Same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: feasibility, safety and patient experience
Objectives To report a single centre's experience of the feasibility, safety and patient acceptability of same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Subjects/Patients and Methods Between June 2015 and December 2021, a total of 180 pre‐selected consecutive patients unde...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BJU international 2023-07, Vol.132 (1), p.92-99 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 99 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 92 |
| container_title | BJU international |
| container_volume | 132 |
| creator | Hill, George Thomas Jeyanthi, Mekha Coomer, William Bryant, Richard J. Colmsee, Matthew T. Tozer, James Cox, Adam Christopher Wilson, Jim R. |
| description | Objectives
To report a single centre's experience of the feasibility, safety and patient acceptability of same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
Subjects/Patients and Methods
Between June 2015 and December 2021, a total of 180 pre‐selected consecutive patients underwent RALP with the intention to discharge on the same day as surgery. Cases were performed by two surgeons. An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme was used. The feasibility of same‐day discharge was analysed, along with the complication rate, oncological outcomes, and postoperative patient experience.
Results
Of 180 patients, 169 (93.8%) were successfully discharged on the same day as surgery. The median (range) age was 63 ( 44–74) years. The median (range) console time was 97 (61–256) min and blood loss was 200 (20–800) mL. The resection specimen pathology results were: pT2 69.4%, pT3a 24.4% and pT3b 6.5%. With regard to Gleason Grade Group (GGG), 25.9% had GGG 1, 65.7% had GGG 2–3 and 8.4% had GGG 4–5 disease. Positive surgical margins were present in 25 cases (14.7%), 18 (15.5%) of which occurred in pT2 cases, and seven (13.4%) in pT3 cases. There were no early (0.2 ng/mL). The 30‐day readmission rate was 3%. A total of 13 early (0–30 days) complications were observed, five of which were Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3, however, none of these would have been avoided had the patient remained in hospital on the first postoperative night. Of 121 consecutive patients, 107 (88%) returned a satisfaction questionnaire, and 92% of responders stated they preferred recovery at home, with 94% stating they felt ready to go home.
Conclusion
Robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy combined with an ERAS programme allows patients to be safely discharged home on the same day of their surgery. This is a feasible option, well‐liked by patients, with morbidity and oncological outcomes similar to non‐day‐case or 23 h stay RALP. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bju.16002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2783498114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2783498114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-b36005feafeef68de651e8fa2c475c14b95dfc46a61235cf5196915690f688aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQha2qiJ9bFn2BylI3IHHBTmyTsAMEpQipixapO2vijKmvkpsQO4LseASesU_CtBdYIOGNj0afjubMYeyzFPuS3kG1GPelESL7wDalMmqupPj98UWL0mywrRgXQtDA6HW2kZvCmFLJTdb8hBb_PjzWMPE6RPcHhhvkQ1d1iaYQY4gJa95AD0MXXdcHx3tSCRK61LXTEfcIMVShCWna4xE8ponDsuY9pIDLxPG-x4GUw09szUMTcfv5n7Hr87Nfpxfzqx_fvp8eX81drvNsXuWURZOtR_SmqNFoiYWHzKlD7aSqSl17pwwYmeXaeS1LU0ptSkF0AZDP2M7Klza9HTEm21I0bBpYYjdGmx0WuSoLKRWhX9-gi24clrSdzQritCkInrHdFeUoehzQ234ILQyTlcL-q8BSBfZ_BcR-eXYcqxbrV_Ll5gQcrIC70OD0vpM9ubxeWT4By_GTiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2827856878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: feasibility, safety and patient experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hill, George Thomas ; Jeyanthi, Mekha ; Coomer, William ; Bryant, Richard J. ; Colmsee, Matthew T. ; Tozer, James ; Cox, Adam Christopher ; Wilson, Jim R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hill, George Thomas ; Jeyanthi, Mekha ; Coomer, William ; Bryant, Richard J. ; Colmsee, Matthew T. ; Tozer, James ; Cox, Adam Christopher ; Wilson, Jim R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To report a single centre's experience of the feasibility, safety and patient acceptability of same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
Subjects/Patients and Methods
Between June 2015 and December 2021, a total of 180 pre‐selected consecutive patients underwent RALP with the intention to discharge on the same day as surgery. Cases were performed by two surgeons. An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme was used. The feasibility of same‐day discharge was analysed, along with the complication rate, oncological outcomes, and postoperative patient experience.
