Efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in the removal of root canal sealers from artificial standardised grooves

The present study aims to assess the efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in removing calcium silicate-based sealers from artificial standardised apical grooves. After the root canal instrumentation of 96 teeth, artificial apical grooves were created in half of each root. The samples w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian endodontic journal 2023-09, Vol.49 (S1), p.339-344
Hauptverfasser: Düzgün, Salih, Topçuoğlu, Hüseyin Sinan, Kahraman, Ömür, Eminsoy, Ayşe Tuğba
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 344
container_issue S1
container_start_page 339
container_title Australian endodontic journal
container_volume 49
creator Düzgün, Salih
Topçuoğlu, Hüseyin Sinan
Kahraman, Ömür
Eminsoy, Ayşe Tuğba
description The present study aims to assess the efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in removing calcium silicate-based sealers from artificial standardised apical grooves. After the root canal instrumentation of 96 teeth, artificial apical grooves were created in half of each root. The samples were divided into two main groups according to the sealer type (AH Plus Jet [APJ] and Sure-Seal Root™ [SSR]) (n = 48). The root halves were then reassembled and divided into four experimental groups based on the final irrigation technique used: Conventional Syringe Irrigation (CSI), Ultrasonic Irrigant Agitation (UIA), Sonic Agitation (SA) and Manual Dynamic Agitation (MDA). The roots were then dissembled to assess the amount of root canal sealer. UIA significantly removed more of SSR sealer than CSI, MDA and SA while there was no statistical difference between CSI, MDA, SA and UIA groups in the APJ group. None of the irrigation agitation systems used had completely removed the APJ and SSR sealers. However, UIA was more effective in removing SSR sealer from the standardised apical groove than were CSI, MDA and SA.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aej.12741
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2779346494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2865205771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-ddf037a9230ed902cc8354790692f804c0806c64957f6eec4e0353fa91b13153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMoVqsL_4AE3Ohial4zmSyl1AcU3HQ_pJmbmjIz0SQVCv54U1tdmE3ODd85cHMQuqJkQvO517CeUCYFPUJnVApZCCHlcdacqYIqIUfoPMY1IUxwSU_RiFc1JYqLM_Q1s9YZbbbYW9w6ayHAkLALwa10cn7AeuXSXsVtTNBH7Aac3gAH6P2n7nbG4H3CRg95iqA7CBHb4HusQ3I53u3ekx5aHVoXocWrbPiEeIFOrO4iXB7uMVo8zhbT52L--vQyfZgXhkmeira1hEutGCfQKsKMqXkppCKVYrYmwpCaVKYSqpS2AjACCC-51YouKaclH6Pbfex78B8biKnpXTTQdXoAv4kNkzL_RfaLjN78Q9d-E_JemaqrkpFSSpqpuz1lgo8xgG3eg-t12DaUNLtGmtxI89NIZq8PiZtlD-0f-VsB_wZlF4cx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2865205771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in the removal of root canal sealers from artificial standardised grooves</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Düzgün, Salih ; Topçuoğlu, Hüseyin Sinan ; Kahraman, Ömür ; Eminsoy, Ayşe Tuğba</creator><creatorcontrib>Düzgün, Salih ; Topçuoğlu, Hüseyin Sinan ; Kahraman, Ömür ; Eminsoy, Ayşe Tuğba</creatorcontrib><description>The present study aims to assess the efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in removing calcium silicate-based sealers from artificial standardised apical grooves. After the root canal instrumentation of 96 teeth, artificial apical grooves were created in half of each root. The samples were divided into two main groups according to the sealer type (AH Plus Jet [APJ] and Sure-Seal Root™ [SSR]) (n = 48). The root halves were then reassembled and divided into four experimental groups based on the final irrigation technique used: Conventional Syringe Irrigation (CSI), Ultrasonic Irrigant Agitation (UIA), Sonic Agitation (SA) and Manual Dynamic Agitation (MDA). The roots were then dissembled to assess the amount of root canal sealer. UIA significantly removed more of SSR sealer than CSI, MDA and SA while there was no statistical difference between CSI, MDA, SA and UIA groups in the APJ group. None of the irrigation agitation systems used had completely removed the APJ and SSR sealers. However, UIA was more effective in removing SSR sealer from the standardised apical groove than were CSI, MDA and SA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1329-1947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-4477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aej.12741</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36810934</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agitation ; Dental roots ; Endodontics ; Lavage ; Root canals ; Sealing compounds</subject><ispartof>Australian endodontic journal, 2023-09, Vol.49 (S1), p.339-344</ispartof><rights>2023 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-ddf037a9230ed902cc8354790692f804c0806c64957f6eec4e0353fa91b13153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1289-1176 ; 0000-0003-2697-8907 ; 0000-0002-0868-3390 ; 0000-0002-2581-7127</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810934$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Düzgün, Salih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topçuoğlu, Hüseyin Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, Ömür</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eminsoy, Ayşe Tuğba</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in the removal of root canal sealers from artificial standardised grooves</title><title>Australian endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Aust Endod J</addtitle><description>The present study aims to assess the efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in removing calcium silicate-based sealers from artificial standardised apical grooves. After the root canal instrumentation of 96 teeth, artificial apical grooves were created in half of each root. The samples were divided into two main groups according to the sealer type (AH Plus Jet [APJ] and Sure-Seal Root™ [SSR]) (n = 48). The root halves were then reassembled and divided into four experimental groups based on the final irrigation technique used: Conventional Syringe Irrigation (CSI), Ultrasonic Irrigant Agitation (UIA), Sonic Agitation (SA) and Manual Dynamic Agitation (MDA). The roots were then dissembled to assess the amount of root canal sealer. UIA significantly removed more of SSR sealer than CSI, MDA and SA while there was no statistical difference between CSI, MDA, SA and UIA groups in the APJ group. None of the irrigation agitation systems used had completely removed the APJ and SSR sealers. However, UIA was more effective in removing SSR sealer from the standardised apical groove than were CSI, MDA and SA.