Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques
Purpose The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique. Methods An analysis was carried out of 38 patients im...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2023-06, Vol.280 (6), p.2749-2754 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2754 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 2749 |
| container_title | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology |
| container_volume | 280 |
| creator | Miura, Mauricio Schneider Ogando, Patrícia Barcelos Pasqualini, Marina Paese Neves, Hemily Lubianca Neto, José Faibes |
| description | Purpose
The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique.
Methods
An analysis was carried out of 38 patients implanted with transcutaneous BAHAs during a 4-year period in a single otolaryngology department.
Results
The implantation was carried out under general anesthesia. Operative time was significant lower with the linear technique compared to the C-shaped technique (76.55 min, SD 16.75 vs. 93.17 min, SD 19.82;
p
= 0.007). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two techniques.
Conclusions
The use of linear incision for transcutaneous BAHA system implantation is associated with a reduced surgery time compared to the C-shaped technique, with no increase in postoperative complications. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2763333126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2763333126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-9fc467d95104db906dd708b1d4ff5edecd37026c05bba1f65420ec9cc11cd62c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi1URJfCH-CAfOzFMP6IvTlWqxaQKnEAzpYzdhpXWTu1E1X992RJ2yNzGY30zDuah5BPHL5wAPO1AihoGAjBwBizZ49vyI4rqZgyQp-RHbTSMKWMOSfva70HgEa18h05l1qLZq_3O1J-LeUuohtpCXUZ50pzT-fiUsVldinkpdIup8BcwiGX4OkQXInpjrroKebjtE3zEOiB1cFNK-KSp2NMK0hjwlhjTnQOOKT4sIT6gbzt3VjDx-d-Qf7cXP8-fGe3P7_9OFzdMpTKzKztUWnj24aD8l0L2nsD-4571fdN8AG9NCA0QtN1jve6UQICtoico9cC5QW53HKnkk93Z3uMFcM4bm9ZYbRciwu9omJDseRaS-jtVOLRlSfLwZ5c2821XV3bf67t47r0-Tl_6Y7Bv668yF0BuQF1OjkKxd7npaT15__F_gX7Vo1F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2763333126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Miura, Mauricio Schneider ; Ogando, Patrícia Barcelos ; Pasqualini, Marina Paese ; Neves, Hemily ; Lubianca Neto, José Faibes</creator><creatorcontrib>Miura, Mauricio Schneider ; Ogando, Patrícia Barcelos ; Pasqualini, Marina Paese ; Neves, Hemily ; Lubianca Neto, José Faibes</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique.
Methods
An analysis was carried out of 38 patients implanted with transcutaneous BAHAs during a 4-year period in a single otolaryngology department.
Results
The implantation was carried out under general anesthesia. Operative time was significant lower with the linear technique compared to the C-shaped technique (76.55 min, SD 16.75 vs. 93.17 min, SD 19.82;
p
= 0.007). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two techniques.
Conclusions
The use of linear incision for transcutaneous BAHA system implantation is associated with a reduced surgery time compared to the C-shaped technique, with no increase in postoperative complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-4477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36625868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Bone Conduction ; Ear ; Head and Neck Surgery ; Hearing Aids - adverse effects ; Hearing Loss, Conductive - surgery ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Otology ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><ispartof>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2023-06, Vol.280 (6), p.2749-2754</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-9fc467d95104db906dd708b1d4ff5edecd37026c05bba1f65420ec9cc11cd62c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-9fc467d95104db906dd708b1d4ff5edecd37026c05bba1f65420ec9cc11cd62c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1362-5072</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36625868$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miura, Mauricio Schneider</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogando, Patrícia Barcelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasqualini, Marina Paese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Hemily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubianca Neto, José Faibes</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques</title><title>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Purpose
The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique.
Methods
An analysis was carried out of 38 patients implanted with transcutaneous BAHAs during a 4-year period in a single otolaryngology department.
Results
The implantation was carried out under general anesthesia. Operative time was significant lower with the linear technique compared to the C-shaped technique (76.55 min, SD 16.75 vs. 93.17 min, SD 19.82;
p
= 0.007). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two techniques.
