30‐day readmission rates among upper gastrointestinal bleeds: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background and Aim Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common emergency, with high rates of hospitalization and in‐patient mortality compared to other gastrointestinal diseases. Despite readmission rates being a common quality metric, little data are available for UGIBs. This study aimed to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2023-05, Vol.38 (5), p.692-702
Hauptverfasser: Dunne, Cody L, Kaur, Sandeep, Delacruz, Bronwyn, Bresee, Lauren C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 702
container_issue 5
container_start_page 692
container_title Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 38
creator Dunne, Cody L
Kaur, Sandeep
Delacruz, Bronwyn
Bresee, Lauren C
description Background and Aim Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common emergency, with high rates of hospitalization and in‐patient mortality compared to other gastrointestinal diseases. Despite readmission rates being a common quality metric, little data are available for UGIBs. This study aimed to determine readmission rates for patients discharged following an UGIB. Methods Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched to October 16, 2021. Randomized and non‐randomized studies that reported hospital readmission for patients following an UGIB were included. screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted in duplicate. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed, with statistical heterogeneity measured using I2. The GRADE framework, with a modified Downs and Black tool, was used to determine certainty of evidence. Results Seventy studies were included of 1847 screened ed, with moderate interrater reliability. Within these studies, 4 292 714 patients were analyzed with a mean age of 66.6 years, and 54.7% male. UGIB had a 30‐day all‐cause readmission rate of 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.7–18.2%), stratification revealed a higher rate for variceal UGIB [19.6% (95% CI 17.6–21.5%)] than non‐variceal [16.8% (95% CI 16.0–17.5%)]. Only one third were readmitted due to recurrent UGIB (4.8% [95% CI 3.1–6.4%]). UGIB due to peptic ulcer bleeding had the lowest 30‐day readmission rate [6.9% (95% CI 3.8–10.0%)]. Certainty of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes. Conclusions Almost one in five patients discharged after an UGIB are readmitted within 30 days. These data should prompt clinicians to reflect on their own practice to identify areas of strength or improvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jgh.16153
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2778973454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811929255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-c8321090c68351d43125928b3b667c96d9470c4b86dc16adb91ac0c5f4828ae93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOl4WvoAE3OiimjSXJu6GwSuCG12XNMnUDL2ZtEp3PoLP6JMYrboQPJsDh4-P__wA7GN0guOcrsrHE8wxI2tghilFCc4oXwczJDBLJMFyC2yHsEIIUZSxTbBFuEAi43wGSoLeX9-MGqG3ytQuBNc20KveBqjqtinh0HXWw1KF3reuiffeNaqCRWWtCWdwDsMYelur3unoeHb2BarGwNr2KppVZMfgwi7YWKoq2L3vvQMeLs7vF1fJ7d3l9WJ-m2giBEm0IClGEmkuCMOGEpwymYqCFJxnWnIjaYY0LQQ3GnNlComVRpotqUiFspLsgKPJ2_n2aYhh8_iTtlWlGtsOIU-zTMiMUEYjevgHXbWDj3kjJTCWqUwZi9TxRGnfhuDtMu-8q5Ufc4zyz_bz2H7-1X5kD76NQ1Fb80v-1B2B0wl4cZUd_zflN5dXk_IDf0WPoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811929255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>30‐day readmission rates among upper gastrointestinal bleeds: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Dunne, Cody L ; Kaur, Sandeep ; Delacruz, Bronwyn ; Bresee, Lauren C</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Cody L ; Kaur, Sandeep ; Delacruz, Bronwyn ; Bresee, Lauren C</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aim Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common emergency, with high rates of hospitalization and in‐patient mortality compared to other gastrointestinal diseases. Despite readmission rates being a common quality metric, little data are available for UGIBs. This study aimed to determine readmission rates for patients discharged following an UGIB. Methods Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched to October 16, 2021. Randomized and non‐randomized studies that reported hospital readmission for patients following an UGIB were included. screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted in duplicate. