Evaluation of scientific reliability and quality of YouTube videos on cancer and nutrition
•Cancer patients have an ongoing search for foods or diet types that will contribute positively to the treatment process and the treatment side effects.•Because social media has been so popular over the past 10 years, there has been an upsurge in sharing of information on health, in particular cance...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2023-04, Vol.108, p.111933-111933, Article 111933 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 111933 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 111933 |
| container_title | Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) |
| container_volume | 108 |
| creator | Sütcüoğlu, Osman Özay, Zeynep İrem Özet, Ahmet Yazıcı, Ozan Özdemir, Nuriye |
| description | •Cancer patients have an ongoing search for foods or diet types that will contribute positively to the treatment process and the treatment side effects.•Because social media has been so popular over the past 10 years, there has been an upsurge in sharing of information on health, in particular cancer•The purpose of this study was to assess the scientific reliability and quality of the most watched YouTube videos found using “cancer and nutrition” keywords, evaluated with internationally accepted scoring systems and to explore the relationships between them and video popularity.•In our study, according to the DISCERN score, only 17 (21%) videos were evaluated as good or excellent.•There was a strong negative correlation between quality and popularity.•There is a need to produce quality content on YouTube or similar platforms.
YouTube is a video-sharing platform used by ∼2 billion people per month, and videos are watched in high numbers in the medical field. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the scientific reliability and the relationship between the quality and popularity of the most watched YouTube videos on cancer and nutrition.
YouTube videos were evaluated independently by two oncologists. The video quality was evaluated according to the internationally valid medical video or document evaluation scores: DISCERN score, modified DISCERN score, Journal of the American Medical Association score, and Global Quality Scale score.
Forty-six (58%) of the videos were uploaded to the platform by physicians or dietitians. Although 29 videos (36%) recommended a uniform diet, 51 videos (64%) had food suggestions that could be added to the diet. The most recommended foods were cruciferous (n = 16 [20%]; broccoli and cauliflower) and berries (n = 12% [15%]; strawberries, blueberries, and raspberries). When the video quality was evaluated according to the DISCERN score, only 17 (21%) videos were evaluated as good or excellent. There was a strong negative correlation between the DISCERN score and the number of video views and likes (r = –0.426; P < 0.001 and r = –0.226; P = 0.017, respectively).
Videos about cancer and nutrition were highly watched, but the overall quality and reliability were low. Although the source of the information presented and its deficiencies and sometimes misleading statements were found, it was determined that the videos with less reliability were watched more. There is a need to produce quality content on YouTube or similar platforms. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nut.2022.111933 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2765778756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0899900722003458</els_id><sourcerecordid>2765778756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-b2f1971dc2f6ed23a507a996eb12574de1f9807517c2fceb36ee927e8a2e69a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EgvLxA1hQJBaWFJ_d2LGYECofEhILDLBYjnORXKUx2HEl_j1uCwwMTHfD8766ewg5BToFCuJyMR3SOGWUsSkAKM53yARqyUtgs9kumdBaqVJRKg_IYYwLSikoofbJARdiRgXnE_I2X5k-mdH5ofBdEa3DYXSds0XA3pnG9W78LMzQFh_JbPZMvfr0nBosVq5FH4sctWawGDZcPim4dd8x2etMH_Hkex6Rl9v58819-fh093Bz_VhaXsNYNqwDJaG1rBPYMm4qKo1SAhtglZy1CJ2qqaxAZsJiwwWiYhJrw1AoU_EjcrHtfQ_-I2Ec9dJFi31vBvQpaiZFJWUtK5HR8z_owqcw5OsyVTMQrKI8U7ClbPAxBuz0e3BLEz41UL0Wrxc6f6nX4vVWfM6cfTenZontb-LHdAautgBmFSuHQW9cW2xdQDvq1rt_6r8AuOGTdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2782162503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of scientific reliability and quality of YouTube videos on cancer and nutrition</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Sütcüoğlu, Osman ; Özay, Zeynep İrem ; Özet, Ahmet ; Yazıcı, Ozan ; Özdemir, Nuriye</creator><creatorcontrib>Sütcüoğlu, Osman ; Özay, Zeynep İrem ; Özet, Ahmet ; Yazıcı, Ozan ; Özdemir, Nuriye</creatorcontrib><description>•Cancer patients have an ongoing search for foods or diet types that will contribute positively to the treatment process and the treatment side effects.•Because social media has been so popular over the past 10 years, there has been an upsurge in sharing of information on health, in particular cancer•The purpose of this study was to assess the scientific reliability and quality of the most watched YouTube videos found using “cancer and nutrition” keywords, evaluated with internationally accepted scoring systems and to explore the relationships between them and video popularity.•In our study, according to the DISCERN score, only 17 (21%) videos were evaluated as good or excellent.•There was a strong negative correlation between quality and popularity.•There is a need to produce quality content on YouTube or similar platforms.
YouTube is a video-sharing platform used by ∼2 billion people per month, and videos are watched in high numbers in the medical field. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the scientific reliability and the relationship between the quality and popularity of the most watched YouTube videos on cancer and nutrition.
