Urine biomarkers in cancer detection: A systematic review of preanalytical parameters and applied methods

The aim of this review was to explore the status of urine sampling as a liquid biopsy for noninvasive cancer research by reviewing used preanalytical parameters and protocols. We searched two main health sciences databases, PubMed and Web of Science. From all eligible publications (2010‐2022), infor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2023-05, Vol.152 (10), p.2186-2205
Hauptverfasser: Jordaens, Stephanie, Zwaenepoel, Karen, Tjalma, Wiebren, Deben, Christophe, Beyers, Koen, Vankerckhoven, Vanessa, Pauwels, Patrick, Vorsters, Alex
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2205
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2186
container_title International journal of cancer
container_volume 152
creator Jordaens, Stephanie
Zwaenepoel, Karen
Tjalma, Wiebren
Deben, Christophe
Beyers, Koen
Vankerckhoven, Vanessa
Pauwels, Patrick
Vorsters, Alex
description The aim of this review was to explore the status of urine sampling as a liquid biopsy for noninvasive cancer research by reviewing used preanalytical parameters and protocols. We searched two main health sciences databases, PubMed and Web of Science. From all eligible publications (2010‐2022), information was extracted regarding: (a) study population characteristics, (b) cancer type, (c) urine preanalytics, (d) analyte class, (e) isolation method, (f) detection method, (g) comparator used, (h) biomarker type, (i) conclusion and (j) sensitivity and specificity. The search query identified 7835 records, of which 924 unique publications remained after screening the title, and full text. Our analysis demonstrated that many publications did not report information about the preanalytical parameters of their urine samples, even though several other studies have shown the importance of standardization of sample handling. Interestingly, it was noted that urine is used for many cancer types and not just cancers originating from the urogenital tract. Many different types of relevant analytes have been shown to be found in urine. Additionally, future considerations and recommendations are discussed: (a) the heterogeneous nature of urine, (b) the need for standardized practice protocols and (c) the road toward the clinic. Urine is an emerging liquid biopsy with broad applicability in different analytes and several cancer types. However, standard practice protocols for sample handling and processing would help to elaborate the clinical utility of urine in cancer research, detection and disease monitoring. What's new? Urine is a valuable source of liquid biopsy for cancer, with applicability particularly in the detection of different analytes and cancer types. Little is known, however, about consistency within urine liquid biopsy methods. Here, the authors investigated reporting of urine protocols in the literature and discuss future recommendations for standardization and clinical application. Analyses show that many publications do not report information on preanalytical parameters. Moreover, urine liquid biopsy was relevant for urogenital cancers as well as a variety of other malignancies. The findings have implications for optimizing the clinical application of urine liquid biopsy in cancer detection and monitoring.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijc.34434
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2766432051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2785187128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-89adf79bd73d43c1adef7cb1c71c87b7897c5fbde3d463e767ae43eb5804423d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMotlYX_oAE3Ohi2mSSmaTuSvFRKbix6yGT3MHUeZnMWPr3pra6EFwF7j05cA9Cl5SMKSHxxK71mHHO-BEaUjIVEYlpcoyGYUciQVk6QGferwmhNCH8FA1YmnLBGBsiu3K2BpzbplLuHZzHtsZa1RocNtCB7mxT3-EZ9lvfQaU6q7GDTwsb3BS4daBqVW7DVJW4VU5V4U-QqNpg1balBYPD6K0x_hydFKr0cHF4R2j1cP86f4qWL4-L-WwZaSYlj-RUmUJMcyOY4UxTZaAQOqdaUC1FLuRU6KTIDYR1ykCkQgFnkCeScB4zw0boZu9tXfPRg--yynoNZalqaHqfxSIcz2KS0IBe_0HXTe_CQTtKJlQKGstA3e4p7RrvHRRZ62yotc0oyXb9s9A_--4f2KuDsc8rML_kT_AATPbAxpaw_d-ULZ7ne-UXp4KP6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785187128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urine biomarkers in cancer detection: A systematic review of preanalytical parameters and applied methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Jordaens, Stephanie ; Zwaenepoel, Karen ; Tjalma, Wiebren ; Deben, Christophe ; Beyers, Koen ; Vankerckhoven, Vanessa ; Pauwels, Patrick ; Vorsters, Alex</creator><creatorcontrib>Jordaens, Stephanie ; Zwaenepoel, Karen ; Tjalma, Wiebren ; Deben, Christophe ; Beyers, Koen ; Vankerckhoven, Vanessa ; Pauwels, Patrick ; Vorsters, Alex</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this review was to explore the status of urine sampling as a liquid biopsy for noninvasive cancer research by reviewing used preanalytical parameters and protocols. We searched two main health sciences databases, PubMed and Web of Science. From all eligible publications (2010‐2022), information was extracted regarding: (a) study population characteristics, (b) cancer type, (c) urine preanalytics, (d) analyte class, (e) isolation method, (f) detection method, (g) comparator used, (h) biomarker type, (i) conclusion and (j) sensitivity and specificity. The search query identified 7835 records, of which 924 unique publications remained after screening the title, and full text. Our analysis demonstrated that many publications did not report information about the preanalytical parameters of their urine samples, even though several other studies have shown the importance of standardization of sample handling. Interestingly, it was noted that urine is used for many cancer types and not just cancers originating from the urogenital tract. Many different types of relevant analytes have been shown to be found in urine. Additionally, future considerations and recommendations are discussed: (a) the heterogeneous nature of urine, (b) the need for standardized practice protocols and (c) the road toward the clinic. Urine is an emerging liquid biopsy with broad applicability in different analytes and several cancer types. However, standard practice protocols