Audiometric and Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Single‐Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Recipients Using the CIQOL‐35
Objective Describe the effect that cochlear implantation (CI) has on audiometric outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients with single‐sided deafness (SSD). Study Design Retrospective case review. Setting Tertiary university hospital system. Methods Preoperative and postoperative AzBio performa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2023-05, Vol.168 (5), p.1156-1163 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1163 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1156 |
| container_title | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery |
| container_volume | 168 |
| creator | Mitton, Tanner J. Yancey, Kristen L. Isaacson, Brandon Kutz, Walter Whitson, Johanna Hunter, Jacob B. |
| description | Objective
Describe the effect that cochlear implantation (CI) has on audiometric outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients with single‐sided deafness (SSD).
Study Design
Retrospective case review.
Setting
Tertiary university hospital system.
Methods
Preoperative and postoperative AzBio performance and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life‐35 (CIQOL‐35) Profile scores in CI patients with SSD were compared, and postoperative measures were compared to those from CI patients without SSD.
Results
Seventeen patients with unilateral CI and contralateral unaided pure‐tone averages ≤30 dB were included. The median age was 60.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 50.9‐64.9 years), and 7/17 (41%) were women. Median daily use was 8.2 hour (IQR, 5.4‐11.9 h). The median preoperative AzBio quiet score in the ear to be implanted was 3% (IQR, 0%‐6%). After a median follow‐up of 12.0 months, the median postoperative AzBio quiet score was 76% (IQR, 47%‐86%) (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ohn.162 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2783495035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2783495035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3172-93b21509ccc557506c0cc7e6dcfd99064d3d60166b8e59407b9a54752f2d3ce53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAURS0EglIQO0CegYRS7Di24yEKn1aqKBQYR6n9Qo3yI06EmLEE1shKcFRgxugN7rlHTxehI0omlJDwvF5XEyrCLTSiRMlAxFRuoxGhKgq4UvEe2nfuhRAihJS7aI-JWFIa0xF6u-iNrUvoWqtxVhl8l3UWqu7r43MJTd12YPCi77RHHLYVfrDVcwE-fbDGR5eQ5RU4h5NarwvIWjwrmyKrOrwEbZvB5PCT8yXcrQEns_vF3JcZP0A7eVY4OPy5Y_R0ffWYTIP54maWXMwDzagMA8VWIeVEaa05l5wITbSWIIzOjVJERIYZQagQqxi4iohcqYxHkod5aJgGzsbodONt2vq1B9elpXUaCv8j1L1LQxmzSHHCBvRkg-q2dq6FPG1aW2bte0pJOqyc-pVTv7Inj3-k_aoE88f9zuqBsw3wZgt4_8-TLqa3g-4b0KOIIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2783495035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Audiometric and Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Single‐Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Recipients Using the CIQOL‐35</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mitton, Tanner J. ; Yancey, Kristen L. ; Isaacson, Brandon ; Kutz, Walter ; Whitson, Johanna ; Hunter, Jacob B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitton, Tanner J. ; Yancey, Kristen L. ; Isaacson, Brandon ; Kutz, Walter ; Whitson, Johanna ; Hunter, Jacob B.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Describe the effect that cochlear implantation (CI) has on audiometric outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients with single‐sided deafness (SSD).
Study Design
Retrospective case review.
Setting
Tertiary university hospital system.
Methods
Preoperative and postoperative AzBio performance and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life‐35 (CIQOL‐35) Profile scores in CI patients with SSD were compared, and postoperative measures were compared to those from CI patients without SSD.
Results
Seventeen patients with unilateral CI and contralateral unaided pure‐tone averages ≤30 dB were included. The median age was 60.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 50.9‐64.9 years), and 7/17 (41%) were women. Median daily use was 8.2 hour (IQR, 5.4‐11.9 h). The median preoperative AzBio quiet score in the ear to be implanted was 3% (IQR, 0%‐6%). After a median follow‐up of 12.0 months, the median postoperative AzBio quiet score was 76% (IQR, 47%‐86%) (p < .01). SSD subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in median scores on the following CIQOL‐35 subdomains following implantation: Entertainment (17 preoperatively vs 21 postoperatively), Listening Effort (12 vs 14), Social (17 vs 22), and Global (28 vs 35; p < .05). SSD patients achieved equal or higher postoperative CIQOL‐35 scores in most subdomains (6/7) compared to an age‐matched group of non‐SSD CI recipients who underwent unilaterally (N = 19) or sequential (N = 6) implantation.
