A systematic review of the neural correlates of well-being reveals no consistent associations

Findings from behavioral and genetic studies indicate a potential role for the involvement of brain structures and brain functioning in well-being. We performed a systematic review on the association between brain structures or brain functioning and well-being, including 56 studies. The 11 electroen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 2023-02, Vol.145, p.105036-105036, Article 105036
Hauptverfasser: de Vries, Lianne P., van de Weijer, Margot P., Bartels, Meike
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105036
container_issue
container_start_page 105036
container_title Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
container_volume 145
creator de Vries, Lianne P.
van de Weijer, Margot P.
Bartels, Meike
description Findings from behavioral and genetic studies indicate a potential role for the involvement of brain structures and brain functioning in well-being. We performed a systematic review on the association between brain structures or brain functioning and well-being, including 56 studies. The 11 electroencephalography (EEG) studies suggest a larger alpha asymmetry (more left than right brain activation) to be related to higher well-being. The 18 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies, 26 resting-state functional MRI studies and two functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies identified a wide range of brain regions involved in well-being, but replication across studies was scarce, both in direction and strength of the associations. The inconsistency could result from small sample sizes of most studies and a possible wide-spread network of brain regions with small effects involved in well-being. Future directions include well-powered brain-wide association studies and innovative methods to more reliably measure brain activity in daily life. •We performed a systematic review on the neural correlates of well-being.•A wide range of brain regions was involved in well-being in the different studies.•More left than right brain activation might be related to higher well-being.•Replication of associations across studies was scarce, in strength and direction.•Well-powered brain-wide association studies are needed to study neural correlates of well-being.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2762817430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149763423000052</els_id><sourcerecordid>2762817430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-71851d189382f04113fbc59f41d53aca6d5400db0ebfe852c1f2fce39d85ef5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC5AlmxQ_4sRZVhUvqRIbWCLLscfgKomLnVD173HVwpaVpfGZe-2D0A3Bc4JJebee9zA2zgf4nlNMWZpyzMoTNCWiYnnFqThFU0yKOq9KVkzQRYxrjDHFjJ-jCStLSrgopuh9kcVdHKBTg9NZinOwzbzNhk_IUkVQbaZ9CNCqAeL-Ygttmzfg-o89DaqNWe8T00eXYvohUzF67VJcGl2iM5sIuDqeM_T2cP-6fMpXL4_Py8Uq1wXFQ14RwYkhomaCWlwQwmyjeW0LYjhTWpWGFxibBkNjQXCqiaVWA6uN4GC5YTN0e8jdBP81Qhxk56JOL1U9-DFKWpVUkKpgOKHVAdXBxxjAyk1wnQo7SbDcu5Vr-edW7t3Kg9u0eX0sGZsOzN_er8wELA4ApK8mkUFG7aDXYFwAPUjj3b8lPyM8kJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2762817430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of the neural correlates of well-being reveals no consistent associations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>de Vries, Lianne P. ; van de Weijer, Margot P. ; Bartels, Meike</creator><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Lianne P. ; van de Weijer, Margot P. ; Bartels, Meike</creatorcontrib><description>Findings from behavioral and genetic studies indicate a potential role for the involvement of brain structures and brain functioning in well-being. We performed a systematic review on the association between brain structures or brain functioning and well-being, including 56 studies. The 11 electroencephalography (EEG) studies suggest a larger alpha asymmetry (more left than right brain activation) to be related to higher well-being. The 18 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies, 26 resting-state functional MRI studies and two functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies identified a wide range of brain regions involved in well-being, but replication across studies was scarce, both in direction and strength of the associations. The inconsistency could result from small sample sizes of most studies and a possible wide-spread network of brain regions with small effects involved in well-being. Future directions include well-powered brain-wide association studies and innovative methods to more reliably measure brain activity in daily life. •We performed a systematic review on the neural correlates of well-being.•A wide range of brain regions was involved in well-being in the different studies.•More left than right brain activation might be related to higher well-being.•Replication of associations across studies was scarce, in strength and direction.•Well-powered brain-wide association studies are needed to study neural correlates of well-being.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7634</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36621584</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Brain ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Brain-wide associations ; Cerebral Cortex ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Neural correlates ; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods ; Well-being</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2023-02, Vol.145, p.105036-105036, Article 105036</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-71851d189382f04113fbc59f41d53aca6d5400db0ebfe852c1f2fce39d85ef5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-71851d189382f04113fbc59f41d53aca6d5400db0ebfe852c1f2fce39d85ef5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36621584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Lianne P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Weijer, Margot P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Meike</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of the neural correlates of well-being reveals no consistent associations</title><title>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</title><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><description>Findings from behavioral and genetic studies indicate a potential role for the involvement of brain structures and brain functioning in well-being. We