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed, with statistical heterogeneity measured using I2. The GRADE framework, with a modified Downs and Black tool, was used to determine certainty of evidence. Results Seventy studies were included of 1847 screened ed, with moderate interrater reliability. Within these studies, 4 292 714 patients were analyzed with a mean age of 66.6 years, and 54.7% male. UGIB had a 30‐day all‐cause readmission rate of 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.7–18.2%), stratification revealed a higher rate for variceal UGIB [19.6% (95% CI 17.6–21.5%)] than non‐variceal [16.8% (95% CI 16.0–17.5%)]. Only one third were readmitted due to recurrent UGIB (4.8% [95% CI 3.1–6.4%]). UGIB due to peptic ulcer bleeding had the lowest 30‐day readmission rate [6.9% (95% CI 3.8–10.0%)]. Certainty of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes. Conclusions Almost one in five patients discharged after an UGIB are readmitted within 30 days. These data should prompt clinicians to reflect on their own practice to identify areas of strength or improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16153</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36808766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bleeding ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices - complications ; Female ; Gastrointestinal diseases ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Male ; Meta-analysis ; mortality ; non‐variceal bleed ; Patient Readmission ; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - therapy ; Peptic ulcers ; Quality control ; quality metrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage ; variceal bleed</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2023-05, Vol.38 (5), p.692-702</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-c8321090c68351d43125928b3b667c96d9470c4b86dc16adb91ac0c5f4828ae93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-c8321090c68351d43125928b3b667c96d9470c4b86dc16adb91ac0c5f4828ae93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7465-3264 ; 0000-0002-4387-9612</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjgh.16153$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjgh.16153$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36808766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Cody L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delacruz, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresee, Lauren C</creatorcontrib><title>30‐day readmission rates among upper gastrointestinal bleeds: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background and Aim Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common emergency, with high rates of hospitalization and in‐patient mortality compared to other gastrointestinal diseases. Despite readmission rates being a common quality metric, little data are available for UGIBs. This study aimed to determine readmission rates for patients discharged following an UGIB. Methods Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched to October 16, 2021. Randomized and non‐randomized studies that reported hospital readmission for patients following an UGIB were included. screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted in duplicate. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed, with statistical heterogeneity measured using I2. The GRADE framework, with a modified Downs and Black tool, was used to determine certainty of evidence. Results Seventy studies were included of 1847 screened ed, with moderate interrater reliability. Within these studies, 4 292 714 patients were analyzed with a mean age of 66.6 years, and 54.7% male. UGIB had a 30‐day all‐cause readmission rate of 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.7–18.2%), stratification revealed a higher rate for variceal UGIB [19.6% (95% CI 17.6–21.5%)] than non‐variceal [16.8% (95% CI 16.0–17.5%)]. Only one third were readmitted due to recurrent UGIB (4.8% [95% CI 3.1–6.4%]). UGIB due to peptic ulcer bleeding had the lowest 30‐day readmission rate [6.9% (95% CI 3.8–10.0%)]. Certainty of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes. Conclusions Almost one in five patients discharged after an UGIB are readmitted within 30 days. These data should prompt clinicians to reflect on their own practice to identify areas of strength or improvement.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal diseases</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>non‐variceal bleed</subject><subject>Patient Readmission</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - therapy</subject><subject>Peptic ulcers</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>quality metrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage</subject><subject>variceal bleed</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOl4WvoAE3OiimjSXJu6GwSuCG12XNMnUDL2ZtEp3PoLP6JMYrboQPJsDh4-P__wA7GN0guOcrsrHE8wxI2tghilFCc4oXwczJDBLJMFyC2yHsEIIUZSxTbBFuEAi43wGSoLeX9-MGqG3ytQuBNc20KveBqjqtinh0HXWw1KF3reuiffeNaqCRWWtCWdwDsMYelur3unoeHb2BarGwNr2KppVZMfgwi7YWKoq2L3vvQMeLs7vF1fJ7d3l9WJ-m2giBEm0IClGEmkuCMOGEpwymYqCFJxnWnIjaYY0LQQ3GnNlComVRpotqUiFspLsgKPJ2_n2aYhh8_iTtlWlGtsOIU-zTMiMUEYjevgHXbWDj3kjJTCWqUwZi9TxRGnfhuDtMu-8q5Ufc4zyz_bz2H7-1X5kD76NQ1Fb80v-1B2B0wl4cZUd_zflN5dXk_IDf0WPoA</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Dunne, Cody