YouTube videos were evaluated independently by two oncologists. The video quality was evaluated according to the internationally valid medical video or document evaluation scores: DISCERN score, modified DISCERN score, Journal of the American Medical Association score, and Global Quality Scale score.
Forty-six (58%) of the videos were uploaded to the platform by physicians or dietitians. Although 29 videos (36%) recommended a uniform diet, 51 videos (64%) had food suggestions that could be added to the diet. The most recommended foods were cruciferous (n = 16 [20%]; broccoli and cauliflower) and berries (n = 12% [15%]; strawberries, blueberries, and raspberries). When the video quality was evaluated according to the DISCERN score, only 17 (21%) videos were evaluated as good or excellent. There was a strong negative correlation between the DISCERN score and the number of video views and likes (r = –0.426; P < 0.001 and r = –0.226; P = 0.017, respectively).
Videos about cancer and nutrition were highly watched, but the overall quality and reliability were low. Although the source of the information presented and its deficiencies and sometimes misleading statements were found, it was determined that the videos with less reliability were watched more. There is a need to produce quality content on YouTube or similar platforms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2022.111933</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36640633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Berries ; Brassica ; Broccoli ; Cancer ; Diet ; Dietitians ; Food ; Fruit ; Fruits ; Humans ; Information sharing ; Internet ; Keywords ; Neoplasms ; Nutrition ; Nutrition research ; Nutritional Status ; Physicians ; Popularity ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Statistical analysis ; United States ; User behavior ; Vegetarianism ; Video ; YouTube</subject><ispartof>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2023-04, Vol.108, p.111933-111933, Article 111933</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-b2f1971dc2f6ed23a507a996eb12574de1f9807517c2fceb36ee927e8a2e69a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-b2f1971dc2f6ed23a507a996eb12574de1f9807517c2fceb36ee927e8a2e69a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4827-9042 ; 0000-0003-3835-2741</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2782162503?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993,64383,64385,64387,72239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36640633$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sütcüoğlu, Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özay, Zeynep İrem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özet, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazıcı, Ozan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Nuriye</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of scientific reliability and quality of YouTube videos on cancer and nutrition</title><title>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)</title><addtitle>Nutrition</addtitle><description>•Cancer patients have an ongoing search for foods or diet types that will contribute positively to the treatment process and the treatment side effects.•Because social media has been so popular over the past 10 years, there has been an upsurge in sharing of information on health, in particular cancer•The purpose of this study was to assess the scientific reliability and quality of the most watched YouTube videos found using “cancer and nutrition” keywords, evaluated with internationally accepted scoring systems and to explore the relationships between them and video popularity.•In our study, according to the DISCERN score, only 17 (21%) videos were evaluated as good or excellent.•There was a strong negative correlation between quality and popularity.•There is a need to produce quality content on YouTube or similar platforms.
YouTube is a video-sharing platform used by ∼2 billion people per month, and videos are watched in high numbers in the medical field. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the scientific reliability and the relationship between the quality and popularity of the most watched YouTube videos on cancer and nutrition.
YouTube videos were evaluated independently by two oncologists. The video quality was evaluated according to the internationally valid medical video or document evaluation scores: DISCERN score, modified DISCERN score, Journal of the American Medical Association score, and Global Quality Scale score.
Forty-six (58%) of the videos were uploaded to the platform by physicians or dietitians. Although 29 videos (36%) recommended a uniform diet, 51 videos (64%) had food suggestions that could be added to the diet. The most recommended foods were cruciferous (n = 16 [20%]; broccoli and cauliflower) and berries (n = 12% [15%]; strawberries, blueberries, and raspberries). When the video quality was evaluated according to the DISCERN score, only 17 (21%) videos were evaluated as good or excellent. There was a strong negative correlation between the DISCERN score and the number of video views and likes (r = –0.426; P < 0.001 and r = –0.226; P = 0.017, respectively).
