Intrathoracic Robotic-Sewn Anastomosis During Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: Back to Basics?
Background To assess the feasibility, clinical utility, and safety of intrathoracic robotic-sewn esophageal anastomosis (IrEA) during Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus, or cancer at the gastro-esophageal junction type I (Siewert classification). Methods...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2023-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1034-1041 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1041 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1034 |
container_title | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Huscher, C. G. S. Cobellis, F. Lazzarin, G. |
description | Background
To assess the feasibility, clinical utility, and safety of intrathoracic robotic-sewn esophageal anastomosis (IrEA) during Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus, or cancer at the gastro-esophageal junction type I (Siewert classification).
Methods
A protocol for completely robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (CrIE) and intrathoracic robotic-sewn anastomosis
(
IrEA) was established at the authors’ institutions from January 2015 through December 2019. Overall surgery-related postoperative complications were analyzed. Overall survival and disease-free survival analysis were performed using standard methods.
Results
The study population consisted of 40 patients. Median operative time was 320 min (sd 62, range 235–500 min), and conversion to open rate was 0%. Anastomotic leak rate was 10%. The mean number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) was 19 (IQR 11–29), and the mean number of positive lymph nodes (PLN) was 3 (IQR 0–5). Short- and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes were comparable at a medium follow-up of 37 months. The median overall survival was 48 months while the mean disease-free survival was 29 months.
Conclusion
This pilot series, in which an intrathoracic robotic-sewn anastomosis (IrEA) was performed during CrIE, demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this approach. Compared to the current standard of care at a high-volume center, IrEA was associated with better postoperative surgical outcomes and similar oncological outcomes to those reported worldwide today. These results call for further validation in a prospective and controlled setting to be fully incorporated into clinical practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11605-023-05616-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773121004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2806287418</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-bb4b08b13f97b3adf5c8fc3bac71045df2d2f8521c482e4f9bcc43c0cc02dc03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOHDEQRS1ExCv8QBZRS2yyMSk_uu1hg2B4ZKSRIiUssrPsahsaZtqD3Z0Rf4_JQJCyyKpKpVO3SvcS8onBMQNQXzNjDdQUuKBQN6yh6y2yx7QSVDa82S49TBjldf1rl-znfA_AFDC9Q3ZFowSXIPaIm_VDssNdTBY7rH5EF4cO6U-_7quz3uYhLmPucnUxpq6_rWa_Y6rmfl0mlzmu7uytx4I8VaHMp7ZHn06qc4sP1RBLzR3m04_kQ7CL7A9f6wG5ubq8mX6j8-_Xs-nZnKJQ9UCdkw60YyJMlBO2DTXqgMJZVAxk3Qbe8qBrzlBq7mWYOEQpEBCBtwjigHzZyK5SfBx9Hsyyy-gXC9v7OGbDlRKMF-NkQY_-Qe_jmPrynOEaGq6VZLpQfENhijknH8wqdUubngwD8xKA2QRgSgDmTwBmXZY-v0qPbunbvytvjhdAbIC8enHUp_fb_5F9Bkzqkck</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2806287418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intrathoracic Robotic-Sewn Anastomosis During Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: Back to Basics?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Huscher, C. G. S. ; Cobellis, F. ; Lazzarin, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huscher, C. G. S. ; Cobellis, F. ; Lazzarin, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
To assess the feasibility, clinical utility, and safety of intrathoracic robotic-sewn esophageal anastomosis (IrEA) during Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus, or cancer at the gastro-esophageal junction type I (Siewert classification).
Methods
A protocol for completely robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (CrIE) and intrathoracic robotic-sewn anastomosis
(
IrEA) was established at the authors’ institutions from January 2015 through December 2019. Overall surgery-related postoperative complications were analyzed. Overall survival and disease-free survival analysis were performed using standard methods.
Results
The study population consisted of 40 patients. Median operative time was 320 min (sd 62, range 235–500 min), and conversion to open rate was 0%. Anastomotic leak rate was 10%. The mean number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) was 19 (IQR 11–29), and the mean number of positive lymph nodes (PLN) was 3 (IQR 0–5). Short- and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes were comparable at a medium follow-up of 37 months. The median overall survival was 48 months while the mean disease-free survival was 29 months.
Conclusion
This pilot series, in which an intrathoracic robotic-sewn anastomosis (IrEA) was performed during CrIE, demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this approach. Compared to the current standard of care at a high-volume center, IrEA was associated with better postoperative surgical outcomes and similar oncological outcomes to those reported worldwide today. These results call for further validation in a prospective and controlled setting to be fully incorporated into clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05616-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36732403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical - methods ; Esophageal cancer ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy ; Esophagus ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Humans ; Lymphatic system ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multimedia Article ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Robotics ; Surgery ; Surgical anastomosis ; Survival analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1034-1041</ispartof><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-bb4b08b13f97b3adf5c8fc3bac71045df2d2f8521c482e4f9bcc43c0cc02dc03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-bb4b08b13f97b3adf5c8fc3bac71045df2d2f8521c482e4f9bcc43c0cc02dc03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9744-6046</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11605-023-05616-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11605-023-05616-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huscher, C. G. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobellis, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazzarin, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Intrathoracic Robotic-Sewn Anastomosis During Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: Back to Basics?</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Background
To assess the feasibility, clinical utility, and safety of intrathoracic robotic-sewn esophageal anastomosis (IrEA) during Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus, or cancer at the gastro-esophageal junction type I (Siewert classification).