for sample handling and processing would help to elaborate the clinical utility of urine in cancer research, detection and disease monitoring. What's new? Urine is a valuable source of liquid biopsy for cancer, with applicability particularly in the detection of different analytes and cancer types. Little is known, however, about consistency within urine liquid biopsy methods. Here, the authors investigated reporting of urine protocols in the literature and discuss future recommendations for standardization and clinical application. Analyses show that many publications do not report information on preanalytical parameters. Moreover, urine liquid biopsy was relevant for urogenital cancers as well as a variety of other malignancies. The findings have implications for optimizing the clinical application of urine liquid biopsy in cancer detection and monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34434</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36647333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biomarkers ; Biopsy ; Cancer ; Cancer research ; Humans ; Liquid Biopsy ; Medical research ; Neoplasms ; oncology ; Population studies ; Specimen Handling ; Standardization ; Systematic review ; Urine</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2023-05, Vol.152 (10), p.2186-2205</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-89adf79bd73d43c1adef7cb1c71c87b7897c5fbde3d463e767ae43eb5804423d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-89adf79bd73d43c1adef7cb1c71c87b7897c5fbde3d463e767ae43eb5804423d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8553-1921 ; 0000-0002-0265-058X ; 0000-0002-6618-045X ; 0000-0001-8085-2040 ; 0000-0001-6730-367X ; 0000-0001-9122-0639 ; 0000-0003-2910-8405 ; 0000-0002-9602-9304</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.34434$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.34434$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36647333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jordaens, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwaenepoel, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tjalma, Wiebren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deben, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyers, Koen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vankerckhoven, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorsters, Alex</creatorcontrib><title>Urine biomarkers in cancer detection: A systematic review of preanalytical parameters and applied methods</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>The aim of this review was to explore the status of urine sampling as a liquid biopsy for noninvasive cancer research by reviewing used preanalytical parameters and protocols. We searched two main health sciences databases, PubMed and Web of Science. From all eligible publications (2010‐2022), information was extracted regarding: (a) study population characteristics, (b) cancer type, (c) urine preanalytics, (d) analyte class, (e) isolation method, (f) detection method, (g) comparator used, (h) biomarker type, (i) conclusion and (j) sensitivity and specificity. The search query identified 7835 records, of which 924 unique publications remained after screening the title, and full text. Our analysis demonstrated that many publications did not report information about the preanalytical parameters of their urine samples, even though several other studies have shown the importance of standardization of sample handling. Interestingly, it was noted that urine is used for many cancer types and not just cancers originating from the urogenital tract. Many different types of relevant analytes have been shown to be found in urine. Additionally, future considerations and recommendations are discussed: (a) the heterogeneous nature of urine, (b) the need for standardized practice protocols and (c) the road toward the clinic. Urine is an emerging liquid biopsy with broad applicability in different analytes and several cancer types. However, standard practice protocols for sample handling and processing would help to elaborate the clinical utility of urine in cancer research, detection and disease monitoring. What's new? Urine is a valuable source of liquid biopsy for cancer, with applicability particularly in the detection of different analytes and cancer types. Little is known, however, about consistency within urine liquid biopsy methods. Here, the authors investigated reporting of urine protocols in the literature and discuss future recommendations for standardization and clinical application. Analyses show that many publications do not report information on preanalytical parameters. Moreover, urine liquid biopsy was relevant for urogenital cancers as well as a variety of other malignancies. The findings have implications for optimizing the clinical application of urine liquid biopsy in cancer detection and monitoring.</description><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liquid Biopsy</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Neoplasms</subject><subject>oncology</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Specimen Handling</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMotlYX_oAE3Ohi2mSSmaTuSvFRKbix6yGT3MHUeZnMWPr3pra6EFwF7j05cA9Cl5SMKSHxxK71mHHO-BEaUjIVEYlpcoyGYUciQVk6QGferwmhNCH8FA1YmnLBGBsiu3K2BpzbplLuHZzHtsZa1RocNtCB7mxT3-EZ9lvfQaU6q7GDTwsb3BS4daBqVW7DVJW4VU5V4U-QqNpg1balBYPD6K0x_hydFKr0cHF4R2j1cP86f4qWL4-L-WwZaSYlj-RUmUJMcyOY4UxTZaAQOqdaUC1FLuRU6KTIDYR1ykCkQgFnkCeScB4zw0boZu9tXfPRg--yynoNZalqaHqfxSIcz2KS0IBe_0HXTe_CQTtKJlQKGstA3e4p7RrvHRRZ62yotc0oyXb9s9A_--4f2KuDsc8rML_kT_AATPbAxpaw_d-ULZ7ne-UXp4KP6g</recordid><startdate>20230515</startdate><enddate>20230515</enddate><creator>Jordaens, Stephanie</creator><creator>Zwaenepoel, Karen</creator><creator>Tjalma, Wiebren</creator><creator>Deben, Christophe</creator><creator>Beyers, Koen</creator><creator>Vankerckhoven, Vanessa</creator><creator>Pauwels, Patrick</creator><creator>Vorsters, Alex</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8553-1921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-058X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6618-045X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8085-2040</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6730-367X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9122-0639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-8405</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-9304</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230515</creationdate><title>Urine