A comparison of the operating performance of alternative refrigerants
This paper provides a comparison of the operating performance of three alternative refrigerants for use in a vapour compression refrigeration cycle. The refrigeration capacity and COP of R401A, R290 and R134A were compared with those of R12 when used in a propriety vapour compression refrigeration u...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied thermal engineering 2003-08, Vol.23 (12), p.1441-1451 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1451 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 1441 |
| container_title | Applied thermal engineering |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Halimic, E Ross, D Agnew, B Anderson, A Potts, I |
| description | This paper provides a comparison of the operating performance of three alternative refrigerants for use in a vapour compression refrigeration cycle. The refrigeration capacity and COP of R401A, R290 and R134A were compared with those of R12 when used in a propriety vapour compression refrigeration unit initially designed to operate with R12. The results indicate that the performance of R134a is very similar to that of R12 justifying the claim that it is a drop in replacement for R12 but of the refrigerants tested it gave the poorest performance. When viewed in terms of green house impact however R290 showed the best performance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1359-4311(03)00081-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27814935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359431103000814</els_id><sourcerecordid>27814935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-ea5b7810ef49eaf3e37feab906b4b47ea94b12118b2f13ca0eb6669ac89aca5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAQgD2ARCn8BKQsIBgCduw8PKGqKg-pEgMwWxf3XIySONhpJf49TlvByGD5cd_d-T5CLhi9ZZQVd6-M5zIVnLFrym8opRVLxRGZ_D6fkNMQPillWVWKCVnMEu3aHrwNrkucSYYPTFyPHgbbrZN4MM630Gkcg9AM6LsY2mLi0Xi7jmA3hDNybKAJeH7Yp-T9YfE2f0qXL4_P89ky1XnGhxQhr8uKUTRCIhiOvDQItaRFLWpRIkhRs4yxqs4M4xoo1kVRSNBVXJCv-JRc7ev23n1tMAyqtUFj00CHbhNUFqsLyfMI5ntQexdC_KrqvW3BfytG1ShK7USp0YiiXO1ExduUXB4aQNDQmDidtuEvWVSS0VJG7n7PYZx2a9GroC1GSyvrUQ9q5ew_nX4A6j6AFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27814935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of the operating performance of alternative refrigerants</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Halimic, E ; Ross, D ; Agnew, B ; Anderson, A ; Potts, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Halimic, E ; Ross, D ; Agnew, B ; Anderson, A ; Potts, I</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides a comparison of the operating performance of three alternative refrigerants for use in a vapour compression refrigeration cycle. The refrigeration capacity and COP of R401A, R290 and R134A were compared with those of R12 when used in a propriety vapour compression refrigeration unit initially designed to operate with R12. The results indicate that the performance of R134a is very similar to that of R12 justifying the claim that it is a drop in replacement for R12 but of the refrigerants tested it gave the poorest performance. When viewed in terms of green house impact however R290 showed the best performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-4311</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1359-4311(03)00081-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Exact sciences and technology ; Ozone depletion potential ; R12 alternative refrigerants ; Refrigerants ; Refrigerating engineering ; Refrigerating engineering. Cryogenics. Food conservation ; Refrigeration ; Total equivalent warming impact</subject><ispartof>Applied thermal engineering, 2003-08, Vol.23 (12), p.1441-1451</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-ea5b7810ef49eaf3e37feab906b4b47ea94b12118b2f13ca0eb6669ac89aca5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-ea5b7810ef49eaf3e37feab906b4b47ea94b12118b2f13ca0eb6669ac89aca5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(03)00081-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14891079$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halimic, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agnew, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, I</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of the operating performance of alternative refrigerants</title><title>Applied thermal engineering</title><description>This paper provides a comparison of the operating performance of three alternative refrigerants for use in a vapour compression refrigeration cycle. The refrigeration capacity and COP of R401A, R290 and R134A were compared with those of R12 when used in a propriety vapour compression refrigeration unit initially designed to operate with R12. The results indicate that the performance of R134a is very similar to that of R12 justifying the claim that it is a drop in replacement for R12 but of the refrigerants tested it gave the poorest performance. When viewed in terms of green house impact however R290 showed the best performance.