Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening, acquired disease in which blood cells lacking complement regulatory proteins are destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity. Since 2007, terminal complement inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this disease....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood reviews 2023-05, Vol.59, p.101041-101041, Article 101041
Hauptverfasser: Kulasekararaj, Austin G., Kuter, David J., Griffin, Morag, Weitz, Ilene C., Röth, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101041
container_issue
container_start_page 101041
container_title Blood reviews
container_volume 59
creator Kulasekararaj, Austin G.
Kuter, David J.
Griffin, Morag
Weitz, Ilene C.
Röth, Alexander
description Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening, acquired disease in which blood cells lacking complement regulatory proteins are destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity. Since 2007, terminal complement inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this disease. However, patients treated with these inhibitors can still experience anemia because of C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis and clinically relevant levels of breakthrough or residual intravascular hemolysis. Proximal complement inhibitors, which are only just beginning to emerge, have the potential to address this problem by targeting components of the pathway upstream of C5, thereby protecting patients against both intra- and extravascular hemolysis. In this review, we describe different biomarkers that can be used to monitor complement pathway blockade and discuss key laboratory assessments for evaluating treatment efficacy. We also consider how these assessments are affected by each class of inhibitor and highlight how evolving treatment goals may influence the relative importance of these assessments.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773120861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0268960X23000024</els_id><sourcerecordid>2773120861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-15305fed32a08e16e1d11cd5c4feec1f132570e95709ba1777e1e50fb21757873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CAfOSSxeNs4iziAqV8SJW4gMTNcpxxd5bEXmyHsv-Mn4fTLRy5jD_mmdfjeRl7BmINAtqX-3U_RlxLIevlQmzgAVtBU8sK2g4espWQbVdtW_HtjJ2ntBdCbOtWPWZnJdZSis2K_X5LYTLxO8bEjR_4aPoQTQ7xyE1KmNKEPifuQuRT8FQS5G943iHPEU1esjw4fjCZ7sBbyrtyiuHXMU1m5D7YPEdfdjucws0YevJzJPOKvyPnMKK3mHiP-RbR84xxogVeWjkUEVo0bJgOI949RX5HPWUK_gl75MyY8On9esG-vr_6cvmxuv784dPlm-vKboTIVRmHaBwOtTSiQ2gRBgA7NHbjEC04qGWjBG5L2PYGlFII2AjXS1CN6lR9wV6cdEs7P2ZMWU-ULI6j8RjmpKVSNUjRtVBQeUJtDClFdPoQywfiUYPQi2N6rxfH9OKYPjlWip7f68_9hMO_kr8WFeD1CcDyy5-EUSdLy9gGimizHgL9T_8PmH2tcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773120861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kulasekararaj, Austin G. ; Kuter, David J. ; Griffin, Morag ; Weitz, Ilene C. ; Röth, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Kulasekararaj, Austin G. ; Kuter, David J. ; Griffin, Morag ; Weitz, Ilene C. ; Röth, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening, acquired disease in which blood cells lacking complement regulatory proteins are destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity. Since 2007, terminal complement inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this disease. However, patients treated with these inhibitors can still experience anemia because of C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis and clinically relevant levels of breakthrough or residual intravascular hemolysis. Proximal complement inhibitors, which are only just beginning to emerge, have the potential to address this problem by targeting components of the pathway upstream of C5, thereby protecting patients against both intra- and extravascular hemolysis. In this review, we describe different biomarkers that can be used to monitor complement pathway blockade and discuss key laboratory assessments for evaluating treatment efficacy. We also consider how these assessments are affected by each class of inhibitor and highlight how evolving treatment goals may influence the relative importance of these assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-960X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36732204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Biomarkers ; Complement C3 - metabolism ; Complement Inactivating Agents - pharmacology ; Complement Inactivating Agents - therapeutic use ; Complement inhibitor ; Extravascular hemolysis ; Hemoglobin ; Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - diagnosis ; Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - drug therapy ; Hemolysis ; Humans ; Intravascular hemolysis ; Lactate dehydrogenase ; Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria</subject><ispartof>Blood reviews, 2023-05, Vol.59, p.101041-101041, Article 101041</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-15305fed32a08e16e1d11cd5c4feec1f132570e95709ba1777e1e50fb21757873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-15305fed32a08e16e1d11cd5c4feec1f132570e95709ba1777e1e50fb21757873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X23000024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732204$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kulasekararaj, Austin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuter, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Morag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitz, Ilene C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röth, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition</title><title>Blood reviews</title><addtitle>Blood Rev</addtitle><description>Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening, acquired disease in which blood cells lacking complement regulatory proteins are destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity. Since 2007, terminal complement inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this disease. However, patients treated with these inhibitors can still experience anemia because of C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis and clinically relevant levels of breakthrough or residual intravascular hemolysis. Proximal complement inhibitors, which are only just beginning to emerge, have the potential to address this problem by targeting components of the pathway upstream of C5, thereby protecting patients against both intra- and extravascular hemolysis. In this review, we describe different biomarkers that can be used to monitor complement pathway blockade and discuss key laboratory assessments for evaluating treatment efficacy. We also consider how these assessments are affected by each class of inhibitor and highlight how evolving treatment goals may influence the relative importance of these assessments.