Conclusions
The use of linear incision for transcutaneous BAHA system implantation is associated with a reduced surgery time compared to the C-shaped technique, with no increase in postoperative complications.</description><subject>Bone Conduction</subject><subject>Ear</subject><subject>Head and Neck Surgery</subject><subject>Hearing Aids - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Conductive - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Otology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><issn>0937-4477</issn><issn>1434-4726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi1URJfCH-CAfOzFMP6IvTlWqxaQKnEAzpYzdhpXWTu1E1X992RJ2yNzGY30zDuah5BPHL5wAPO1AihoGAjBwBizZ49vyI4rqZgyQp-RHbTSMKWMOSfva70HgEa18h05l1qLZq_3O1J-LeUuohtpCXUZ50pzT-fiUsVldinkpdIup8BcwiGX4OkQXInpjrroKebjtE3zEOiB1cFNK-KSp2NMK0hjwlhjTnQOOKT4sIT6gbzt3VjDx-d-Qf7cXP8-fGe3P7_9OFzdMpTKzKztUWnj24aD8l0L2nsD-4571fdN8AG9NCA0QtN1jve6UQICtoico9cC5QW53HKnkk93Z3uMFcM4bm9ZYbRciwu9omJDseRaS-jtVOLRlSfLwZ5c2821XV3bf67t47r0-Tl_6Y7Bv668yF0BuQF1OjkKxd7npaT15__F_gX7Vo1F</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Miura, Mauricio Schneider</creator><creator>Ogando, Patrícia Barcelos</creator><creator>Pasqualini, Marina Paese</creator><creator>Neves, Hemily</creator><creator>Lubianca Neto, José Faibes</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1362-5072</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques</title><author>Miura, Mauricio Schneider ; Ogando, Patrícia Barcelos ; Pasqualini, Marina Paese ; Neves, Hemily ; Lubianca Neto, José Faibes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-9fc467d95104db906dd708b1d4ff5edecd37026c05bba1f65420ec9cc11cd62c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bone Conduction</topic><topic>Ear</topic><topic>Head and Neck Surgery</topic><topic>Hearing Aids - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Conductive - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Otology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miura, Mauricio Schneider</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogando, Patrícia Barcelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasqualini, Marina Paese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Hemily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubianca Neto, José Faibes</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miura, Mauricio Schneider</au><au>Ogando, Patrícia Barcelos</au><au>Pasqualini, Marina Paese</au><au>Neves, Hemily</au><au>Lubianca Neto, José Faibes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques</atitle><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>280</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2749</spage><epage>2754</epage><pages>2749-2754</pages><issn>0937-4477</issn><eissn>1434-4726</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique.
Methods
An analysis was carried out of 38 patients implanted with transcutaneous BAHAs during a 4-year period in a single otolaryngology department.
Results
The implantation was carried out under general anesthesia. Operative time was significant lower with the linear technique compared to the C-shaped technique (76.55 min, SD 16.75 vs. 93.17 min, SD 19.82;
p
= 0.007). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two techniques.
Conclusions
The use of linear incision for transcutaneous BAHA system implantation is associated with a reduced surgery time compared to the C-shaped technique, with no increase in postoperative complications.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36625868</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1362-5072</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0937-4477 |
| ispartof | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2023-06, Vol.280 (6), p.2749-2754 |
| issn | 0937-4477 1434-4726 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2763333126 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Bone Conduction Ear Head and Neck Surgery Hearing Aids - adverse effects Hearing Loss, Conductive - surgery Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurosurgery Otology Otorhinolaryngology Postoperative Complications - etiology Prosthesis Implantation - methods |
| title | Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A54%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20results%20of%20transcutaneous%20bone-anchored%20hearing%20aid%20comparing%20the%20C-shaped%20and%20linear%20incision%20techniques&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20oto-rhino-laryngology&rft.au=Miura,%20Mauricio%20Schneider&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=280&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2749&rft.epage=2754&rft.pages=2749-2754&rft.issn=0937-4477&rft.eissn=1434-4726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2763333126%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2763333126&rft_id=info:pmid/36625868&rfr_iscdi=true |