Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
Background Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring is a commonly used strategy to reduce esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib). Objectives We sought to compare the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) between two commonly used esoph...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2023-11, Vol.66 (8), p.1827-1835 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1835 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1827 |
container_title | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Abdulsalam, Nashwa M. Sridhar, Arun M. Tregoning, Deanna M. He, Beixin J. Jafarvand, Mahbod Mehri, Avin Afroze, Tanzina Chahine, Yaacoub Ko, Cynthia W. Akoum, Nazem |
description | Background
Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring is a commonly used strategy to reduce esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib).
Objectives
We sought to compare the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) between two commonly used esophageal luminal temperature probes.
Methods
Consecutive patients undergoing ablation with esophageal luminal temperature monitoring and upper endoscopy within 24 h after ablation were included.
Results
Four hundred forty-five patients (64 ± 10 years, 44% female) were included. Esophageal temperature monitoring was done with a single-sensor probe in 213 (48%) and multi-sensor probe in 232 (52%). Cryoballoon (CB) ablation was performed in 118 (27%) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 327 (73%) of patients. EDEL was present in 94 (22.9%) of which 85 were mild, 8 were moderate, and 1 was severe, and none progressed to atrial-esophageal fistula. The use of the multi-sensor probe during CB ablation was associated with a reduction in EDEL compared to single sensor (6.8% vs 24.3%;
P
= 0.016). Similarly, in the RF ablation group, EDEL was present in 19.5% of the multi-sensor group vs 32.8% in the single-sensor group (
P
= 0.001). Logistic regression showed that multi-sensor probe use was associated with reduction in EDEL with an odds ratio of 0.23 in CB ablation (
P
= 0.024) and 0.44 for RF ablation (
P
= 0.001).
Conclusions
Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring during AFib ablation using a multi-sensor probe was associated with a significant reduction in EDEL compared to a single-sensor probe. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10840-023-01492-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773719094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2876182551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e2bb8bb93a4680f7d724d232e576dce11eda55ef9892acd5e9f60097f43e10693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsAv6J43iJqvIjVWIDa8tJxq0viR3GttB9KZ4RX1IoYsHGY1nfOTOe0zTPGX3NKFVvEqNDR1vKRUtZp3nLHjTnTCreDlLLh3_dz5onKR0opZry_nFzJnrVScG78-bHVYrbrb0Bu5ClrD7UmmHdAG0uCGSNweeIPtyQkk6nJWtZsm8ThBSRbBhHIEv8DphIvgWCPn0l0RG49_XhUPBYC5nwGIkNM0E7--gQvhUI05FMtkozILHjYrOPgbjqbTP6Knd-RL_s70-bR84uCZ7d1Yvmy7urz5cf2utP7z9evr1uJ6FkboGP4zCOWtiuH6hTs-LdzAUHqfp5AsZgtlKC04PmdpolaNfX5SjXCWC01-KiebX71v_VGVM2q08T1CkCxJIMV0oopqnuKvryH_QQC9Y9VmpQPRu4lKxSfKcmjCkhOLOhXy0eDaPmlKbZ0zQ1TfMrTXMSvbizLuMK8x_J7_gqIHYgbaeIAO97_8f2J2Jvryw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2876182551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Abdulsalam, Nashwa M. ; Sridhar, Arun M. ; Tregoning, Deanna M. ; He, Beixin J. ; Jafarvand, Mahbod ; Mehri, Avin ; Afroze, Tanzina ; Chahine, Yaacoub ; Ko, Cynthia W. ; Akoum, Nazem</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdulsalam, Nashwa M. ; Sridhar, Arun M. ; Tregoning, Deanna M. ; He, Beixin J. ; Jafarvand, Mahbod ; Mehri, Avin ; Afroze, Tanzina ; Chahine, Yaacoub ; Ko, Cynthia W. ; Akoum, Nazem</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring is a commonly used strategy to reduce esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib).
Objectives
We sought to compare the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) between two commonly used esophageal luminal temperature probes.
Methods
Consecutive patients undergoing ablation with esophageal luminal temperature monitoring and upper endoscopy within 24 h after ablation were included.
