Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic cholecystectomy in the treatment of benign gallbladder disease

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current standard of care treatment for benign gallbladder disease. Robotic cholecystectomy is another approach for performing cholecystectomy that offers a surgeon better dexterity and visualization. However, robotic cholecystectomy may increase cost without suffi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2023-06, Vol.173 (6), p.1323-1328
Hauptverfasser: Singh, Adityabikram, Panse, Neal S., Prasath, Vishnu, Arjani, Simran, Chokshi, Ravi J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1328
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1323
container_title Surgery
container_volume 173
creator Singh, Adityabikram
Panse, Neal S.
Prasath, Vishnu
Arjani, Simran
Chokshi, Ravi J.
description Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current standard of care treatment for benign gallbladder disease. Robotic cholecystectomy is another approach for performing cholecystectomy that offers a surgeon better dexterity and visualization. However, robotic cholecystectomy may increase cost without sufficient evidence to suggest an improvement in clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to construct a decision tree model to compare cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and robotic cholecystectomy. Complication rates and effectiveness associated with robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy over a 1-year time frame were compared using a decision tree model populated with data from the published literature. Cost was calculated using Medicare data. Effectiveness was represented by quality-adjusted life-years. The primary outcome of the study was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which compares the cost per quality-adjusted life-year of the 2 interventions. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year. Results were confirmed with 1-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses varying branch-point probabilities. The studies used in our analysis included 3,498 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 1,833 patients who underwent robotic cholecystectomy, and 392 patients who required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy produced 0.9722 quality-adjusted life-years, costing $9,370.06. Robotic cholecystectomy produced an additional 0.0017 quality-adjusted life-years at an additional $3,013.64. These results equate to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,795,735.21/quality-adjusted life-year. This exceeds the willingness-to-pay threshold, making laparoscopic cholecystectomy the more cost-effective strategy. Sensitivity analyses did not alter results. Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the more cost-effective treatment modality for benign gallbladder disease. At present, robotic cholecystectomy is not able to improve clinical outcomes enough to justify its added cost.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2023.01.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2786810397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606023000430</els_id><sourcerecordid>2786810397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-33c01a8947c2d0a95f5fc8065ff113cc091c647be3ac82037072e23d520438183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIjl56rEq6093gRQa_YMGLnkM6XZnN0N1ZU5mF-fd2M6tH4YW6PO8L9QjxFmGPgObDac_nfNwrUHoPuKZ9JnbYaFW12uBzsQPQfWXAwI14xXwCgL7G7qW40abHukHYCTokLhWFQL7ER1qIWbrFTReOLFOQOQ2pRC_9fZrIX7isXJovMi6y3JMsmVyZaSkbO9ASj4s8umkaJjeOlOUYmRzTa_EiuInpzdO9Fb--fP55-Fbd_fj6_fDprvK6MaXS2gO6rq9br0ZwfROa4DswTQiI2nvo0Zu6HUg73ynQLbSKlB4bBbXusNO34v119yGn32fiYufInqbJLZTObFXbmQ5XK-2Kqivqc2LOFOxDjrPLF4tgN732ZDe9dtNrAddspXdP--dhpvFf5a_PFfh4BWj98jFStuwjLZ7GmFdzdkzxf_t_AB4GjJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786810397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic cholecystectomy in the treatment of benign gallbladder disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Singh, Adityabikram ; Panse, Neal S. ; Prasath, Vishnu ; Arjani, Simran ; Chokshi, Ravi J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Adityabikram ; Panse, Neal S. ; Prasath, Vishnu ; Arjani, Simran ; Chokshi, Ravi J.</creatorcontrib><description>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current standard of care treatment for benign gallbladder disease. Robotic cholecystectomy is another approach for performing cholecystectomy that offers a surgeon better dexterity and visualization. However, robotic cholecystectomy may increase cost without sufficient evidence to suggest an improvement in clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to construct a decision tree model to compare cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and robotic cholecystectomy. Complication rates and effectiveness associated with robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy over a 1-year time frame were compared using a decision tree model populated with data from the published literature. Cost was calculated using Medicare data. Effectiveness was represented by quality-adjusted life-years. The primary outcome of the study was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which compares the cost per quality-adjusted life-year of the 2 interventions. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year. Results were confirmed with 1-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses varying branch-point probabilities. The studies used in our analysis included 3,498 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 1,833 patients who underwent robotic cholecystectomy, and 392 patients who required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy produced 0.9722 quality-adjusted life-years, costing $9,370.06. Robotic cholecystectomy produced an additional 0.0017 quality-adjusted life-years at an additional $3,013.64. These results equate to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,795,735.21/quality-adjusted life-year. This exceeds the willingness-to-pay threshold, making laparoscopic cholecystectomy the more cost-effective strategy. Sensitivity analyses did not alter results. Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the more cost-effective treatment modality for benign gallbladder disease. At present, robotic cholecystectomy is not able to improve clinical outcomes enough to justify its added cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.01.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36914510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cholecystectomy ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ; Gallbladder Diseases - surgery ; Humans ; Medicare ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; United States</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2023-06, Vol.173 (6), p.1323-1328</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-33c01a8947c2d0a95f5fc8065ff113cc091c647be3ac82037072e23d520438183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-33c01a8947c2d0a95f5fc8065ff113cc091c647be3ac82037072e23d520438183</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2198-8452 ; 0000-0002-9071-1556 ; 0000-0003-3269-648X ; 0000-0002-4742-8552</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606023000430$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36914510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Adityabikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panse, Neal S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasath, Vishnu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arjani, Simran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chokshi, Ravi J.