Comparison of Patient and Provider Practices between Bone Marrow and Solid Organ Transplantation Programs for Patient Education on Increased Risk of Skin Cancer
•Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy post-transplantation are at risk for skin cancer.•Although recipients are aware of skin cancer risk, many do not practice sun safety.•Most transplant recipients have never had a full body skin exam.•Recommendations for timing of full body skin exams diff...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation and cellular therapy 2023-07, Vol.29 (7), p.466.e1-466.e7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 466.e7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 466.e1 |
container_title | Transplantation and cellular therapy |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Shope, Chelsea Andrews, Laura Atherton, Kelly Ritter, Alexandra LaPorte, Margaret Wine Lee, Lara |
description | •Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy post-transplantation are at risk for skin cancer.•Although recipients are aware of skin cancer risk, many do not practice sun safety.•Most transplant recipients have never had a full body skin exam.•Recommendations for timing of full body skin exams differ by provider type.
Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy following transplantation are at risk for skin cancer owing to dampened tumor surveillance. As long-term immunotherapy is necessary to prevent graft rejection, transplantation providers and recipients are expected to perform regular surveillance for the development of suspicious lesions, and recipients are encouraged to practice preventative sun safe behaviors. No consensus exists regarding the timing of full body skin exams, and despite the well-established risk, patient education is not always prioritized. We investigated whether differences exist between bone marrow transplant (BMT) and organ transplant (OT) recipients and their providers regarding prevention and screening. We distributed surveys to adult and pediatric BMT and OT recipients, as well as their providers, at a single academic institution. Results were evaluated using the chi-square test. The survey results show that most BMT recipients (69%) and OT recipients (77%) were aware of their increased risk for skin cancer, but despite this knowledge, only 13% of patients overall reported using sunscreen, 29% reported reapplying sunscreen, and 48% reported wearing sun protective clothing. Most OT recipients (63%) reported never having a total body skin exam, whereas only 34% BMT recipients reported having a total body skin exam every 6 months (P = .006). BMT providers recommended a total body skin exam every 6 or 12 months (44.4% each), and OT providers recommended a total body skin exam every 12 months (58.3%). Only 11.1% of BMT providers and 8.3% of OT providers reported performing a total body skin exam at each visit. Despite results indicating widespread patient knowledge of skin cancer risk, most patients do not practice adequate prevention. Inclusion of a transplantation dermatologist in the care team or use of risk stratification tools by providers may help streamline timely referrals to Dermatology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.01.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773124398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S266663672300060X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2773124398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9dc0931cc84169d8ac139a5632dbe03255b160e0db70dea4475aa286995e4cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9uFDEMxiMEolXpC3BAOXLZIX9mMjsSF1gVqFTUipZz5Ek8VbY7yeJkW_E2PCpZtlSckCLZcT7_FPtj7LUUjRTSvFs36-JKo4TSjZCNUOoZO1bGmIXRpn_-T37ETnNeCyFUq4XU4iU7qlVt6u2Y_VqleQsUcoo8TfwKSsBYOETPryjdB49UE3AlOMx8xPKAGPnHFJF_BaL08Ed6nTbB80u6hchvCGLebiCWyqrUirklmDOfEj3xz_zOHZ7rOY-OEDJ6_i3ku_03ru9C5CuIDukVezHBJuPpYzxh3z-d3ay-LC4uP5-vPlwsnO5MWcDgnRi0dG7ZSjP4JTipB-iMVn5EoVXXjdIIFH7shUdo274DUEszDB22btIn7O2Bu6X0Y4e52Dlkh5s6CKZdtqrvtawbHJZVqg5SRylnwsluKcxAP60Udm-OXdu9OXZvjhXSVnNq05tH_m6c0T-1_LWiCt4fBFinvA9INru6K4c-EFaYT-F__N8DLqJU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773124398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Patient and Provider Practices between Bone Marrow and Solid Organ Transplantation Programs for Patient Education on Increased Risk of Skin Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shope, Chelsea ; Andrews, Laura ; Atherton, Kelly ; Ritter, Alexandra ; LaPorte, Margaret ; Wine Lee, Lara</creator><creatorcontrib>Shope, Chelsea ; Andrews, Laura ; Atherton, Kelly ; Ritter, Alexandra ; LaPorte, Margaret ; Wine Lee, Lara</creatorcontrib><description>•Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy post-transplantation are at risk for skin cancer.•Although recipients are aware of skin cancer risk, many do not practice sun safety.•Most transplant recipients have never had a full body skin exam.•Recommendations for timing of full body skin exams differ by provider type.
Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy following transplantation are at risk for skin cancer owing to dampened tumor surveillance. As long-term immunotherapy is necessary to prevent graft rejection, transplantation providers and recipients are expected to perform regular surveillance for the development of suspicious lesions, and recipients are encouraged to practice preventative sun safe behaviors. No consensus exists regarding the timing of full body skin exams, and despite the well-established risk, patient education is not always prioritized. We investigated whether differences exist between bone marrow transplant (BMT) and organ transplant (OT) recipients and their providers regarding prevention and screening. We distributed surveys to adult and pediatric BMT and OT recipients, as well as their providers, at a single academic institution. Results were evaluated using the chi-square test. The survey results show that most BMT recipients (69%) and OT recipients (77%) were aware of their increased risk for skin cancer, but despite this knowledge, only 13% of patients overall reported using sunscreen, 29% reported reapplying sunscreen, and 48% reported wearing sun protective clothing. Most OT recipients (63%) reported never having a total body skin exam, whereas only 34% BMT recipients reported having a total body skin exam every 6 months (P = .006). BMT providers recommended a total body skin exam every 6 or 12 months (44.4% each), and OT providers recommended a total body skin exam every 12 months (58.3%). Only 11.1% of BMT providers and 8.3% of OT providers reported performing a total body skin exam at each visit. Despite results indicating widespread patient knowledge of skin cancer risk, most patients do not practice adequate prevention. Inclusion of a transplantation dermatologist in the care team or use of risk stratification tools by providers may help streamline timely referrals to Dermatology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2666-6367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2666-6367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.01.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36736430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bone Marrow ; Child ; Humans ; Immunosuppression ; Organ Transplantation - adverse effects ; Patient education ; Patient Education as Topic ; Prevention ; Screening ; Skin cancer ; Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Skin Neoplasms - etiology ; Skin Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Sunscreening Agents - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2023-07, Vol.29 (7), p.466.e1-466.e7</ispartof><rights>2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9dc0931cc84169d8ac139a5632dbe03255b160e0db70dea4475aa286995e4cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9dc0931cc84169d8ac139a5632dbe03255b160e0db70dea4475aa286995e4cf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2944-4380 ; 0000-0001-8873-230X ; 0000-0002-3450-5598</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36736430$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shope, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atherton, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPorte, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wine Lee, Lara</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Patient and Provider Practices between Bone Marrow and Solid Organ Transplantation Programs for Patient Education on Increased Risk of Skin Cancer</title><title>Transplantation and cellular therapy</title><addtitle>Transplant Cell Ther</addtitle><description>•Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy post-transplantation are at risk for skin cancer.•Although recipients are aware of skin cancer risk, many do not practice sun safety.•Most transplant recipients have never had a full body skin exam.•Recommendations for timing of full body skin exams differ by provider type.
Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy following transplantation are at risk for skin cancer owing to dampened tumor surveillance. As long-term immunotherapy is necessary to prevent graft rejection, transplantation providers and recipients are expected to perform regular surveillance for the development of suspicious lesions, and recipients are encouraged to practice preventative sun safe behaviors. No consensus exists regarding the timing of full body skin exams, and despite the well-established risk, patient education is not always prioritized. We investigated whether differences exist between bone marrow transplant (BMT) and organ transplant (OT) recipients and their providers regarding prevention and screening. We distributed surveys to adult and pediatric BMT and OT recipients, as well as their providers, at a single academic institution. Results were evaluated using the chi-square test. The survey results show that most BMT recipients (69%) and OT recipients (77%) were aware of their increased risk for skin cancer, but despite this knowledge, only 13% of patients overall reported using sunscreen, 29% reported reapplying sunscreen, and 48% reported wearing sun protective clothing. Most OT recipients (63%) reported never having a total body skin exam, whereas only 34% BMT recipients reported having a total body skin exam every 6 months (P = .006). BMT providers recommended a total body skin exam every 6 or 12 months (44.4% each), and OT providers recommended a total body skin exam every 12 months (58.3%). Only 11.1% of BMT providers and 8.3% of OT providers reported performing a total body skin exam at each visit. Despite results indicating widespread patient knowledge of skin cancer risk, most patients do not practice adequate prevention. Inclusion of a transplantation dermatologist in the care team or use of risk stratification tools by providers may help streamline timely referrals to Dermatology.