Conclusion
SSD CI patients not only demonstrate significant improvements in speech perception testing in the implanted ear but also exhibit improvement in multiple QOL subdomains on the CIQOL‐35, the only validated cochlear implant QOL instrument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ohn.162</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36871181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>CIQOL ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - rehabilitation ; Deafness - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; single‐sided deafness ; Speech Perception ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2023-05, Vol.168 (5), p.1156-1163</ispartof><rights>2023 American Association of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.</rights><rights>2023 American Association of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3172-93b21509ccc557506c0cc7e6dcfd99064d3d60166b8e59407b9a54752f2d3ce53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3172-93b21509ccc557506c0cc7e6dcfd99064d3d60166b8e59407b9a54752f2d3ce53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2055-1614 ; 0000-0003-3479-1309</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fohn.162$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fohn.162$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36871181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitton, Tanner J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yancey, Kristen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaacson, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutz, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitson, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Jacob B.</creatorcontrib><title>Audiometric and Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Single‐Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Recipients Using the CIQOL‐35</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Objective
Describe the effect that cochlear implantation (CI) has on audiometric outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients with single‐sided deafness (SSD).
Study Design
Retrospective case review.
Setting
Tertiary university hospital system.
Methods
Preoperative and postoperative AzBio performance and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life‐35 (CIQOL‐35) Profile scores in CI patients with SSD were compared, and postoperative measures were compared to those from CI patients without SSD.
Results
Seventeen patients with unilateral CI and contralateral unaided pure‐tone averages ≤30 dB were included. The median age was 60.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 50.9‐64.9 years), and 7/17 (41%) were women. Median daily use was 8.2 hour (IQR, 5.4‐11.9 h). The median preoperative AzBio quiet score in the ear to be implanted was 3% (IQR, 0%‐6%). After a median follow‐up of 12.0 months, the median postoperative AzBio quiet score was 76% (IQR, 47%‐86%) (p < .01). SSD subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in median scores on the following CIQOL‐35 subdomains following implantation: Entertainment (17 preoperatively vs 21 postoperatively), Listening Effort (12 vs 14), Social (17 vs 22), and Global (28 vs 35; p < .05). SSD patients achieved equal or higher postoperative CIQOL‐35 scores in most subdomains (6/7) compared to an age‐matched group of non‐SSD CI recipients who underwent unilaterally (N = 19) or sequential (N = 6) implantation.
