Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture

Many plant traits respond to changes in water availability and might be useful for understanding ecosystem properties such as net primary production (NPP). This is especially evident in grasslands where NPP is water-limited and primarily determined by the traits of dominant species. We measured root...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oecologia 2023-02, Vol.201 (2), p.311-322
Hauptverfasser: Griffin-Nolan, Robert J., Felton, Andrew J., Slette, Ingrid J., Smith, Melinda D., Knapp, Alan K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 322
container_issue 2
container_start_page 311
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 201
creator Griffin-Nolan, Robert J.
Felton, Andrew J.
Slette, Ingrid J.
Smith, Melinda D.
Knapp, Alan K.
description Many plant traits respond to changes in water availability and might be useful for understanding ecosystem properties such as net primary production (NPP). This is especially evident in grasslands where NPP is water-limited and primarily determined by the traits of dominant species. We measured root and shoot morphology, leaf hydraulic traits, and NPP of four dominant North American prairie grasses in response to four levels of soil moisture in a greenhouse experiment. We expected that traits of species from drier regions would be more responsive to reduced water availability and that this would make these species more resistant to low soil moisture than species from wetter regions. All four species grew taller, produced more biomass, and increased total root length in wetter treatments. Each species reduced its leaf turgor loss point (TLP) in drier conditions, but only two species (one xeric, one mesic) maintained leaf water potential above TLP. We identified a suite of traits that clearly distinguished species from one another, but, surprisingly, these traits were relatively unresponsive to reduced soil moisture. Specifically, more xeric species produced thinner roots with higher specific root length and had a lower root mass fraction. This suggest that root traits are critical for distinguishing species from one another but might not respond strongly to changing water availability, though this warrants further investigation in the field. Overall, we found that NPP of these dominant grass species responded similarly to varying levels of soil moisture despite differences in species morphology, physiology, and habitat of origin.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2765777259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A738168277</galeid><sourcerecordid>A738168277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-5b222581e2d128773ffa62eadd50d1c9cbd5649bdda2ffb7549a5b046516e6913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kkFrFTEUhYMo9ln9Ay4k4EYXU5PMJJksS7G1UBC0rkNmcjNNeZO8Jhnw_XvTTrU8EcniQvKdwz3kIPSWkhNKiPyUCek61hDWNoS3lDf7Z2hDu5Y1VLXqOdoQwlTT804doVc53xJCO8r5S3TUCtERquQG3V0n40vG5cYUbH0uPkyLzzfYxtkHEwrOOxg9ZGzGFHMdyVtf9nhKxnoIVWq9c5CwS3GuNjHDapYg72KwuESco9_iOVb3JcFr9MKZbYY3j_MY_Tj_fH32pbn6enF5dnrVjB0RpeEDY4z3FJilrJeydc4IBsZaTiwd1ThYLjo1WGuYc4OsKQ0fSCc4FSAUbY_Rh9V3l-LdArno2ecRtlsTIC5ZMym4lJJxVdH3f6G3cUmhblcp2XdS9YQ8UZPZgvbBxZLMeG-qT2XbU9FXuFIn_6DqsTD7MQZwvt4fCD4eCCpT4GeZzJKzvvz-7ZBlK_vwFwmc3iU_m7TXlOj7Tui1E7p2Qj90Qu-r6N1jumWYwf6R_C5BBdoVyPUpTJCe4v_H9hdRH8GY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2778479800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Griffin-Nolan, Robert J. ; Felton, Andrew J. ; Slette, Ingrid J. ; Smith, Melinda D. ; Knapp, Alan K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Griffin-Nolan, Robert J. ; Felton, Andrew J. ; Slette, Ingrid J. ; Smith, Melinda D. ; Knapp, Alan K.</creatorcontrib><description>Many plant traits respond to changes in water availability and might be useful for understanding ecosystem properties such as net primary production (NPP). This is especially evident in grasslands where NPP is water-limited and primarily determined by the traits of dominant species. We measured root and shoot morphology, leaf hydraulic traits, and NPP of four dominant North American prairie grasses in response to four levels of soil moisture in a greenhouse experiment. We expected that traits of species from drier regions would be more responsive to reduced water availability and that this would make these species more resistant to low soil moisture than species from wetter regions. All four species grew taller, produced more biomass, and increased total root length in wetter treatments. Each species reduced its leaf turgor loss point (TLP) in drier conditions, but only two species (one xeric, one mesic) maintained leaf water potential above TLP. We identified a suite of traits that clearly distinguished species from one another, but, surprisingly, these traits were relatively unresponsive to reduced soil moisture. Specifically, more