Videos about cancer and nutrition were highly watched, but the overall quality and reliability were low. Although the source of the information presented and its deficiencies and sometimes misleading statements were found, it was determined that the videos with less reliability were watched more. There is a need to produce quality content on YouTube or similar platforms.</description><subject>Berries</subject><subject>Brassica</subject><subject>Broccoli</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietitians</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Fruit</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Neoplasms</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>User behavior</subject><subject>Vegetarianism</subject><subject>Video</subject><subject>YouTube</subject><issn>0899-9007</issn><issn>1873-1244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EgvLxA1hQJBaWFJ_d2LGYECofEhILDLBYjnORXKUx2HEl_j1uCwwMTHfD8766ewg5BToFCuJyMR3SOGWUsSkAKM53yARqyUtgs9kumdBaqVJRKg_IYYwLSikoofbJARdiRgXnE_I2X5k-mdH5ofBdEa3DYXSds0XA3pnG9W78LMzQFh_JbPZMvfr0nBosVq5FH4sctWawGDZcPim4dd8x2etMH_Hkex6Rl9v58819-fh093Bz_VhaXsNYNqwDJaG1rBPYMm4qKo1SAhtglZy1CJ2qqaxAZsJiwwWiYhJrw1AoU_EjcrHtfQ_-I2Ec9dJFi31vBvQpaiZFJWUtK5HR8z_owqcw5OsyVTMQrKI8U7ClbPAxBuz0e3BLEz41UL0Wrxc6f6nX4vVWfM6cfTenZontb-LHdAautgBmFSuHQW9cW2xdQDvq1rt_6r8AuOGTdA</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Sütcüoğlu, Osman</creator><creator>Özay, Zeynep İrem</creator><creator>Özet, Ahmet</creator><creator>Yazıcı, Ozan</creator><creator>Özdemir, Nuriye</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-9042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3835-2741</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Evaluation of scientific reliability and quality of YouTube videos on cancer and nutrition</title><author>Sütcüoğlu, Osman ; Özay, Zeynep İrem ; Özet, Ahmet ; Yazıcı, Ozan ; Özdemir, Nuriye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-b2f1971dc2f6ed23a507a996eb12574de1f9807517c2fceb36ee927e8a2e69a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Berries</topic><topic>Brassica</topic><topic>Broccoli</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietitians</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Fruit</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Neoplasms</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>User behavior</topic><topic>Vegetarianism</topic><topic>Video</topic><topic>YouTube</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sütcüoğlu, Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özay, Zeynep İrem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özet, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazıcı, Ozan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Nuriye</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sütcüoğlu, Osman</au><au>Özay, Zeynep İrem</au><au>Özet, Ahmet</au><au>Yazıcı, Ozan</au><au>Özdemir, Nuriye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of scientific reliability and quality of YouTube videos on cancer and nutrition</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)</jtitle><addtitle>Nutrition</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>108</volume><spage>111933</spage><epage>111933</epage><pages>111933-111933</pages><artnum>111933</artnum><issn>0899-9007</issn><eissn>1873-1244</eissn><abstract>•Cancer patients have an ongoing search for foods or diet types that will contribute positively to the treatment process and the treatment side effects.•Because social media has been so popular over the past 10 years, there has been an upsurge in sharing of information on health, in particular cancer•The purpose of this study was to assess the scientific reliability and quality of the most watched YouTube videos found using “cancer and nutrition” keywords, evaluated with internationally accepted scoring systems and to explore the relationships between them and video popularity.•In our study, according to the DISCERN score, only 17 (21%) videos were evaluated as good or excellent.•There was a strong negative correlation between quality and popularity.•There is a need to produce quality content on YouTube or similar platforms.
YouTube is a video-sharing platform used by ∼2 billion people per month, and videos are watched in high numbers in the medical field. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the scientific reliability and the relationship between the quality and popularity of the most watched YouTube videos on cancer and nutrition.
YouTube videos were evaluated independently by two oncologists. The video quality was evaluated according to the internationally valid medical video or document evaluation scores: DISCERN score, modified DISCERN score, Journal of the American Medical Association score, and Global Quality Scale score.
Forty-six (58%) of the videos were uploaded to the platform by physicians or dietitians. Although 29 videos (36%) recommended a uniform diet, 51 videos (64%) had food suggestions that could be added to the diet. The most recommended foods were cruciferous (n = 16 [20%]; broccoli and cauliflower) and berries (n = 12% [15%]; strawberries, blueberries, and raspberries). When the video quality was evaluated according to the DISCERN score, only 17 (21%) videos were evaluated as good or excellent. There was a strong negative correlation between the DISCERN score and the number of video views and likes (r = –0.426; P < 0.001 and r = –0.226; P = 0.017, respectively).
Videos about cancer and nutrition were highly watched, but the overall quality and reliability were low. Although the source of the information presented and its deficiencies and sometimes misleading statements were found, it was determined that the videos with less reliability were watched more. There is a need to produce quality content on YouTube or similar platforms.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36640633</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nut.2022.111933</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-9042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3835-2741</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0899-9007 |
| ispartof | Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2023-04, Vol.108, p.111933-111933, Article 111933 |
| issn | 0899-9007 1873-1244 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2765778756 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Berries Brassica Broccoli Cancer Diet Dietitians Food Fruit Fruits Humans Information sharing Internet Keywords Neoplasms Nutrition Nutrition research Nutritional Status Physicians Popularity Reliability analysis Reproducibility of Results Social Media Social networks Statistical analysis United States User behavior Vegetarianism Video YouTube |
| title | Evaluation of scientific reliability and quality of YouTube videos on cancer and nutrition |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A13%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20scientific%20reliability%20and%20quality%20of%20YouTube%20videos%20on%20cancer%20and%20nutrition&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20(Burbank,%20Los%20Angeles%20County,%20Calif.)&rft.au=S%C3%BCtc%C3%BCo%C4%9Flu,%20Osman&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=108&rft.spage=111933&rft.epage=111933&rft.pages=111933-111933&rft.artnum=111933&rft.issn=0899-9007&rft.eissn=1873-1244&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nut.2022.111933&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2765778756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2782162503&rft_id=info:pmid/36640633&rft_els_id=S0899900722003458&rfr_iscdi=true |