Distal aortic progression following acute type A aortic dissection repair among patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves

The study objective was to analyze long-term growth and outcomes of the distal aorta after open acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients with bicuspid aortic valves or tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease. From 1996 to 2021, 60 patients with bicuspid aortic valves and 6...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2024-08, Vol.168 (2), p.453-462
Hauptverfasser: Titsworth, Marc, Graham, Nathan J., Orelaru, Felix, Ahmad, Rana-Armaghan, Wu, Xiaoting, Kim, Karen M., Fukuhara, Shinichi, Patel, Himanshu, Deeb, G. Michael, Yang, Bo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 462
container_issue 2
container_start_page 453
container_title The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
container_volume 168
creator Titsworth, Marc
Graham, Nathan J.
Orelaru, Felix
Ahmad, Rana-Armaghan
Wu, Xiaoting
Kim, Karen M.
Fukuhara, Shinichi
Patel, Himanshu
Deeb, G. Michael
Yang, Bo
description The study objective was to analyze long-term growth and outcomes of the distal aorta after open acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients with bicuspid aortic valves or tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease. From 1996 to 2021, 60 patients with bicuspid aortic valves and 655 patients with tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease underwent open repair for acute type A aortic dissection. Data were collected from the local Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, medical record review, surveys, and the National Death Index and Michigan Death Index (December 12, 2021). Compared with the tricuspid aortic valve group, the bicuspid aortic valve group was significantly younger, had more severe aortic insufficiency (33% vs 22%, P = .05), and had less hypertension (67% vs 78%, P = .05). Intraoperatively, patients with bicuspid aortic valves received more aortic root replacements (70% vs 26%, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.12.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2765773513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022522322013472</els_id><sourcerecordid>2765773513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-899bd0bbd362b52c88ca9de4f97c7027923c72e8b6bc24c6b0e7fc93e75ffbd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaLZpf0Gh6NiLXX3ElnXoIaSfEMilhd6EPsapFq_lauQNufaXR9tNcsxpGOaZGd6HkHectZzx_uO23Ra_x1YwIVouWsb0C7LhTKumH7rfL8mG1UnTCSFPyWvELWNMMa5fkVPZ91KLQW3Iv88Ri52oTblET5ecbjIgxjTTMU1Tuo3zDbV-LUDL3QL04pEMERF8OYAZFhsztbtU2cWWCHNBehvLH-qiX3GJgdo50JKfuuONvZ32gG_IyWgnhLcP9Yz8-vrl5-X35ur624_Li6vGy06XZtDaBeZckL1wnfDD4K0OcD5q5RUTSgvplYDB9c6Lc987Bmr0WoLqxtGFTp6RD8e7NeTfFbCYXUQP02RnSCsaofpOKdlxWVF5RH1OiBlGs-S4s_nOcGYO8s3W_JdvDvINF6bKr1vvHx6sbgfhaefRdgU-HQGoMfcRskFfZXkIMVeXJqT47IN7iICa-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765773513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distal aortic progression following acute type A aortic dissection repair among patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Titsworth, Marc ; Graham, Nathan J. ; Orelaru, Felix ; Ahmad, Rana-Armaghan ; Wu, Xiaoting ; Kim, Karen M. ; Fukuhara, Shinichi ; Patel, Himanshu ; Deeb, G. Michael ; Yang, Bo</creator><creatorcontrib>Titsworth, Marc ; Graham, Nathan J. ; Orelaru, Felix ; Ahmad, Rana-Armaghan ; Wu, Xiaoting ; Kim, Karen M. ; Fukuhara, Shinichi ; Patel, Himanshu ; Deeb, G. Michael ; Yang, Bo</creatorcontrib><description>The study objective was to analyze long-term growth and outcomes of the distal aorta after open acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients with bicuspid aortic valves or tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease. From 1996 to 2021, 60 patients with bicuspid aortic valves and 655 patients with tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease underwent open repair for acute type A aortic dissection. Data were collected from the local Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, medical record review, surveys, and the National Death Index and Michigan Death Index (December 12, 2021). Compared with the tricuspid aortic valve group, the bicuspid aortic valve group was significantly younger, had more severe aortic insufficiency (33% vs 22%, P = .05), and had less hypertension (67% vs 78%, P = .05). Intraoperatively, patients with bicuspid aortic valves received more aortic root replacements (70% vs 26%, P &lt; .001), less zone 2 aortic arch replacement (8.3% vs 20%, P = .03), and longer median cardiopulmonary bypass (233 vs 214 minutes, P = .05) and aortic crossclamp (184 vs 141 minutes, P &lt; .001) times. The average annual aortic arch growth rate (0.23 mm/year vs 0.39 mm/year, P = .52) and descending aorta growth rate (0.61 mm/year vs 0.79 mm/year, P = .39) were similar between the bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve groups. The bicuspid aortic valve group had lower annual abdominal aorta growth (0.51 mm/year vs 0.68 mm/year, P = .03). The cumulative incidence of reoperation for the distal aorta (9.7% vs 16.0%, P = .77) was similar between the bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve groups. The 10-year survival was higher in the bicuspid aortic valve group (75.4% vs 66.0%, P = .03). Patients with bicuspid aortic valves could be treated similarly as patients with tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease in the setting of open acute type A aortic dissection repair. [Display omitted] Patients with BAV or TAV without CTD treated with open surgical repair for ATAAD had similar postoperative outcomes. The growth of the distal arch and descending aorta was not different between groups over time; however, the abdominal aorta grew at a lesser rate in the BAV group. The BAV group had greater long-term survival and similar reoperation rates due to aortic aneurysm and therefore potentially can be treated as patients with TAV without CTD with respect to ATAAD repair. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5223</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-685X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-685X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.12.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36639287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>acute type A aortic dissection ; bicuspid aortic valve ; tricuspid aortic valve</subject><ispartof>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2024-08, Vol.168 (2), p.453-462</ispartof><rights>2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-899bd0bbd362b52c88ca9de4f97c7027923c72e8b6bc24c6b0e7fc93e75ffbd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-899bd0bbd362b52c88ca9de4f97c7027923c72e8b6bc24c6b0e7fc93e75ffbd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.12.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Titsworth, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orelaru, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Rana-Armaghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiaoting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Karen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Himanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deeb, G. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Bo</creatorcontrib><title>Distal aortic progression following acute type A aortic dissection repair among patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves</title><title>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><description>The study objective was to analyze long-term growth and outcomes of the distal aorta after open acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients with bicuspid aortic valves or tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease. From 1996 to 2021, 60 patients with bicuspid aortic valves and 655 patients with tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease underwent open repair for acute type A aortic dissection. Data were collected from the local Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, medical record review, surveys, and the National Death Index and Michigan Death Index (December 12, 2021). Compared with the tricuspid aortic valve group, the bicuspid aortic valve group was significantly younger, had more severe aortic insufficiency (33% vs 22%, P = .05), and had less hypertension (67% vs 78%, P = .05). Intraoperatively, patients with bicuspid aortic valves received more aortic root replacements (70% vs 26%, P &lt; .001), less zone 2 aortic arch replacement (8.3% vs 20%, P = .03), and longer median cardiopulmonary bypass (233 vs 214 minutes, P = .05) and aortic crossclamp (184 vs 141 minutes, P &lt; .001) times. The average annual aortic arch growth rate (0.23 mm/year vs 0.39 mm/year, P = .52) and descending aorta growth rate (0.61 mm/year vs 0.79 mm/year, P = .39) were similar between the bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve groups. The bicuspid aortic valve group had lower annual abdominal aorta growth (0.51 mm/year vs 0.68 mm/year, P = .03). The cumulative incidence of reoperation for the distal aorta (9.7% vs 16.0%, P = .77) was similar between the bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve groups. The 10-year survival was higher in the bicuspid aortic valve group (75.4% vs 66.0%, P = .03). Patients with bicuspid aortic valves could be treated similarly as patients with tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease in the setting of open acute type A aortic dissection repair. [Display omitted] Patients with BAV or TAV without CTD treated with open surgical repair for ATAAD had similar postoperative outcomes. The growth of the distal arch and descending aorta was not different between groups over time; however, the abdominal aorta grew at a lesser rate in the BAV group. The BAV group had greater long-term survival and similar reoperation rates due to aortic aneurysm and therefore potentially can be treated as patients with TAV without CTD with respect to ATAAD repair. [Display omitted]</description><subject>acute type A aortic dissection</subject><subject>bicuspid aortic valve</subject><subject>tricuspid aortic valve</subject><issn>0022-5223</issn><issn>1097-685X</issn><issn>1097-685X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaLZpf0Gh6NiLXX3ElnXoIaSfEMilhd6EPsapFq_lauQNufaXR9tNcsxpGOaZGd6HkHectZzx_uO23Ra_x1YwIVouWsb0C7LhTKumH7rfL8mG1UnTCSFPyWvELWNMMa5fkVPZ91KLQW3Iv88Ri52oTblET5ecbjIgxjTTMU1Tuo3zDbV-LUDL3QL04pEMERF8OYAZFhsztbtU2cWWCHNBehvLH-qiX3GJgdo50JKfuuONvZ32gG_IyWgnhLcP9Yz8-vrl5-X35ur624_Li6vGy06XZtDaBeZckL1wnfDD4K0OcD5q5RUTSgvplYDB9c6Lc987Bmr0WoLqxtGFTp6RD8e7NeTfFbCYXUQP02RnSCsaofpOKdlxWVF5RH1OiBlGs-S4s_nOcGYO8s3W_JdvDvINF6bKr1vvHx6sbgfhaefRdgU-HQGoMfcRskFfZXkIMVeXJqT47IN7iICa-w</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Titsworth, Marc</creator><creator>Graham, Nathan J.</creator><creator>Orelaru, Felix</creator><creator>Ahmad, Rana-Armaghan</creator><creator>Wu, Xiaoting</creator><creator>Kim, Karen M.