Who is motivated to accept a booster and annual dose? A dimensional and person-centered approach
The transmissibility of new COVID-19 variants and decreasing efficacy of vaccines led authorities to recommend a booster and even an annual dose. However, people's willingness to accept new doses varied considerably. Using two independent longitudinal samples of 4596 (Mean age = 53.6) and 514 (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied psychology : health and well-being 2023-11, Vol.15 (4), p.1293-1318 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1318 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1293 |
container_title | Applied psychology : health and well-being |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Waterschoot, Joachim Van Oost, Pascaline Vansteenkiste, Maarten Brisbois, Marie Schmitz, Mathias Morbée, Sofie Klein, Olivier Luminet, Olivier Van den Bergh, Omer Raemdonck, Eveline Yzerbyt, Vincent |
description | The transmissibility of new COVID-19 variants and decreasing efficacy of vaccines led authorities to recommend a booster and even an annual dose. However, people's willingness to accept new doses varied considerably. Using two independent longitudinal samples of 4596 (Mean age = 53.6) and 514 (Mean age = 55.9) vaccinated participants, we examined how people's (lack of) vaccination motivation for their first dose was associated with their intention to get a booster (Sample 1) and an annual dose (Sample 2) several months later (Aim 1). We also aimed to capture the impact of the motivational heterogeneity on these intentions by capitalizing on participants' different motivational profiles collected at baseline (Aim 2). Across both samples, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and distrust-based amotivation were uniquely related to, respectively, higher, lower, and even lower booster and annual dose intentions. Further, a two-step clustering procedure revealed five profiles, with the profiles characterized by higher autonomous motivation (i.e. Good Quality and High Quantity profiles) reporting the highest vaccination intentions and the profile characterized by the highest number of obstacles (i.e. Global Amotivated profile) yielding the lowest vaccination intentions. These results stress the critical need to support citizens' volitional endorsement of vaccination to harvest long-term benefits with respect to COVID-19. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aphw.12437 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2774270674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2885416853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-affcb949195ec9675754944e9900008ba46a2b758f1fb47e6a7d48f64b2a81bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AES8EaEzqTNV69kDL9g4I3iZT1JU9axNjVpFf-9mZu78MAh4eQ5b3hfhM4pmdJYN9Atv6Y0ZZk8QGMquUqI4uxwf2dihE5CWBEiuKDiGI0yIZlijIzR-9vS4TrgxvX1J_S2xL3DYIztegxYOxd66zG0Zex2gDUuXbC3eIbLurFtqF0bZ5vnzvrg2sTYNi5EGeg678AsT9FRBetgz3bnBL3e373MH5PF88PTfLZITEZ5n0BVGZ2znObcmlxILjnLGbN5TmIpDUxAqqOfilaaSStAlkxVgukUFNVlNkFXW9347cdgQ180dTB2vYbWuiEUqZQslSQaj-jlP3TlBh-NRErF5KhQPIvU9ZYy3oXgbVV0vm7AfxeUFJvci03uxW_uEb7YSQ66seUe_Qs6-wFtjX1k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2885416853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who is motivated to accept a booster and annual dose? A dimensional and person-centered approach</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Waterschoot, Joachim ; Van Oost, Pascaline ; Vansteenkiste, Maarten ; Brisbois, Marie ; Schmitz, Mathias ; Morbée, Sofie ; Klein, Olivier ; Luminet, Olivier ; Van den Bergh, Omer ; Raemdonck, Eveline ; Yzerbyt, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Waterschoot, Joachim ; Van Oost, Pascaline ; Vansteenkiste, Maarten ; Brisbois, Marie ; Schmitz, Mathias ; Morbée, Sofie ; Klein, Olivier ; Luminet, Olivier ; Van den Bergh, Omer ; Raemdonck, Eveline ; Yzerbyt, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>The transmissibility of new COVID-19 variants and decreasing efficacy of vaccines led authorities to recommend a booster and even an annual dose. However, people's willingness to accept new doses varied considerably. Using two independent longitudinal samples of 4596 (Mean age = 53.6) and 514 (Mean age = 55.9) vaccinated participants, we examined how people's (lack of) vaccination motivation for their first dose was associated with their intention to get a booster (Sample 1) and an annual dose (Sample 2) several months later (Aim 1). We also aimed to capture the impact of the motivational heterogeneity on these intentions by capitalizing on participants' different motivational profiles collected at baseline (Aim 2). Across both samples, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and distrust-based amotivation were uniquely related to, respectively, higher, lower, and even lower booster and annual dose intentions. Further, a two-step clustering procedure revealed five profiles, with the profiles characterized by higher autonomous motivation (i.e. Good Quality and High Quantity profiles) reporting the highest vaccination intentions and the profile characterized by the highest number of obstacles (i.e. Global Amotivated profile) yielding the lowest vaccination intentions. These results stress the critical need to support citizens' volitional endorsement of vaccination to harvest long-term benefits with respect to COVID-19.