Information design to support growth, quality, and equity of the US transplant system
The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, an arm of the Health Resources and Services Administration, has a contract with the United Network for Organ Sharing since 1986 to provide central oversight of organ donation and transplants in the United States. The United Network for Organ Sharing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of transplantation 2023-01, Vol.23 (1), p.5-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | American journal of transplantation |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Perakslis, Eric Knechtle, Stuart J. |
description | The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, an arm of the Health Resources and Services Administration, has a contract with the United Network for Organ Sharing since 1986 to provide central oversight of organ donation and transplants in the United States. The United Network for Organ Sharing has recently come under scrutiny, prompting a review by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as summarized in its recent report and also by the US Senate Finance Committee. The national news services have opined about organ donation ethics, access to transplantation particularly for medically underserved populations, and management of organ transplantation data. These critiques raise important concerns that deserve our best response as a transplant community. Broadly, we suggest that the data management approach of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network be replaced with a patient-centric omnichannel network in which all donor and recipient data exist in a single longitudinal record that can be used by all applications. A more comprehensive and standardized approach to donor data collection would drive quality improvement across organ procurement organizations and help address inequities in transplantation. Finally, a substantial increase in organ donation would be prompted by considering organ donors as a public health resource, meriting transparent publicly available data collection with respect to organ donor referral, screening, and management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.10.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2769591571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1600613522292569</els_id><sourcerecordid>2769591571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9720236e00a646afe24c0cf1e4a06eafd96fad3d783223e3cd9890887df734ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotj5-gBvJ0kVb85hmZnAlxRcUXGjXISY3NqUzmSYZpf_elGqXru6Dcw_nfghdUTKhhIrb1USt0oQRxvI8IWR6hIZUEDIWtODHh55PB-gsxhUhtGQVO0UDLkQ9FYwO0eKltT40KjnfYgPRfbY4eRz7rvMh4c_gv9NyhDe9Wru0HWHVGgybPvfYW5yWgBdvOAXVxm6t2oTjNiZoLtCJVesIl7_1HC0eH95nz-P569PL7H4-1rwWaVyXOTsXQIgShVAWWKGJthQKRQQoa2phleGmrDhjHLg2dVWTqiqNLXkBhp-jm71vF_ymh5hk46KGdY4Cvo-SlfnPmk5LmqV0L9XBxxjAyi64RoWtpETuaMqVzDTljuZulWnmm-tf-_6jAXO4-MOXBXd7AeQnvxwEGbWDVoNxAXSSxrt_7H8A_z2FlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769591571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Information design to support growth, quality, and equity of the US transplant system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Perakslis, Eric ; Knechtle, Stuart J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Perakslis, Eric ; Knechtle, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><description>The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, an arm of the Health Resources and Services Administration, has a contract with the United Network for Organ Sharing since 1986 to provide central oversight of organ donation and transplants in the United States. The United Network for Organ Sharing has recently come under scrutiny, prompting a review by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as summarized in its recent report and also by the US Senate Finance Committee. The national news services have opined about organ donation ethics, access to transplantation particularly for medically underserved populations, and management of organ transplantation data. These critiques raise important concerns that deserve our best response as a transplant community. Broadly, we suggest that the data management approach of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network be replaced with a patient-centric omnichannel network in which all donor and recipient data exist in a single longitudinal record that can be used by all applications. A more comprehensive and standardized approach to donor data collection would drive quality improvement across organ procurement organizations and help address inequities in transplantation. Finally, a substantial increase in organ donation would be prompted by considering organ donors as a public health resource, meriting transparent publicly available data collection with respect to organ donor referral, screening, and management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.10.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36695621</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>editorial/personal viewpoint ; ethics and public policy ; Humans ; law/legislation ; Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) ; Organ Transplantation ; organ transplantation in general ; Tissue and Organ Procurement ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants ; United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) ; United States ; United States Health Resources and Services Administration</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2023-01, Vol.23 (1), p.5-10</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9720236e00a646afe24c0cf1e4a06eafd96fad3d783223e3cd9890887df734ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9720236e00a646afe24c0cf1e4a06eafd96fad3d783223e3cd9890887df734ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2395-810X ; 0000-0002-1625-385X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perakslis, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knechtle, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><title>Information design to support growth, quality, and equity of the US transplant system</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, an arm of the Health Resources and Services Administration, has a contract with the United Network for Organ Sharing since 1986 to provide central oversight of organ donation and transplants in the United States. The United Network for Organ Sharing has recently come under scrutiny, prompting a review by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as summarized in its recent report and also by the US Senate