Colorado pet owners’ perceptions of and attitudes towards antimicrobial drug use and resistance
Background Antimicrobial drug (AMD) use in companion animal medicine may contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in both pets and humans. However, pet owners' attitudes and perceptions regarding AMD use and AMR have not been extensively studied in the United States. Methods A cross‐section...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary record 2023-03, Vol.192 (6), p.no-no |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | no |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | no |
| container_title | Veterinary record |
| container_volume | 192 |
| creator | Taylor, Daniel D. Scallan Walter, Elaine J. |
| description | Background
Antimicrobial drug (AMD) use in companion animal medicine may contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in both pets and humans. However, pet owners' attitudes and perceptions regarding AMD use and AMR have not been extensively studied in the United States.
Methods
A cross‐sectional survey at five Colorado veterinary hospitals collected information about pet owners' knowledge and perceptions of AMD use and AMR, adherence with AMD treatment instructions and the role of the veterinarian in the AMD prescribing process.
Results
The pet owners surveyed did not have an adequate understanding of AMR and were unaware of the potential human health impact of AMD use in pets. However, most pet owners reported adherence with veterinary prescription instructions and indicated that they trusted their veterinarian to make appropriate decisions for their pets.
Limitations
The cross‐sectional design focusing on Colorado pet owners limits the generalisability of the results. Selection and social desirability biases may have occurred, which could have affected who participated and how participants responded to statements.
Conclusions
Pet owners play an important role in the AMD prescription process, and their lack of AMR understanding should be addressed in antimicrobial stewardship plans. Further research on how to effectively incorporate pet owners into stewardship interventions is needed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/vetr.2583 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2769373023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2769373023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-4c6c4cb479863be20334f790d1080f4143963e346741bb7d25e761e104905b5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgitbqwheQATe6aJvbJJOllHqBgiDV7ZCZOSOR6aQmGUt3voav55OYXnQhuEpy-PjJ-RE6I3hIMKajdwhuSNOM7aEexZwOpJB4H_Xw-s4Vxkfo2PvXSFXK6CE6YkIoqqTqIT22jXW6sskCQmKXLTj_9fEZX66ERTC29YmtE91WiQ7BhK4CnwS71K7ycRrM3JTOFkY3SeW6l6TzsMEOvPFBtyWcoINaNx5Od2cfPd1MZuO7wfTh9n58PR2ULMvYgJei5GXBpcoEK4BixngtFa4IznDNCWdKMGBcSE6KQlY0BSkIEBz3S4u0Zn10uc1dOPvWgQ_53PgSmka3YDufUykUkwxTFunFH_pqO9fG30WVyZSkVOKorrYqLui9gzpfODPXbpUTnK97z9e95-veoz3fJXbFHKpf-VN0BKMtWJoGVv8n5c-T2eMm8hs2X413</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2787515270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colorado pet owners’ perceptions of and attitudes towards antimicrobial drug use and resistance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Taylor, Daniel D. ; Scallan Walter, Elaine J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Daniel D. ; Scallan Walter, Elaine J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Antimicrobial drug (AMD) use in companion animal medicine may contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in both pets and humans. However, pet owners' attitudes and perceptions regarding AMD use and AMR have not been extensively studied in the United States.
Methods
A cross‐sectional survey at five Colorado veterinary hospitals collected information about pet owners' knowledge and perceptions of AMD use and AMR, adherence with AMD treatment instructions and the role of the veterinarian in the AMD prescribing process.
Results
The pet owners surveyed did not have an adequate understanding of AMR and were unaware of the potential human health impact of AMD use in pets. However, most pet owners reported adherence with veterinary prescription instructions and indicated that they trusted their veterinarian to make appropriate decisions for their pets.
Limitations
The cross‐sectional design focusing on Colorado pet owners limits the generalisability of the results. Selection and social desirability biases may have occurred, which could have affected who participated and how participants responded to statements.
Conclusions
Pet owners play an important role in the AMD prescription process, and their lack of AMR understanding should be addressed in antimicrobial stewardship plans. Further research on how to effectively incorporate pet owners into stewardship interventions is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-4900</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-7670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/vetr.2583</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36692979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use ; Antimicrobial agents ; Colorado ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Ownership ; Pet supplies ; Pets ; Social desirability ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Veterinarians ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>Veterinary record, 2023-03, Vol.192 (6), p.no-no</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Veterinary Association.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Veterinary Record published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Veterinary Association.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-4c6c4cb479863be20334f790d1080f4143963e346741bb7d25e761e104905b5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-4c6c4cb479863be20334f790d1080f4143963e346741bb7d25e761e104905b5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1063-3261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fvetr.2583$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fvetr.2583$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Daniel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scallan Walter, Elaine J.</creatorcontrib><title>Colorado pet owners’ perceptions of and attitudes towards antimicrobial drug use and resistance</title><title>Veterinary record</title><addtitle>Vet Rec</addtitle><description>Background
Antimicrobial drug (AMD) use in companion animal medicine may contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in both pets and humans. However, pet owners' attitudes and perceptions regarding AMD use and AMR have not been extensively studied in the United States.
