A nationwide propensity score analysis comparing ablation and resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and Objectives Studies have reported ambiguous results regarding the efficacy of ablation for early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our study compared outcomes of ablation versus resection for HCC ≤50 mm to identify tumor sizes that would most benefit from ablation in terms of long‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2023-06, Vol.127 (7), p.1125-1134
Hauptverfasser: Rasic, Gordana, Geus, Susanna W. L., Beaulieu‐Jones, Brendin, Kasumova, Gyulnara G., Kent, Tara S., Ng, Sing Chau, McAneny, David, Tseng, Jennifer F., Sachs, Teviah E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objectives Studies have reported ambiguous results regarding the efficacy of ablation for early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our study compared outcomes of ablation versus resection for HCC ≤50 mm to identify tumor sizes that would most benefit from ablation in terms of long‐term survival. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with stage I and II HCC ≤50 mm who underwent ablation or resection (2004−2018). Three cohorts were created based on tumor size: ≤20, 21−30, and 31−50 mm. A propensity score‐matched survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan−Meier method. Results In total, 36.47% (n = 4263) and 63.53% (n = 7425) of patients underwent resection and ablation, respectively. After matching, resection was associated with a significant survival benefit compared to ablation (3‐year survival: 78.13% vs. 67.64%; p 
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.27232