Cyclic testing of slab-column connections with shear reinforcement. Paper by Ian N. Robertson, Tadashi Kawai, James Lee, and Brian Enomoto. Discussion by Amin Ghali and Ramez B. Gayed
The objective of the paper is to compare the response of slab connections containing three types of shear reinforcement when subjected to combined gravity and cyclic loading. The three types of shear reinforcement are single-leg stirrups, closed stirrups, and stud shear reinforcement. Slabs provided...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | ACI structural journal 2003-07, Vol.100 (4), p.541-543 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 543 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 541 |
| container_title | ACI structural journal |
| container_volume | 100 |
| creator | Ghali, A Gayed, R B |
| description | The objective of the paper is to compare the response of slab connections containing three types of shear reinforcement when subjected to combined gravity and cyclic loading. The three types of shear reinforcement are single-leg stirrups, closed stirrups, and stud shear reinforcement. Slabs provided with the same amount of flexural and shear reinforcements are tested, differing only in the type of shear reinforcement. The three types of shear reinforcement have three distinct means of anchorage; the tests are to compare their effectiveness. This discussion will show that shear reinforcement is not required in the tested slabs. The failure is mainly by flexure and there is no demand for the action of the shear reinforcement. Therefore, the reported tests cannot justify the conclusion: 'The three types of shear reinforcement proved equally effective in resisting punching shear failure...' |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27822489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27822489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_278224893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj0tOw0AQRL0AifC5Q69Y2ZaxLeEsSQjhJ4Si7KP2uI0HjbvD9FiRuRjXwyAOwKo2r16pjqJZVlXzpMjLq5PoVPU9y4osL8pZ9LUcjbMGAmmw_AbSgjqsEyNu6BmMMJMJVljhYEMH2hF68GS5FW-oJw4pvOKePNQjPCDDSwobqckHFY5hiw1qZ-EJD2hjeMSeFJ6JYkBuYOHt1Fix9BIkhVurZlCd1n5kN71lWHfo7C-7maqfsEhhjSM159Fxi07p4i_Posu71XZ5n-y9fAzTmV0_ycg5ZJJBd_l1ledlNS_-DX4DXD9kvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27822489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cyclic testing of slab-column connections with shear reinforcement. Paper by Ian N. Robertson, Tadashi Kawai, James Lee, and Brian Enomoto. Discussion by Amin Ghali and Ramez B. Gayed</title><source>American Concrete Institute Online Journal Archives</source><creator>Ghali, A ; Gayed, R B</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghali, A ; Gayed, R B</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the paper is to compare the response of slab connections containing three types of shear reinforcement when subjected to combined gravity and cyclic loading. The three types of shear reinforcement are single-leg stirrups, closed stirrups, and stud shear reinforcement. Slabs provided with the same amount of flexural and shear reinforcements are tested, differing only in the type of shear reinforcement. The three types of shear reinforcement have three distinct means of anchorage; the tests are to compare their effectiveness. This discussion will show that shear reinforcement is not required in the tested slabs. The failure is mainly by flexure and there is no demand for the action of the shear reinforcement. Therefore, the reported tests cannot justify the conclusion: 'The three types of shear reinforcement proved equally effective in resisting punching shear failure...'</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-3241</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>ACI structural journal, 2003-07, Vol.100 (4), p.541-543</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghali, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayed, R B</creatorcontrib><title>Cyclic testing of slab-column connections with shear reinforcement. Paper by Ian N. Robertson, Tadashi Kawai, James Lee, and Brian Enomoto. Discussion by Amin Ghali and Ramez B. Gayed</title><title>ACI structural journal</title><description>The objective of the paper is to compare the response of slab connections containing three types of shear reinforcement when subjected to combined gravity and cyclic loading. The three types of shear reinforcement are single-leg stirrups, closed stirrups, and stud shear reinforcement. Slabs provided with the same amount of flexural and shear reinforcements are tested, differing only in the type of shear reinforcement. The three types of shear reinforcement have three distinct means of anchorage; the tests are to compare their effectiveness. This discussion will show that shear reinforcement is not required in the tested slabs. The failure is mainly by flexure and there is no demand for the action of the shear reinforcement. Therefore, the reported tests cannot justify the conclusion: 'The three types of shear reinforcement proved equally effective in resisting punching shear failure...'</description><issn>0889-3241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNj0tOw0AQRL0AifC5Q69Y2ZaxLeEsSQjhJ4Si7KP2uI0HjbvD9FiRuRjXwyAOwKo2r16pjqJZVlXzpMjLq5PoVPU9y4osL8pZ9LUcjbMGAmmw_AbSgjqsEyNu6BmMMJMJVljhYEMH2hF68GS5FW-oJw4pvOKePNQjPCDDSwobqckHFY5hiw1qZ-EJD2hjeMSeFJ6JYkBuYOHt1Fix9BIkhVurZlCd1n5kN71lWHfo7C-7maqfsEhhjSM159Fxi07p4i_Posu71XZ5n-y9fAzTmV0_ycg5ZJJBd_l1ledlNS_-DX4DXD9kvg</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Ghali, A</creator><creator>Gayed, R B</creator><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Cyclic testing of slab-column connections with shear reinforcement. Paper by Ian N. Robertson, Tadashi Kawai, James Lee, and Brian Enomoto. Discussion by Amin Ghali and Ramez B. Gayed</title><author>Ghali, A ; Gayed, R B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_278224893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghali, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayed, R B</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>ACI structural journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghali, A</au><au>Gayed, R B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cyclic testing of slab-column connections with shear reinforcement. Paper by Ian N. Robertson, Tadashi Kawai, James Lee, and Brian Enomoto. Discussion by Amin Ghali and Ramez B. Gayed</atitle><jtitle>ACI structural journal</jtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>541</spage><epage>543</epage><pages>541-543</pages><issn>0889-3241</issn><abstract>The objective of the paper is to compare the response of slab connections containing three types of shear reinforcement when subjected to combined gravity and cyclic loading. The three types of shear reinforcement are single-leg stirrups, closed stirrups, and stud shear reinforcement. Slabs provided with the same amount of flexural and shear reinforcements are tested, differing only in the type of shear reinforcement. The three types of shear reinforcement have three distinct means of anchorage; the tests are to compare their effectiveness. This discussion will show that shear reinforcement is not required in the tested slabs. The failure is mainly by flexure and there is no demand for the action of the shear reinforcement. Therefore, the reported tests cannot justify the conclusion: 'The three types of shear reinforcement proved equally effective in resisting punching shear failure...'</abstract></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0889-3241 |
| ispartof | ACI structural journal, 2003-07, Vol.100 (4), p.541-543 |
| issn | 0889-3241 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27822489 |
| source | American Concrete Institute Online Journal Archives |
| title | Cyclic testing of slab-column connections with shear reinforcement. Paper by Ian N. Robertson, Tadashi Kawai, James Lee, and Brian Enomoto. Discussion by Amin Ghali and Ramez B. Gayed |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A16%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cyclic%20testing%20of%20slab-column%20connections%20with%20shear%20reinforcement.%20Paper%20by%20Ian%20N.%20Robertson,%20Tadashi%20Kawai,%20James%20Lee,%20and%20Brian%20Enomoto.%20Discussion%20by%20Amin%20Ghali%20and%20Ramez%20B.%20Gayed&rft.jtitle=ACI%20structural%20journal&rft.au=Ghali,%20A&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=543&rft.pages=541-543&rft.issn=0889-3241&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E27822489%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27822489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |