Inhibition of Motor Planning and Response Selection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The purpose of this study is to compare cortical motor planning activity during response selection and motor execution processes between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured controls during a reaction time and response selection task. Individuals with ACLR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2023-03, Vol.55 (3), p.440-449
Hauptverfasser: SHERMAN, DAVID A., BAUMEISTER, JOCHEN, STOCK, MATT S., MURRAY, AMANDA M., BAZETT-JONES, DAVID M., NORTE, GRANT E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 449
container_issue 3
container_start_page 440
container_title Medicine and science in sports and exercise
container_volume 55
creator SHERMAN, DAVID A.
BAUMEISTER, JOCHEN
STOCK, MATT S.
MURRAY, AMANDA M.
BAZETT-JONES, DAVID M.
NORTE, GRANT E.
description The purpose of this study is to compare cortical motor planning activity during response selection and motor execution processes between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured controls during a reaction time and response selection task. Individuals with ACLR ( n = 20) and controls ( n = 20) performed a lateralized choice reaction time (e.g., Go/NoGo) task. Electrocortical activity and reaction time were recorded concurrently using electroencephalography and inertial measurement units. Separate stimulus locked and response-locked event-related potentials were computed for each limb. The lateralized readiness potential (LRP) was computed as the interhemispheric differences between waveforms and the mean LRP area and onset latency were recorded. Active motor threshold was determined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Differences between groups (ACLR vs control) and limbs (involved vs uninvolved) and the associations between LRP characteristics and response performance (number of errors) were assessed. Participants with ACLR have had smaller LRP area during periods of response selection ( P = 0.043, d = 0.4) and motor execution ( P = 0.015, d = 0.5) and committed more errors in both Go ( P < 0.001, d = 0.8) and NoGo ( P = 0.032, d = 0.5) response conditions. There were no differences in latency of response selection or motor execution. Participants with ACLR had higher active motor thresholds ( P < 0.001, d = 1.3) than controls, which was weakly associated with smaller LRP areas ( r = 0.32-0.42, P < 0.05). The ACLR group demonstrated greater motor planning and response inhibition during a choice reaction time task. More errant performance also suggests poorer decision making in the presence of a "speed-accuracy" trade-off. Key features of the sample, including lower corticospinal excitability, lend support to an interpretation of widespread cortical inhibition contributing to impairments in response selection and motor execution.
doi_str_mv 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003072
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773125438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2773125438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3521-32104b23acdbf8f80ffbcfb49723031d6d1f47aa89d63975ed5b88f306b187ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF9r2zAUxcXYWNNs32AMP-7Fqa6ubdmPJXRtIWWj6Z6NLF816hwplWzCvn2V_mcC6SLxO0ecw9g34AsQRXNytV4v-LuFXIoPbAYl8pwjlB_ZjENT5g0gHLHjGO8SJBHhMzvCSiJw4DOmL93Gdna03mXeZFd-9CH7PSjnrLvNlOuza4o77yJlaxpIP4LKjBSyU5dOm_BlmLRVI2Ure6u25Mak0UkypvcD_4V9MmqI9PV5ztmfn2c3y4t89ev8cnm6yjWWAnIUwItOoNJ9Z2pTc2M6bbqikQJToL7qwRRSqbrpK2xkSX3Z1bVBXnVQS0U4Zz-efHfB308Ux3Zro6YhpSE_xVbIlFqUBdYJLZ5QHXyMgUy7C3arwr8WeHuot031tv_Xm2Tfn3-Yui31r6KXPt98935I7cS_w7Sn0G5IDePm0a-UVZ0LfoiUbnnaAPgA3zSF7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773125438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inhibition of Motor Planning and Response Selection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>SHERMAN, DAVID A. ; BAUMEISTER, JOCHEN ; STOCK, MATT S. ; MURRAY, AMANDA M. ; BAZETT-JONES, DAVID M. ; NORTE, GRANT E.</creator><creatorcontrib>SHERMAN, DAVID A. ; BAUMEISTER, JOCHEN ; STOCK, MATT S. ; MURRAY, AMANDA M. ; BAZETT-JONES, DAVID M. ; NORTE, GRANT E.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study is to compare cortical motor planning activity during response selection and motor execution processes between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured controls during a reaction time and response selection task. Individuals with ACLR ( n = 20) and controls ( n = 20) performed a lateralized choice reaction time (e.g., Go/NoGo) task. Electrocortical activity and reaction time were recorded concurrently using electroencephalography and inertial measurement units. Separate stimulus locked and response-locked event-related potentials were computed for each limb. The lateralized readiness potential (LRP) was computed as the interhemispheric differences between waveforms and the mean LRP area and onset latency were