Psychosocial profiles within community-dwelling older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A prevalence and latent profile analysis study

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is an at-risk stage for dementia and accurate prevalence studies are lacking in Singapore. From the literature, it is evident that psychosocial factors increase the risk of conversion to dementia. In this study, we sought to establish the prevalence of MCI in Singapore and study the associated psychosocial factors using latent profile analysis. 902 community-dwelling older adults, aged between 60 and 99 years old (Mage = 70.48 years), were recruited as part of the Community Health and Intergenerational Study (CHI). They completed neurocognitive assessments and questionnaires on depression and anxiety symptoms, quality of life, social support, satisfaction with life, and social connectivity. Petersen’s criteria was used to diagnose MCI. Within the MCI sample, 166 subjects’ psychosocial scores were entered into a latent profile analysis to identify profiles of psychosocial functioning. The prevalence of MCI in our sample was 21.5%. They had significantly lower years of education and perceived social support and higher depressive symptoms than the normal ageing group. Three distinct profiles emerged within the MCI group corresponding to a positive (45.2%), neutral (38.5%), and negative (16.3%) pattern of psychosocial scores. These profiles did not differ significantly in terms of demographic or cognitive variables. The three psychosocial profiles might reflect the differing implications of MCI on a person’s well-being and the negative psychosocial profile might likely be most at risk of conversion to dementia. Future longitudinal studies are required to confirm these implications. •Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Singapore was 21.5%.•They had less education and perceived social support, and higher depression scores.•Latent profile analysis yielded 3 distinct psychosocial profiles in MCI subjects.•Psychosocial profiles were positive (45.2%), negative (16.3%), and neutral (38.5%).•Profiles did not differ significantly in demographic or cognitive variables.