Compositional analyses of lunar pyroclastic deposits

The 5-band Clementine UVVIS data at ∼100 m/pixel were used to examine the compositions of 75 large and small lunar pyroclastic deposits (LPDs), and these were compared to representative lunar maria and highlands deposits. Results show that the albedo, spectral color, and inferred composition of most...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Icarus (New York, N.Y. 1962) N.Y. 1962), 2003-02, Vol.161 (2), p.262-280
Hauptverfasser: Gaddis, Lisa R, Staid, Matthew I, Tyburczy, James A, Hawke, B.Ray, Petro, Noah E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 280
container_issue 2
container_start_page 262
container_title Icarus (New York, N.Y. 1962)
container_volume 161
creator Gaddis, Lisa R
Staid, Matthew I
Tyburczy, James A
Hawke, B.Ray
Petro, Noah E
description The 5-band Clementine UVVIS data at ∼100 m/pixel were used to examine the compositions of 75 large and small lunar pyroclastic deposits (LPDs), and these were compared to representative lunar maria and highlands deposits. Results show that the albedo, spectral color, and inferred composition of most LPDs are similar to those of low-titanium, mature lunar maria. These LPDs may have consisted largely of fragmented basalt, with substantial components of iron-bearing mafic minerals (pyroxenes, olivine) and smaller amounts (if any) of volcanic glass. Several smaller LPDs also show substantial highland components. Three classes of very large deposits can be distinguished from most LPDs and from each other on the basis of crystallinity and possible titanium content of their pyroclastic components. One class has spectral properties that are dominated by high-titanium, crystallized “black beads” (e.g., Taurus–Littrow), a second consists of a mixture of high-titanium glasses and beads with a higher glass/bead ratio (Sulpicius Gallus) than that of Taurus–Littrow, and a third has a significant component of quenched iron-bearing volcanic glasses (Aristarchus) with possible moderate titanium contents. Although areally extensive, these three classes of very large pyroclastic deposits compose only 20 of the 75 deposits studied (∼27%), and eruption of such materials was thus likely to have been less frequent on the Moon.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0019-1035(02)00036-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27813941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0019103502000362</els_id><sourcerecordid>18682147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-93c50a3fb72ccf155beb27123b957052e3577e2f36dc4b758927c4766d67e8023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BKEn0UN1MmmS9iSy-AULHtRzSNMpRLpNTbrC_nu7u-J1LzOXZ17eeRi75HDLgau7dwBe5RyEvAa8AQChcjxiMw4V5KgKccxm_8gpO0vpa4JkWYkZKxZhNYTkRx9622V2GptEKQtt1q17G7NhE4PrbBq9yxraoemcnbS2S3Txt-fs8-nxY_GSL9-eXxcPy9yKCse8Ek6CFW2t0bmWS1lTjZqjqCupQSIJqTVhK1TjilpPhVC7QivVKE0loJizq33uEMP3mtJoVj456jrbU1gng7rkoir4QZCXqkRe6AmUe9DFkFKk1gzRr2zcGA5mK9PsZJqtKQNodjLNtsn9_o6md388RZOcp95R4yO50TTBH0j4BcQTen8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18682147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compositional analyses of lunar pyroclastic deposits</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gaddis, Lisa R ; Staid, Matthew I ; Tyburczy, James A ; Hawke, B.Ray ; Petro, Noah E</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaddis, Lisa R ; Staid, Matthew I ; Tyburczy, James A ; Hawke, B.Ray ; Petro, Noah E</creatorcontrib><description>The 5-band Clementine UVVIS data at ∼100 m/pixel were used to examine the compositions of 75 large and small lunar pyroclastic deposits (LPDs), and these were compared to representative lunar maria and highlands deposits. Results show that the albedo, spectral color, and inferred composition of most LPDs are similar to those of low-titanium, mature lunar maria. These LPDs may have consisted largely of fragmented basalt, with substantial components of iron-bearing mafic minerals (pyroxenes, olivine) and smaller amounts (if any) of volcanic glass. Several smaller LPDs also show substantial highland components. Three classes of very large deposits can be distinguished from most LPDs and from each other on the basis of crystallinity and possible titanium content of their pyroclastic components. One class has spectral properties that are dominated by high-titanium, crystallized “black beads” (e.g., Taurus–Littrow), a second consists of a mixture of high-titanium glasses and beads with a higher glass/bead ratio (Sulpicius Gallus) than that of Taurus–Littrow, and a third has a significant component of quenched iron-bearing volcanic glasses (Aristarchus) with possible moderate titanium contents. Although areally extensive, these three classes of very large pyroclastic deposits compose only 20 of the 75 deposits studied (∼27%), and eruption of such materials was thus likely to have been less frequent on the Moon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-1035</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0019-1035(02)00036-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Moon ; Moon surface ; Spectroscopy ; Volcanism</subject><ispartof>Icarus (New York, N.Y. 1962), 2003-02, Vol.161 (2), p.262-280</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science (USA)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-93c50a3fb72ccf155beb27123b957052e3577e2f36dc4b758927c4766d67e8023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-93c50a3fb72ccf155beb27123b957052e3577e2f36dc4b758927c4766d67e8023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-1035(02)00036-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaddis, Lisa R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staid, Matthew I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyburczy, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawke, B.Ray</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petro, Noah E</creatorcontrib><title>Compositional analyses of lunar pyroclastic deposits</title><title>Icarus (New York, N.Y. 1962)</title><description>The 5-band Clementine UVVIS data at ∼100 m/pixel were used to