Ultrasound‐Based Machine Learning Approach for Detection of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Objectives Current diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) relies on biopsy or MR‐based fat quantification. This prospective study explored the use of ultrasound with artificial intelligence for the detection of NAFLD. Methods One hundred and twenty subjects with clinical suspicion of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2023-08, Vol.42 (8), p.1747-1756 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
Current diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) relies on biopsy or MR‐based fat quantification. This prospective study explored the use of ultrasound with artificial intelligence for the detection of NAFLD.
Methods
One hundred and twenty subjects with clinical suspicion of NAFLD and 10 healthy volunteers consented to participate in this institutional review board‐approved study. Subjects were categorized as NAFLD and non‐NAFLD according to MR proton density fat fraction (PDFF) findings. Ultrasound images from 10 different locations in the right and left hepatic lobes were collected following a standard protocol. MRI‐based liver fat quantification was used as the reference standard with >6.4% indicative of NAFLD. A supervised machine learning model was developed for assessment of NAFLD. To validate model performance, a balanced testing dataset of 24 subjects was used. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy with 95% confidence interval were calculated.
Results
A total of 1119 images from 106 participants was used for model development. The internal evaluation achieved an average precision of 0.941, recall of 88.2%, and precision of 89.0%. In the testing set AutoML achieved a sensitivity of 72.2% (63.1%–80.1%), specificity of 94.6% (88.7%–98.0%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.1% (86.0%–96.7%), negative predictive value of 77.3% (71.6%–82.1%), and accuracy of 83.4% (77.9%–88.0%). The average agreement for an individual subject was 92%.
Conclusions
An ultrasound‐based machine learning model for identification of NAFLD showed high specificity and PPV in this prospective trial. This approach may in the future be used as an inexpensive and noninvasive screening tool for identifying NAFLD in high‐risk patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0278-4297 1550-9613 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jum.16194 |