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-0846</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-0854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12437</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36748440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Clustering ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Dosage ; Efficacy ; Immunization ; Motivation ; Vaccines ; Variants</subject><ispartof>Applied psychology : health and well-being, 2023-11, Vol.15 (4), p.1293-1318</ispartof><rights>2023 International Association of Applied Psychology.</rights><rights>2023 The International Association of Applied Psychology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-affcb949195ec9675754944e9900008ba46a2b758f1fb47e6a7d48f64b2a81bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-affcb949195ec9675754944e9900008ba46a2b758f1fb47e6a7d48f64b2a81bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0845-9310</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waterschoot, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Oost, Pascaline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vansteenkiste, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brisbois, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morbée, Sofie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luminet, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Bergh, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raemdonck, Eveline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yzerbyt, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Who is motivated to accept a booster and annual dose? A dimensional and person-centered approach</title><title>Applied psychology : health and well-being</title><addtitle>Appl Psychol Health Well Being</addtitle><description>The transmissibility of new COVID-19 variants and decreasing efficacy of vaccines led authorities to recommend a booster and even an annual dose. However, people's willingness to accept new doses varied considerably. Using two independent longitudinal samples of 4596 (Mean age = 53.6) and 514 (Mean age = 55.9) vaccinated participants, we examined how people's (lack of) vaccination motivation for their first dose was associated with their intention to get a booster (Sample 1) and an annual dose (Sample 2) several months later (Aim 1). We also aimed to capture the impact of the motivational heterogeneity on these intentions by capitalizing on participants' different motivational profiles collected at baseline (Aim 2). Across both samples, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and distrust-based amotivation were uniquely related to, respectively, higher, lower, and even lower booster and annual dose intentions. Further, a two-step clustering procedure revealed five profiles, with the profiles characterized by higher autonomous motivation (i.e. Good Quality and High Quantity profiles) reporting the highest vaccination intentions and the profile characterized by the highest number of obstacles (i.e. Global Amotivated profile) yielding the lowest vaccination intentions. These results stress the critical need to support citizens' volitional endorsement of vaccination to harvest long-term benefits with respect to COVID-19.</description><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Variants</subject><issn>1758-0846</issn><issn>1758-0854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AES8EaEzqTNV69kDL9g4I3iZT1JU9axNjVpFf-9mZu78MAh4eQ5b3hfhM4pmdJYN9Atv6Y0ZZk8QGMquUqI4uxwf2dihE5CWBEiuKDiGI0yIZlijIzR-9vS4TrgxvX1J_S2xL3DYIztegxYOxd66zG0Zex2gDUuXbC3eIbLurFtqF0bZ5vnzvrg2sTYNi5EGeg678AsT9FRBetgz3bnBL3e373MH5PF88PTfLZITEZ5n0BVGZ2znObcmlxILjnLGbN5TmIpDUxAqqOfilaaSStAlkxVgukUFNVlNkFXW9347cdgQ180dTB2vYbWuiEUqZQslSQaj-jlP3TlBh-NRErF5KhQPIvU9ZYy3oXgbVV0vm7AfxeUFJvci03uxW_uEb7YSQ66seUe_Qs6-wFtjX1k</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Waterschoot, Joachim</creator><creator>Van Oost, Pascaline</creator><creator>Vansteenkiste, Maarten</creator><creator>Brisbois, Marie</creator><creator>Schmitz, Mathias</creator><creator>Morbée, Sofie</creator><creator>Klein, Olivier</creator><creator>Luminet, Olivier</creator><creator>Van den