A nationwide propensity score analysis comparing ablation and resection for hepatocellular carcinoma
Background and Objectives Studies have reported ambiguous results regarding the efficacy of ablation for early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our study compared outcomes of ablation versus resection for HCC ≤50 mm to identify tumor sizes that would most benefit from ablation in terms of long‐...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2023-06, Vol.127 (7), p.1125-1134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and Objectives
Studies have reported ambiguous results regarding the efficacy of ablation for early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our study compared outcomes of ablation versus resection for HCC ≤50 mm to identify tumor sizes that would most benefit from ablation in terms of long‐term survival.
Methods
The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with stage I and II HCC ≤50 mm who underwent ablation or resection (2004−2018). Three cohorts were created based on tumor size: ≤20, 21−30, and 31−50 mm. A propensity score‐matched survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan−Meier method.
Results
In total, 36.47% (n = 4263) and 63.53% (n = 7425) of patients underwent resection and ablation, respectively. After matching, resection was associated with a significant survival benefit compared to ablation (3‐year survival: 78.13% vs. 67.64%; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.27232 |