examine the compositions of 75 large and small lunar pyroclastic deposits (LPDs), and these were compared to representative lunar maria and highlands deposits. Results show that the albedo, spectral color, and inferred composition of most LPDs are similar to those of low-titanium, mature lunar maria. These LPDs may have consisted largely of fragmented basalt, with substantial components of iron-bearing mafic minerals (pyroxenes, olivine) and smaller amounts (if any) of volcanic glass. Several smaller LPDs also show substantial highland components. Three classes of very large deposits can be distinguished from most LPDs and from each other on the basis of crystallinity and possible titanium content of their pyroclastic components. One class has spectral properties that are dominated by high-titanium, crystallized “black beads” (e.g., Taurus–Littrow), a second consists of a mixture of high-titanium glasses and beads with a higher glass/bead ratio (Sulpicius Gallus) than that of Taurus–Littrow, and a third has a significant component of quenched iron-bearing volcanic glasses (Aristarchus) with possible moderate titanium contents. Although areally extensive, these three classes of very large pyroclastic deposits compose only 20 of the 75 deposits studied (∼27%), and eruption of such materials was thus likely to have been less frequent on the Moon.</description><subject>Moon</subject><subject>Moon surface</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Volcanism</subject><issn>0019-1035</issn><issn>1090-2643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BKEn0UN1MmmS9iSy-AULHtRzSNMpRLpNTbrC_nu7u-J1LzOXZ17eeRi75HDLgau7dwBe5RyEvAa8AQChcjxiMw4V5KgKccxm_8gpO0vpa4JkWYkZKxZhNYTkRx9622V2GptEKQtt1q17G7NhE4PrbBq9yxraoemcnbS2S3Txt-fs8-nxY_GSL9-eXxcPy9yKCse8Ek6CFW2t0bmWS1lTjZqjqCupQSIJqTVhK1TjilpPhVC7QivVKE0loJizq33uEMP3mtJoVj456jrbU1gng7rkoir4QZCXqkRe6AmUe9DFkFKk1gzRr2zcGA5mK9PsZJqtKQNodjLNtsn9_o6md388RZOcp95R4yO50TTBH0j4BcQTen8</recordid><startdate>20030201</startdate><enddate>20030201</enddate><creator>Gaddis, Lisa R</creator><creator>Staid, Matthew I</creator><creator>Tyburczy, James A</creator><creator>Hawke, B.Ray</creator><creator>Petro, Noah E</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030201</creationdate><title>Compositional analyses of lunar pyroclastic deposits</title><author>Gaddis, Lisa R ; Staid, Matthew I ; Tyburczy, James A ; Hawke, B.Ray ; Petro, Noah E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a392t-93c50a3fb72ccf155beb27123b957052e3577e2f36dc4b758927c4766d67e8023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Moon</topic><topic>Moon surface</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Volcanism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaddis, Lisa R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staid, Matthew I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyburczy, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawke, B.Ray</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petro, Noah E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Icarus (New York, N.Y. 1962)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaddis, Lisa R</au><au>Staid, Matthew I</au><au>Tyburczy, James A</au><au>Hawke, B.Ray</au><au>Petro, Noah E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compositional analyses of lunar pyroclastic deposits</atitle><jtitle>Icarus (New York, N.Y. 1962)</jtitle><date>2003-02-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>262</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>262-280</pages><issn>0019-1035</issn><eissn>1090-2643</eissn><abstract>The 5-band Clementine UVVIS data at ∼100 m/pixel were used to examine the compositions of 75 large and small lunar pyroclastic deposits (LPDs), and these were compared to representative lunar maria and highlands deposits. Results show that the albedo, spectral color, and inferred composition of most LPDs are similar to those of low-titanium, mature lunar maria. These LPDs may have consisted largely of fragmented basalt, with substantial components of iron-bearing mafic minerals (pyroxenes, olivine) and smaller amounts (if any) of volcanic glass. Several smaller LPDs also show substantial highland components. Three classes of very large deposits can be distinguished from most LPDs and from each other on the basis of crystallinity and possible titanium content of their pyroclastic components. One class has spectral properties that are dominated by high-titanium, crystallized “black beads” (e.g., Taurus–Littrow), a second consists of a mixture of high-titanium glasses and beads with a higher glass/bead ratio (Sulpicius Gallus) than that of Taurus–Littrow, and a third has a significant component of quenched iron-bearing volcanic glasses (Aristarchus) with possible moderate titanium contents. Although areally extensive, these three classes of very large pyroclastic deposits compose only 20 of the 75 deposits studied (∼27%), and eruption of such materials was thus likely to have been less frequent on the Moon.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0019-1035(02)00036-2</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-1035
ispartof Icarus (New York, N.Y. 1962), 2003-02, Vol.161 (2), p.262-280
issn 0019-1035
1090-2643
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27813941
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Moon
Moon surface
Spectroscopy
Volcanism
title Compositional analyses of lunar pyroclastic deposits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A48%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compositional%20analyses%20of%20lunar%20pyroclastic%20deposits&rft.jtitle=Icarus%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201962)&rft.au=Gaddis,%20Lisa%20R&rft.date=2003-02-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=262-280&rft.issn=0019-1035&rft.eissn=1090-2643&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0019-1035(02)00036-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18682147%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18682147&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0019103502000362&rfr_iscdi=true