Tinkering with (in)visibilities: Caring for older people with surveillance technologies
New surveillance technologies have in later years been introduced in care for older people as part of a broader policy agenda of ‘sustainable’ welfare state retrenchment, promoting ideals of self‐sufficiency and empowerment of older people ‘ageing in place’. Drawing on newer approaches to surveillan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociology of health & illness 2023-03, Vol.45 (3), p.605-622 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 622 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 605 |
container_title | Sociology of health & illness |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Kamp, Annette Grosen, Sidsel Lond Hansen, Agnete Meldgaard |
description | New surveillance technologies have in later years been introduced in care for older people as part of a broader policy agenda of ‘sustainable’ welfare state retrenchment, promoting ideals of self‐sufficiency and empowerment of older people ‘ageing in place’. Drawing on newer approaches to surveillance studies, this article explores care workers’ active labour in creating (in)visibility in a complex and ongoing process of tinkering, while negotiating political rationales of empowerment and professional accountability. Hence, visibilities are conceived as coded, reflecting different ideals and rationales. Based on extensive fieldwork in Danish eldercare, we analyse two forms of surveillance: virtual homecare and sensor‐flooring, where clients are involved and positioned in different ways in accomplishing surveillance. We illuminate how the process of accomplishing (in)visibility does not only involve tinkering with technology, but also with spatial arrangements in the client’s home, and with clients’ behaviour. Consequently, we underscore how tinkering may turn out to be a difficult and even conflictual task of negotiating professional authority and accountability in ways that resonate with clients’ sense of autonomy and policy ideals of empowerment. Our studies underline how the power dynamics of surveillance in care should not be overlooked, even though they are continuously negotiated in care practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1467-9566.13606 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2765777516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2782001230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4136-d52e9c225551ca148e95cd1fb558f5e751f4ec21aecaa7dec1571813d668182e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EouVjZkORWMqQ1pfEjsOGKj4qVWKgiNFKnUvrksbFblrx73FJ6cDCLZbOz7169RByBbQPfgaQ8DTMGOd9iDnlR6R72ByTLoUEwkyIrEPOnFtQSoGn8SnpxJzHmYhpl7xPdP2BVtezYKvX86Cn69uNdnqqK73W6O6CYf7zWxobmKpAG6zQrCpscdfYDeqqymuFwRrVvDaVmfm7C3JS5pXDy_17Tt4eHybD53D88jQa3o9DlfjGYcEizFQUMcZA5ZAIzJgqoJwyJkqGKYMyQRVBjirP0wIVsBQExAXnAkSE8Tnptbkraz4bdGu51E7hrhGaxsko5SxNfQ736M0fdGEaW_t2nhKRlxPF1FODllLWOGexlCurl7n9kkDlzrncGZY7w_LHub-43uc20yUWB_5Xsgd4C2x1hV__5cnX59G4Tf4GiGKLaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2782001230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tinkering with (in)visibilities: Caring for older people with surveillance technologies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kamp, Annette ; Grosen, Sidsel Lond ; Hansen, Agnete Meldgaard</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamp, Annette ; Grosen, Sidsel Lond ; Hansen, Agnete Meldgaard</creatorcontrib><description>New surveillance technologies have in later years been introduced in care for older people as part of a broader policy agenda of ‘sustainable’ welfare state retrenchment, promoting ideals of self‐sufficiency and empowerment of older people ‘ageing in place’. Drawing on newer approaches to surveillance studies, this article explores care workers’ active labour in creating (in)visibility in a complex and ongoing process of tinkering, while negotiating political rationales of empowerment and professional accountability. Hence, visibilities are conceived as coded, reflecting different ideals and rationales. Based on extensive fieldwork in Danish eldercare, we analyse two forms of surveillance: virtual homecare and sensor‐flooring, where clients are involved and positioned in different ways in accomplishing surveillance. We illuminate how the process of accomplishing (in)visibility does not only involve tinkering with technology, but also with spatial arrangements in the client’s home, and with clients’ behaviour. Consequently, we underscore how tinkering may turn out to be a difficult and even conflictual task of negotiating professional authority and accountability in ways that resonate with clients’ sense of autonomy and policy ideals of empowerment. Our studies underline how the power dynamics of surveillance in care should not be overlooked, even though they are continuously negotiated in care practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-9889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9566</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13606</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36639830</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Aged ; ageing technology surveillance ; Aging ; Autonomy ; Bargaining ; care work ; Clients ; Empowerment ; Health Personnel ; Home Care Services ; Humans ; Older people ; Power structure ; Self sufficiency ; Social Responsibility ; Surveillance ; Technology ; Visibility ; Welfare state</subject><ispartof>Sociology of health & illness, 2023-03, Vol.45 (3), p.605-622</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4136-d52e9c225551ca148e95cd1fb558f5e751f4ec21aecaa7dec1571813d668182e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4136-d52e9c225551ca148e95cd1fb558f5e751f4ec21aecaa7dec1571813d668182e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8867-8796 ; 0000-0003-1009-5085 ; 0000-0001-9867-7586</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-9566.13606$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-9566.13606$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639830$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamp, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grosen, Sidsel Lond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Agnete Meldgaard</creatorcontrib><title>Tinkering with (in)visibilities: Caring for older people with surveillance technologies</title><title>Sociology of health & illness</title><addtitle>Sociol Health Illn</addtitle><description>New surveillance technologies have in later years been introduced in care for older people as part of a broader policy agenda of ‘sustainable’ welfare state retrenchment, promoting ideals of self‐sufficiency and empowerment of older people ‘ageing in place’. Drawing on newer approaches to surveillance studies, this article explores care workers’ active labour in creating (in)visibility in a complex and ongoing process of tinkering, while negotiating political rationales of empowerment and professional accountability. Hence, visibilities are conceived as coded, reflecting different ideals and rationales. Based on extensive fieldwork in Danish eldercare, we analyse two forms of surveillance: virtual homecare and sensor‐flooring, where clients are involved and positioned in different ways in accomplishing surveillance. We illuminate how the process of accomplishing (in)visibility does not only involve tinkering with technology, but also with spatial arrangements in the client’s home, and with clients’ behaviour. Consequently, we underscore how tinkering may turn out to be a difficult and even conflictual task of negotiating professional authority and accountability in ways that resonate with clients’ sense of autonomy and policy ideals of empowerment. Our studies underline how the power dynamics of surveillance in care should not be overlooked, even though they are continuously negotiated in care practices.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>ageing technology surveillance</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>care work</subject><subject>Clients</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Home Care Services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Power structure</subject><subject>Self sufficiency</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Visibility</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><issn>0141-9889</issn><issn>1467-9566</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EouVjZkORWMqQ1pfEjsOGKj4qVWKgiNFKnUvrksbFblrx73FJ6cDCLZbOz7169RByBbQPfgaQ8DTMGOd9iDnlR6R72ByTLoUEwkyIrEPOnFtQSoGn8SnpxJzHmYhpl7xPdP2BVtezYKvX86Cn69uNdnqqK73W6O6CYf7zWxobmKpAG6zQrCpscdfYDeqqymuFwRrVvDaVmfm7C3JS5pXDy_17Tt4eHybD53D88jQa3o9DlfjGYcEizFQUMcZA5ZAIzJgqoJwyJkqGKYMyQRVBjirP0wIVsBQExAXnAkSE8Tnptbkraz4bdGu51E7hrhGaxsko5SxNfQ736M0fdGEaW_t2nhKRlxPF1FODllLWOGexlCurl7n9kkDlzrncGZY7w_LHub-43uc20yUWB_5Xsgd4C2x1hV__5cnX59G4Tf4GiGKLaA</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Kamp, Annette</creator><creator>Grosen, Sidsel Lond</creator><creator>Hansen, Agnete Meldgaard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8867-8796</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1009-5085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-7586</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Tinkering with (in)visibilities: Caring for older people with surveillance technologies</title><author>Kamp, Annette ; Grosen, Sidsel Lond ; Hansen, Agnete Meldgaard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4136-d52e9c225551ca148e95cd1fb558f5e751f4ec21aecaa7dec1571813d668182e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>ageing technology surveillance</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>care work</topic><topic>Clients</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Home Care Services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Power structure</topic><topic>Self sufficiency</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Visibility</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamp, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grosen, Sidsel Lond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Agnete Meldgaard</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sociology of health & illness</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamp, Annette</au><au>Grosen, Sidsel Lond</au><au>Hansen, Agnete Meldgaard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tinkering with (in)visibilities: Caring for older people with surveillance technologies</atitle><jtitle>Sociology of health & illness</jtitle><addtitle>Sociol Health Illn</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>622</epage><pages>605-622</pages><issn>0141-9889</issn><eissn>1467-9566</eissn><abstract>New surveillance technologies have in later years been introduced in care for older people as part of a broader policy agenda of ‘sustainable’ welfare state retrenchment, promoting ideals of self‐sufficiency and empowerment of older people ‘ageing in place’. Drawing on newer approaches to surveillance studies, this article explores care workers’ active labour in creating (in)visibility in a complex and ongoing process of tinkering, while negotiating political rationales of empowerment and professional accountability. Hence, visibilities are conceived as coded, reflecting different ideals and rationales. Based on extensive fieldwork in Danish eldercare, we analyse two forms of surveillance: virtual homecare and sensor‐flooring, where clients are involved and positioned in different ways in accomplishing surveillance. We illuminate how the process of accomplishing (in)visibility does not only involve tinkering with technology, but also with spatial arrangements in the client’s home, and with clients’ behaviour. Consequently, we underscore how tinkering may turn out to be a difficult and even conflictual task of negotiating professional authority and accountability in ways that resonate with clients’ sense of autonomy and policy ideals of empowerment. Our studies underline how the power dynamics of surveillance in care should not be overlooked, even though they are continuously negotiated in care practices.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36639830</pmid><doi>10.1111/1467-9566.13606</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8867-8796</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1009-5085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-7586</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-9889 |
ispartof | Sociology of health & illness, 2023-03, Vol.45 (3), p.605-622 |
issn | 0141-9889 1467-9566 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2765777516 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Accountability Aged ageing technology surveillance Aging Autonomy Bargaining care work Clients Empowerment Health Personnel Home Care Services Humans Older people Power structure Self sufficiency Social Responsibility Surveillance Technology Visibility Welfare state |
title | Tinkering with (in)visibilities: Caring for older people with surveillance technologies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A17%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tinkering%20with%20(in)visibilities:%20Caring%20for%20older%20people%20with%20surveillance%20technologies&rft.jtitle=Sociology%20of%20health%20&%20illness&rft.au=Kamp,%20Annette&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=622&rft.pages=605-622&rft.issn=0141-9889&rft.eissn=1467-9566&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-9566.13606&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2782001230%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2782001230&rft_id=info:pmid/36639830&rfr_iscdi=true |