Bergh, Omer</creator><creator>Raemdonck, Eveline</creator><creator>Yzerbyt, Vincent</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0845-9310</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Who is motivated to accept a booster and annual dose? A dimensional and person-centered approach</title><author>Waterschoot, Joachim ; Van Oost, Pascaline ; Vansteenkiste, Maarten ; Brisbois, Marie ; Schmitz, Mathias ; Morbée, Sofie ; Klein, Olivier ; Luminet, Olivier ; Van den Bergh, Omer ; Raemdonck, Eveline ; Yzerbyt, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-affcb949195ec9675754944e9900008ba46a2b758f1fb47e6a7d48f64b2a81bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Variants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waterschoot, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Oost, Pascaline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vansteenkiste, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brisbois, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morbée, Sofie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luminet, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Bergh, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raemdonck, Eveline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yzerbyt, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied psychology : health and well-being</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waterschoot, Joachim</au><au>Van Oost, Pascaline</au><au>Vansteenkiste, Maarten</au><au>Brisbois, Marie</au><au>Schmitz, Mathias</au><au>Morbée, Sofie</au><au>Klein, Olivier</au><au>Luminet, Olivier</au><au>Van den Bergh, Omer</au><au>Raemdonck, Eveline</au><au>Yzerbyt, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who is motivated to accept a booster and annual dose? A dimensional and person-centered approach</atitle><jtitle>Applied psychology : health and well-being</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Psychol Health Well Being</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1293</spage><epage>1318</epage><pages>1293-1318</pages><issn>1758-0846</issn><eissn>1758-0854</eissn><abstract>The transmissibility of new COVID-19 variants and decreasing efficacy of vaccines led authorities to recommend a booster and even an annual dose. However, people's willingness to accept new doses varied considerably. Using two independent longitudinal samples of 4596 (Mean age = 53.6) and 514 (Mean age = 55.9) vaccinated participants, we examined how people's (lack of) vaccination motivation for their first dose was associated with their intention to get a booster (Sample 1) and an annual dose (Sample 2) several months later (Aim 1). We also aimed to capture the impact of the motivational heterogeneity on these intentions by capitalizing on participants' different motivational profiles collected at baseline (Aim 2). Across both samples, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and distrust-based amotivation were uniquely related to, respectively, higher, lower, and even lower booster and annual dose intentions. Further, a two-step clustering procedure revealed five profiles, with the profiles characterized by higher autonomous motivation (i.e. Good Quality and High Quantity profiles) reporting the highest vaccination intentions and the profile characterized by the highest number of obstacles (i.e. Global Amotivated profile) yielding the lowest vaccination intentions. These results stress the critical need to support citizens' volitional endorsement of vaccination to harvest long-term benefits with respect to COVID-19.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36748440</pmid><doi>10.1111/aphw.12437</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0845-9310</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-0846 |
ispartof | Applied psychology : health and well-being, 2023-11, Vol.15 (4), p.1293-1318 |
issn | 1758-0846 1758-0854 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2774270674 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Clustering COVID-19 COVID-19 vaccines Dosage Efficacy Immunization Motivation Vaccines Variants |
title | Who is motivated to accept a booster and annual dose? A dimensional and person-centered approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T12%3A49%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20is%20motivated%20to%20accept%20a%20booster%20and%20annual%20dose?%20A%20dimensional%20and%20person-centered%20approach&rft.jtitle=Applied%20psychology%20:%20health%20and%20well-being&rft.au=Waterschoot,%20Joachim&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1293&rft.epage=1318&rft.pages=1293-1318&rft.issn=1758-0846&rft.eissn=1758-0854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aphw.12437&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2885416853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2885416853&rft_id=info:pmid/36748440&rfr_iscdi=true |