Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage
Background Anorganic bovine bone has been deeply studied for bone regeneration in the oral cavity. Different manufacturing processes can modify the final composition of the biomaterial and the responses that induce. Aim To evaluate the physico‐chemical characteristics of a bovine bone mineral matrix...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2023-04, Vol.25 (2), p.370-380 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 380 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 370 |
container_title | Clinical implant dentistry and related research |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo Martín‐Morales, Natividad Olaechea, Allinson Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen O'Valle, Francisco Padial‐Molina, Miguel |
description | Background
Anorganic bovine bone has been deeply studied for bone regeneration in the oral cavity. Different manufacturing processes can modify the final composition of the biomaterial and the responses that induce.
Aim
To evaluate the physico‐chemical characteristics of a bovine bone mineral matrix and the clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA results after using it for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in humans.
Materials and Methods
First, the physical–chemical characteristics of the biomaterial were evaluated by X‐ray powder diffraction, X‐ray fluorescence, and electron microscopy. A frequently used biomaterial with the same animal origin was used as comparator. Then, a clinical study was designed for evaluating clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA outcomes. Patients in need of two‐stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation were included in the study. Six months after the grafting procedure, a bone biopsy was collected for evaluation.
Results
In terms of physico‐chemical characteristics, no differences were found between both biomaterials. Clinically, 10 patients were included in the study. After 6 months, clinical and radiographical data showed adequate outcomes for allowing implant placement. Histological, immunohistochemical and mRNA analyses showed that the biomaterial in use provides biological support to induce responses similar to those of other commonly used biomaterials.
Conclusion
Bovine bone mineral matrix (Creos™ Xenogain) used as a single material for maxillary sinus floor augmentation shows adequate biological, clinical, and radiological outcomes. In fact, the results from this study are similar to those reported in the literature for another bovine bone‐derived biomaterial with whom it shares composition and micro‐ and nanoscale characteristics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cid.13184 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2771083912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2771083912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-6215ce5d9b7af8bde0f5f7d97ceb27bd47aa0f4e15e41452a62a224d80270003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb9OwzAQhy0EoqUw8ALIEgsMKbaT1M6Iyr9KlWBgjy7OpXWVxMVugDLxCDwjT4KhwICEB9-d9OnT6X6EHHI25OGdaVMOecxVskX6XDIVKcHUduhTEUdMZVmP7Hm_YExwPuK7pBePJMuyVPTJ8m6-9kbb99c3PcfGaKgptCUtjK3t7GvUc3CgV-jMC6yMbamtKNAWn2hhH02LoYSvCZ0LdAMrZ54pPIKpoaiRVtbReddASzsPM9wnOxXUHg--64DcX13ej2-i6e31ZHw-jXSsVBKNBE81pmVWSKhUUSKr0kqWmdRYCFmUiQRgVYI8xYQnqYCRACGSUjEhGWPxgJxstEtnHzr0q7wxXmNdQ4u287mQkjMVZ1wE9PgPurCda8NygcqCmzOZBup0Q2lnvXdY5UtnGnDrnLP8M4U8pJB_pRDYo29jVzRY_pI_Zw_A2QZ4MjWu_zfl48nFRvkBsuKSYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2794521075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo ; Martín‐Morales, Natividad ; Olaechea, Allinson ; Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro ; Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal ; Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca ; Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen ; O'Valle, Francisco ; Padial‐Molina, Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo ; Martín‐Morales, Natividad ; Olaechea, Allinson ; Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro ; Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal ; Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca ; Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen ; O'Valle, Francisco ; Padial‐Molina, Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Anorganic bovine bone has been deeply studied for bone regeneration in the oral cavity. Different manufacturing processes can modify the final composition of the biomaterial and the responses that induce.
Aim
To evaluate the physico‐chemical characteristics of a bovine bone mineral matrix and the clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA results after using it for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in humans.
Materials and Methods
First, the physical–chemical characteristics of the biomaterial were evaluated by X‐ray powder diffraction, X‐ray fluorescence, and electron microscopy. A frequently used biomaterial with the same animal origin was used as comparator. Then, a clinical study was designed for evaluating clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA outcomes. Patients in need of two‐stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation were included in the study. Six months after the grafting procedure, a bone biopsy was collected for evaluation.
Results
In terms of physico‐chemical characteristics, no differences were found between both biomaterials. Clinically, 10 patients were included in the study. After 6 months, clinical and radiographical data showed adequate outcomes for allowing implant placement. Histological, immunohistochemical and mRNA analyses showed that the biomaterial in use provides biological support to induce responses similar to those of other commonly used biomaterials.
