Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening, acquired disease in which blood cells lacking complement regulatory proteins are destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity. Since 2007, terminal complement inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this disease....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Blood reviews 2023-05, Vol.59, p.101041-101041, Article 101041 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101041 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 101041 |
container_title | Blood reviews |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Kulasekararaj, Austin G. Kuter, David J. Griffin, Morag Weitz, Ilene C. Röth, Alexander |
description | Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening, acquired disease in which blood cells lacking complement regulatory proteins are destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity. Since 2007, terminal complement inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this disease. However, patients treated with these inhibitors can still experience anemia because of C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis and clinically relevant levels of breakthrough or residual intravascular hemolysis. Proximal complement inhibitors, which are only just beginning to emerge, have the potential to address this problem by targeting components of the pathway upstream of C5, thereby protecting patients against both intra- and extravascular hemolysis. In this review, we describe different biomarkers that can be used to monitor complement pathway blockade and discuss key laboratory assessments for evaluating treatment efficacy. We also consider how these assessments are affected by each class of inhibitor and highlight how evolving treatment goals may influence the relative importance of these assessments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101041 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773120861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0268960X23000024</els_id><sourcerecordid>2773120861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-15305fed32a08e16e1d11cd5c4feec1f132570e95709ba1777e1e50fb21757873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CAfOSSxeNs4iziAqV8SJW4gMTNcpxxd5bEXmyHsv-Mn4fTLRy5jD_mmdfjeRl7BmINAtqX-3U_RlxLIevlQmzgAVtBU8sK2g4espWQbVdtW_HtjJ2ntBdCbOtWPWZnJdZSis2K_X5LYTLxO8bEjR_4aPoQTQ7xyE1KmNKEPifuQuRT8FQS5G943iHPEU1esjw4fjCZ7sBbyrtyiuHXMU1m5D7YPEdfdjucws0YevJzJPOKvyPnMKK3mHiP-RbR84xxogVeWjkUEVo0bJgOI949RX5HPWUK_gl75MyY8On9esG-vr_6cvmxuv784dPlm-vKboTIVRmHaBwOtTSiQ2gRBgA7NHbjEC04qGWjBG5L2PYGlFII2AjXS1CN6lR9wV6cdEs7P2ZMWU-ULI6j8RjmpKVSNUjRtVBQeUJtDClFdPoQywfiUYPQi2N6rxfH9OKYPjlWip7f68_9hMO_kr8WFeD1CcDyy5-EUSdLy9gGimizHgL9T_8PmH2tcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773120861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kulasekararaj, Austin G. ; Kuter, David J. ; Griffin, Morag ; Weitz, Ilene C. ; Röth, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Kulasekararaj, Austin G. ; Kuter, David J. ; Griffin, Morag ; Weitz, Ilene C. ; Röth, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening, acquired disease in which blood cells lacking complement regulatory proteins are destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity. Since 2007, terminal complement inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this disease. However, patients treated with these inhibitors can still experience anemia because of C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis and clinically relevant levels of breakthrough or residual intravascular hemolysis. Proximal complement inhibitors, which are only just beginning to emerge, have the potential to address this problem by targeting components of the pathway upstream of C5, thereby protecting patients against both intra- and extravascular hemolysis. In this review, we describe different biomarkers that can be used to monitor complement pathway blockade and discuss key laboratory assessments for evaluating treatment efficacy. We also consider how these assessments are affected by each class of inhibitor and highlight how evolving treatment goals may influence the relative importance of these assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-960X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36732204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Biomarkers ; Complement C3 - metabolism ; Complement Inactivating Agents - pharmacology ; Complement Inactivating Agents - therapeutic use ; Complement inhibitor ; Extravascular hemolysis ; Hemoglobin ; Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - diagnosis ; Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - drug therapy ; Hemolysis ; Humans ; Intravascular hemolysis ; Lactate dehydrogenase ; Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria</subject><ispartof>Blood reviews, 2023-05, Vol.59, p.101041-101041, Article 101041</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-15305fed32a08e16e1d11cd5c4feec1f132570e95709ba1777e1e50fb21757873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-15305fed32a08e16e1d11cd5c4feec1f132570e95709ba1777e1e50fb21757873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X23000024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732204$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kulasekararaj, Austin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuter, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Morag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitz, Ilene C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röth, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition</title><title>Blood reviews</title><addtitle>Blood Rev</addtitle><description>Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening, acquired disease in which blood cells lacking complement regulatory proteins are destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity. Since 2007, terminal complement inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this disease. However, patients treated with these inhibitors can still experience anemia because of C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis and clinically relevant levels of breakthrough or residual intravascular hemolysis. Proximal complement inhibitors, which are only just beginning to emerge, have the potential to address this problem by targeting components of the pathway upstream of C5, thereby protecting patients against both intra- and extravascular hemolysis. In this review, we describe different biomarkers that can be used to monitor complement pathway blockade and discuss key laboratory assessments for evaluating treatment efficacy. We also consider how these assessments are affected by each class of inhibitor and highlight how evolving treatment goals may influence the relative importance of these assessments.