</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Complement C3 - metabolism</subject><subject>Complement Inactivating Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Complement Inactivating Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Complement inhibitor</subject><subject>Extravascular hemolysis</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hemolysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intravascular hemolysis</subject><subject>Lactate dehydrogenase</subject><subject>Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria</subject><issn>0268-960X</issn><issn>1532-1681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CAfOSSxeNs4iziAqV8SJW4gMTNcpxxd5bEXmyHsv-Mn4fTLRy5jD_mmdfjeRl7BmINAtqX-3U_RlxLIevlQmzgAVtBU8sK2g4espWQbVdtW_HtjJ2ntBdCbOtWPWZnJdZSis2K_X5LYTLxO8bEjR_4aPoQTQ7xyE1KmNKEPifuQuRT8FQS5G943iHPEU1esjw4fjCZ7sBbyrtyiuHXMU1m5D7YPEdfdjucws0YevJzJPOKvyPnMKK3mHiP-RbR84xxogVeWjkUEVo0bJgOI949RX5HPWUK_gl75MyY8On9esG-vr_6cvmxuv784dPlm-vKboTIVRmHaBwOtTSiQ2gRBgA7NHbjEC04qGWjBG5L2PYGlFII2AjXS1CN6lR9wV6cdEs7P2ZMWU-ULI6j8RjmpKVSNUjRtVBQeUJtDClFdPoQywfiUYPQi2N6rxfH9OKYPjlWip7f68_9hMO_kr8WFeD1CcDyy5-EUSdLy9gGimizHgL9T_8PmH2tcg</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Kulasekararaj, Austin G.</creator><creator>Kuter, David J.</creator><creator>Griffin, Morag</creator><creator>Weitz, Ilene C.</creator><creator>Röth, Alexander</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition</title><author>Kulasekararaj, Austin G. ; Kuter, David J. ; Griffin, Morag ; Weitz, Ilene C. ; Röth, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-15305fed32a08e16e1d11cd5c4feec1f132570e95709ba1777e1e50fb21757873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Complement C3 - metabolism</topic><topic>Complement Inactivating Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Complement Inactivating Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Complement inhibitor</topic><topic>Extravascular hemolysis</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hemolysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intravascular hemolysis</topic><topic>Lactate dehydrogenase</topic><topic>Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kulasekararaj, Austin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuter, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Morag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitz, Ilene C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röth, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Blood reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kulasekararaj, Austin G.</au><au>Kuter, David J.</au><au>Griffin, Morag</au><au>Weitz, Ilene C.</au><au>Röth, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition</atitle><jtitle>Blood reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Blood Rev</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>101041</spage><epage>101041</epage><pages>101041-101041</pages><artnum>101041</artnum><issn>0268-960X</issn><eissn>1532-1681</eissn><abstract>Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening, acquired disease in which blood cells lacking complement regulatory proteins are destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity. Since 2007, terminal complement inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this disease. However, patients treated with these inhibitors can still experience anemia because of C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis and clinically relevant levels of breakthrough or residual intravascular hemolysis. Proximal complement inhibitors, which are only just beginning to emerge, have the potential to address this problem by targeting components of the pathway upstream of C5, thereby protecting patients against both intra- and extravascular hemolysis. In this review, we describe different biomarkers that can be used to monitor complement pathway blockade and discuss key laboratory assessments for evaluating treatment efficacy. We also consider how these assessments are affected by each class of inhibitor and highlight how evolving treatment goals may influence the relative importance of these assessments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36732204</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.blre.2023.101041</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-960X
ispartof Blood reviews, 2023-05, Vol.59, p.101041-101041, Article 101041
issn 0268-960X
1532-1681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773120861
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use
Biomarkers
Complement C3 - metabolism
Complement Inactivating Agents - pharmacology
Complement Inactivating Agents - therapeutic use
Complement inhibitor
Extravascular hemolysis
Hemoglobin
Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - diagnosis
Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - drug therapy
Hemolysis
Humans
Intravascular hemolysis
Lactate dehydrogenase
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
title Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A57%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomarkers%20and%20laboratory%20assessments%20for%20monitoring%20the%20treatment%20of%20patients%20with%20paroxysmal%20nocturnal%20hemoglobinuria:%20Differences%20between%20terminal%20and%20proximal%20complement%20inhibition&rft.jtitle=Blood%20reviews&rft.au=Kulasekararaj,%20Austin%20G.&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=101041&rft.epage=101041&rft.pages=101041-101041&rft.artnum=101041&rft.issn=0268-960X&rft.eissn=1532-1681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.blre.2023.101041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2773120861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773120861&rft_id=info:pmid/36732204&rft_els_id=S0268960X23000024&rfr_iscdi=true