Management of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Large Sagittal Split Advancements: To Free or Not?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether neurosensory recovery of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is influenced by its location following sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) in patients undergoing large mandibular movements. This was a prospective, split-mouth study of skeletally mature patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2023-07, Vol.152 (2), p.167-170
Hauptverfasser: Massenburg, Benjamin B., Tolley, Philip D., Ettinger, Russell E., Susarla, Srinivas M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 170
container_issue 2
container_start_page 167
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 152
creator Massenburg, Benjamin B.
Tolley, Philip D.
Ettinger, Russell E.
Susarla, Srinivas M.
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether neurosensory recovery of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is influenced by its location following sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) in patients undergoing large mandibular movements. This was a prospective, split-mouth study of skeletally mature patients undergoing bilateral SSO. Patients were included as study subjects if they underwent bilateral SSO for mandibular advancement greater than 10 mm and, following the splits, the IAN was freely entering the distal segment on one side and within the proximal segment on the other. Descriptive, bivariate, and Kaplan-Meier statistics were computed. The study sample included 13 subjects (eight female subjects; mean age, 18.7 ± 1.8 years) undergoing 26 SSOs. Eleven subjects underwent bimaxillary surgery; 10 had simultaneous genioplasty. The mean mandibular movement was 12.2 ± 1.4 mm and was not significantly different between sides ( P = 0.43). All subjects achieved functional sensory recovery (FSR) bilaterally within 1 year of surgery. There was no difference in the median times to FSR based on the location of the IAN (distal segment, 105 days, versus proximal segment, 126 days; P = 0.57). In SSO for mandibular advancement with movements greater than 10 mm, leaving the IAN within the proximal segment may not impact time to FSR. Risk, II.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010280
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773126184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2773126184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-2bce962846eab2e4e72485f8f5e426637e26664b7ffe3b12509fd4d95d2054af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkG9rFDEQxoNU7Fn9BqXkZd9sTSb_dvumHMVq4azi1dchuzu52za3OZPcFb-9a1stODAzDDzPM_Aj5JizM84a8-Hb9-UZeynOoGavyIwraCoJEg7IjDEBFWcKDsnbnO8mkRFavSGHQhuhai5nxH5xo1vhBsdCo6dljfR69JiGmOg87DEGl-gNpj3SYaQLl1ZIl241lOICXW7DUOi837uxe4zI5_Q20quESCf_TSwX78hr70LG98_7iPy4-nh7-blafP10fTlfVJ1QoCpoO2w01FKjawElGpC18rVXKEFrYXCaWrbGexQtB8Ua38u-UT0wJZ0XR-T0KXeb4s8d5mI3Q-4wBDdi3GULxggOmtdyksonaZdizgm93aZh49Ivy5n9g9ZOaO3_aCfbyfOHXbvB_p_pL8uX3IcYCqZ8H3YPmOwaXSjrxzythKyAgWBmuqqphRK_Ad-ngkU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773126184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Large Sagittal Split Advancements: To Free or Not?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Massenburg, Benjamin B. ; Tolley, Philip D. ; Ettinger, Russell E. ; Susarla, Srinivas M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Massenburg, Benjamin B. ; Tolley, Philip D. ; Ettinger, Russell E. ; Susarla, Srinivas M.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether neurosensory recovery of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is influenced by its location following sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) in patients undergoing large mandibular movements. This was a prospective, split-mouth study of skeletally mature patients undergoing bilateral SSO. Patients were included as study subjects if they underwent bilateral SSO for mandibular advancement greater than 10 mm and, following the splits, the IAN was freely entering the distal segment on one side and within the proximal segment on the other. Descriptive, bivariate, and Kaplan-Meier statistics were computed. The study sample included 13 subjects (eight female subjects; mean age, 18.7 ± 1.8 years) undergoing 26 SSOs. Eleven subjects underwent bimaxillary surgery; 10 had simultaneous genioplasty. The mean mandibular movement was 12.2 ± 1.4 mm and was not significantly different between sides ( P = 0.43). All subjects achieved functional sensory recovery (FSR) bilaterally within 1 year of surgery. There was no difference in the median times to FSR based on the location of the IAN (distal segment, 105 days, versus proximal segment, 126 days; P = 0.57). In SSO for mandibular advancement with movements greater than 10 mm, leaving the IAN within the proximal segment may not impact time to FSR. Risk, II.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010280</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36735814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Genioplasty ; Humans ; Mandible - surgery ; Mandibular Nerve - surgery ; Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus ; Prospective Studies ; Trigeminal Nerve Injuries ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2023-07, Vol.152 (2), p.167-170</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-2bce962846eab2e4e72485f8f5e426637e26664b7ffe3b12509fd4d95d2054af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-2bce962846eab2e4e72485f8f5e426637e26664b7ffe3b12509fd4d95d2054af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735814$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Massenburg, Benjamin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolley, Philip D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettinger, Russell E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susarla, Srinivas M.</creatorcontrib><title>Management of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Large Sagittal Split Advancements: To Free or Not?