biomarkers in cancer detection: A systematic review of preanalytical parameters and applied methods</title><author>Jordaens, Stephanie ; Zwaenepoel, Karen ; Tjalma, Wiebren ; Deben, Christophe ; Beyers, Koen ; Vankerckhoven, Vanessa ; Pauwels, Patrick ; Vorsters, Alex</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-89adf79bd73d43c1adef7cb1c71c87b7897c5fbde3d463e767ae43eb5804423d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liquid Biopsy</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Neoplasms</topic><topic>oncology</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Specimen Handling</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jordaens, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwaenepoel, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tjalma, Wiebren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deben, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyers, Koen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vankerckhoven, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorsters, Alex</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jordaens, Stephanie</au><au>Zwaenepoel, Karen</au><au>Tjalma, Wiebren</au><au>Deben, Christophe</au><au>Beyers, Koen</au><au>Vankerckhoven, Vanessa</au><au>Pauwels, Patrick</au><au>Vorsters, Alex</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urine biomarkers in cancer detection: A systematic review of preanalytical parameters and applied methods</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2023-05-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2186</spage><epage>2205</epage><pages>2186-2205</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><abstract>The aim of this review was to explore the status of urine sampling as a liquid biopsy for noninvasive cancer research by reviewing used preanalytical parameters and protocols. We searched two main health sciences databases, PubMed and Web of Science. From all eligible publications (2010‐2022), information was extracted regarding: (a) study population characteristics, (b) cancer type, (c) urine preanalytics, (d) analyte class, (e) isolation method, (f) detection method, (g) comparator used, (h) biomarker type, (i) conclusion and (j) sensitivity and specificity. The search query identified 7835 records, of which 924 unique publications remained after screening the title, and full text. Our analysis demonstrated that many publications did not report information about the preanalytical parameters of their urine samples, even though several other studies have shown the importance of standardization of sample handling. Interestingly, it was noted that urine is used for many cancer types and not just cancers originating from the urogenital tract. Many different types of relevant analytes have been shown to be found in urine. Additionally, future considerations and recommendations are discussed: (a) the heterogeneous nature of urine, (b) the need for standardized practice protocols and (c) the road toward the clinic. Urine is an emerging liquid biopsy with broad applicability in different analytes and several cancer types. However, standard practice protocols for sample handling and processing would help to elaborate the clinical utility of urine in cancer research, detection and disease monitoring. What's new? Urine is a valuable source of liquid biopsy for cancer, with applicability particularly in the detection of different analytes and cancer types. Little is known, however, about consistency within urine liquid biopsy methods. Here, the authors investigated reporting of urine protocols in the literature and discuss future recommendations for standardization and clinical application. Analyses show that many publications do not report information on preanalytical parameters. Moreover, urine liquid biopsy was relevant for urogenital cancers as well as a variety of other malignancies. The findings have implications for optimizing the clinical application of urine liquid biopsy in cancer detection and monitoring.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36647333</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.34434</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8553-1921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-058X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6618-045X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8085-2040</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6730-367X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9122-0639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-8405</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-9304</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7136
ispartof International journal of cancer, 2023-05, Vol.152 (10), p.2186-2205
issn 0020-7136
1097-0215
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2766432051
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Biomarkers
Biopsy
Cancer
Cancer research
Humans
Liquid Biopsy
Medical research
Neoplasms
oncology
Population studies
Specimen Handling
Standardization
Systematic review
Urine
title Urine biomarkers in cancer detection: A systematic review of preanalytical parameters and applied methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T20%3A40%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urine%20biomarkers%20in%20cancer%20detection:%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20preanalytical%20parameters%20and%20applied%20methods&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Jordaens,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2023-05-15&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2186&rft.epage=2205&rft.pages=2186-2205&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.34434&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2785187128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785187128&rft_id=info:pmid/36647333&rfr_iscdi=true