</description><subject>Agitation</subject><subject>Dental roots</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Lavage</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Sealing compounds</subject><issn>1329-1947</issn><issn>1747-4477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUtLAzEUhYMoVqsL_4AE3Ohial4zmSyl1AcU3HQ_pJmbmjIz0SQVCv54U1tdmE3ODd85cHMQuqJkQvO517CeUCYFPUJnVApZCCHlcdacqYIqIUfoPMY1IUxwSU_RiFc1JYqLM_Q1s9YZbbbYW9w6ayHAkLALwa10cn7AeuXSXsVtTNBH7Aac3gAH6P2n7nbG4H3CRg95iqA7CBHb4HusQ3I53u3ekx5aHVoXocWrbPiEeIFOrO4iXB7uMVo8zhbT52L--vQyfZgXhkmeira1hEutGCfQKsKMqXkppCKVYrYmwpCaVKYSqpS2AjACCC-51YouKaclH6Pbfex78B8biKnpXTTQdXoAv4kNkzL_RfaLjN78Q9d-E_JemaqrkpFSSpqpuz1lgo8xgG3eg-t12DaUNLtGmtxI89NIZq8PiZtlD-0f-VsB_wZlF4cx</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Düzgün, Salih</creator><creator>Topçuoğlu, Hüseyin Sinan</creator><creator>Kahraman, Ömür</creator><creator>Eminsoy, Ayşe Tuğba</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-1176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-8907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0868-3390</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2581-7127</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in the removal of root canal sealers from artificial standardised grooves</title><author>Düzgün, Salih ; Topçuoğlu, Hüseyin Sinan ; Kahraman, Ömür ; Eminsoy, Ayşe Tuğba</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-ddf037a9230ed902cc8354790692f804c0806c64957f6eec4e0353fa91b13153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agitation</topic><topic>Dental roots</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Lavage</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Sealing compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Düzgün, Salih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topçuoğlu, Hüseyin Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, Ömür</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eminsoy, Ayşe Tuğba</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Düzgün, Salih</au><au>Topçuoğlu, Hüseyin Sinan</au><au>Kahraman, Ömür</au><au>Eminsoy, Ayşe Tuğba</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in the removal of root canal sealers from artificial standardised grooves</atitle><jtitle>Australian endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Endod J</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>339-344</pages><issn>1329-1947</issn><eissn>1747-4477</eissn><abstract>The present study aims to assess the efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in removing calcium silicate-based sealers from artificial standardised apical grooves. After the root canal instrumentation of 96 teeth, artificial apical grooves were created in half of each root. The samples were divided into two main groups according to the sealer type (AH Plus Jet [APJ] and Sure-Seal Root™ [SSR]) (n = 48). The root halves were then reassembled and divided into four experimental groups based on the final irrigation technique used: Conventional Syringe Irrigation (CSI), Ultrasonic Irrigant Agitation (UIA), Sonic Agitation (SA) and Manual Dynamic Agitation (MDA). The roots were then dissembled to assess the amount of root canal sealer. UIA significantly removed more of SSR sealer than CSI, MDA and SA while there was no statistical difference between CSI, MDA, SA and UIA groups in the APJ group. None of the irrigation agitation systems used had completely removed the APJ and SSR sealers. However, UIA was more effective in removing SSR sealer from the standardised apical groove than were CSI, MDA and SA.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36810934</pmid><doi>10.1111/aej.12741</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-1176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-8907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0868-3390</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2581-7127</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1329-1947
ispartof Australian endodontic journal, 2023-09, Vol.49 (S1), p.339-344
issn 1329-1947
1747-4477
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2779346494
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Agitation
Dental roots
Endodontics
Lavage
Root canals
Sealing compounds
title Efficacy of different irrigation agitation systems in the removal of root canal sealers from artificial standardised grooves
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20different%20irrigation%20agitation%20systems%20in%20the%20removal%20of%20root%20canal%20sealers%20from%20artificial%20standardised%20grooves&rft.jtitle=Australian%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=D%C3%BCzg%C3%BCn,%20Salih&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=339-344&rft.issn=1329-1947&rft.eissn=1747-4477&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aej.12741&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2865205771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2865205771&rft_id=info:pmid/36810934&rfr_iscdi=true