Results
Of 180 patients, 169 (93.8%) were successfully discharged on the same day as surgery. The median (range) age was 63 ( 44–74) years. The median (range) console time was 97 (61–256) min and blood loss was 200 (20–800) mL. The resection specimen pathology results were: pT2 69.4%, pT3a 24.4% and pT3b 6.5%. With regard to Gleason Grade Group (GGG), 25.9% had GGG 1, 65.7% had GGG 2–3 and 8.4% had GGG 4–5 disease. Positive surgical margins were present in 25 cases (14.7%), 18 (15.5%) of which occurred in pT2 cases, and seven (13.4%) in pT3 cases. There were no early (<90 days) biochemical relapses (defined as prostate‐specific antigen level >0.2 ng/mL). The 30‐day readmission rate was 3%. A total of 13 early (0–30 days) complications were observed, five of which were Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3, however, none of these would have been avoided had the patient remained in hospital on the first postoperative night. Of 121 consecutive patients, 107 (88%) returned a satisfaction questionnaire, and 92% of responders stated they preferred recovery at home, with 94% stating they felt ready to go home.
Conclusion
Robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy combined with an ERAS programme allows patients to be safely discharged home on the same day of their surgery. This is a feasible option, well‐liked by patients, with morbidity and oncological outcomes similar to non‐day‐case or 23 h stay RALP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.16002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36866941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; day‐case surgery ; enhanced recovery ; ERAS ; feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery ; Patient Discharge ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; patient satisfaction ; Patients ; PCSM ; ProstateCancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; RALP ; RARP ; Recovery (Medical) ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Robotics ; Robots ; robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Urological surgery</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2023-07, Vol.132 (1), p.92-99</ispartof><rights>2023 BJU International.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 BJU International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-b36005feafeef68de651e8fa2c475c14b95dfc46a61235cf5196915690f688aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-b36005feafeef68de651e8fa2c475c14b95dfc46a61235cf5196915690f688aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9863-5658 ; 0000-0002-8330-9251</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbju.16002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbju.16002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36866941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hill, George Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeyanthi, Mekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomer, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colmsee, Matthew T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tozer, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Adam Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jim R.</creatorcontrib><title>Same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: feasibility, safety and patient experience</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>Objectives
To report a single centre's experience of the feasibility, safety and patient acceptability of same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
Subjects/Patients and Methods
Between June 2015 and December 2021, a total of 180 pre‐selected consecutive patients underwent RALP with the intention to discharge on the same day as surgery. Cases were performed by two surgeons. An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme was used. The feasibility of same‐day discharge was analysed, along with the complication rate, oncological outcomes, and postoperative patient experience.
Results
Of 180 patients, 169 (93.8%) were successfully discharged on the same day as surgery. The median (range) age was 63 ( 44–74) years. The median (range) console time was 97 (61–256) min and blood loss was 200 (20–800) mL. The resection specimen pathology results were: pT2 69.4%, pT3a 24.4% and pT3b 6.5%. With regard to Gleason Grade Group (GGG), 25.9% had GGG 1, 65.7% had GGG 2–3 and 8.4% had GGG 4–5 disease. Positive surgical margins were present in 25 cases (14.7%), 18 (15.5%) of which occurred in pT2 cases, and seven (13.4%) in pT3 cases. There were no early (<90 days) biochemical relapses (defined as prostate‐specific antigen level >0.2 ng/mL). The 30‐day readmission rate was 3%. A total of 13 early (0–30 days) complications were observed, five of which were Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3, however, none of these would have been avoided had the patient remained in hospital on the first postoperative night. Of 121 consecutive patients, 107 (88%) returned a satisfaction questionnaire, and 92% of responders stated they preferred recovery at home, with 94% stating they felt ready to go home.