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Ozone depletion potential</subject><subject>R12 alternative refrigerants</subject><subject>Refrigerants</subject><subject>Refrigerating engineering</subject><subject>Refrigerating engineering. Cryogenics. Food conservation</subject><subject>Refrigeration</subject><subject>Total equivalent warming impact</subject><issn>1359-4311</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAQgD2ARCn8BKQsIBgCduw8PKGqKg-pEgMwWxf3XIySONhpJf49TlvByGD5cd_d-T5CLhi9ZZQVd6-M5zIVnLFrym8opRVLxRGZ_D6fkNMQPillWVWKCVnMEu3aHrwNrkucSYYPTFyPHgbbrZN4MM630Gkcg9AM6LsY2mLi0Xi7jmA3hDNybKAJeH7Yp-T9YfE2f0qXL4_P89ky1XnGhxQhr8uKUTRCIhiOvDQItaRFLWpRIkhRs4yxqs4M4xoo1kVRSNBVXJCv-JRc7ev23n1tMAyqtUFj00CHbhNUFqsLyfMI5ntQexdC_KrqvW3BfytG1ShK7USp0YiiXO1ExduUXB4aQNDQmDidtuEvWVSS0VJG7n7PYZx2a9GroC1GSyvrUQ9q5ew_nX4A6j6AFA</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Halimic, E</creator><creator>Ross, D</creator><creator>Agnew, B</creator><creator>Anderson, A</creator><creator>Potts, I</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>A comparison of the operating performance of alternative refrigerants</title><author>Halimic, E ; Ross, D ; Agnew, B ; Anderson, A ; Potts, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-ea5b7810ef49eaf3e37feab906b4b47ea94b12118b2f13ca0eb6669ac89aca5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Ozone depletion potential</topic><topic>R12 alternative refrigerants</topic><topic>Refrigerants</topic><topic>Refrigerating engineering</topic><topic>Refrigerating engineering. Cryogenics. Food conservation</topic><topic>Refrigeration</topic><topic>Total equivalent warming impact</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halimic, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agnew, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, I</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied thermal engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halimic, E</au><au>Ross, D</au><au>Agnew, B</au><au>Anderson, A</au><au>Potts, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of the operating performance of alternative refrigerants</atitle><jtitle>Applied thermal engineering</jtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1441</spage><epage>1451</epage><pages>1441-1451</pages><issn>1359-4311</issn><abstract>This paper provides a comparison of the operating performance of three alternative refrigerants for use in a vapour compression refrigeration cycle. The refrigeration capacity and COP of R401A, R290 and R134A were compared with those of R12 when used in a propriety vapour compression refrigeration unit initially designed to operate with R12. The results indicate that the performance of R134a is very similar to that of R12 justifying the claim that it is a drop in replacement for R12 but of the refrigerants tested it gave the poorest performance. When viewed in terms of green house impact however R290 showed the best performance.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S1359-4311(03)00081-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1359-4311 |
| ispartof | Applied thermal engineering, 2003-08, Vol.23 (12), p.1441-1451 |
| issn | 1359-4311 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27814935 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Applied sciences Energy Energy. Thermal use of fuels Exact sciences and technology Ozone depletion potential R12 alternative refrigerants Refrigerants Refrigerating engineering Refrigerating engineering. Cryogenics. Food conservation Refrigeration Total equivalent warming impact |
| title | A comparison of the operating performance of alternative refrigerants |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A37%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20the%20operating%20performance%20of%20alternative%20refrigerants&rft.jtitle=Applied%20thermal%20engineering&rft.au=Halimic,%20E&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1441&rft.epage=1451&rft.pages=1441-1451&rft.issn=1359-4311&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1359-4311(03)00081-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27814935%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27814935&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1359431103000814&rfr_iscdi=true |