Assessing the Governance of Digital Contact Tracing in Response to COVID-19: Results of a Multi-National Study
This paper describes the results of a multi-country survey of governance approaches for the use of digital contact tracing (DCT) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that the countries in our survey represent two distinct models of DCT governance, both of which are flawed. The "data p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics medicine & ethics, 2022-01, Vol.50 (4), p.791-804 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 804 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 791 |
| container_title | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Hutler, Brian Blasimme, Alessandro Gur-Arie, Rachel Ali, Joseph Barnhill, Anne Hood, Amelia Kahn, Jeffrey Perkins, Nancy L Regenberg, Alan Vayena, Effy |
| description | This paper describes the results of a multi-country survey of governance approaches for the use of digital contact tracing (DCT) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that the countries in our survey represent two distinct models of DCT governance, both of which are flawed. The "data protection model" emphasizes privacy protections at the expense of public health benefit, while the "emergency response model" sacrifices transparency and accountability, prompting concerns about excessive governance surveillance. The ethical and effective use of DCT in the future requires a new governance approach that is better suited to this novel use of mobile phone data to promote public health." |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/jme.2023.20 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2784839553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2784171987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-532abb01077f78b6eb00758e0b3f09c84dfd9430b0012ec77b61aff5acf702be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LJDEQhoPsou7oybsE9iIsrZVkepL2JuMnqAN-4a1JMhXtoScZO2nBf2-a0T14qSqKp16q6iVkj8EhAyaPFks85MBFDhtkm8mxKiSH51-5BikKxqDcIn9iXAAA42KySbbERCkhKr5N_EmMGGPjX2h6RXoR3rHz2lukwdHT5qVJuqXT4JO2iT502g5k4-kdxlXwEWkKdDp7ujotWHU8dPs2xWFW05tcNsWtTk3wWeQ-9fOPHfLb6Tbi7lcekcfzs4fpZXE9u7ianlwXlssyFaXg2hjI-0snlZmgAZClQjDCQWXVeO7m1ViAGS5CK6WZMO1cqa2TwA2KETlY66668NZjTPWyiRbbVnsMfay5VGMlqrIUGf37A12EPv-gXVNMskrJTP1bU7YLMXbo6lXXLHX3UTOoBxvqbEM92JBDpve_NHuzxPl_9vvv4hObzYGf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2784171987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the Governance of Digital Contact Tracing in Response to COVID-19: Results of a Multi-National Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Hutler, Brian ; Blasimme, Alessandro ; Gur-Arie, Rachel ; Ali, Joseph ; Barnhill, Anne ; Hood, Amelia ; Kahn, Jeffrey ; Perkins, Nancy L ; Regenberg, Alan ; Vayena, Effy</creator><creatorcontrib>Hutler, Brian ; Blasimme, Alessandro ; Gur-Arie, Rachel ; Ali, Joseph ; Barnhill, Anne ; Hood, Amelia ; Kahn, Jeffrey ; Perkins, Nancy L ; Regenberg, Alan ; Vayena, Effy</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes the results of a multi-country survey of governance approaches for the use of digital contact tracing (DCT) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that the countries in our survey represent two distinct models of DCT governance, both of which are flawed. The "data protection model" emphasizes privacy protections at the expense of public health benefit, while the "emergency response model" sacrifices transparency and accountability, prompting concerns about excessive governance surveillance. The ethical and effective use of DCT in the future requires a new governance approach that is better suited to this novel use of mobile phone data to promote public health."</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-1105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-720X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36883392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Cellular telephones ; Consortia ; Contact Tracing ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; Disease transmission ; Epidemics ; Governance ; Health education ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Legislation ; Medical ethics ; Pandemics ; Pandemics - prevention & control ; Personal information ; Privacy ; Public Health ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Surveillance ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 2022-01, Vol.50 (4), p.791-804</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hutler, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasimme, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gur-Arie, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnhill, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hood, Amelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Nancy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regenberg, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vayena, Effy</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the Governance of Digital Contact Tracing in Response to COVID-19: Results of a Multi-National Study</title><title>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</title><addtitle>J Law Med Ethics</addtitle><description>This paper describes the results of a multi-country survey of governance approaches for the use of digital contact tracing (DCT) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that the countries in our survey represent two distinct models of DCT governance, both of which are flawed. The "data protection model" emphasizes privacy protections at the expense of public health benefit, while the "emergency response model" sacrifices transparency and accountability, prompting concerns about excessive governance surveillance. The ethical and effective use of DCT in the future requires a new governance approach that is better suited to this novel use of mobile phone data to promote public health."