Bias‐reduced estimators of conditional odds ratios in matched case‐control studies with unmatched confounding

We study bias‐reduced estimators of exponentially transformed parameters in general linear models (GLMs) and show how they can be used to obtain bias‐reduced conditional (or unconditional) odds ratios in matched case‐control studies. Two options are considered and compared: the explicit approach and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biometrical journal 2023-04, Vol.65 (4), p.e2200133-n/a
1. Verfasser: Blagus, Rok
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We study bias‐reduced estimators of exponentially transformed parameters in general linear models (GLMs) and show how they can be used to obtain bias‐reduced conditional (or unconditional) odds ratios in matched case‐control studies. Two options are considered and compared: the explicit approach and the implicit approach. The implicit approach is based on the modified score function where bias‐reduced estimates are obtained by using iterative procedures to solve the modified score equations. The explicit approach is shown to be a one‐step approximation of this iterative procedure. To apply these approaches for the conditional analysis of matched case‐control studies, with potentially unmatched confounding and with several exposures, we utilize the relation between the conditional likelihood and the likelihood of the unconditional logit binomial GLM for matched pairs and Cox partial likelihood for matched sets with appropriately setup data. The properties of the estimators are evaluated by using a large Monte Carlo simulation study and an illustration of a real dataset is shown. Researchers reporting the results on the exponentiated scale should use bias‐reduced estimators since otherwise the effects can be under or overestimated, where the magnitude of the bias is especially large in studies with smaller sample sizes.
ISSN:0323-3847
1521-4036
DOI:10.1002/bimj.202200133