performed a systematic review on the association between brain structures or brain functioning and well-being, including 56 studies. The 11 electroencephalography (EEG) studies suggest a larger alpha asymmetry (more left than right brain activation) to be related to higher well-being. The 18 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies, 26 resting-state functional MRI studies and two functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies identified a wide range of brain regions involved in well-being, but replication across studies was scarce, both in direction and strength of the associations. The inconsistency could result from small sample sizes of most studies and a possible wide-spread network of brain regions with small effects involved in well-being. Future directions include well-powered brain-wide association studies and innovative methods to more reliably measure brain activity in daily life. •We performed a systematic review on the neural correlates of well-being.•A wide range of brain regions was involved in well-being in the different studies.•More left than right brain activation might be related to higher well-being.•Replication of associations across studies was scarce, in strength and direction.•Well-powered brain-wide association studies are needed to study neural correlates of well-being.</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Brain-wide associations</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Neural correlates</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods</subject><subject>Well-being</subject><issn>0149-7634</issn><issn>1873-7528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC5AlmxQ_4sRZVhUvqRIbWCLLscfgKomLnVD173HVwpaVpfGZe-2D0A3Bc4JJebee9zA2zgf4nlNMWZpyzMoTNCWiYnnFqThFU0yKOq9KVkzQRYxrjDHFjJ-jCStLSrgopuh9kcVdHKBTg9NZinOwzbzNhk_IUkVQbaZ9CNCqAeL-Ygttmzfg-o89DaqNWe8T00eXYvohUzF67VJcGl2iM5sIuDqeM_T2cP-6fMpXL4_Py8Uq1wXFQ14RwYkhomaCWlwQwmyjeW0LYjhTWpWGFxibBkNjQXCqiaVWA6uN4GC5YTN0e8jdBP81Qhxk56JOL1U9-DFKWpVUkKpgOKHVAdXBxxjAyk1wnQo7SbDcu5Vr-edW7t3Kg9u0eX0sGZsOzN_er8wELA4ApK8mkUFG7aDXYFwAPUjj3b8lPyM8kJI</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>de Vries, Lianne P.</creator><creator>van de Weijer, Margot P.</creator><creator>Bartels, Meike</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>A systematic review of the neural correlates of well-being reveals no consistent associations</title><author>de Vries, Lianne P. ; van de Weijer, Margot P. ; Bartels, Meike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-71851d189382f04113fbc59f41d53aca6d5400db0ebfe852c1f2fce39d85ef5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Brain-wide associations</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Neural correlates</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods</topic><topic>Well-being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Lianne P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Weijer, Margot P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Meike</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Vries, Lianne P.</au><au>van de Weijer, Margot P.</au><au>Bartels, Meike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of the neural correlates of well-being reveals no consistent associations</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>145</volume><spage>105036</spage><epage>105036</epage><pages>105036-105036</pages><artnum>105036</artnum><issn>0149-7634</issn><eissn>1873-7528</eissn><abstract>Findings from behavioral and genetic studies indicate a potential role for the involvement of brain structures and brain functioning in well-being. We performed a systematic review on the association between brain structures or brain functioning and well-being, including 56 studies. The 11 electroencephalography (EEG) studies suggest a larger alpha asymmetry (more left than right brain activation) to be related to higher well-being. The 18 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies, 26 resting-state functional MRI studies and two functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies identified a wide range of brain regions involved in well-being, but replication across studies was scarce, both in direction and strength of the associations. The inconsistency could result from small sample sizes of most studies and a possible wide-spread network of brain regions with small effects involved in well-being. Future directions include well-powered brain-wide association studies and innovative methods to more reliably measure brain activity in daily life. •We performed a systematic review on the neural correlates of well-being.•A wide range of brain regions was involved in well-being in the different studies.•More left than right brain activation might be related to higher well-being.•Replication of associations across studies was scarce, in strength and direction.•Well-powered brain-wide association studies are needed to study neural correlates of well-being.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36621584</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105036</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-7634
ispartof Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2023-02, Vol.145, p.105036-105036, Article 105036
issn 0149-7634
1873-7528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2762817430
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Brain
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping - methods
Brain-wide associations
Cerebral Cortex
Electroencephalography - methods
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neural correlates
Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods
Well-being
title A systematic review of the neural correlates of well-being reveals no consistent associations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A18%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20neural%20correlates%20of%20well-being%20reveals%20no%20consistent%20associations&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience%20and%20biobehavioral%20reviews&rft.au=de%20Vries,%20Lianne%20P.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=145&rft.spage=105036&rft.epage=105036&rft.pages=105036-105036&rft.artnum=105036&rft.issn=0149-7634&rft.eissn=1873-7528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2762817430%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2762817430&rft_id=info:pmid/36621584&rft_els_id=S0149763423000052&rfr_iscdi=true