</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Complement C3 - metabolism</subject><subject>Complement Inactivating Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Complement Inactivating Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Complement inhibitor</subject><subject>Extravascular hemolysis</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hemolysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intravascular hemolysis</subject><subject>Lactate dehydrogenase</subject><subject>Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria</subject><issn>0268-960X</issn><issn>1532-1681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CAfOSSxeNs4iziAqV8SJW4gMTNcpxxd5bEXmyHsv-Mn4fTLRy5jD_mmdfjeRl7BmINAtqX-3U_RlxLIevlQmzgAVtBU8sK2g4espWQbVdtW_HtjJ2ntBdCbOtWPWZnJdZSis2K_X5LYTLxO8bEjR_4aPoQTQ7xyE1KmNKEPifuQuRT8FQS5G943iHPEU1esjw4fjCZ7sBbyrtyiuHXMU1m5D7YPEdfdjucws0YevJzJPOKvyPnMKK3mHiP-RbR84xxogVeWjkUEVo0bJgOI949RX5HPWUK_gl75MyY8On9esG-vr_6cvmxuv784dPlm-vKboTIVRmHaBwOtTSiQ2gRBgA7NHbjEC04qGWjBG5L2PYGlFII2AjXS1CN6lR9wV6cdEs7P2ZMWU-ULI6j8RjmpKVSNUjRtVBQeUJtDClFdPoQywfiUYPQi2N6rxfH9OKYPjlWip7f68_9hMO_kr8WFeD1CcDyy5-EUSdLy9gGimizHgL9T_8PmH2tcg</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Kulasekararaj, Austin G.</creator><creator>Kuter, David J.</creator><creator>Griffin, Morag</creator><creator>Weitz, Ilene C.</creator><creator>Röth, Alexander</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition</title><author>Kulasekararaj, Austin G. ; Kuter, David J. ; Griffin, Morag ; Weitz, Ilene C. ; Röth, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-15305fed32a08e16e1d11cd5c4feec1f132570e95709ba1777e1e50fb21757873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Complement C3 - metabolism</topic><topic>Complement Inactivating Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Complement Inactivating Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Complement inhibitor</topic><topic>Extravascular hemolysis</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hemolysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intravascular hemolysis</topic><topic>Lactate dehydrogenase</topic><topic>Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kulasekararaj, Austin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuter, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Morag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitz, Ilene C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röth, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Blood reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kulasekararaj, Austin G.</au><au>Kuter, David J.</au><au>Griffin, Morag</au><au>Weitz, Ilene C.</au><au>Röth, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition</atitle><jtitle>Blood reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Blood Rev</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>101041</spage><epage>101041</epage><pages>101041-101041</pages><artnum>101041</artnum><issn>0268-960X</issn><eissn>1532-1681</eissn><abstract>Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening, acquired disease in which blood cells lacking complement regulatory proteins are destroyed because of uncontrolled complement activity. Since 2007, terminal complement inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this disease. However, patients treated with these inhibitors can still experience anemia because of C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis and clinically relevant levels of breakthrough or residual intravascular hemolysis. Proximal complement inhibitors, which are only just beginning to emerge, have the potential to address this problem by targeting components of the pathway upstream of C5, thereby protecting patients against both intra- and extravascular hemolysis. In this review, we describe different biomarkers that can be used to monitor complement pathway blockade and discuss key laboratory assessments for evaluating treatment efficacy. We also consider how these assessments are affected by each class of inhibitor and highlight how evolving treatment goals may influence the relative importance of these assessments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36732204</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.blre.2023.101041</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-960X |
ispartof | Blood reviews, 2023-05, Vol.59, p.101041-101041, Article 101041 |
issn | 0268-960X 1532-1681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773120861 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use Biomarkers Complement C3 - metabolism Complement Inactivating Agents - pharmacology Complement Inactivating Agents - therapeutic use Complement inhibitor Extravascular hemolysis Hemoglobin Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - diagnosis Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal - drug therapy Hemolysis Humans Intravascular hemolysis Lactate dehydrogenase Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria |
title | Biomarkers and laboratory assessments for monitoring the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Differences between terminal and proximal complement inhibition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A57%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomarkers%20and%20laboratory%20assessments%20for%20monitoring%20the%20treatment%20of%20patients%20with%20paroxysmal%20nocturnal%20hemoglobinuria:%20Differences%20between%20terminal%20and%20proximal%20complement%20inhibition&rft.jtitle=Blood%20reviews&rft.au=Kulasekararaj,%20Austin%20G.&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=101041&rft.epage=101041&rft.pages=101041-101041&rft.artnum=101041&rft.issn=0268-960X&rft.eissn=1532-1681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.blre.2023.101041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2773120861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773120861&rft_id=info:pmid/36732204&rft_els_id=S0268960X23000024&rfr_iscdi=true |