</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Contact Tracing</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention & control</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pandemics - prevention & control</subject><subject>Personal information</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>1073-1105</issn><issn>1748-720X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LJDEQhoPsou7oybsE9iIsrZVkepL2JuMnqAN-4a1JMhXtoScZO2nBf2-a0T14qSqKp16q6iVkj8EhAyaPFks85MBFDhtkm8mxKiSH51-5BikKxqDcIn9iXAAA42KySbbERCkhKr5N_EmMGGPjX2h6RXoR3rHz2lukwdHT5qVJuqXT4JO2iT502g5k4-kdxlXwEWkKdDp7ujotWHU8dPs2xWFW05tcNsWtTk3wWeQ-9fOPHfLb6Tbi7lcekcfzs4fpZXE9u7ianlwXlssyFaXg2hjI-0snlZmgAZClQjDCQWXVeO7m1ViAGS5CK6WZMO1cqa2TwA2KETlY66668NZjTPWyiRbbVnsMfay5VGMlqrIUGf37A12EPv-gXVNMskrJTP1bU7YLMXbo6lXXLHX3UTOoBxvqbEM92JBDpve_NHuzxPl_9vvv4hObzYGf</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Hutler, Brian</creator><creator>Blasimme, Alessandro</creator><creator>Gur-Arie, Rachel</creator><creator>Ali, Joseph</creator><creator>Barnhill, Anne</creator><creator>Hood, Amelia</creator><creator>Kahn, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Perkins, Nancy L</creator><creator>Regenberg, Alan</creator><creator>Vayena, Effy</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Assessing the Governance of Digital Contact Tracing in Response to COVID-19: Results of a Multi-National Study</title><author>Hutler, Brian ; Blasimme, Alessandro ; Gur-Arie, Rachel ; Ali, Joseph ; Barnhill, Anne ; Hood, Amelia ; Kahn, Jeffrey ; Perkins, Nancy L ; Regenberg, Alan ; Vayena, Effy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-532abb01077f78b6eb00758e0b3f09c84dfd9430b0012ec77b61aff5acf702be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Contact Tracing</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention & control</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pandemics - prevention & control</topic><topic>Personal information</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hutler, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasimme, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gur-Arie, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnhill, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hood, Amelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Nancy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regenberg, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vayena, Effy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hutler, Brian</au><au>Blasimme, Alessandro</au><au>Gur-Arie, Rachel</au><au>Ali, Joseph</au><au>Barnhill, Anne</au><au>Hood, Amelia</au><au>Kahn, Jeffrey</au><au>Perkins, Nancy L</au><au>Regenberg, Alan</au><au>Vayena, Effy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the Governance of Digital Contact Tracing in Response to COVID-19: Results of a Multi-National Study</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</jtitle><addtitle>J Law Med Ethics</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>791</spage><epage>804</epage><pages>791-804</pages><issn>1073-1105</issn><eissn>1748-720X</eissn><abstract>This paper describes the results of a multi-country survey of governance approaches for the use of digital contact tracing (DCT) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that the countries in our survey represent two distinct models of DCT governance, both of which are flawed. The "data protection model" emphasizes privacy protections at the expense of public health benefit, while the "emergency response model" sacrifices transparency and accountability, prompting concerns about excessive governance surveillance. The ethical and effective use of DCT in the future requires a new governance approach that is better suited to this novel use of mobile phone data to promote public health."</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>36883392</pmid><doi>10.1017/jme.2023.20</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1073-1105 |
| ispartof | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 2022-01, Vol.50 (4), p.791-804 |
| issn | 1073-1105 1748-720X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2784839553 |
| source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Cambridge Journals |
| subjects | Accountability Cellular telephones Consortia Contact Tracing COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - prevention & control Disease transmission Epidemics Governance Health education Humans Infectious diseases Legislation Medical ethics Pandemics Pandemics - prevention & control Personal information Privacy Public Health Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Surveillance Transparency |
| title | Assessing the Governance of Digital Contact Tracing in Response to COVID-19: Results of a Multi-National Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T03%3A32%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20Governance%20of%20Digital%20Contact%20Tracing%20in%20Response%20to%20COVID-19:%20Results%20of%20a%20Multi-National%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20law,%20medicine%20&%20ethics&rft.au=Hutler,%20Brian&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=791&rft.epage=804&rft.pages=791-804&rft.issn=1073-1105&rft.eissn=1748-720X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/jme.2023.20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2784171987%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2784171987&rft_id=info:pmid/36883392&rfr_iscdi=true |