Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage

Background Anorganic bovine bone has been deeply studied for bone regeneration in the oral cavity. Different manufacturing processes can modify the final composition of the biomaterial and the responses that induce. Aim To evaluate the physico‐chemical characteristics of a bovine bone mineral matrix...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2023-04, Vol.25 (2), p.370-380
Hauptverfasser: Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo, Martín‐Morales, Natividad, Olaechea, Allinson, Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro, Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal, Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca, Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen, O'Valle, Francisco, Padial‐Molina, Miguel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 380
container_issue 2
container_start_page 370
container_title Clinical implant dentistry and related research
container_volume 25
creator Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo
Martín‐Morales, Natividad
Olaechea, Allinson
Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro
Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal
Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca
Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen
O'Valle, Francisco
Padial‐Molina, Miguel
description Background Anorganic bovine bone has been deeply studied for bone regeneration in the oral cavity. Different manufacturing processes can modify the final composition of the biomaterial and the responses that induce. Aim To evaluate the physico‐chemical characteristics of a bovine bone mineral matrix and the clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA results after using it for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in humans. Materials and Methods First, the physical–chemical characteristics of the biomaterial were evaluated by X‐ray powder diffraction, X‐ray fluorescence, and electron microscopy. A frequently used biomaterial with the same animal origin was used as comparator. Then, a clinical study was designed for evaluating clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA outcomes. Patients in need of two‐stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation were included in the study. Six months after the grafting procedure, a bone biopsy was collected for evaluation. Results In terms of physico‐chemical characteristics, no differences were found between both biomaterials. Clinically, 10 patients were included in the study. After 6 months, clinical and radiographical data showed adequate outcomes for allowing implant placement. Histological, immunohistochemical and mRNA analyses showed that the biomaterial in use provides biological support to induce responses similar to those of other commonly used biomaterials. Conclusion Bovine bone mineral matrix (Creos™ Xenogain) used as a single material for maxillary sinus floor augmentation shows adequate biological, clinical, and radiological outcomes. In fact, the results from this study are similar to those reported in the literature for another bovine bone‐derived biomaterial with whom it shares composition and micro‐ and nanoscale characteristics.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cid.13184
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2771083912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2771083912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-6215ce5d9b7af8bde0f5f7d97ceb27bd47aa0f4e15e41452a62a224d80270003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb9OwzAQhy0EoqUw8ALIEgsMKbaT1M6Iyr9KlWBgjy7OpXWVxMVugDLxCDwjT4KhwICEB9-d9OnT6X6EHHI25OGdaVMOecxVskX6XDIVKcHUduhTEUdMZVmP7Hm_YExwPuK7pBePJMuyVPTJ8m6-9kbb99c3PcfGaKgptCUtjK3t7GvUc3CgV-jMC6yMbamtKNAWn2hhH02LoYSvCZ0LdAMrZ54pPIKpoaiRVtbReddASzsPM9wnOxXUHg--64DcX13ej2-i6e31ZHw-jXSsVBKNBE81pmVWSKhUUSKr0kqWmdRYCFmUiQRgVYI8xYQnqYCRACGSUjEhGWPxgJxstEtnHzr0q7wxXmNdQ4u287mQkjMVZ1wE9PgPurCda8NygcqCmzOZBup0Q2lnvXdY5UtnGnDrnLP8M4U8pJB_pRDYo29jVzRY_pI_Zw_A2QZ4MjWu_zfl48nFRvkBsuKSYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2794521075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo ; Martín‐Morales, Natividad ; Olaechea, Allinson ; Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro ; Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal ; Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca ; Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen ; O'Valle, Francisco ; Padial‐Molina, Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo ; Martín‐Morales, Natividad ; Olaechea, Allinson ; Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro ; Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal ; Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca ; Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen ; O'Valle, Francisco ; Padial‐Molina, Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>Background Anorganic bovine bone has been deeply studied for bone regeneration in the oral cavity. Different manufacturing processes can modify the final composition of the biomaterial and the responses that induce. Aim To evaluate the physico‐chemical characteristics of a bovine bone mineral matrix and the clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA results after using it for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in humans. Materials and Methods First, the physical–chemical characteristics of the biomaterial were evaluated by X‐ray powder diffraction, X‐ray fluorescence, and electron microscopy. A frequently used biomaterial with the same animal origin was used as comparator. Then, a clinical study was designed for evaluating clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA outcomes. Patients in need of two‐stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation were included in the study. Six months after the grafting procedure, a bone biopsy was collected for evaluation. Results In terms of physico‐chemical characteristics, no differences were found between both biomaterials. Clinically, 10 patients were included in the study. After 6 months, clinical and radiographical data showed adequate outcomes for allowing implant placement. Histological, immunohistochemical and mRNA analyses showed that the biomaterial in use provides biological support to induce responses similar to those of other commonly used biomaterials. Conclusion Bovine bone mineral matrix (Creos™ Xenogain) used as a single material for maxillary sinus floor augmentation shows adequate biological, clinical, and radiological outcomes. In fact, the results from this study are similar to those reported in the literature for another bovine bone‐derived biomaterial with whom it shares composition and micro‐ and nanoscale characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-0899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cid.13184</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36709952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biocompatible Materials ; biomaterial ; Biomaterials ; Biomedical materials ; Biopsy ; Bone biomaterials ; Bone composition ; bone grafting ; Bone grafts ; Bone growth ; Bone matrix ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Cattle ; Composition ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Electron microscopy ; Fluorescence ; Humans ; implant dentistry ; Manufacturing industry ; Maxillary sinus ; Maxillary Sinus - surgery ; Minerals ; Mouth ; mRNA ; Oral cavity ; Regeneration ; Regeneration (physiology) ; sinus floor augmentation ; Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods ; Sinuses ; Surgical implants ; xenograft</subject><ispartof>Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2023-04, Vol.25 (2), p.370-380</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-6215ce5d9b7af8bde0f5f7d97ceb27bd47aa0f4e15e41452a62a224d80270003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-6215ce5d9b7af8bde0f5f7d97ceb27bd47aa0f4e15e41452a62a224d80270003</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3540-1085 ; 0000-0002-8361-1469 ; 0000-0002-5907-9660 ; 0000-0002-6614-6470 ; 0000-0003-2345-8359 ; 0000-0001-6222-1341 ; 0000-0003-2057-5285 ; 0000-0001-9207-2287 ; 0000-0002-8301-4453</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcid.13184$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcid.13184$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36709952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín‐Morales, Natividad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olaechea, Allinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Valle, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padial‐Molina, Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage</title><title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</addtitle><description>Background Anorganic bovine bone has been deeply studied for bone regeneration in the oral cavity. Different manufacturing processes can modify the final composition of the biomaterial and the responses that induce. Aim To evaluate the physico‐chemical characteristics of a bovine bone mineral matrix and the clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA results after using it for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in humans. Materials and Methods First, the physical–chemical characteristics of the biomaterial were evaluated by X‐ray powder diffraction, X‐ray fluorescence, and electron microscopy. A frequently used biomaterial with the same animal origin was used as comparator. Then, a clinical study was designed for evaluating clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA outcomes. Patients in need of two‐stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation were included in the study. Six months after the grafting procedure, a bone biopsy was collected for evaluation. Results In terms of physico‐chemical characteristics, no differences were found between both biomaterials. Clinically, 10 patients were included in the study. After 6 months, clinical and radiographical data showed adequate outcomes for allowing implant placement. Histological, immunohistochemical and mRNA analyses showed that the biomaterial in use provides biological support to induce responses similar to those of other commonly used biomaterials. Conclusion Bovine bone mineral matrix (Creos™ Xenogain) used as a single material for maxillary sinus floor augmentation shows adequate biological, clinical, and radiological outcomes. In fact, the results from this study are similar to those reported in the literature for another bovine bone‐derived biomaterial with whom it shares composition and micro‐ and nanoscale characteristics.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>biomaterial</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Bone biomaterials</subject><subject>Bone composition</subject><subject>bone grafting</subject><subject>Bone grafts</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>Bone matrix</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implant dentistry</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Maxillary sinus</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Mouth</subject><subject>mRNA</subject><subject>Oral cavity</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Regeneration (physiology)</subject><subject>sinus floor augmentation</subject><subject>Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>xenograft</subject><issn>1523-0899</issn><issn>1708-8208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kb9OwzAQhy0EoqUw8ALIEgsMKbaT1M6Iyr9KlWBgjy7OpXWVxMVugDLxCDwjT4KhwICEB9-d9OnT6X6EHHI25OGdaVMOecxVskX6XDIVKcHUduhTEUdMZVmP7Hm_YExwPuK7pBePJMuyVPTJ8m6-9kbb99c3PcfGaKgptCUtjK3t7GvUc3CgV-jMC6yMbamtKNAWn2hhH02LoYSvCZ0LdAMrZ54pPIKpoaiRVtbReddASzsPM9wnOxXUHg--64DcX13ej2-i6e31ZHw-jXSsVBKNBE81pmVWSKhUUSKr0kqWmdRYCFmUiQRgVYI8xYQnqYCRACGSUjEhGWPxgJxstEtnHzr0q7wxXmNdQ4u287mQkjMVZ1wE9PgPurCda8NygcqCmzOZBup0Q2lnvXdY5UtnGnDrnLP8M4U8pJB_pRDYo29jVzRY_pI_Zw_A2QZ4MjWu_zfl48nFRvkBsuKSYA</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creator><creator>Martín‐Morales, Natividad</creator><creator>Olaechea, Allinson</creator><creator>Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro</creator><creator>Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal</creator><creator>Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca</creator><creator>Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen</creator><creator>O'Valle, Francisco</creator><creator>Padial‐Molina, Miguel</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-1085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-1469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-9660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6470</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-8359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6222-1341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-5285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-2287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8301-4453</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage</title><author>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo ; Martín‐Morales, Natividad ; Olaechea, Allinson ; Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro ; Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal ; Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca ; Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen ; O'Valle, Francisco ; Padial‐Molina, Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-6215ce5d9b7af8bde0f5f7d97ceb27bd47aa0f4e15e41452a62a224d80270003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>biomaterial</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Bone biomaterials</topic><topic>Bone composition</topic><topic>bone grafting</topic><topic>Bone grafts</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>Bone matrix</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implant dentistry</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Maxillary sinus</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Mouth</topic><topic>mRNA</topic><topic>Oral cavity</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Regeneration (physiology)</topic><topic>sinus floor augmentation</topic><topic>Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>xenograft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín‐Morales, Natividad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olaechea, Allinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Valle, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padial‐Molina, Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo</au><au>Martín‐Morales, Natividad</au><au>Olaechea, Allinson</au><au>Hernández‐Cortes, Pedro</au><au>Verdugo‐Escamilla, Cristobal</au><au>Martinez‐Ruiz, Francisca</au><au>Carrillo‐Galvez, Ana Belen</au><au>O'Valle, Francisco</au><au>Padial‐Molina, Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage</atitle><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>370-380</pages><issn>1523-0899</issn><eissn>1708-8208</eissn><abstract>Background Anorganic bovine bone has been deeply studied for bone regeneration in the oral cavity. Different manufacturing processes can modify the final composition of the biomaterial and the responses that induce. Aim To evaluate the physico‐chemical characteristics of a bovine bone mineral matrix and the clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA results after using it for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in humans. Materials and Methods First, the physical–chemical characteristics of the biomaterial were evaluated by X‐ray powder diffraction, X‐ray fluorescence, and electron microscopy. A frequently used biomaterial with the same animal origin was used as comparator. Then, a clinical study was designed for evaluating clinical, radiographical, histological, and mRNA outcomes. Patients in need of two‐stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation were included in the study. Six months after the grafting procedure, a bone biopsy was collected for evaluation. Results In terms of physico‐chemical characteristics, no differences were found between both biomaterials. Clinically, 10 patients were included in the study. After 6 months, clinical and radiographical data showed adequate outcomes for allowing implant placement. Histological, immunohistochemical and mRNA analyses showed that the biomaterial in use provides biological support to induce responses similar to those of other commonly used biomaterials. Conclusion Bovine bone mineral matrix (Creos™ Xenogain) used as a single material for maxillary sinus floor augmentation shows adequate biological, clinical, and radiological outcomes. In fact, the results from this study are similar to those reported in the literature for another bovine bone‐derived biomaterial with whom it shares composition and micro‐ and nanoscale characteristics.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36709952</pmid><doi>10.1111/cid.13184</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-1085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-1469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-9660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6470</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2345-8359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6222-1341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-5285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-2287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8301-4453</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-0899
ispartof Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2023-04, Vol.25 (2), p.370-380
issn 1523-0899
1708-8208
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2771083912
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Animals
Biocompatible Materials
biomaterial
Biomaterials
Biomedical materials
Biopsy
Bone biomaterials
Bone composition
bone grafting
Bone grafts
Bone growth
Bone matrix
Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use
Bone Transplantation - methods
Cattle
Composition
Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
Electron microscopy
Fluorescence
Humans
implant dentistry
Manufacturing industry
Maxillary sinus
Maxillary Sinus - surgery
Minerals
Mouth
mRNA
Oral cavity
Regeneration
Regeneration (physiology)
sinus floor augmentation
Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods
Sinuses
Surgical implants
xenograft
title Physico‐chemical and biological characterization of a new bovine bone mineral matrix available for human usage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physico%E2%80%90chemical%20and%20biological%20characterization%20of%20a%20new%20bovine%20bone%20mineral%20matrix%20available%20for%20human%20usage&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20implant%20dentistry%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Galindo%E2%80%90Moreno,%20Pablo&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=370-380&rft.issn=1523-0899&rft.eissn=1708-8208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cid.13184&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2771083912%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2794521075&rft_id=info:pmid/36709952&rfr_iscdi=true