xeric species produced thinner roots with higher specific root length and had a lower root mass fraction. This suggest that root traits are critical for distinguishing species from one another but might not respond strongly to changing water availability, though this warrants further investigation in the field. Overall, we found that NPP of these dominant grass species responded similarly to varying levels of soil moisture despite differences in species morphology, physiology, and habitat of origin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36640197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aridity ; Availability ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Dominant species ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Moisture effects ; Moisture resistance ; Morphology ; Net Primary Productivity ; Physiological Ecology–Original Research ; Plant Leaves - physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Poaceae - physiology ; Prairies ; Primary production ; Soil ; Soil moisture ; Soil resistance ; Turgor ; Water ; Water - physiology ; Water availability ; Water potential</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2023-02, Vol.201 (2), p.311-322</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-5b222581e2d128773ffa62eadd50d1c9cbd5649bdda2ffb7549a5b046516e6913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-5b222581e2d128773ffa62eadd50d1c9cbd5649bdda2ffb7549a5b046516e6913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9411-3588</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36640197$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griffin-Nolan, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felton, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slette, Ingrid J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Melinda D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Alan K.</creatorcontrib><title>Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Many plant traits respond to changes in water availability and might be useful for understanding ecosystem properties such as net primary production (NPP). This is especially evident in grasslands where NPP is water-limited and primarily determined by the traits of dominant species. We measured root and shoot morphology, leaf hydraulic traits, and NPP of four dominant North American prairie grasses in response to four levels of soil moisture in a greenhouse experiment. We expected that traits of species from drier regions would be more responsive to reduced water availability and that this would make these species more resistant to low soil moisture than species from wetter regions. All four species grew taller, produced more biomass, and increased total root length in wetter treatments. Each species reduced its leaf turgor loss point (TLP) in drier conditions, but only two species (one xeric, one mesic) maintained leaf water potential above TLP. We identified a suite of traits that clearly distinguished species from one another, but, surprisingly, these traits were relatively unresponsive to reduced soil moisture. Specifically, more xeric species produced thinner roots with higher specific root length and had a lower root mass fraction. This suggest that root traits are critical for distinguishing species from one another but might not respond strongly to changing water availability, though this warrants further investigation in the field. Overall, we found that NPP of these dominant grass species responded similarly to varying levels of soil moisture despite differences in species morphology, physiology, and habitat of origin.</description><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Moisture effects</subject><subject>Moisture resistance</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Net Primary Productivity</subject><subject>Physiological Ecology–Original Research</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Poaceae - physiology</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil resistance</subject><subject>Turgor</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water - physiology</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>Water potential</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kkFrFTEUhYMo9ln9Ay4k4EYXU5PMJJksS7G1UBC0rkNmcjNNeZO8Jhnw_XvTTrU8EcniQvKdwz3kIPSWkhNKiPyUCek61hDWNoS3lDf7Z2hDu5Y1VLXqOdoQwlTT804doVc53xJCO8r5S3TUCtERquQG3V0n40vG5cYUbH0uPkyLzzfYxtkHEwrOOxg9ZGzGFHMdyVtf9nhKxnoIVWq9c5CwS3GuNjHDapYg72KwuESco9_iOVb3JcFr9MKZbYY3j_MY_Tj_fH32pbn6enF5dnrVjB0RpeEDY4z3FJilrJeydc4IBsZaTiwd1ThYLjo1WGuYc4OsKQ0fSCc4FSAUbY_Rh9V3l-LdArno2ecRtlsTIC5ZMym4lJJxVdH3f6G3cUmhblcp2XdS9YQ8UZPZgvbBxZLMeG-qT2XbU9FXuFIn_6DqsTD7MQZwvt4fCD4eCCpT4GeZzJKzvvz-7ZBlK_vwFwmc3iU_m7TXlOj7Tui1E7p2Qj90Qu-r6N1jumWYwf6R_C5BBdoVyPUpTJCe4v_H9hdRH8GY</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Griffin-Nolan, Robert J.