</creator><creator>Fukuhara, Shinichi</creator><creator>Patel, Himanshu</creator><creator>Deeb, G. Michael</creator><creator>Yang, Bo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Distal aortic progression following acute type A aortic dissection repair among patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves</title><author>Titsworth, Marc ; Graham, Nathan J. ; Orelaru, Felix ; Ahmad, Rana-Armaghan ; Wu, Xiaoting ; Kim, Karen M. ; Fukuhara, Shinichi ; Patel, Himanshu ; Deeb, G. Michael ; Yang, Bo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-899bd0bbd362b52c88ca9de4f97c7027923c72e8b6bc24c6b0e7fc93e75ffbd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>acute type A aortic dissection</topic><topic>bicuspid aortic valve</topic><topic>tricuspid aortic valve</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Titsworth, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orelaru, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Rana-Armaghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiaoting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Karen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Himanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deeb, G. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Bo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Titsworth, Marc</au><au>Graham, Nathan J.</au><au>Orelaru, Felix</au><au>Ahmad, Rana-Armaghan</au><au>Wu, Xiaoting</au><au>Kim, Karen M.</au><au>Fukuhara, Shinichi</au><au>Patel, Himanshu</au><au>Deeb, G. Michael</au><au>Yang, Bo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distal aortic progression following acute type A aortic dissection repair among patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>168</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>453-462</pages><issn>0022-5223</issn><issn>1097-685X</issn><eissn>1097-685X</eissn><abstract>The study objective was to analyze long-term growth and outcomes of the distal aorta after open acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients with bicuspid aortic valves or tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease. From 1996 to 2021, 60 patients with bicuspid aortic valves and 655 patients with tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease underwent open repair for acute type A aortic dissection. Data were collected from the local Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, medical record review, surveys, and the National Death Index and Michigan Death Index (December 12, 2021). Compared with the tricuspid aortic valve group, the bicuspid aortic valve group was significantly younger, had more severe aortic insufficiency (33% vs 22%, P = .05), and had less hypertension (67% vs 78%, P = .05). Intraoperatively, patients with bicuspid aortic valves received more aortic root replacements (70% vs 26%, P &lt; .001), less zone 2 aortic arch replacement (8.3% vs 20%, P = .03), and longer median cardiopulmonary bypass (233 vs 214 minutes, P = .05) and aortic crossclamp (184 vs 141 minutes, P &lt; .001) times. The average annual aortic arch growth rate (0.23 mm/year vs 0.39 mm/year, P = .52) and descending aorta growth rate (0.61 mm/year vs 0.79 mm/year, P = .39) were similar between the bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve groups. The bicuspid aortic valve group had lower annual abdominal aorta growth (0.51 mm/year vs 0.68 mm/year, P = .03). The cumulative incidence of reoperation for the distal aorta (9.7% vs 16.0%, P = .77) was similar between the bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve groups. The 10-year survival was higher in the bicuspid aortic valve group (75.4% vs 66.0%, P = .03). Patients with bicuspid aortic valves could be treated similarly as patients with tricuspid aortic valves without connective tissue disease in the setting of open acute type A aortic dissection repair. [Display omitted] Patients with BAV or TAV without CTD treated with open surgical repair for ATAAD had similar postoperative outcomes. The growth of the distal arch and descending aorta was not different between groups over time; however, the abdominal aorta grew at a lesser rate in the BAV group. The BAV group had greater long-term survival and similar reoperation rates due to aortic aneurysm and therefore potentially can be treated as patients with TAV without CTD with respect to ATAAD repair. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36639287</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.12.009</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5223
ispartof The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2024-08, Vol.168 (2), p.453-462
issn 0022-5223
1097-685X
1097-685X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2765773513
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects acute type A aortic dissection
bicuspid aortic valve
tricuspid aortic valve
title Distal aortic progression following acute type A aortic dissection repair among patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T21%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distal%20aortic%20progression%20following%20acute%20type%20A%20aortic%20dissection%20repair%20among%20patients%20with%20bicuspid%20and%20tricuspid%20aortic%20valves&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20thoracic%20and%20cardiovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Titsworth,%20Marc&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=453-462&rft.issn=0022-5223&rft.eissn=1097-685X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.12.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2765773513%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765773513&rft_id=info:pmid/36639287&rft_els_id=S0022522322013472&rfr_iscdi=true