Cost‐effectiveness of urethral bulking polydimethylsiloxane‐Urolastic® compared with mid‐urethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence: A two‐arm cohort study

Objective To investigate the cost‐effectiveness of urethral bulking polydimethylsiloxane‐Urolastic® (PDMS‐U) compared with mid‐urethral sling (MUS) surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at 1‐year follow‐up. Design Prospective, two‐arm cohort study with 2‐year follow‐up. Setting International...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2023-05, Vol.130 (6), p.674-683
Hauptverfasser:	Casteleijn, Fenne M., Vries, Allert M., Tu, Le Mai, Heesakkers, John P. F. A., Latul, Yani, Kowalik, Claudia R., Eijndhoven, Hugo W. F., Eekelen, Rik, Roovers, Jan‐Paul W. R.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Body mass index Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Cost-Benefit Analysis cost‐effectiveness Cough Dimethylpolysiloxanes Female Humans mid‐urethral sling surgery Polydimethylsiloxane Prospective Studies Quality of Life stress urinary incontinence Suburethral Slings Surgery Treatment Outcome urethral bulking Urinary Incontinence Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery willingness to pay
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!