</creator><creator>Felton, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Slette, Ingrid J.</creator><creator>Smith, Melinda D.</creator><creator>Knapp, Alan K.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9411-3588</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture</title><author>Griffin-Nolan, Robert J. ; Felton, Andrew J. ; Slette, Ingrid J. ; Smith, Melinda D. ; Knapp, Alan K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-5b222581e2d128773ffa62eadd50d1c9cbd5649bdda2ffb7549a5b046516e6913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Moisture effects</topic><topic>Moisture resistance</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Net Primary Productivity</topic><topic>Physiological Ecology–Original Research</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Poaceae - physiology</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil resistance</topic><topic>Turgor</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water - physiology</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>Water potential</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griffin-Nolan, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felton, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slette, Ingrid J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Melinda D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapp, Alan K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griffin-Nolan, Robert J.</au><au>Felton, Andrew J.</au><au>Slette, Ingrid J.</au><au>Smith, Melinda D.</au><au>Knapp, Alan K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>201</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>311-322</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><abstract>Many plant traits respond to changes in water availability and might be useful for understanding ecosystem properties such as net primary production (NPP). This is especially evident in grasslands where NPP is water-limited and primarily determined by the traits of dominant species. We measured root and shoot morphology, leaf hydraulic traits, and NPP of four dominant North American prairie grasses in response to four levels of soil moisture in a greenhouse experiment. We expected that traits of species from drier regions would be more responsive to reduced water availability and that this would make these species more resistant to low soil moisture than species from wetter regions. All four species grew taller, produced more biomass, and increased total root length in wetter treatments. Each species reduced its leaf turgor loss point (TLP) in drier conditions, but only two species (one xeric, one mesic) maintained leaf water potential above TLP. We identified a suite of traits that clearly distinguished species from one another, but, surprisingly, these traits were relatively unresponsive to reduced soil moisture. Specifically, more xeric species produced thinner roots with higher specific root length and had a lower root mass fraction. This suggest that root traits are critical for distinguishing species from one another but might not respond strongly to changing water availability, though this warrants further investigation in the field. Overall, we found that NPP of these dominant grass species responded similarly to varying levels of soil moisture despite differences in species morphology, physiology, and habitat of origin.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36640197</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9411-3588</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8549
ispartof Oecologia, 2023-02, Vol.201 (2), p.311-322
issn 0029-8549
1432-1939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2765777259
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Aridity
Availability
Biomass
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Dominant species
Ecology
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Grasses
Grasslands
Hydrology/Water Resources
Leaves
Life Sciences
Moisture effects
Moisture resistance
Morphology
Net Primary Productivity
Physiological Ecology–Original Research
Plant Leaves - physiology
Plant Sciences
Poaceae - physiology
Prairies
Primary production
Soil
Soil moisture
Soil resistance
Turgor
Water
Water - physiology
Water availability
Water potential
title Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A24%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Traits%20that%20distinguish%20dominant%20species%20across%20aridity%20gradients%20differ%20from%20those%20that%20respond%20to%20soil%20moisture&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Griffin-Nolan,%20Robert%20J.&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=201&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=311-322&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA738168277%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2778479800&rft_id=info:pmid/36640197&rft_galeid=A738168277&rfr_iscdi=true