. During clinical implementation for HER2 groups 2, 3, and 4, we achieved a final concordance of 76% (95 of 125). Of these, only 8% (10 of 125) of the cases had discordances with clinical impact that can be identified algorithmically and triaged for manual review. Digital FISH enumeration is a useful tool to improve the efficacy of HER2 FISH enumeration and capture genetic heterogeneity across HER2 signals. Excluding cases with high background or poor image quality and manual review for cases with ASCO/CAP group discordances can further improve the efficiency of digital HER2 FISH enumeration.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Enumeration</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor</subject><subject>ErbB-2 protein</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Fluorescence in situ hybridization</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Stacking</subject><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhoModq3-AG8kIIg3s-ZjZjK5HJfWLRQWtXobzmQy25RssiYzhfXXm2HrR2UJIR_neQ8nJy9CrylZVk3VfIC4hyUjjBWEC1Zs2idoQauSF4zW1VO0IITwQsqmOkMvUrrLR8kYfY7OeC0ZIYws0P3nCfxoRxjtvcFXO9hav8WtB3dINuFLN4VokjZe56jHX-044fWhi7a3P7MmePwdnO2P2yFEvHLWWw0Ory--MHxj0jgntB5_jAbSiFeQU8WX6NkALplXD-s5-nZ5cbNaF9ebT1er9rrQZU3GQhAJpQFSCugEp13Jm6pr6kH3eULPYOBC9BUA6ygMTDbU6LrkpZFMi5oIfo7eH_PuY_gx5WLUzubXOAfehCkpJhrBKK9qltG3_6F3YYq5EZmSJFdSCSH-UltwRlk_hDGCnpOqNscrKUVJMlWcoLbGmwgueDPYfP2IX57g8-jNzuqTgnf_CG4NuPE2BTfN35Aeg_QI6hhSimZQ-2h3EA-KEjWbSM0mUrOJ1GwitWmz5s1DJ6ZuZ_o_it-u4b8AZcDA9g</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Wilcock, Diane M</creator><creator>Moore, Kristina H</creator><creator>Rowe, Leslie</creator><creator>Mahlow, Jonathan</creator><creator>Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta</creator><creator>Cleary, Allison S</creator><creator>Lomo, Lesley</creator><creator>Ruano, Ana L</creator><creator>Gering, Maarika</creator><creator>Bradshaw, Derek</creator><creator>Maughan, Meghan</creator><creator>Tran, Phuong</creator><creator>Burlingame, Jesse</creator><creator>Davis, Richard</creator><creator>Affolter, Kajsa</creator><creator>Albertson, Daniel J</creator><creator>Adelhardt, Parisa</creator><creator>Kim, Jong Take</creator><creator>Coleman, Joshua F</creator><creator>Deftereos, Georgios</creator><creator>Gulbahce, Evin H</creator><creator>Sirohi, Deepika</creator><general>College of American Pathologists</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Quantitative Imaging Analysis Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Validation for Clinical HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer</title><author>Wilcock, Diane M ; Moore, Kristina H ; Rowe, Leslie ; Mahlow, Jonathan ; Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta ; Cleary, Allison S ; Lomo, Lesley ; Ruano, Ana L ; Gering, Maarika ; Bradshaw, Derek ; Maughan, Meghan ; Tran, Phuong ; Burlingame, Jesse ; Davis, Richard ; Affolter, Kajsa ; Albertson, Daniel J ; Adelhardt, Parisa ; Kim, Jong Take ; Coleman, Joshua F ; Deftereos, Georgios ; Gulbahce, Evin H ; Sirohi, Deepika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-709a4ea047ab731b4385b86fcd6fcad2af377d5aa2b1af2981ec6434e92c76073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Enumeration</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor</topic><topic>ErbB-2 protein</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Fluorescence in situ hybridization</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Stacking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Diane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Kristina H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahlow, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Allison S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomo, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruano, Ana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gering, Maarika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradshaw, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maughan, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Phuong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burlingame, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Affolter, Kajsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albertson, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelhardt, Parisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jong Take</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Joshua F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deftereos, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulbahce, Evin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirohi, Deepika</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilcock, Diane M</au><au>Moore, Kristina H</au><au>Rowe, Leslie</au><au>Mahlow, Jonathan</au><au>Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta</au><au>Cleary, Allison S</au><au>Lomo, Lesley</au><au>Ruano, Ana L</au><au>Gering, Maarika</au><au>Bradshaw, Derek</au><au>Maughan, Meghan</au><au>Tran, Phuong</au><au>Burlingame, Jesse</au><au>Davis, Richard</au><au>Affolter, Kajsa</au><au>Albertson, Daniel J</au><au>Adelhardt, Parisa</au><au>Kim, Jong Take</au><au>Coleman, Joshua F</au><au>Deftereos, Georgios</au><au>Gulbahce, Evin H</au><au>Sirohi, Deepika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Imaging Analysis Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Validation for Clinical HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>147</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1402</spage><epage>1412</epage><pages>1402-1412</pages><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><abstract>Quantitative imaging is a promising tool that is gaining wide use across several areas of pathology. Although there has been increasing adoption of morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis, the adoption for evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue has been limited because of complexity and lack of practice guidelines. To perform HER2 FISH validation in breast carcinoma in accordance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2018 guideline. Clinical validation of HER2 FISH was performed using the US Food and Drug Administration-approved, dual-probe HER2 IQFISH (Dako, Carpinteria, California) with digital scanning performed on a PathFusion (Applied Spectral Imaging, Carlsbad, California) system. Validation parameters evaluated included: z-stacking, classifier, accuracy, precision, software, and hardware settings. Finally, we evaluated the performance of digital enumeration on clinical samples in a real-world setting. The accuracy samples showed a final concordance of 95.3% to 100% across HER2 groups 1 to 5. During clinical implementation for HER2 groups 2, 3, and 4, we achieved a final concordance of 76% (95 of 125). Of these, only 8% (10 of 125) of the cases had discordances with clinical impact that can be identified algorithmically and triaged for manual review. Digital FISH enumeration is a useful tool to improve the efficacy of HER2 FISH enumeration and capture genetic heterogeneity across HER2 signals. Excluding cases with high background or poor image quality and manual review for cases with ASCO/CAP group discordances can further improve the efficiency of digital HER2 FISH enumeration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>College of American Pathologists</pub><pmid>36920020</pmid><doi>10.5858/arpa.2022-0372-OA</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9985
ispartof Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2023-12, Vol.147 (12), p.1402-1412
issn 0003-9985
1543-2165
1543-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2787213562
source Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Accuracy
Automation
Breast cancer
Breast carcinoma
Classification
Diagnosis
Diagnostic immunohistochemistry
Enumeration
Epidermal growth factor
ErbB-2 protein
FDA approval
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
Hybridization
Image processing
Immunohistochemistry
Methods
Oncology
Pathology
Stacking
title Quantitative Imaging Analysis Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Validation for Clinical HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A18%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Imaging%20Analysis%20Fluorescence%20In%20Situ%20Hybridization%20Validation%20for%20Clinical%20HER2%20Testing%20in%20Breast%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Wilcock,%20Diane%20M&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=147&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1402&rft.epage=1412&rft.pages=1402-1412&rft.issn=0003-9985&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.5858/arpa.2022-0372-OA&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA777599740%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2907095777&rft_id=info:pmid/36920020&rft_galeid=A777599740&rfr_iscdi=true