L</creator><creator>Kaur, Sandeep</creator><creator>Delacruz, Bronwyn</creator><creator>Bresee, Lauren C</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7465-3264</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-9612</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>30‐day readmission rates among upper gastrointestinal bleeds: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Dunne, Cody L ; Kaur, Sandeep ; Delacruz, Bronwyn ; Bresee, Lauren C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-c8321090c68351d43125928b3b667c96d9470c4b86dc16adb91ac0c5f4828ae93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal diseases</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>non‐variceal bleed</topic><topic>Patient Readmission</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - therapy</topic><topic>Peptic ulcers</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>quality metrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage</topic><topic>variceal bleed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Cody L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delacruz, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresee, Lauren C</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunne, Cody L</au><au>Kaur, Sandeep</au><au>Delacruz, Bronwyn</au><au>Bresee, Lauren C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>30‐day readmission rates among upper gastrointestinal bleeds: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>692</spage><epage>702</epage><pages>692-702</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Background and Aim Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common emergency, with high rates of hospitalization and in‐patient mortality compared to other gastrointestinal diseases. Despite readmission rates being a common quality metric, little data are available for UGIBs. This study aimed to determine readmission rates for patients discharged following an UGIB. Methods Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched to October 16, 2021. Randomized and non‐randomized studies that reported hospital readmission for patients following an UGIB were included. screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted in duplicate. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed, with statistical heterogeneity measured using I2. The GRADE framework, with a modified Downs and Black tool, was used to determine certainty of evidence. Results Seventy studies were included of 1847 screened ed, with moderate interrater reliability. Within these studies, 4 292 714 patients were analyzed with a mean age of 66.6 years, and 54.7% male. UGIB had a 30‐day all‐cause readmission rate of 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.7–18.2%), stratification revealed a higher rate for variceal UGIB [19.6% (95% CI 17.6–21.5%)] than non‐variceal [16.8% (95% CI 16.0–17.5%)]. Only one third were readmitted due to recurrent UGIB (4.8% [95% CI 3.1–6.4%]). UGIB due to peptic ulcer bleeding had the lowest 30‐day readmission rate [6.9% (95% CI 3.8–10.0%)]. Certainty of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes. Conclusions Almost one in five patients discharged after an UGIB are readmitted within 30 days. These data should prompt clinicians to reflect on their own practice to identify areas of strength or improvement.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36808766</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgh.16153</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7465-3264</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-9612</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0815-9319
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2023-05, Vol.38 (5), p.692-702
issn 0815-9319
1440-1746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2778973454
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Bleeding
Esophageal and Gastric Varices - complications
Female
Gastrointestinal diseases
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Meta-analysis
mortality
non‐variceal bleed
Patient Readmission
Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - therapy
Peptic ulcers
Quality control
quality metrics
Reproducibility of Results
upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage
variceal bleed
title 30‐day readmission rates among upper gastrointestinal bleeds: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A50%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=30%E2%80%90day%20readmission%20rates%20among%20upper%20gastrointestinal%20bleeds:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Dunne,%20Cody%20L&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=692&rft.epage=702&rft.pages=692-702&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgh.16153&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2811929255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811929255&rft_id=info:pmid/36808766&rfr_iscdi=true