Blood donor notification rate in a blood bank in Veracruz, Mexico

Blood banks are primarily responsible for providing safe blood, but they also indirectly act to prevent the spread of infectious diseases by notifying blood donors of positive screening results. The notification process differs between countries and notifications rates are generally low. This study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion and apheresis science 2023-06, Vol.62 (3), p.103650-103650, Article 103650
Hauptverfasser: López-Balderas, Nayali, Hernández-Romano, Jesús, Zaldívar-López, Alejandra, González-Jiménez, Beatriz, Santiesteban-González, Salvador, Avila-Rejón, Carmen, Hernández-Romano, Pablo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 103650
container_issue 3
container_start_page 103650
container_title Transfusion and apheresis science
container_volume 62
creator López-Balderas, Nayali
Hernández-Romano, Jesús
Zaldívar-López, Alejandra
González-Jiménez, Beatriz
Santiesteban-González, Salvador
Avila-Rejón, Carmen
Hernández-Romano, Pablo
description Blood banks are primarily responsible for providing safe blood, but they also indirectly act to prevent the spread of infectious diseases by notifying blood donors of positive screening results. The notification process differs between countries and notifications rates are generally low. This study sought to analyze the notification rate of healthy and infection-positive donors who donated blood at CETS-Veracruz. A total of 41790 donors were analyzed, 1585 (3.79%) were positive for one or more of the screened infection markers. Only 4163 (9.96% of the total) were notified about their serology results. Of the positive donors, 157 were contacted by phone call; of them, 91 (57%) returned to the blood bank for their results. The average notification rate for positive donors was only 17.48%. The highest notification rate was for anti-HBc (26.63%), while the lowest was for HBsAg (4.17%). Age significantly influenced the return of donors: Those aged 18–24 and 25–39 years were 4.71 and 1.64 times less likely, respectively, to return for their results compared to the rate for all ages. The advice received in the pre-donation stage about the risks of transfusion-transmitted infections and the relevance of returning for results did not appear to impact donors, since the rate of notification was lower than those reported internationally. These data indicate that CETS-Veracruz should improve donor data registration and communication mechanisms to increase the notification rate, and that donor notification studies should be carried out in other Mexican blood banks to analyze the return rate at the national level.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103650
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2774896291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1473050223000174</els_id><sourcerecordid>2774896291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-648fdb2620eb42ff1f1694bac00da7a4bfc8ec3e1cd9f3751f505b8ff6f050453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQQC0EomX5BFCOHEixY8dOTqhUbFIRF-BqeRlLLm1c7AQBX09KCldOs-jNjOYhdELwhGDCLxaTNqomGT8pcEH7HuUl3kFjUokqJ7yiu33OBM1xiYsROkhpgTERpOb7aES5KJng9RhNr5Yh2MyGJsSsCa133qjWhyaLqoXMN5nK9A-iVfO6qV8gKhO7r_PsAT68CUdoz6llguNtPETPN9dPs7t8_nh7P5vOc0MJbXPOKmd1wQsMmhXOEUd4zbQyGFslFNPOVGAoEGNrR0VJXIlLXTnHXf8BK-khOhv2rmN46yC1cuWTgeVSNRC6JAshWFXzoiY9Wg6oiSGlCE6uo1-p-CkJlht7ciG39uTGnhzs9XOn2xOdXoH9m_rV1QOXAwD9o-8eouxXQGPA-gimlTb4f058A8y_gro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774896291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blood donor notification rate in a blood bank in Veracruz, Mexico</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>López-Balderas, Nayali ; Hernández-Romano, Jesús ; Zaldívar-López, Alejandra ; González-Jiménez, Beatriz ; Santiesteban-González, Salvador ; Avila-Rejón, Carmen ; Hernández-Romano, Pablo</creator><creatorcontrib>López-Balderas, Nayali ; Hernández-Romano, Jesús ; Zaldívar-López, Alejandra ; González-Jiménez, Beatriz ; Santiesteban-González, Salvador ; Avila-Rejón, Carmen ; Hernández-Romano, Pablo</creatorcontrib><description>Blood banks are primarily responsible for providing safe blood, but they also indirectly act to prevent the spread of infectious diseases by notifying blood donors of positive screening results. The notification process differs between countries and notifications rates are generally low. This study sought to analyze the notification rate of healthy and infection-positive donors who donated blood at CETS-Veracruz. A total of 41790 donors were analyzed, 1585 (3.79%) were positive for one or more of the screened infection markers. Only 4163 (9.96% of the total) were notified about their serology results. Of the positive donors, 157 were contacted by phone call; of them, 91 (57%) returned to the blood bank for their results. The average notification rate for positive donors was only 17.48%. The highest