</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether neurosensory recovery of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is influenced by its location following sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) in patients undergoing large mandibular movements. This was a prospective, split-mouth study of skeletally mature patients undergoing bilateral SSO. Patients were included as study subjects if they underwent bilateral SSO for mandibular advancement greater than 10 mm and, following the splits, the IAN was freely entering the distal segment on one side and within the proximal segment on the other. Descriptive, bivariate, and Kaplan-Meier statistics were computed. The study sample included 13 subjects (eight female subjects; mean age, 18.7 ± 1.8 years) undergoing 26 SSOs. Eleven subjects underwent bimaxillary surgery; 10 had simultaneous genioplasty. The mean mandibular movement was 12.2 ± 1.4 mm and was not significantly different between sides ( P = 0.43). All subjects achieved functional sensory recovery (FSR) bilaterally within 1 year of surgery. There was no difference in the median times to FSR based on the location of the IAN (distal segment, 105 days, versus proximal segment, 126 days; P = 0.57). In SSO for mandibular advancement with movements greater than 10 mm, leaving the IAN within the proximal segment may not impact time to FSR. Risk, II.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genioplasty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Mandibular Nerve - surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Trigeminal Nerve Injuries</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkG9rFDEQxoNU7Fn9BqXkZd9sTSb_dvumHMVq4azi1dchuzu52za3OZPcFb-9a1stODAzDDzPM_Aj5JizM84a8-Hb9-UZeynOoGavyIwraCoJEg7IjDEBFWcKDsnbnO8mkRFavSGHQhuhai5nxH5xo1vhBsdCo6dljfR69JiGmOg87DEGl-gNpj3SYaQLl1ZIl241lOICXW7DUOi837uxe4zI5_Q20quESCf_TSwX78hr70LG98_7iPy4-nh7-blafP10fTlfVJ1QoCpoO2w01FKjawElGpC18rVXKEFrYXCaWrbGexQtB8Ua38u-UT0wJZ0XR-T0KXeb4s8d5mI3Q-4wBDdi3GULxggOmtdyksonaZdizgm93aZh49Ivy5n9g9ZOaO3_aCfbyfOHXbvB_p_pL8uX3IcYCqZ8H3YPmOwaXSjrxzythKyAgWBmuqqphRK_Ad-ngkU</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Massenburg, Benjamin B.</creator><creator>Tolley, Philip D.</creator><creator>Ettinger, Russell E.</creator><creator>Susarla, Srinivas M.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Management of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Large Sagittal Split Advancements: To Free or Not?</title><author>Massenburg, Benjamin B. ; Tolley, Philip D. ; Ettinger, Russell E. ; Susarla, Srinivas M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-2bce962846eab2e4e72485f8f5e426637e26664b7ffe3b12509fd4d95d2054af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genioplasty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Mandibular Nerve - surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Trigeminal Nerve Injuries</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Massenburg, Benjamin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolley, Philip D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettinger, Russell E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susarla, Srinivas M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Massenburg, Benjamin B.</au><au>Tolley, Philip D.</au><au>Ettinger, Russell E.</au><au>Susarla, Srinivas M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Large Sagittal Split Advancements: To Free or Not?</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>167-170</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether neurosensory recovery of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is influenced by its location following sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) in patients undergoing large mandibular movements. This was a prospective, split-mouth study of skeletally mature patients undergoing bilateral SSO. Patients were included as study subjects if they underwent bilateral SSO for mandibular advancement greater than 10 mm and, following the splits, the IAN was freely entering the distal segment on one side and within the proximal segment on the other. Descriptive, bivariate, and Kaplan-Meier statistics were computed. The study sample included 13 subjects (eight female subjects; mean age, 18.7 ± 1.8 years) undergoing 26 SSOs. Eleven subjects underwent bimaxillary surgery; 10 had simultaneous genioplasty. The mean mandibular movement was 12.2 ± 1.4 mm and was not significantly different between sides ( P = 0.43). All subjects achieved functional sensory recovery (FSR) bilaterally within 1 year of surgery. There was no difference in the median times to FSR based on the location of the IAN (distal segment, 105 days, versus proximal segment, 126 days; P = 0.57). In SSO for mandibular advancement with movements greater than 10 mm, leaving the IAN within the proximal segment may not impact time to FSR. Risk, II.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>36735814</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000010280</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2023-07, Vol.152 (2), p.167-170
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773126184
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Female
Genioplasty
Humans
Mandible - surgery
Mandibular Nerve - surgery
Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus
Prospective Studies
Trigeminal Nerve Injuries
Young Adult
title Management of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Large Sagittal Split Advancements: To Free or Not?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T10%3A05%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20the%20Inferior%20Alveolar%20Nerve%20in%20Large%20Sagittal%20Split%20Advancements:%20To%20Free%20or%20Not?&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Massenburg,%20Benjamin%20B.&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=167-170&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2773126184%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773126184&rft_id=info:pmid/36735814&rfr_iscdi=true