Effect of a nationwide intervention of electronic letters with behavioural nudges on influenza vaccination in older adults in Denmark
Before the 2022–23 influenza season, all eligible Danish citizens aged 65 years or older were randomly assigned to receive either usual care (no electronic letter) or one of nine letters that included a behavioural nudge: (1) standard electronic letter with person's name; (2) standard electroni...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2023-04, Vol.401 (10382), p.1058-1060 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1060 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10382 |
container_start_page | 1058 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 401 |
creator | Stockwell, Melissa |
description | Before the 2022–23 influenza season, all eligible Danish citizens aged 65 years or older were randomly assigned to receive either usual care (no electronic letter) or one of nine letters that included a behavioural nudge: (1) standard electronic letter with person's name; (2) standard electronic letter repeated at 14 days; (3) depersonalised electronic letter without name; (4) gain-framed electronic letter focused on protection of self and loved ones; (5) loss-framed electronic letter focused on risk to self and loved ones; (6) collective-goal electronic letter focused on increasing vaccination rates together; (7) active-choice electronic letter including planning prompt; (8) gain-framed electronic letter focused on cardiovascular disease protection; or (9) electronic letter with expert-authority statement. Compared with usual care, Johansen and colleagues9 found that vaccination was higher in both the group receiving gain-framed letters highlighting cardiovascular disease protection (81·00% vs 80·12%; difference 0·89 percentage points [99·55% CI 0·29–1·48; relative risk [RR] 1·011 [99.55% CI 1·004–1·019]), and those receiving repeated standard letters (80·85% vs 80·12%; difference 0·73 percentage points [0·13–1·34]; RR 1·009 [1·002–1·017]). [...]Denmark is relatively unique in having an electronic letter system used nationally including for an older population, as well as high baseline vaccination rates, as indicated by the usual-care population having a vaccination rate of 80%, which could affect generalisability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00453-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2785197628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673623004531</els_id><sourcerecordid>2785197628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-518fd586cff4294f4ad89a19aa5e1fc53eff074a3fcaa0a029f89370da993db33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9vFSEUxYnR2NfqR9CQuGkXozDAzLAyTa1_kiZdqIk7ch9cLHUeVJh5je77vcv01S66cUW493fu5XAIecXZW8549-4r45I1XS-6w1YcMSaVaPgTsuKyl42S_Y-nZPWA7JH9Ui5ZpTqmnpM90Q2DFkKuyM2p92gnmjwFGmEKKV4HhzTECfMW41JYmjhWKqcYLB1xqr1Cr8N0Qdd4AduQ5gwjjbP7iYVWQYh-nDH-BboFa8Nubq3SNDrMFNw8TmW5f8C4gfzrBXnmYSz48v48IN8_nn47-dycnX_6cnJ81lihxdQoPninhs56L1stvQQ3aOAaQCH3Vgn0nvUShLcADFirfbXZMwdaC7cW4oAc7uZe5fR7xjKZTSgWxxEiprmYth8U133XDhV98wi9rC5jfV2ldDv0Wuq2UmpH2ZxKyejNVQ7V0R_DmVlyMnc5mSUE0wpzl5PhVff6fvq83qB7UP0LpgLvdwDW79gGzKbYgNGiC7kmYVwK_1lxCwOQpOk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792879492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of a nationwide intervention of electronic letters with behavioural nudges on influenza vaccination in older adults in Denmark</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Stockwell, Melissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Stockwell, Melissa</creatorcontrib><description>Before the 2022–23 influenza season, all eligible Danish citizens aged 65 years or older were randomly assigned to receive either usual care (no electronic letter) or one of nine letters that included a behavioural nudge: (1) standard electronic letter with person's name; (2) standard electronic letter repeated at 14 days; (3) depersonalised electronic letter without name; (4) gain-framed electronic letter focused on protection of self and loved ones; (5) loss-framed electronic letter focused on risk to self and loved ones; (6) collective-goal electronic letter focused on increasing vaccination rates together; (7) active-choice electronic letter including planning prompt; (8) gain-framed electronic letter focused on cardiovascular disease protection; or (9) electronic letter with expert-authority statement. Compared with usual care, Johansen and colleagues9 found that vaccination was higher in both the group receiving gain-framed letters highlighting cardiovascular disease protection (81·00% vs 80·12%; difference 0·89 percentage points [99·55% CI 0·29–1·48; relative risk [RR] 1·011 [99.55% CI 1·004–1·019]), and those receiving repeated standard letters (80·85% vs 80·12%; difference 0·73 percentage points [0·13–1·34]; RR 1·009 [1·002–1·017]). [...]Denmark is relatively unique in having an electronic letter system used nationally including for an older population, as well as high baseline vaccination rates, as indicated by the usual-care population having a vaccination rate of 80%, which could affect generalisability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00453-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36889334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Denmark ; Humans ; Immunization ; Influenza ; Influenza Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Influenza, Human - prevention & control ; Intervention ; Older people ; Sensitivity analysis ; Smartphones ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Web portals</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2023-04, Vol.401 (10382), p.1058-1060</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-518fd586cff4294f4ad89a19aa5e1fc53eff074a3fcaa0a029f89370da993db33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-518fd586cff4294f4ad89a19aa5e1fc53eff074a3fcaa0a029f89370da993db33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2792879492?