recorded. Active motor threshold was determined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Differences between groups (ACLR vs control) and limbs (involved vs uninvolved) and the associations between LRP characteristics and response performance (number of errors) were assessed. Participants with ACLR have had smaller LRP area during periods of response selection ( P = 0.043, d = 0.4) and motor execution ( P = 0.015, d = 0.5) and committed more errors in both Go ( P &lt; 0.001, d = 0.8) and NoGo ( P = 0.032, d = 0.5) response conditions. There were no differences in latency of response selection or motor execution. Participants with ACLR had higher active motor thresholds ( P &lt; 0.001, d = 1.3) than controls, which was weakly associated with smaller LRP areas ( r = 0.32-0.42, P &lt; 0.05). The ACLR group demonstrated greater motor planning and response inhibition during a choice reaction time task. More errant performance also suggests poorer decision making in the presence of a "speed-accuracy" trade-off. Key features of the sample, including lower corticospinal excitability, lend support to an interpretation of widespread cortical inhibition contributing to impairments in response selection and motor execution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36731010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ; Evoked Potentials ; Humans ; Reaction Time ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</subject><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2023-03, Vol.55 (3), p.440-449</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Sports Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3521-32104b23acdbf8f80ffbcfb49723031d6d1f47aa89d63975ed5b88f306b187ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3521-32104b23acdbf8f80ffbcfb49723031d6d1f47aa89d63975ed5b88f306b187ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00005768-202303000-00011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4595,27901,27902,65434</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36731010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHERMAN, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUMEISTER, JOCHEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOCK, MATT S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURRAY, AMANDA M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAZETT-JONES, DAVID M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NORTE, GRANT E.</creatorcontrib><title>Inhibition of Motor Planning and Response Selection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study is to compare cortical motor planning activity during response selection and motor execution processes between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured controls during a reaction time and response selection task. Individuals with ACLR ( n = 20) and controls ( n = 20) performed a lateralized choice reaction time (e.g., Go/NoGo) task. Electrocortical activity and reaction time were recorded concurrently using electroencephalography and inertial measurement units. Separate stimulus locked and response-locked event-related potentials were computed for each limb. The lateralized readiness potential (LRP) was computed as the interhemispheric differences between waveforms and the mean LRP area and onset latency were recorded. Active motor threshold was determined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Differences between groups (ACLR vs control) and limbs (involved vs uninvolved) and the associations between LRP characteristics and response performance (number of errors) were assessed. Participants with ACLR have had smaller LRP area during periods of response selection ( P = 0.043, d = 0.4) and motor execution ( P = 0.015, d = 0.5) and committed more errors in both Go ( P &lt; 0.001, d = 0.8) and NoGo ( P = 0.032, d = 0.5) response conditions. There were no differences in latency of response selection or motor execution. Participants with ACLR had higher active motor thresholds ( P &lt; 0.001, d = 1.3) than controls, which was weakly associated with smaller LRP areas ( r = 0.32-0.42, P &lt; 0.05). The ACLR group demonstrated greater motor planning and response inhibition during a choice reaction time task. More errant performance also suggests poorer decision making in the presence of a "speed-accuracy" trade-off. Key features of the sample, including lower corticospinal excitability, lend support to an interpretation of widespread cortical inhibition contributing to impairments in response selection and motor execution.</description><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</subject><issn>0195-9131</issn><issn>1530-0315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF9r2zAUxcXYWNNs32AMP-7Fqa6ubdmPJXRtIWWj6Z6NLF816hwplWzCvn2V_mcC6SLxO0ecw9g34AsQRXNytV4v-LuFXIoPbAYl8pwjlB_ZjENT5g0gHLHjGO8SJBHhMzvCSiJw4DOmL93Gdna03mXeZFd-9CH7PSjnrLvNlOuza4o77yJlaxpIP4LKjBSyU5dOm_BlmLRVI2Ure6u25Mak0UkypvcD_4V9MmqI9PV5ztmfn2c3y4t89ev8cnm6yjWWAnIUwItOoNJ9Z2pTc2M6bbqikQJToL7qwRRSqbrpK2xkSX3Z1bVBXnVQS0U4Zz-efHfB308Ux3Zro6YhpSE_xVbIlFqUBdYJLZ5QHXyMgUy7C3arwr8WeHuot031tv_Xm2Tfn3-Yui31r6KXPt98935I7cS_w7Sn0G5IDePm0a-UVZ0LfoiUbnnaAPgA3zSF7A</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>SHERMAN, DAVID A.