Conclusion
Robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy combined with an ERAS programme allows patients to be safely discharged home on the same day of their surgery. This is a feasible option, well‐liked by patients, with morbidity and oncological outcomes similar to non‐day‐case or 23 h stay RALP.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>day‐case surgery</subject><subject>enhanced recovery</subject><subject>ERAS</subject><subject>feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>PCSM</subject><subject>ProstateCancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>RALP</subject><subject>RARP</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQha2qiJ9bFn2BylI3IHHBTmyTsAMEpQipixapO2vijKmvkpsQO4LseASesU_CtBdYIOGNj0afjubMYeyzFPuS3kG1GPelESL7wDalMmqupPj98UWL0mywrRgXQtDA6HW2kZvCmFLJTdb8hBb_PjzWMPE6RPcHhhvkQ1d1iaYQY4gJa95AD0MXXdcHx3tSCRK61LXTEfcIMVShCWna4xE8ponDsuY9pIDLxPG-x4GUw09szUMTcfv5n7Hr87Nfpxfzqx_fvp8eX81drvNsXuWURZOtR_SmqNFoiYWHzKlD7aSqSl17pwwYmeXaeS1LU0ptSkF0AZDP2M7Klza9HTEm21I0bBpYYjdGmx0WuSoLKRWhX9-gi24clrSdzQritCkInrHdFeUoehzQ234ILQyTlcL-q8BSBfZ_BcR-eXYcqxbrV_Ll5gQcrIC70OD0vpM9ubxeWT4By_GTiw</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Hill, George Thomas</creator><creator>Jeyanthi, Mekha</creator><creator>Coomer, William</creator><creator>Bryant, Richard J.</creator><creator>Colmsee, Matthew T.</creator><creator>Tozer, James</creator><creator>Cox, Adam Christopher</creator><creator>Wilson, Jim R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9863-5658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8330-9251</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: feasibility, safety and patient experience</title><author>Hill, George Thomas ; Jeyanthi, Mekha ; Coomer, William ; Bryant, Richard J. ; Colmsee, Matthew T. ; Tozer, James ; Cox, Adam Christopher ; Wilson, Jim R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-b36005feafeef68de651e8fa2c475c14b95dfc46a61235cf5196915690f688aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>day‐case surgery</topic><topic>enhanced recovery</topic><topic>ERAS</topic><topic>feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>PCSM</topic><topic>ProstateCancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>RALP</topic><topic>RARP</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hill, George Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeyanthi, Mekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coomer, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colmsee, Matthew T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tozer, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Adam Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jim R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hill, George Thomas</au><au>Jeyanthi, Mekha</au><au>Coomer, William</au><au>Bryant, Richard J.</au><au>Colmsee, Matthew T.</au><au>Tozer, James</au><au>Cox, Adam Christopher</au><au>Wilson, Jim R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: feasibility, safety and patient experience</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>92-99</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To report a single centre's experience of the feasibility, safety and patient acceptability of same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
Subjects/Patients and Methods
Between June 2015 and December 2021, a total of 180 pre‐selected consecutive patients underwent RALP with the intention to discharge on the same day as surgery. Cases were performed by two surgeons. An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme was used. The feasibility of same‐day discharge was analysed, along with the complication rate, oncological outcomes, and postoperative patient experience.
Results
Of 180 patients, 169 (93.8%) were successfully discharged on the same day as surgery. The median (range) age was 63 ( 44–74) years. The median (range) console time was 97 (61–256) min and blood loss was 200 (20–800) mL. The resection specimen pathology results were: pT2 69.4%, pT3a 24.4% and pT3b 6.5%. With regard to Gleason Grade Group (GGG), 25.9% had GGG 1, 65.7% had GGG 2–3 and 8.4% had GGG 4–5 disease. Positive surgical margins were present in 25 cases (14.7%), 18 (15.5%) of which occurred in pT2 cases, and seven (13.4%) in pT3 cases. There were no early (<90 days) biochemical relapses (defined as prostate‐specific antigen level >0.2 ng/mL). The 30‐day readmission rate was 3%. A total of 13 early (0–30 days) complications were observed, five of which were Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3, however, none of these would have been avoided had the patient remained in hospital on the first postoperative night. Of 121 consecutive patients, 107 (88%) returned a satisfaction questionnaire, and 92% of responders stated they preferred recovery at home, with 94% stating they felt ready to go home.
Conclusion
Robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy combined with an ERAS programme allows patients to be safely discharged home on the same day of their surgery. This is a feasible option, well‐liked by patients, with morbidity and oncological outcomes similar to non‐day‐case or 23 h stay RALP.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36866941</pmid><doi>10.1111/bju.16002</doi><tpages>99</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9863-5658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8330-9251</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1464-4096 |
| ispartof | BJU international, 2023-07, Vol.132 (1), p.92-99 |
| issn | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2783498114 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Aged day‐case surgery enhanced recovery ERAS feasibility Feasibility Studies Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - adverse effects Laparoscopy - methods Male Middle Aged Morbidity Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery Patient Discharge Patient Outcome Assessment patient satisfaction Patients PCSM ProstateCancer Prostatectomy Prostatectomy - adverse effects Prostatectomy - methods Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery RALP RARP Recovery (Medical) Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Robotics Robots robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy Surgery Treatment Outcome Urological surgery |
| title | Same‐day discharge robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: feasibility, safety and patient experience |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T06%3A59%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Same%E2%80%90day%20discharge%20robot%E2%80%90assisted%20laparoscopic%20prostatectomy:%20feasibility,%20safety%20and%20patient%20experience&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Hill,%20George%20Thomas&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=92-99&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.16002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2783498114%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2827856878&rft_id=info:pmid/36866941&rfr_iscdi=true |