Clinical outcomes of Dieulafoy's lesion compared with peptic ulcer in upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Background and Aim Although Dieulafoy's lesion (DL) is an important cause of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, few studies have investigated the clinico‐epidemiological outcomes due to its rarity. Here, we investigated clinical features of upper GI bleeding caused by peptic ulce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2023-06, Vol.38 (6), p.888-895
Hauptverfasser: Jo, Sang Yong, Noh, Jin Hee, Cha, Boram, Ahn, Ji Yong, Oh, Seung‐pyo, Seo, Jun‐young, Na, Hee Kyong, Lee, Jeong Hoon, Jung, Kee Wook, Kim, Do Hoon, Choi, Kee Don, Song, Ho June, Lee, Gin Hyug, Jung, Hwoon‐Yong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 895
container_issue 6
container_start_page 888
container_title Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 38
creator Jo, Sang Yong
Noh, Jin Hee
Cha, Boram
Ahn, Ji Yong
Oh, Seung‐pyo
Seo, Jun‐young
Na, Hee Kyong
Lee, Jeong Hoon
Jung, Kee Wook
Kim, Do Hoon
Choi, Kee Don
Song, Ho June
Lee, Gin Hyug
Jung, Hwoon‐Yong
description Background and Aim Although Dieulafoy's lesion (DL) is an important cause of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, few studies have investigated the clinico‐epidemiological outcomes due to its rarity. Here, we investigated clinical features of upper GI bleeding caused by peptic ulcer (PU) or DL and compared endoscopic treatment outcomes. Methods Patients with upper GI bleeding resulting from PU or DL who visited emergency room between January 2013 and December 2017 were eligible. Clinical features and treatment outcomes were retrospectively investigated. Results Overall, 728 patients with upper GI bleeding due to PU (n = 669) and DL (n = 59) were enrolled. The median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56–75 years), and 74.3% were male. Endoscopic intervention was performed in 53.7% (n = 359) and 98.3% (n = 58) of the PU and DL groups, respectively (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jgh.16139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773719667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2825940114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-78c6b0bac5b0229214f1ca5c7b64077277e4929374dec44f910590053ad33ce93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotn4c_AMS8KAetk022U1zlKpVKXjR85LNzrYp6WZNdin990ZbPQjOZQbm4eHlReiCkhGNM14tliOaUyYP0JByThIqeH6IhmRCs0QyKgfoJIQVIYQTkR2jAcsFJ5JPhgim1jRGK4td32m3hoBdje8N9FbVbnsdsIVgXIPjr1UeKrwx3RK30HZG495q8Ng0uG_beCxU6LwzTQehM010lhagMs3iDB3VygY43-9T9P748DZ9Suavs-fp3TzRLGMyEROdl6RUOitJmsqU8ppqlWlR5jG4SIUALlPJBK9Ac15LSjJJSMZUxZgGyU7Rzc7bevfRxxTF2gQN1qoGXB-KaGCCyjwXEb36g65c72PoSE3STHJCKY_U7Y7S3oXgoS5ab9bKbwtKiq_ui9h98d19ZC_3xr5cQ_VL_pQdgfEO2BgL2_9Nxcvsaaf8BPsojT8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2825940114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical outcomes of Dieulafoy's lesion compared with peptic ulcer in upper gastrointestinal bleeding</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jo, Sang Yong ; Noh, Jin Hee ; Cha, Boram ; Ahn, Ji Yong ; Oh, Seung‐pyo ; Seo, Jun‐young ; Na, Hee Kyong ; Lee, Jeong Hoon ; Jung, Kee Wook ; Kim, Do Hoon ; Choi, Kee Don ; Song, Ho June ; Lee, Gin Hyug ; Jung, Hwoon‐Yong</creator><creatorcontrib>Jo, Sang Yong ; Noh, Jin Hee ; Cha, Boram ; Ahn, Ji Yong ; Oh, Seung‐pyo ; Seo, Jun‐young ; Na, Hee Kyong ; Lee, Jeong Hoon ; Jung, Kee Wook ; Kim, Do Hoon ; Choi, Kee Don ; Song, Ho June ; Lee, Gin Hyug ; Jung, Hwoon‐Yong</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aim Although Dieulafoy's lesion (DL) is an important cause of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, few studies have investigated the clinico‐epidemiological outcomes due to its rarity. Here, we investigated clinical features of upper GI bleeding caused by peptic ulcer (PU) or DL and compared endoscopic treatment outcomes. Methods Patients with upper GI bleeding resulting from PU or DL who visited emergency room between January 2013 and December 2017 were eligible. Clinical features and treatment outcomes were retrospectively investigated. Results Overall, 728 patients with upper GI bleeding due to PU (n = 669) and DL (n = 59) were enrolled. The median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56–75 years), and 74.3% were male. Endoscopic intervention was performed in 53.7% (n = 359) and 98.3% (n = 58) of the PU and DL groups, respectively (P &lt; 0.0001). Patients were matched by sex, age, body mass index, comorbidity, and past medical history, and 190 PU and 52 DL were finally selected. The rebleeding rates within 7 (7.37% vs 17.31%, P = 0.037) and 30 (7.37% vs 26.92%, P &lt; 0.001) days after initial endoscopy were significantly lower in the PU than in the DL group after propensity score matching. During the median follow‐up period of 52 months (IQR, 34–70 months), there was no difference in overall survival rate (67.9% vs 82.7%, P = 0.518). Conclusions Although DL is a rare cause of upper GI bleeding, it requires endoscopic hemostasis more frequently and has a higher rate of rebleeding than PU even after therapeutic endoscopy. Endoscopists should pay attention and perform active endoscopic hemostasis for DL bleeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16139</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36740948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bleeding ; Body mass index ; Clinical outcomes ; Comorbidity ; Dieulafoy's lesion ; Emergency medical care ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy ; Hemostasis ; Hemostasis, Endoscopic - adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; peptic ulcer ; Peptic Ulcer - complications ; Peptic ulcers ; rebleeding ; Retrospective Studies ; Ulcers ; upper gastrointestinal bleeding</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2023-06, Vol.38 (6), p.888-895</ispartof><rights>2023 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-78c6b0bac5b0229214f1ca5c7b64077277e4929374dec44f910590053ad33ce93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-78c6b0bac5b0229214f1ca5c7b64077277e4929374dec44f910590053ad33ce93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6720-9528 ; 0000-0001-6764-9099 ; 0000-0002-3771-3691 ; 0000-0002-0030-3744 ; 0000-0002-3195-8794 ; 0000-0002-4250-4683 ; 0000-0003-1281-5859</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjgh.16139$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjgh.16139$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36740948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jo, Sang Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noh, Jin Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Boram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Ji Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Seung‐pyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jun‐young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Na, Hee Kyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeong Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kee Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Do Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Kee Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Ho June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Gin Hyug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hwoon‐Yong</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical outcomes of Dieulafoy's lesion compared with peptic ulcer in upper gastrointestinal bleeding</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Background and Aim Although Dieulafoy's lesion (DL) is an important cause of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, few studies have investigated the clinico‐epidemiological outcomes due to its rarity. Here, we investigated clinical features of upper GI bleeding caused by peptic ulcer (PU) or DL and compared endoscopic treatment outcomes. Methods Patients with upper GI bleeding resulting from PU or DL who visited emergency room between January 2013 and December 2017 were eligible. Clinical features and treatment outcomes were retrospectively investigated. Results Overall, 728 patients with upper GI bleeding due to PU (n = 669) and DL (n = 59) were enrolled. The median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56–75 years), and 74.3% were male. Endoscopic intervention was performed in 53.7% (n = 359) and 98.3% (n = 58) of the PU and DL groups, respectively (P &lt; 0.0001). Patients were matched by sex, age, body mass index, comorbidity, and past medical history, and 190 PU and 52 DL were finally selected. The rebleeding rates within 7 (7.37% vs 17.31%, P = 0.037) and 30 (7.37% vs 26.92%, P &lt; 0.001) days after initial endoscopy were significantly lower in the PU than in the DL group after propensity score matching. During the median follow‐up period of 52 months (IQR, 34–70 months), there was no difference in overall survival rate (67.9% vs 82.7%, P = 0.518). Conclusions Although DL is a rare cause of upper GI bleeding, it requires endoscopic hemostasis more frequently and has a higher rate of rebleeding than PU even after therapeutic endoscopy. Endoscopists should pay attention and perform active endoscopic hemostasis for DL bleeding.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Dieulafoy's lesion</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy</subject><subject>Hemostasis</subject><subject>Hemostasis, Endoscopic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>peptic ulcer</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer - complications</subject><subject>Peptic ulcers</subject><subject>rebleeding</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Ulcers</subject><subject>upper gastrointestinal bleeding</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotn4c_AMS8KAetk022U1zlKpVKXjR85LNzrYp6WZNdin990ZbPQjOZQbm4eHlReiCkhGNM14tliOaUyYP0JByThIqeH6IhmRCs0QyKgfoJIQVIYQTkR2jAcsFJ5JPhgim1jRGK4td32m3hoBdje8N9FbVbnsdsIVgXIPjr1UeKrwx3RK30HZG495q8Ng0uG_beCxU6LwzTQehM010lhagMs3iDB3VygY43-9T9P748DZ9Suavs-fp3TzRLGMyEROdl6RUOitJmsqU8ppqlWlR5jG4SIUALlPJBK9Ac15LSjJJSMZUxZgGyU7Rzc7bevfRxxTF2gQN1qoGXB-KaGCCyjwXEb36g65c72PoSE3STHJCKY_U7Y7S3oXgoS5ab9bKbwtKiq_ui9h98d19ZC_3xr5cQ_VL_pQdgfEO2BgL2_9Nxcvsaaf8BPsojT8</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Jo, Sang Yong</creator><creator>Noh, Jin Hee</creator><creator>Cha, Boram</creator><creator>Ahn, Ji Yong</creator><creator>Oh, Seung‐pyo</creator><creator>Seo, Jun‐young</creator><creator>Na, Hee Kyong</creator><creator>Lee, Jeong Hoon</creator><creator>Jung, Kee Wook</creator><creator>Kim, Do Hoon</creator><creator>Choi, Kee Don</creator><creator>Song, Ho June</creator><creator>Lee, Gin Hyug</creator><creator>Jung, Hwoon‐Yong</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6720-9528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6764-9099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3771-3691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0030-3744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-8794</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4250-4683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1281-5859</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Clinical outcomes of Dieulafoy's lesion compared with peptic ulcer in upper gastrointestinal bleeding</title><author>Jo, Sang Yong ; Noh, Jin Hee ; Cha, Boram ; Ahn, Ji Yong ; Oh, Seung‐pyo ; Seo, Jun‐young ; Na, Hee Kyong ; Lee, Jeong Hoon ; Jung, Kee Wook ; Kim, Do Hoon ; Choi, Kee Don ; Song, Ho June ; Lee, Gin Hyug ; Jung, Hwoon‐Yong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-78c6b0bac5b0229214f1ca5c7b64077277e4929374dec44f910590053ad33ce93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Dieulafoy's lesion</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy</topic><topic>Hemostasis</topic><topic>Hemostasis, Endoscopic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>peptic ulcer</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer - complications</topic><topic>Peptic ulcers</topic><topic>rebleeding</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Ulcers</topic><topic>upper gastrointestinal bleeding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jo, Sang Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noh, Jin Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Boram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Ji Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Seung‐pyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jun‐young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Na, Hee Kyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeong Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kee Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Do Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Kee Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Ho June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Gin Hyug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hwoon‐Yong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jo, Sang Yong</au><au>Noh, Jin Hee</au><au>Cha, Boram</au><au>Ahn, Ji Yong</au><au>Oh, Seung‐pyo</au><au>Seo, Jun‐young</au><au>Na, Hee Kyong</au><au>Lee, Jeong Hoon</au><au>Jung, Kee Wook</au><au>Kim, Do Hoon</au><au>Choi, Kee Don</au><au>Song, Ho June</au><au>Lee, Gin Hyug</au><au>Jung, Hwoon‐Yong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical outcomes of Dieulafoy's lesion compared with peptic ulcer in upper gastrointestinal bleeding</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>888</spage><epage>895</epage><pages>888-895</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Background and Aim Although Dieulafoy's lesion (DL) is an important cause of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, few studies have investigated the clinico‐epidemiological outcomes due to its rarity. Here, we investigated clinical features of upper GI bleeding caused by peptic ulcer (PU) or DL and compared endoscopic treatment outcomes. Methods Patients with upper GI bleeding resulting from PU or DL who visited emergency room between January 2013 and December 2017 were eligible. Clinical features and treatment outcomes were retrospectively investigated. Results Overall, 728 patients with upper GI bleeding due to PU (n = 669) and DL (n = 59) were enrolled. The median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56–75 years), and 74.3% were male. Endoscopic intervention was performed in 53.7% (n = 359) and 98.3% (n = 58) of the PU and DL groups, respectively (P &lt; 0.0001). Patients were matched by sex, age, body mass index, comorbidity, and past medical history, and 190 PU and 52 DL were finally selected. The rebleeding rates within 7 (7.37% vs 17.31%, P = 0.037) and 30 (7.37% vs 26.92%, P &lt; 0.001) days after initial endoscopy were significantly lower in the PU than in the DL group after propensity score matching. During the median follow‐up period of 52 months (IQR, 34–70 months), there was no difference in overall survival rate (67.9% vs 82.7%, P = 0.518). Conclusions Although DL is a rare cause of upper GI bleeding, it requires endoscopic hemostasis more frequently and has a higher rate of rebleeding than PU even after therapeutic endoscopy. Endoscopists should pay attention and perform active endoscopic hemostasis for DL bleeding.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36740948</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgh.16139</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6720-9528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6764-9099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3771-3691</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0030-3744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-8794</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4250-4683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1281-5859</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0815-9319
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2023-06, Vol.38 (6), p.888-895
issn 0815-9319
1440-1746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773719667
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Bleeding
Body mass index
Clinical outcomes
Comorbidity
Dieulafoy's lesion
Emergency medical care
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - adverse effects
Epidemiology
Female
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy
Hemostasis
Hemostasis, Endoscopic - adverse effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patients
peptic ulcer
Peptic Ulcer - complications
Peptic ulcers
rebleeding
Retrospective Studies
Ulcers
upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title Clinical outcomes of Dieulafoy's lesion compared with peptic ulcer in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A41%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20outcomes%20of%20Dieulafoy's%20lesion%20compared%20with%20peptic%20ulcer%20in%20upper%20gastrointestinal%20bleeding&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Jo,%20Sang%20Yong&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=888&rft.epage=895&rft.pages=888-895&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgh.16139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2825940114%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2825940114&rft_id=info:pmid/36740948&rfr_iscdi=true