Results
Four hundred forty-five patients (64 ± 10 years, 44% female) were included. Esophageal temperature monitoring was done with a single-sensor probe in 213 (48%) and multi-sensor probe in 232 (52%). Cryoballoon (CB) ablation was performed in 118 (27%) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 327 (73%) of patients. EDEL was present in 94 (22.9%) of which 85 were mild, 8 were moderate, and 1 was severe, and none progressed to atrial-esophageal fistula. The use of the multi-sensor probe during CB ablation was associated with a reduction in EDEL compared to single sensor (6.8% vs 24.3%;
P
= 0.016). Similarly, in the RF ablation group, EDEL was present in 19.5% of the multi-sensor group vs 32.8% in the single-sensor group (
P
= 0.001). Logistic regression showed that multi-sensor probe use was associated with reduction in EDEL with an odds ratio of 0.23 in CB ablation (
P
= 0.024) and 0.44 for RF ablation (
P
= 0.001).
Conclusions
Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring during AFib ablation using a multi-sensor probe was associated with a significant reduction in EDEL compared to a single-sensor probe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-8595</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1383-875X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8595</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01492-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36745324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiology ; Catheters ; Endoscopy ; Esophagus ; Fibrillation ; Health risks ; Injury prevention ; Medical instruments ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Monitoring ; Radio frequency ; Radiofrequency ablation ; Sensors ; Thermal injury</subject><ispartof>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 2023-11, Vol.66 (8), p.1827-1835</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e2bb8bb93a4680f7d724d232e576dce11eda55ef9892acd5e9f60097f43e10693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e2bb8bb93a4680f7d724d232e576dce11eda55ef9892acd5e9f60097f43e10693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9045-0501</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10840-023-01492-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10840-023-01492-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745324$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdulsalam, Nashwa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sridhar, Arun M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tregoning, Deanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Beixin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafarvand, Mahbod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehri, Avin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afroze, Tanzina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Yaacoub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Cynthia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akoum, Nazem</creatorcontrib><title>Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation</title><title>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Background
Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring is a commonly used strategy to reduce esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib).
Objectives
We sought to compare the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) between two commonly used esophageal luminal temperature probes.
Methods
Consecutive patients undergoing ablation with esophageal luminal temperature monitoring and upper endoscopy within 24 h after ablation were included.
Results
Four hundred forty-five patients (64 ± 10 years, 44% female) were included. Esophageal temperature monitoring was done with a single-sensor probe in 213 (48%) and multi-sensor probe in 232 (52%). Cryoballoon (CB) ablation was performed in 118 (27%) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 327 (73%) of patients. EDEL was present in 94 (22.9%) of which 85 were mild, 8 were moderate, and 1 was severe, and none progressed to atrial-esophageal fistula. The use of the multi-sensor probe during CB ablation was associated with a reduction in EDEL compared to single sensor (6.8% vs 24.3%;
P
= 0.016). Similarly, in the RF ablation group, EDEL was present in 19.5% of the multi-sensor group vs 32.8% in the single-sensor group (
P
= 0.001). Logistic regression showed that multi-sensor probe use was associated with reduction in EDEL with an odds ratio of 0.23 in CB ablation (
P
= 0.024) and 0.44 for RF ablation (
P
= 0.001).
Conclusions
Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring during AFib ablation using a multi-sensor probe was associated with a significant reduction in EDEL compared to a single-sensor probe.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Fibrillation</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Medical instruments</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><subject>Radiofrequency ablation</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Thermal injury</subject><issn>1572-8595</issn><issn>1383-875X</issn><issn>1572-8595</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTZsAv6J43iJqvIjVWIDa8tJxq0viR3GttB9KZ4RX1IoYsHGY1nfOTOe0zTPGX3NKFVvEqNDR1vKRUtZp3nLHjTnTCreDlLLh3_dz5onKR0opZry_nFzJnrVScG78-bHVYrbrb0Bu5ClrD7UmmHdAG0uCGSNweeIPtyQkk6nJWtZsm8ThBSRbBhHIEv8DphIvgWCPn0l0RG49_XhUPBYC5nwGIkNM0E7--gQvhUI05FMtkozILHjYrOPgbjqbTP6Knd-RL_s70-bR84uCZ7d1Yvmy7urz5cf2utP7z9evr1uJ6FkboGP4zCOWtiuH6hTs-LdzAUHqfp5AsZgtlKC04PmdpolaNfX5SjXCWC01-KiebX71v_VGVM2q08T1CkCxJIMV0oopqnuKvryH_QQC9Y9VmpQPRu4lKxSfKcmjCkhOLOhXy0eDaPmlKbZ0zQ1TfMrTXMSvbizLuMK8x_J7_gqIHYgbaeIAO97_8f2J2Jvryw</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Abdulsalam, Nashwa M.