Methods
A protocol for completely robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (CrIE) and intrathoracic robotic-sewn anastomosis
(
IrEA) was established at the authors’ institutions from January 2015 through December 2019. Overall surgery-related postoperative complications were analyzed. Overall survival and disease-free survival analysis were performed using standard methods.
Results
The study population consisted of 40 patients. Median operative time was 320 min (sd 62, range 235–500 min), and conversion to open rate was 0%. Anastomotic leak rate was 10%. The mean number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) was 19 (IQR 11–29), and the mean number of positive lymph nodes (PLN) was 3 (IQR 0–5). Short- and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes were comparable at a medium follow-up of 37 months. The median overall survival was 48 months while the mean disease-free survival was 29 months.
Conclusion
This pilot series, in which an intrathoracic robotic-sewn anastomosis (IrEA) was performed during CrIE, demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this approach. Compared to the current standard of care at a high-volume center, IrEA was associated with better postoperative surgical outcomes and similar oncological outcomes to those reported worldwide today. These results call for further validation in a prospective and controlled setting to be fully incorporated into clinical practice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multimedia Article</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical anastomosis</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOHDEQRS1ExCv8QBZRS2yyMSk_uu1hg2B4ZKSRIiUssrPsahsaZtqD3Z0Rf4_JQJCyyKpKpVO3SvcS8onBMQNQXzNjDdQUuKBQN6yh6y2yx7QSVDa82S49TBjldf1rl-znfA_AFDC9Q3ZFowSXIPaIm_VDssNdTBY7rH5EF4cO6U-_7quz3uYhLmPucnUxpq6_rWa_Y6rmfl0mlzmu7uytx4I8VaHMp7ZHn06qc4sP1RBLzR3m04_kQ7CL7A9f6wG5ubq8mX6j8-_Xs-nZnKJQ9UCdkw60YyJMlBO2DTXqgMJZVAxk3Qbe8qBrzlBq7mWYOEQpEBCBtwjigHzZyK5SfBx9Hsyyy-gXC9v7OGbDlRKMF-NkQY_-Qe_jmPrynOEaGq6VZLpQfENhijknH8wqdUubngwD8xKA2QRgSgDmTwBmXZY-v0qPbunbvytvjhdAbIC8enHUp_fb_5F9Bkzqkck</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Huscher, C. G. S.</creator><creator>Cobellis, F.</creator><creator>Lazzarin, G.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-6046</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Intrathoracic Robotic-Sewn Anastomosis During Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: Back to Basics?</title><author>Huscher, C. G. S. ; Cobellis, F. ; Lazzarin, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-bb4b08b13f97b3adf5c8fc3bac71045df2d2f8521c482e4f9bcc43c0cc02dc03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multimedia Article</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical anastomosis</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huscher, C. G. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobellis, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazzarin, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huscher, C. G. S.</au><au>Cobellis, F.</au><au>Lazzarin, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intrathoracic Robotic-Sewn Anastomosis During Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: Back to Basics?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Gastrointest Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1034</spage><epage>1041</epage><pages>1034-1041</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Background
To assess the feasibility, clinical utility, and safety of intrathoracic robotic-sewn esophageal anastomosis (IrEA) during Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus, or cancer at the gastro-esophageal junction type I (Siewert classification).
Methods
A protocol for completely robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (CrIE) and intrathoracic robotic-sewn anastomosis
(
IrEA) was established at the authors’ institutions from January 2015 through December 2019. Overall surgery-related postoperative complications were analyzed. Overall survival and disease-free survival analysis were performed using standard methods.
Results
The study population consisted of 40 patients. Median operative time was 320 min (sd 62, range 235–500 min), and conversion to open rate was 0%. Anastomotic leak rate was 10%. The mean number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) was 19 (IQR 11–29), and the mean number of positive lymph nodes (PLN) was 3 (IQR 0–5). Short- and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes were comparable at a medium follow-up of 37 months. The median overall survival was 48 months while the mean disease-free survival was 29 months.
Conclusion
This pilot series, in which an intrathoracic robotic-sewn anastomosis (IrEA) was performed during CrIE, demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this approach. Compared to the current standard of care at a high-volume center, IrEA was associated with better postoperative surgical outcomes and similar oncological outcomes to those reported worldwide today. These results call for further validation in a prospective and controlled setting to be fully incorporated into clinical practice.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>36732403</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11605-023-05616-w</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-6046</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1091-255X |
ispartof | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1034-1041 |
issn | 1091-255X 1873-4626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773121004 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Aged Anastomosis, Surgical - methods Esophageal cancer Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery Esophagectomy Esophagus Feasibility Studies Female Gastroenterology Humans Lymphatic system Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Multimedia Article Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - surgery Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotics Surgery Surgical anastomosis Survival analysis Treatment Outcome |
title | Intrathoracic Robotic-Sewn Anastomosis During Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer: Back to Basics? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A47%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrathoracic%20Robotic-Sewn%20Anastomosis%20During%20Ivor%20Lewis%20Esophagectomy%20for%20Cancer:%20Back%20to%20Basics?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Huscher,%20C.%20G.%20S.&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1034&rft.epage=1041&rft.pages=1034-1041&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11605-023-05616-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2806287418%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2806287418&rft_id=info:pmid/36732403&rfr_iscdi=true |