Conclusion
Bovine bone mineral matrix (Creos™ Xenogain) used as a single material for maxillary sinus floor augmentation shows adequate biological, clinical, and radiological outcomes. In fact, the results from this study are similar to those reported in the literature for another bovine bone‐derived biomaterial with whom it shares composition and micro‐ and nanoscale characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-0899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cid.13184</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36709952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biocompatible Materials ; biomaterial ; Biomaterials ; Biomedical materials ; Biopsy ; Bone biomaterials ; Bone composition ; bone grafting ; Bone grafts ; Bone growth ; Bone matrix ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Cattle ; Composition ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Electron microscopy ; Fluorescence ; Humans ; implant dentistry ; Manufacturing industry ; Maxillary sinus ; Maxillary Sinus - surgery ; Minerals ; Mouth ; mRNA ; Oral cavity ; Regeneration ; Regeneration (physiology) ; sinus floor augmentation ; Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods ; Sinuses ; Surgical implants ; xenograft</subject><ispartof>Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2023-04, Vol.25 (2), p.370-380</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-6215ce5d9b7af8bde0f5f7d97ceb27bd47aa0f4e15e41452a62a224d80270003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-6215ce5d9b7af8bde0f5f7d97ceb27bd47aa0f4e15e41452a62a224d80270003</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3540-1085 ; 0000-0002-8361-1469 ; 0000-0002-5907-9660 ; 0000-0002-6614-6470 ; 0000-0003-2345-8359 ; 0000-0001-6222-1341 ; 0000-0003-2057-5285 ; 0000-0001-9207-2287 ; 0000-0002-8301-4453</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcid.13184$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcid.13184$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36709952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín‐Morales, Natividad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olaechea, Allinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Valle, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padial‐Molina, Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage</title><title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</addtitle><description>Background
Anorganic bovine bone has been deeply studied for bone regeneration in the oral cavity. Different manufacturing processes can modify the final composition of the biomaterial and the responses that induce.
Aim
To evaluate the physico‐chemical characteristics of a bovine bone mineral matrix and the clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA results after using it for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in humans.
Materials and Methods
First, the physical–chemical characteristics of the biomaterial were evaluated by X‐ray powder diffraction, X‐ray fluorescence, and electron microscopy. A frequently used biomaterial with the same animal origin was used as comparator. Then, a clinical study was designed for evaluating clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA outcomes. Patients in need of two‐stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation were included in the study. Six months after the grafting procedure, a bone biopsy was collected for evaluation.
Results
In terms of physico‐chemical characteristics, no differences were found between both biomaterials. Clinically, 10 patients were included in the study. After 6 months, clinical and radiographical data showed adequate outcomes for allowing implant placement. Histological, immunohistochemical and mRNA analyses showed that the biomaterial in use provides biological support to induce responses similar to those of other commonly used biomaterials.
Conclusion
Bovine bone mineral matrix (Creos™ Xenogain) used as a single material for maxillary sinus floor augmentation shows adequate biological, clinical, and radiological outcomes. In fact, the results from this study are similar to those reported in the literature for another bovine bone‐derived biomaterial with whom it shares composition and micro‐ and nanoscale characteristics.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>biomaterial</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Bone biomaterials</subject><subject>Bone composition</subject><subject>bone grafting</subject><subject>Bone grafts</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>Bone matrix</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implant dentistry</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Maxillary sinus</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Mouth</subject><subject>mRNA</subject><subject>Oral cavity</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Regeneration (physiology)</subject><subject>sinus floor augmentation</subject><subject>Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>xenograft</subject><issn>1523-0899</issn><issn>1708-8208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kb9OwzAQhy0EoqUw8ALIEgsMKbaT1M6Iyr9KlWBgjy7OpXWVxMVugDLxCDwjT4KhwICEB9-d9OnT6X6EHHI25OGdaVMOecxVskX6XDIVKcHUduhTEUdMZVmP7Hm_YExwPuK7pBePJMuyVPTJ8m6-9kbb99c3PcfGaKgptCUtjK3t7GvUc3CgV-jMC6yMbamtKNAWn2hhH02LoYSvCZ0LdAMrZ54pPIKpoaiRVtbReddASzsPM9wnOxXUHg--64DcX13ej2-i6e31ZHw-jXSsVBKNBE81pmVWSKhUUSKr0kqWmdRYCFmUiQRgVYI8xYQnqYCRACGSUjEhGWPxgJxstEtnHzr0q7wxXmNdQ4u287mQkjMVZ1wE9PgPurCda8NygcqCmzOZBup0Q2lnvXdY5UtnGnDrnLP8M4U8pJB_pRDYo29jVzRY_pI_Zw_A2QZ4MjWu_zfl48nFRvkBsuKSYA</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creator><creator>Martín‐Morales, Natividad</creator><creator>Olaechea, Allinson</creator><creator>Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro</creator><creator>Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal</creator><creator>Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca</creator><creator>Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen</creator><creator>O'Valle, Francisco</creator><creator>Padial‐Molina, Miguel</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-1085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-1469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-9660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6470</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-8359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6222-1341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-5285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-2287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8301-4453</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage</title><author>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo ; Martín‐Morales, Natividad ; Olaechea, Allinson ; Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro ; Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal ; Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca ; Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen ; O'Valle, Francisco ; Padial‐Molina, Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-6215ce5d9b7af8bde0f5f7d97ceb27bd47aa0f4e15e41452a62a224d80270003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>biomaterial</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Bone biomaterials</topic><topic>Bone composition</topic><topic>bone grafting</topic><topic>Bone grafts</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>Bone matrix</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implant dentistry</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Maxillary sinus</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Mouth</topic><topic>mRNA</topic><topic>Oral cavity</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Regeneration (physiology)</topic><topic>sinus floor augmentation</topic><topic>Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>xenograft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín‐Morales, Natividad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olaechea, Allinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Valle, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padial‐Molina, Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</au><au>Martín‐Morales, Natividad</au><au>Olaechea, Allinson</au><au>Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro</au><au>Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal</au><au>Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca</au><au>Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen</au><au>O'Valle, Francisco</au><au>Padial‐Molina, Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage</atitle><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>370-380</pages><issn>1523-0899</issn><eissn>1708-8208</eissn><abstract>Background
Anorganic bovine bone has been deeply studied for bone regeneration in the oral cavity. Different manufacturing processes can modify the final composition of the biomaterial and the responses that induce.
Aim
To evaluate the physico‐chemical characteristics of a bovine bone mineral matrix and the clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA results after using it for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in humans.
Materials and Methods
First, the physical–chemical characteristics of the biomaterial were evaluated by X‐ray powder diffraction, X‐ray fluorescence, and electron microscopy. A frequently used biomaterial with the same animal origin was used as comparator. Then, a clinical study was designed for evaluating clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA outcomes. Patients in need of two‐stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation were included in the study. Six months after the grafting procedure, a bone biopsy was collected for evaluation.
Results
In terms of physico‐chemical characteristics, no differences were found between both biomaterials. Clinically, 10 patients were included in the study. After 6 months, clinical and radiographical data showed adequate outcomes for allowing implant placement. Histological, immunohistochemical and mRNA analyses showed that the biomaterial in use provides biological support to induce responses similar to those of other commonly used biomaterials.
Conclusion
Bovine bone mineral matrix (Creos™ Xenogain) used as a single material for maxillary sinus floor augmentation shows adequate biological, clinical, and radiological outcomes. In fact, the results from this study are similar to those reported in the literature for another bovine bone‐derived biomaterial with whom it shares composition and micro‐ and nanoscale characteristics.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36709952</pmid><doi>10.1111/cid.13184</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-1085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-1469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-9660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6470</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-8359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6222-1341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-5285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-2287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8301-4453</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1523-0899 |
ispartof | Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2023-04, Vol.25 (2), p.370-380 |
issn | 1523-0899 1708-8208 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2771083912 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Animals Biocompatible Materials biomaterial Biomaterials Biomedical materials Biopsy Bone biomaterials Bone composition bone grafting Bone grafts Bone growth Bone matrix Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use Bone Transplantation - methods Cattle Composition Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods Electron microscopy Fluorescence Humans implant dentistry Manufacturing industry Maxillary sinus Maxillary Sinus - surgery Minerals Mouth mRNA Oral cavity Regeneration Regeneration (physiology) sinus floor augmentation Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods Sinuses Surgical implants xenograft |
title | Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physico%E2%80%90chemical%20and%20biological%20characterization%20of%20a%20new%20bovine%20bone%20mineral%20matrix%20available%20for%20human%20usage&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20implant%20dentistry%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Galindo%E2%80%90Moreno,%20Pablo&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=370-380&rft.issn=1523-0899&rft.eissn=1708-8208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cid.13184&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2771083912%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2794521075&rft_id=info:pmid/36709952&rfr_iscdi=true |