Conclusion
SSD CI patients not only demonstrate significant improvements in speech perception testing in the implanted ear but also exhibit improvement in multiple QOL subdomains on the CIQOL‐35, the only validated cochlear implant QOL instrument.</description><subject>CIQOL</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Deafness - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>single‐sided deafness</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAURS0EglIQO0CegYRS7Di24yEKn1aqKBQYR6n9Qo3yI06EmLEE1shKcFRgxugN7rlHTxehI0omlJDwvF5XEyrCLTSiRMlAxFRuoxGhKgq4UvEe2nfuhRAihJS7aI-JWFIa0xF6u-iNrUvoWqtxVhl8l3UWqu7r43MJTd12YPCi77RHHLYVfrDVcwE-fbDGR5eQ5RU4h5NarwvIWjwrmyKrOrwEbZvB5PCT8yXcrQEns_vF3JcZP0A7eVY4OPy5Y_R0ffWYTIP54maWXMwDzagMA8VWIeVEaa05l5wITbSWIIzOjVJERIYZQagQqxi4iohcqYxHkod5aJgGzsbodONt2vq1B9elpXUaCv8j1L1LQxmzSHHCBvRkg-q2dq6FPG1aW2bte0pJOqyc-pVTv7Inj3-k_aoE88f9zuqBsw3wZgt4_8-TLqa3g-4b0KOIIQ</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Mitton, Tanner J.</creator><creator>Yancey, Kristen L.</creator><creator>Isaacson, Brandon</creator><creator>Kutz, Walter</creator><creator>Whitson, Johanna</creator><creator>Hunter, Jacob B.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2055-1614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-1309</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Audiometric and Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Single‐Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Recipients Using the CIQOL‐35</title><author>Mitton, Tanner J. ; Yancey, Kristen L. ; Isaacson, Brandon ; Kutz, Walter ; Whitson, Johanna ; Hunter, Jacob B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3172-93b21509ccc557506c0cc7e6dcfd99064d3d60166b8e59407b9a54752f2d3ce53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>CIQOL</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Deafness - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>single‐sided deafness</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitton, Tanner J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yancey, Kristen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaacson, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutz, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitson, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Jacob B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitton, Tanner J.</au><au>Yancey, Kristen L.</au><au>Isaacson, Brandon</au><au>Kutz, Walter</au><au>Whitson, Johanna</au><au>Hunter, Jacob B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Audiometric and Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Single‐Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Recipients Using the CIQOL‐35</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>168</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1156</spage><epage>1163</epage><pages>1156-1163</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Objective
Describe the effect that cochlear implantation (CI) has on audiometric outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients with single‐sided deafness (SSD).
Study Design
Retrospective case review.
Setting
Tertiary university hospital system.
Methods
Preoperative and postoperative AzBio performance and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life‐35 (CIQOL‐35) Profile scores in CI patients with SSD were compared, and postoperative measures were compared to those from CI patients without SSD.
Results
Seventeen patients with unilateral CI and contralateral unaided pure‐tone averages ≤30 dB were included. The median age was 60.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 50.9‐64.9 years), and 7/17 (41%) were women. Median daily use was 8.2 hour (IQR, 5.4‐11.9 h). The median preoperative AzBio quiet score in the ear to be implanted was 3% (IQR, 0%‐6%). After a median follow‐up of 12.0 months, the median postoperative AzBio quiet score was 76% (IQR, 47%‐86%) (p < .01). SSD subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in median scores on the following CIQOL‐35 subdomains following implantation: Entertainment (17 preoperatively vs 21 postoperatively), Listening Effort (12 vs 14), Social (17 vs 22), and Global (28 vs 35; p < .05). SSD patients achieved equal or higher postoperative CIQOL‐35 scores in most subdomains (6/7) compared to an age‐matched group of non‐SSD CI recipients who underwent unilaterally (N = 19) or sequential (N = 6) implantation.
Conclusion
SSD CI patients not only demonstrate significant improvements in speech perception testing in the implanted ear but also exhibit improvement in multiple QOL subdomains on the CIQOL‐35, the only validated cochlear implant QOL instrument.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>36871181</pmid><doi>10.1002/ohn.162</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2055-1614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-1309</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0194-5998 |
| ispartof | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2023-05, Vol.168 (5), p.1156-1163 |
| issn | 0194-5998 1097-6817 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2783495035 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | CIQOL Cochlear Implantation Cochlear Implants Deafness - rehabilitation Deafness - surgery Female Humans Male Middle Aged Patient Reported Outcome Measures Quality of Life Retrospective Studies single‐sided deafness Speech Perception Treatment Outcome |
| title | Audiometric and Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Single‐Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Recipients Using the CIQOL‐35 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A20%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Audiometric%20and%20Patient%E2%80%90Reported%20Outcomes%20in%20Single%E2%80%90Sided%20Deafness%20Cochlear%20Implant%20Recipients%20Using%20the%20CIQOL%E2%80%9035&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Mitton,%20Tanner%20J.&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1156&rft.epage=1163&rft.pages=1156-1163&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ohn.162&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2783495035%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2783495035&rft_id=info:pmid/36871181&rfr_iscdi=true |