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Marrow</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppression</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Sunscreening Agents - therapeutic use</subject><issn>2666-6367</issn><issn>2666-6367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9uFDEMxiMEolXpC3BAOXLZIX9mMjsSF1gVqFTUipZz5Ek8VbY7yeJkW_E2PCpZtlSckCLZcT7_FPtj7LUUjRTSvFs36-JKo4TSjZCNUOoZO1bGmIXRpn_-T37ETnNeCyFUq4XU4iU7qlVt6u2Y_VqleQsUcoo8TfwKSsBYOETPryjdB49UE3AlOMx8xPKAGPnHFJF_BaL08Ed6nTbB80u6hchvCGLebiCWyqrUirklmDOfEj3xz_zOHZ7rOY-OEDJ6_i3ku_03ru9C5CuIDukVezHBJuPpYzxh3z-d3ay-LC4uP5-vPlwsnO5MWcDgnRi0dG7ZSjP4JTipB-iMVn5EoVXXjdIIFH7shUdo274DUEszDB22btIn7O2Bu6X0Y4e52Dlkh5s6CKZdtqrvtawbHJZVqg5SRylnwsluKcxAP60Udm-OXdu9OXZvjhXSVnNq05tH_m6c0T-1_LWiCt4fBFinvA9INru6K4c-EFaYT-F__N8DLqJU</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Shope, Chelsea</creator><creator>Andrews, Laura</creator><creator>Atherton, Kelly</creator><creator>Ritter, Alexandra</creator><creator>LaPorte, Margaret</creator><creator>Wine Lee, Lara</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-4380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8873-230X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3450-5598</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Comparison of Patient and Provider Practices between Bone Marrow and Solid Organ Transplantation Programs for Patient Education on Increased Risk of Skin Cancer</title><author>Shope, Chelsea ; Andrews, Laura ; Atherton, Kelly ; Ritter, Alexandra ; LaPorte, Margaret ; Wine Lee, Lara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-a9dc0931cc84169d8ac139a5632dbe03255b160e0db70dea4475aa286995e4cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Marrow</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppression</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Sunscreening Agents - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shope, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atherton, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPorte, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wine Lee, Lara</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation and cellular therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shope, Chelsea</au><au>Andrews, Laura</au><au>Atherton, Kelly</au><au>Ritter, Alexandra</au><au>LaPorte, Margaret</au><au>Wine Lee, Lara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Patient and Provider Practices between Bone Marrow and Solid Organ Transplantation Programs for Patient Education on Increased Risk of Skin Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation and cellular therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Cell Ther</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>466.e1</spage><epage>466.e7</epage><pages>466.e1-466.e7</pages><issn>2666-6367</issn><eissn>2666-6367</eissn><abstract>•Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy post-transplantation are at risk for skin cancer.•Although recipients are aware of skin cancer risk, many do not practice sun safety.•Most transplant recipients have never had a full body skin exam.•Recommendations for timing of full body skin exams differ by provider type.
Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy following transplantation are at risk for skin cancer owing to dampened tumor surveillance. As long-term immunotherapy is necessary to prevent graft rejection, transplantation providers and recipients are expected to perform regular surveillance for the development of suspicious lesions, and recipients are encouraged to practice preventative sun safe behaviors. No consensus exists regarding the timing of full body skin exams, and despite the well-established risk, patient education is not always prioritized. We investigated whether differences exist between bone marrow transplant (BMT) and organ transplant (OT) recipients and their providers regarding prevention and screening. We distributed surveys to adult and pediatric BMT and OT recipients, as well as their providers, at a single academic institution. Results were evaluated using the chi-square test. The survey results show that most BMT recipients (69%) and OT recipients (77%) were aware of their increased risk for skin cancer, but despite this knowledge, only 13% of patients overall reported using sunscreen, 29% reported reapplying sunscreen, and 48% reported wearing sun protective clothing. Most OT recipients (63%) reported never having a total body skin exam, whereas only 34% BMT recipients reported having a total body skin exam every 6 months (P = .006). BMT providers recommended a total body skin exam every 6 or 12 months (44.4% each), and OT providers recommended a total body skin exam every 12 months (58.3%). Only 11.1% of BMT providers and 8.3% of OT providers reported performing a total body skin exam at each visit. Despite results indicating widespread patient knowledge of skin cancer risk, most patients do not practice adequate prevention. Inclusion of a transplantation dermatologist in the care team or use of risk stratification tools by providers may help streamline timely referrals to Dermatology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36736430</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtct.2023.01.022</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-4380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8873-230X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3450-5598</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2666-6367 |
ispartof | Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2023-07, Vol.29 (7), p.466.e1-466.e7 |
issn | 2666-6367 2666-6367 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773124398 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Bone Marrow Child Humans Immunosuppression Organ Transplantation - adverse effects Patient education Patient Education as Topic Prevention Screening Skin cancer Skin Neoplasms - epidemiology Skin Neoplasms - etiology Skin Neoplasms - prevention & control Sunscreening Agents - therapeutic use |
title | Comparison of Patient and Provider Practices between Bone Marrow and Solid Organ Transplantation Programs for Patient Education on Increased Risk of Skin Cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A49%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Patient%20and%20Provider%20Practices%20between%20Bone%20Marrow%20and%20Solid%20Organ%20Transplantation%20Programs%20for%20Patient%20Education%20on%20Increased%20Risk%20of%20Skin%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20and%20cellular%20therapy&rft.au=Shope,%20Chelsea&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=466.e1&rft.epage=466.e7&rft.pages=466.e1-466.e7&rft.issn=2666-6367&rft.eissn=2666-6367&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtct.2023.01.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2773124398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773124398&rft_id=info:pmid/36736430&rft_els_id=S266663672300060X&rfr_iscdi=true |