Finance Committee. The national news services have opined about organ donation ethics, access to transplantation particularly for medically underserved populations, and management of organ transplantation data. These critiques raise important concerns that deserve our best response as a transplant community. Broadly, we suggest that the data management approach of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network be replaced with a patient-centric omnichannel network in which all donor and recipient data exist in a single longitudinal record that can be used by all applications. A more comprehensive and standardized approach to donor data collection would drive quality improvement across organ procurement organizations and help address inequities in transplantation. Finally, a substantial increase in organ donation would be prompted by considering organ donors as a public health resource, meriting transparent publicly available data collection with respect to organ donor referral, screening, and management.</description><subject>editorial/personal viewpoint</subject><subject>ethics and public policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>law/legislation</subject><subject>Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation</subject><subject>organ transplantation in general</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Procurement</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Transplants</subject><subject>United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Health Resources and Services Administration</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotj5-gBvJ0kVb85hmZnAlxRcUXGjXISY3NqUzmSYZpf_elGqXru6Dcw_nfghdUTKhhIrb1USt0oQRxvI8IWR6hIZUEDIWtODHh55PB-gsxhUhtGQVO0UDLkQ9FYwO0eKltT40KjnfYgPRfbY4eRz7rvMh4c_gv9NyhDe9Wru0HWHVGgybPvfYW5yWgBdvOAXVxm6t2oTjNiZoLtCJVesIl7_1HC0eH95nz-P569PL7H4-1rwWaVyXOTsXQIgShVAWWKGJthQKRQQoa2phleGmrDhjHLg2dVWTqiqNLXkBhp-jm71vF_ymh5hk46KGdY4Cvo-SlfnPmk5LmqV0L9XBxxjAyi64RoWtpETuaMqVzDTljuZulWnmm-tf-_6jAXO4-MOXBXd7AeQnvxwEGbWDVoNxAXSSxrt_7H8A_z2FlQ</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Perakslis, Eric</creator><creator>Knechtle, Stuart J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2395-810X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-385X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Information design to support growth, quality, and equity of the US transplant system</title><author>Perakslis, Eric ; Knechtle, Stuart J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-9720236e00a646afe24c0cf1e4a06eafd96fad3d783223e3cd9890887df734ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>editorial/personal viewpoint</topic><topic>ethics and public policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>law/legislation</topic><topic>Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation</topic><topic>organ transplantation in general</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Procurement</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Transplants</topic><topic>United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Health Resources and Services Administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perakslis, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knechtle, Stuart J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perakslis, Eric</au><au>Knechtle, Stuart J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Information design to support growth, quality, and equity of the US transplant system</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>5-10</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, an arm of the Health Resources and Services Administration, has a contract with the United Network for Organ Sharing since 1986 to provide central oversight of organ donation and transplants in the United States. The United Network for Organ Sharing has recently come under scrutiny, prompting a review by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as summarized in its recent report and also by the US Senate Finance Committee. The national news services have opined about organ donation ethics, access to transplantation particularly for medically underserved populations, and management of organ transplantation data. These critiques raise important concerns that deserve our best response as a transplant community. Broadly, we suggest that the data management approach of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network be replaced with a patient-centric omnichannel network in which all donor and recipient data exist in a single longitudinal record that can be used by all applications. A more comprehensive and standardized approach to donor data collection would drive quality improvement across organ procurement organizations and help address inequities in transplantation. Finally, a substantial increase in organ donation would be prompted by considering organ donors as a public health resource, meriting transparent publicly available data collection with respect to organ donor referral, screening, and management.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36695621</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajt.2022.10.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2395-810X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-385X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1600-6135 |
ispartof | American journal of transplantation, 2023-01, Vol.23 (1), p.5-10 |
issn | 1600-6135 1600-6143 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2769591571 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | editorial/personal viewpoint ethics and public policy Humans law/legislation Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Organ Transplantation organ transplantation in general Tissue and Organ Procurement Tissue Donors Transplants United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) United States United States Health Resources and Services Administration |
title | Information design to support growth, quality, and equity of the US transplant system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A00%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Information%20design%20to%20support%20growth,%20quality,%20and%20equity%20of%20the%20US%20transplant%20system&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Perakslis,%20Eric&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=5-10&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajt.2022.10.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2769591571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769591571&rft_id=info:pmid/36695621&rft_els_id=S1600613522292569&rfr_iscdi=true |