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic cholecystectomy in the treatment of benign gallbladder disease</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current standard of care treatment for benign gallbladder disease. Robotic cholecystectomy is another approach for performing cholecystectomy that offers a surgeon better dexterity and visualization. However, robotic cholecystectomy may increase cost without sufficient evidence to suggest an improvement in clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to construct a decision tree model to compare cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and robotic cholecystectomy. Complication rates and effectiveness associated with robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy over a 1-year time frame were compared using a decision tree model populated with data from the published literature. Cost was calculated using Medicare data. Effectiveness was represented by quality-adjusted life-years. The primary outcome of the study was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which compares the cost per quality-adjusted life-year of the 2 interventions. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year. Results were confirmed with 1-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses varying branch-point probabilities. The studies used in our analysis included 3,498 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 1,833 patients who underwent robotic cholecystectomy, and 392 patients who required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy produced 0.9722 quality-adjusted life-years, costing $9,370.06. Robotic cholecystectomy produced an additional 0.0017 quality-adjusted life-years at an additional $3,013.64. These results equate to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,795,735.21/quality-adjusted life-year. This exceeds the willingness-to-pay threshold, making laparoscopic cholecystectomy the more cost-effective strategy. Sensitivity analyses did not alter results. Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the more cost-effective treatment modality for benign gallbladder disease. At present, robotic cholecystectomy is not able to improve clinical outcomes enough to justify its added cost.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</subject><subject>Gallbladder Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6BzxIjl56rEq6093gRQa_YMGLnkM6XZnN0N1ZU5mF-fd2M6tH4YW6PO8L9QjxFmGPgObDac_nfNwrUHoPuKZ9JnbYaFW12uBzsQPQfWXAwI14xXwCgL7G7qW40abHukHYCTokLhWFQL7ER1qIWbrFTReOLFOQOQ2pRC_9fZrIX7isXJovMi6y3JMsmVyZaSkbO9ASj4s8umkaJjeOlOUYmRzTa_EiuInpzdO9Fb--fP55-Fbd_fj6_fDprvK6MaXS2gO6rq9br0ZwfROa4DswTQiI2nvo0Zu6HUg73ynQLbSKlB4bBbXusNO34v119yGn32fiYufInqbJLZTObFXbmQ5XK-2Kqivqc2LOFOxDjrPLF4tgN732ZDe9dtNrAddspXdP--dhpvFf5a_PFfh4BWj98jFStuwjLZ7GmFdzdkzxf_t_AB4GjJQ</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Singh, Adityabikram</creator><creator>Panse, Neal S.</creator><creator>Prasath, Vishnu</creator><creator>Arjani, Simran</creator><creator>Chokshi, Ravi J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2198-8452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-1556</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-648X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4742-8552</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic cholecystectomy in the treatment of benign gallbladder disease</title><author>Singh, Adityabikram ; Panse, Neal S. ; Prasath, Vishnu ; Arjani, Simran ; Chokshi, Ravi J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-33c01a8947c2d0a95f5fc8065ff113cc091c647be3ac82037072e23d520438183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</topic><topic>Gallbladder Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Adityabikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panse, Neal S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasath, Vishnu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arjani, Simran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chokshi, Ravi J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Adityabikram</au><au>Panse, Neal S.</au><au>Prasath, Vishnu</au><au>Arjani, Simran</au><au>Chokshi, Ravi J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic cholecystectomy in the treatment of benign gallbladder disease</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1323</spage><epage>1328</epage><pages>1323-1328</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current standard of care treatment for benign gallbladder disease. Robotic cholecystectomy is another approach for performing cholecystectomy that offers a surgeon better dexterity and visualization. However, robotic cholecystectomy may increase cost without sufficient evidence to suggest an improvement in clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to construct a decision tree model to compare cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and robotic cholecystectomy. Complication rates and effectiveness associated with robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy over a 1-year time frame were compared using a decision tree model populated with data from the published literature. Cost was calculated using Medicare data. Effectiveness was represented by quality-adjusted life-years. The primary outcome of the study was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which compares the cost per quality-adjusted life-year of the 2 interventions. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year. Results were confirmed with 1-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses varying branch-point probabilities. The studies used in our analysis included 3,498 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 1,833 patients who underwent robotic cholecystectomy, and 392 patients who required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy produced 0.9722 quality-adjusted life-years, costing $9,370.06. Robotic cholecystectomy produced an additional 0.0017 quality-adjusted life-years at an additional $3,013.64. These results equate to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,795,735.21/quality-adjusted life-year. This exceeds the willingness-to-pay threshold, making laparoscopic cholecystectomy the more cost-effective strategy. Sensitivity analyses did not alter results. Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the more cost-effective treatment modality for benign gallbladder disease. At present, robotic cholecystectomy is not able to improve clinical outcomes enough to justify its added cost.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36914510</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2023.01.017</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2198-8452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-1556</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-648X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4742-8552</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2023-06, Vol.173 (6), p.1323-1328
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2786810397
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Cholecystectomy
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Gallbladder Diseases - surgery
Humans
Medicare
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
United States
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic cholecystectomy in the treatment of benign gallbladder disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A05%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20analysis%20of%20robotic%20cholecystectomy%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20benign%20gallbladder%20disease&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Singh,%20Adityabikram&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1323&rft.epage=1328&rft.pages=1323-1328&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2023.01.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2786810397%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786810397&rft_id=info:pmid/36914510&rft_els_id=S0039606023000430&rfr_iscdi=true