</creator><creator>Sridhar, Arun M.</creator><creator>Tregoning, Deanna M.</creator><creator>He, Beixin J.</creator><creator>Jafarvand, Mahbod</creator><creator>Mehri, Avin</creator><creator>Afroze, Tanzina</creator><creator>Chahine, Yaacoub</creator><creator>Ko, Cynthia W.</creator><creator>Akoum, Nazem</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9045-0501</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation</title><author>Abdulsalam, Nashwa M. ; Sridhar, Arun M. ; Tregoning, Deanna M. ; He, Beixin J. ; Jafarvand, Mahbod ; Mehri, Avin ; Afroze, Tanzina ; Chahine, Yaacoub ; Ko, Cynthia W. ; Akoum, Nazem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-e2bb8bb93a4680f7d724d232e576dce11eda55ef9892acd5e9f60097f43e10693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Fibrillation</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Medical instruments</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><topic>Radiofrequency ablation</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Thermal injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdulsalam, Nashwa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sridhar, Arun M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tregoning, Deanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Beixin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jafarvand, Mahbod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehri, Avin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afroze, Tanzina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chahine, Yaacoub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Cynthia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akoum, Nazem</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdulsalam, Nashwa M.</au><au>Sridhar, Arun M.</au><au>Tregoning, Deanna M.</au><au>He, Beixin J.</au><au>Jafarvand, Mahbod</au><au>Mehri, Avin</au><au>Afroze, Tanzina</au><au>Chahine, Yaacoub</au><au>Ko, Cynthia W.</au><au>Akoum, Nazem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</jtitle><stitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</stitle><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1827</spage><epage>1835</epage><pages>1827-1835</pages><issn>1572-8595</issn><issn>1383-875X</issn><eissn>1572-8595</eissn><abstract>Background
Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring is a commonly used strategy to reduce esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFib).
Objectives
We sought to compare the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) between two commonly used esophageal luminal temperature probes.
Methods
Consecutive patients undergoing ablation with esophageal luminal temperature monitoring and upper endoscopy within 24 h after ablation were included.
Results
Four hundred forty-five patients (64 ± 10 years, 44% female) were included. Esophageal temperature monitoring was done with a single-sensor probe in 213 (48%) and multi-sensor probe in 232 (52%). Cryoballoon (CB) ablation was performed in 118 (27%) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in 327 (73%) of patients. EDEL was present in 94 (22.9%) of which 85 were mild, 8 were moderate, and 1 was severe, and none progressed to atrial-esophageal fistula. The use of the multi-sensor probe during CB ablation was associated with a reduction in EDEL compared to single sensor (6.8% vs 24.3%;
P
= 0.016). Similarly, in the RF ablation group, EDEL was present in 19.5% of the multi-sensor group vs 32.8% in the single-sensor group (
P
= 0.001). Logistic regression showed that multi-sensor probe use was associated with reduction in EDEL with an odds ratio of 0.23 in CB ablation (
P
= 0.024) and 0.44 for RF ablation (
P
= 0.001).
Conclusions
Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring during AFib ablation using a multi-sensor probe was associated with a significant reduction in EDEL compared to a single-sensor probe.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>36745324</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10840-023-01492-1</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9045-0501</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1572-8595 |
ispartof | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 2023-11, Vol.66 (8), p.1827-1835 |
issn | 1572-8595 1383-875X 1572-8595 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773719094 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Ablation Cardiac arrhythmia Cardiology Catheters Endoscopy Esophagus Fibrillation Health risks Injury prevention Medical instruments Medicine Medicine & Public Health Monitoring Radio frequency Radiofrequency ablation Sensors Thermal injury |
title | Esophageal luminal temperature monitoring using a multi-sensor probe lowers the risk of esophageal injury in cryo and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T02%3A05%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Esophageal%20luminal%20temperature%20monitoring%20using%20a%20multi-sensor%20probe%20lowers%20the%20risk%20of%20esophageal%20injury%20in%20cryo%20and%20radiofrequency%20catheter%20ablation%20for%20atrial%20fibrillation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interventional%20cardiac%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Abdulsalam,%20Nashwa%20M.&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1827&rft.epage=1835&rft.pages=1827-1835&rft.issn=1572-8595&rft.eissn=1572-8595&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10840-023-01492-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2876182551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2876182551&rft_id=info:pmid/36745324&rfr_iscdi=true |