Methods
A cross‐sectional survey at five Colorado veterinary hospitals collected information about pet owners' knowledge and perceptions of AMD use and AMR, adherence with AMD treatment instructions and the role of the veterinarian in the AMD prescribing process.
Results
The pet owners surveyed did not have an adequate understanding of AMR and were unaware of the potential human health impact of AMD use in pets. However, most pet owners reported adherence with veterinary prescription instructions and indicated that they trusted their veterinarian to make appropriate decisions for their pets.
Limitations
The cross‐sectional design focusing on Colorado pet owners limits the generalisability of the results. Selection and social desirability biases may have occurred, which could have affected who participated and how participants responded to statements.
Conclusions
Pet owners play an important role in the AMD prescription process, and their lack of AMR understanding should be addressed in antimicrobial stewardship plans. Further research on how to effectively incorporate pet owners into stewardship interventions is needed.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Pet supplies</subject><subject>Pets</subject><subject>Social desirability</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Veterinarians</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>0042-4900</issn><issn>2042-7670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgitbqwheQATe6aJvbJJOllHqBgiDV7ZCZOSOR6aQmGUt3voav55OYXnQhuEpy-PjJ-RE6I3hIMKajdwhuSNOM7aEexZwOpJB4H_Xw-s4Vxkfo2PvXSFXK6CE6YkIoqqTqIT22jXW6sskCQmKXLTj_9fEZX66ERTC29YmtE91WiQ7BhK4CnwS71K7ycRrM3JTOFkY3SeW6l6TzsMEOvPFBtyWcoINaNx5Od2cfPd1MZuO7wfTh9n58PR2ULMvYgJei5GXBpcoEK4BixngtFa4IznDNCWdKMGBcSE6KQlY0BSkIEBz3S4u0Zn10uc1dOPvWgQ_53PgSmka3YDufUykUkwxTFunFH_pqO9fG30WVyZSkVOKorrYqLui9gzpfODPXbpUTnK97z9e95-veoz3fJXbFHKpf-VN0BKMtWJoGVv8n5c-T2eMm8hs2X413</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Taylor, Daniel D.</creator><creator>Scallan Walter, Elaine J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-3261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Colorado pet owners’ perceptions of and attitudes towards antimicrobial drug use and resistance</title><author>Taylor, Daniel D. ; Scallan Walter, Elaine J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-4c6c4cb479863be20334f790d1080f4143963e346741bb7d25e761e104905b5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Pet supplies</topic><topic>Pets</topic><topic>Social desirability</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Veterinarians</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Daniel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scallan Walter, Elaine J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Daniel D.</au><au>Scallan Walter, Elaine J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colorado pet owners’ perceptions of and attitudes towards antimicrobial drug use and resistance</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary record</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Rec</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>192</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>no</spage><epage>no</epage><pages>no-no</pages><issn>0042-4900</issn><eissn>2042-7670</eissn><abstract>Background
Antimicrobial drug (AMD) use in companion animal medicine may contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in both pets and humans. However, pet owners' attitudes and perceptions regarding AMD use and AMR have not been extensively studied in the United States.
Methods
A cross‐sectional survey at five Colorado veterinary hospitals collected information about pet owners' knowledge and perceptions of AMD use and AMR, adherence with AMD treatment instructions and the role of the veterinarian in the AMD prescribing process.
Results
The pet owners surveyed did not have an adequate understanding of AMR and were unaware of the potential human health impact of AMD use in pets. However, most pet owners reported adherence with veterinary prescription instructions and indicated that they trusted their veterinarian to make appropriate decisions for their pets.
Limitations
The cross‐sectional design focusing on Colorado pet owners limits the generalisability of the results. Selection and social desirability biases may have occurred, which could have affected who participated and how participants responded to statements.
Conclusions
Pet owners play an important role in the AMD prescription process, and their lack of AMR understanding should be addressed in antimicrobial stewardship plans. Further research on how to effectively incorporate pet owners into stewardship interventions is needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36692979</pmid><doi>10.1002/vetr.2583</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-3261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0042-4900 |
| ispartof | Veterinary record, 2023-03, Vol.192 (6), p.no-no |
| issn | 0042-4900 2042-7670 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2769373023 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Animals Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use Antimicrobial agents Colorado Cross-Sectional Studies Humans Ownership Pet supplies Pets Social desirability Surveys and Questionnaires Veterinarians Veterinary medicine |
| title | Colorado pet owners’ perceptions of and attitudes towards antimicrobial drug use and resistance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A12%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colorado%20pet%20owners%E2%80%99%20perceptions%20of%20and%20attitudes%20towards%20antimicrobial%20drug%20use%20and%20resistance&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20record&rft.au=Taylor,%20Daniel%20D.&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=192&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=no&rft.epage=no&rft.pages=no-no&rft.issn=0042-4900&rft.eissn=2042-7670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/vetr.2583&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2769373023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2787515270&rft_id=info:pmid/36692979&rfr_iscdi=true |