notification rate was for anti-HBc (26.63%), while the lowest was for HBsAg (4.17%). Age significantly influenced the return of donors: Those aged 18–24 and 25–39 years were 4.71 and 1.64 times less likely, respectively, to return for their results compared to the rate for all ages. The advice received in the pre-donation stage about the risks of transfusion-transmitted infections and the relevance of returning for results did not appear to impact donors, since the rate of notification was lower than those reported internationally. These data indicate that CETS-Veracruz should improve donor data registration and communication mechanisms to increase the notification rate, and that donor notification studies should be carried out in other Mexican blood banks to analyze the return rate at the national level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-0502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103650</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36754769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Blood Banks ; Blood Donors ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens ; Humans ; Mexico ; Notification ; Safe blood ; Screening ; Transfusion Reaction</subject><ispartof>Transfusion and apheresis science, 2023-06, Vol.62 (3), p.103650-103650, Article 103650</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-648fdb2620eb42ff1f1694bac00da7a4bfc8ec3e1cd9f3751f505b8ff6f050453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2023.103650$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36754769$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>López-Balderas, Nayali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Romano, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaldívar-López, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Jiménez, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiesteban-González, Salvador</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avila-Rejón, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Romano, Pablo</creatorcontrib><title>Blood donor notification rate in a blood bank in Veracruz, Mexico</title><title>Transfusion and apheresis science</title><addtitle>Transfus Apher Sci</addtitle><description>Blood banks are primarily responsible for providing safe blood, but they also indirectly act to prevent the spread of infectious diseases by notifying blood donors of positive screening results. The notification process differs between countries and notifications rates are generally low. This study sought to analyze the notification rate of healthy and infection-positive donors who donated blood at CETS-Veracruz. A total of 41790 donors were analyzed, 1585 (3.79%) were positive for one or more of the screened infection markers. Only 4163 (9.96% of the total) were notified about their serology results. Of the positive donors, 157 were contacted by phone call; of them, 91 (57%) returned to the blood bank for their results. The average notification rate for positive donors was only 17.48%. The highest notification rate was for anti-HBc (26.63%), while the lowest was for HBsAg (4.17%). Age significantly influenced the return of donors: Those aged 18–24 and 25–39 years were 4.71 and 1.64 times less likely, respectively, to return for their results compared to the rate for all ages. The advice received in the pre-donation stage about the risks of transfusion-transmitted infections and the relevance of returning for results did not appear to impact donors, since the rate of notification was lower than those reported internationally. These data indicate that CETS-Veracruz should improve donor data registration and communication mechanisms to increase the notification rate, and that donor notification studies should be carried out in other Mexican blood banks to analyze the return rate at the national level.</description><subject>Blood Banks</subject><subject>Blood Donors</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>Notification</subject><subject>Safe blood</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Transfusion Reaction</subject><issn>1473-0502</issn><issn>1878-1683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQQC0EomX5BFCOHEixY8dOTqhUbFIRF-BqeRlLLm1c7AQBX09KCldOs-jNjOYhdELwhGDCLxaTNqomGT8pcEH7HuUl3kFjUokqJ7yiu33OBM1xiYsROkhpgTERpOb7aES5KJng9RhNr5Yh2MyGJsSsCa133qjWhyaLqoXMN5nK9A-iVfO6qV8gKhO7r_PsAT68CUdoz6llguNtPETPN9dPs7t8_nh7P5vOc0MJbXPOKmd1wQsMmhXOEUd4zbQyGFslFNPOVGAoEGNrR0VJXIlLXTnHXf8BK-khOhv2rmN46yC1cuWTgeVSNRC6JAshWFXzoiY9Wg6oiSGlCE6uo1-p-CkJlht7ciG39uTGnhzs9XOn2xOdXoH9m_rV1QOXAwD9o-8eouxXQGPA-gimlTb4f058A8y_gro</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>López-Balderas, Nayali</creator><creator>Hernández-Romano, Jesús</creator><creator>Zaldívar-López, Alejandra</creator><creator>González-Jiménez, Beatriz</creator><creator>Santiesteban-González, Salvador</creator><creator>Avila-Rejón, Carmen</creator><creator>Hernández-Romano, Pablo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Blood