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36889334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stockwell, Melissa</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of a nationwide intervention of electronic letters with behavioural nudges on influenza vaccination in older adults in Denmark</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Before the 2022–23 influenza season, all eligible Danish citizens aged 65 years or older were randomly assigned to receive either usual care (no electronic letter) or one of nine letters that included a behavioural nudge: (1) standard electronic letter with person's name; (2) standard electronic letter repeated at 14 days; (3) depersonalised electronic letter without name; (4) gain-framed electronic letter focused on protection of self and loved ones; (5) loss-framed electronic letter focused on risk to self and loved ones; (6) collective-goal electronic letter focused on increasing vaccination rates together; (7) active-choice electronic letter including planning prompt; (8) gain-framed electronic letter focused on cardiovascular disease protection; or (9) electronic letter with expert-authority statement. Compared with usual care, Johansen and colleagues9 found that vaccination was higher in both the group receiving gain-framed letters highlighting cardiovascular disease protection (81·00% vs 80·12%; difference 0·89 percentage points [99·55% CI 0·29–1·48; relative risk [RR] 1·011 [99.55% CI 1·004–1·019]), and those receiving repeated standard letters (80·85% vs 80·12%; difference 0·73 percentage points [0·13–1·34]; RR 1·009 [1·002–1·017]). [...]Denmark is relatively unique in having an electronic letter system used nationally including for an older population, as well as high baseline vaccination rates, as indicated by the usual-care population having a vaccination rate of 80%, which could affect generalisability.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - prevention & control</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Web portals</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9vFSEUxYnR2NfqR9CQuGkXozDAzLAyTa1_kiZdqIk7ch9cLHUeVJh5je77vcv01S66cUW493fu5XAIecXZW8549-4r45I1XS-6w1YcMSaVaPgTsuKyl42S_Y-nZPWA7JH9Ui5ZpTqmnpM90Q2DFkKuyM2p92gnmjwFGmEKKV4HhzTECfMW41JYmjhWKqcYLB1xqr1Cr8N0Qdd4AduQ5gwjjbP7iYVWQYh-nDH-BboFa8Nubq3SNDrMFNw8TmW5f8C4gfzrBXnmYSz48v48IN8_nn47-dycnX_6cnJ81lihxdQoPninhs56L1stvQQ3aOAaQCH3Vgn0nvUShLcADFirfbXZMwdaC7cW4oAc7uZe5fR7xjKZTSgWxxEiprmYth8U133XDhV98wi9rC5jfV2ldDv0Wuq2UmpH2ZxKyejNVQ7V0R_DmVlyMnc5mSUE0wpzl5PhVff6fvq83qB7UP0LpgLvdwDW79gGzKbYgNGiC7kmYVwK_1lxCwOQpOk</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Stockwell, Melissa</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Effect of a nationwide intervention of electronic letters with behavioural nudges on influenza vaccination in older adults in Denmark</title><author>Stockwell, Melissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-518fd586cff4294f4ad89a19aa5e1fc53eff074a3fcaa0a029f89370da993db33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - prevention & control</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Web portals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stockwell, Melissa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stockwell, Melissa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of a nationwide intervention of electronic letters with behavioural nudges on influenza vaccination in older adults in Denmark</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>401</volume><issue>10382</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1060</epage><pages>1058-1060</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><abstract>Before the 2022–23 influenza season, all eligible Danish citizens aged 65 years or older were randomly assigned to receive either usual care (no electronic letter) or one of nine letters that included a behavioural nudge: (1) standard electronic letter with person's name; (2) standard electronic letter repeated at 14 days; (3) depersonalised electronic letter without name; (4) gain-framed electronic letter focused on protection of self and loved ones; (5) loss-framed electronic letter focused on risk to self and loved ones; (6) collective-goal electronic letter focused on increasing vaccination rates together; (7) active-choice electronic letter including planning prompt; (8) gain-framed electronic letter focused on cardiovascular disease protection; or (9) electronic letter with expert-authority statement. Compared with usual care, Johansen and colleagues9 found that vaccination was higher in both the group receiving gain-framed letters highlighting cardiovascular disease protection (81·00% vs 80·12%; difference 0·89 percentage points [99·55% CI 0·29–1·48; relative risk [RR] 1·011 [99.55% CI 1·004–1·019]), and those receiving repeated standard letters (80·85% vs 80·12%; difference 0·73 percentage points [0·13–1·34]; RR 1·009 [1·002–1·017]). [...]Denmark is relatively unique in having an electronic letter system used nationally including for an older population, as well as high baseline vaccination rates, as indicated by the usual-care population having a vaccination rate of 80%, which could affect generalisability.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36889334</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00453-1</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2023-04, Vol.401 (10382), p.1058-1060 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2785197628 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Aged Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular diseases Denmark Humans Immunization Influenza Influenza Vaccines - therapeutic use Influenza, Human - prevention & control Intervention Older people Sensitivity analysis Smartphones Surveys and Questionnaires Vaccination Vaccines Web portals |
title | Effect of a nationwide intervention of electronic letters with behavioural nudges on influenza vaccination in older adults in Denmark |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A54%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20a%20nationwide%20intervention%20of%20electronic%20letters%20with%20behavioural%20nudges%20on%20influenza%20vaccination%20in%20older%20adults%20in%20Denmark&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Stockwell,%20Melissa&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=401&rft.issue=10382&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1060&rft.pages=1058-1060&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00453-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2785197628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792879492&rft_id=info:pmid/36889334&rft_els_id=S0140673623004531&rfr_iscdi=true |