</creator><creator>BAUMEISTER, JOCHEN</creator><creator>STOCK, MATT S.</creator><creator>MURRAY, AMANDA M.</creator><creator>BAZETT-JONES, DAVID M.</creator><creator>NORTE, GRANT E.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Inhibition of Motor Planning and Response Selection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</title><author>SHERMAN, DAVID A. ; BAUMEISTER, JOCHEN ; STOCK, MATT S. ; MURRAY, AMANDA M. ; BAZETT-JONES, DAVID M. ; NORTE, GRANT E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3521-32104b23acdbf8f80ffbcfb49723031d6d1f47aa89d63975ed5b88f306b187ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHERMAN, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAUMEISTER, JOCHEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOCK, MATT S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURRAY, AMANDA M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAZETT-JONES, DAVID M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NORTE, GRANT E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHERMAN, DAVID A.</au><au>BAUMEISTER, JOCHEN</au><au>STOCK, MATT S.</au><au>MURRAY, AMANDA M.</au><au>BAZETT-JONES, DAVID M.</au><au>NORTE, GRANT E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inhibition of Motor Planning and Response Selection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>440</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>440-449</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><eissn>1530-0315</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study is to compare cortical motor planning activity during response selection and motor execution processes between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured controls during a reaction time and response selection task. Individuals with ACLR ( n = 20) and controls ( n = 20) performed a lateralized choice reaction time (e.g., Go/NoGo) task. Electrocortical activity and reaction time were recorded concurrently using electroencephalography and inertial measurement units. Separate stimulus locked and response-locked event-related potentials were computed for each limb. The lateralized readiness potential (LRP) was computed as the interhemispheric differences between waveforms and the mean LRP area and onset latency were recorded. Active motor threshold was determined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Differences between groups (ACLR vs control) and limbs (involved vs uninvolved) and the associations between LRP characteristics and response performance (number of errors) were assessed. Participants with ACLR have had smaller LRP area during periods of response selection ( P = 0.043, d = 0.4) and motor execution ( P = 0.015, d = 0.5) and committed more errors in both Go ( P &lt; 0.001, d = 0.8) and NoGo ( P = 0.032, d = 0.5) response conditions. There were no differences in latency of response selection or motor execution. Participants with ACLR had higher active motor thresholds ( P &lt; 0.001, d = 1.3) than controls, which was weakly associated with smaller LRP areas ( r = 0.32-0.42, P &lt; 0.05). The ACLR group demonstrated greater motor planning and response inhibition during a choice reaction time task. More errant performance also suggests poorer decision making in the presence of a "speed-accuracy" trade-off. Key features of the sample, including lower corticospinal excitability, lend support to an interpretation of widespread cortical inhibition contributing to impairments in response selection and motor execution.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>36731010</pmid><doi>10.1249/MSS.0000000000003072</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-9131
ispartof Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2023-03, Vol.55 (3), p.440-449
issn 0195-9131
1530-0315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773125438
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Evoked Potentials
Humans
Reaction Time
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
title Inhibition of Motor Planning and Response Selection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A55%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inhibition%20of%20Motor%20Planning%20and%20Response%20Selection%20after%20Anterior%20Cruciate%20Ligament%20Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=SHERMAN,%20DAVID%20A.&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=440&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=440-449&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft.eissn=1530-0315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2773125438%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773125438&rft_id=info:pmid/36731010&rfr_iscdi=true