donor notification rate in a blood bank in Veracruz, Mexico</title><author>López-Balderas, Nayali ; Hernández-Romano, Jesús ; Zaldívar-López, Alejandra ; González-Jiménez, Beatriz ; Santiesteban-González, Salvador ; Avila-Rejón, Carmen ; Hernández-Romano, Pablo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-648fdb2620eb42ff1f1694bac00da7a4bfc8ec3e1cd9f3751f505b8ff6f050453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Blood Banks</topic><topic>Blood Donors</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>Notification</topic><topic>Safe blood</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Transfusion Reaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>López-Balderas, Nayali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Romano, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaldívar-López, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Jiménez, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiesteban-González, Salvador</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avila-Rejón, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Romano, Pablo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion and apheresis science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>López-Balderas, Nayali</au><au>Hernández-Romano, Jesús</au><au>Zaldívar-López, Alejandra</au><au>González-Jiménez, Beatriz</au><au>Santiesteban-González, Salvador</au><au>Avila-Rejón, Carmen</au><au>Hernández-Romano, Pablo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blood donor notification rate in a blood bank in Veracruz, Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion and apheresis science</jtitle><addtitle>Transfus Apher Sci</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>103650</spage><epage>103650</epage><pages>103650-103650</pages><artnum>103650</artnum><issn>1473-0502</issn><eissn>1878-1683</eissn><abstract>Blood banks are primarily responsible for providing safe blood, but they also indirectly act to prevent the spread of infectious diseases by notifying blood donors of positive screening results. The notification process differs between countries and notifications rates are generally low. This study sought to analyze the notification rate of healthy and infection-positive donors who donated blood at CETS-Veracruz. A total of 41790 donors were analyzed, 1585 (3.79%) were positive for one or more of the screened infection markers. Only 4163 (9.96% of the total) were notified about their serology results. Of the positive donors, 157 were contacted by phone call; of them, 91 (57%) returned to the blood bank for their results. The average notification rate for positive donors was only 17.48%. The highest notification rate was for anti-HBc (26.63%), while the lowest was for HBsAg (4.17%). Age significantly influenced the return of donors: Those aged 18–24 and 25–39 years were 4.71 and 1.64 times less likely, respectively, to return for their results compared to the rate for all ages. The advice received in the pre-donation stage about the risks of transfusion-transmitted infections and the relevance of returning for results did not appear to impact donors, since the rate of notification was lower than those reported internationally. These data indicate that CETS-Veracruz should improve donor data registration and communication mechanisms to increase the notification rate, and that donor notification studies should be carried out in other Mexican blood banks to analyze the return rate at the national level.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36754769</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transci.2023.103650</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-0502
ispartof Transfusion and apheresis science, 2023-06, Vol.62 (3), p.103650-103650, Article 103650
issn 1473-0502
1878-1683
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2774896291
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Blood Banks
Blood Donors
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens
Humans
Mexico
Notification
Safe blood
Screening
Transfusion Reaction
title Blood donor notification rate in a blood bank in Veracruz, Mexico
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A24%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blood%20donor%20notification%20rate%20in%20a%20blood%20bank%20in%20Veracruz,%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20and%20apheresis%20science&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez-Balderas,%20Nayali&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=103650&rft.epage=103650&rft.pages=103650-103650&rft.artnum=103650&rft.issn=1473-0502&rft.eissn=1878-1683&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transci.2023.103650&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2774896291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774896291&rft_id=info:pmid/36754769&rft_els_id=S1473050223000174&rfr_iscdi=true