INVOLVING WATERSHED STAKEHOLDERS: AN ISSUE ATTRIBUTE APPROACH TO DETERMINE WILLINGNESS AND NEED

The development of effective solutions for addressing nonpoint source pollution on a watershed basis often involves watershed stakeholders. However, success in engaging stakeholders in collaborative decision making processes varies, as watershed managers are faced with the challenges inherent to fin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2002-08, Vol.38 (4), p.995-1006
Hauptverfasser: Smutko, L. Steven, Kimek, Suzanne H., Perrin, Christy A., Danielson, Leon E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1006
container_issue 4
container_start_page 995
container_title Journal of the American Water Resources Association
container_volume 38
creator Smutko, L. Steven
Kimek, Suzanne H.
Perrin, Christy A.
Danielson, Leon E.
description The development of effective solutions for addressing nonpoint source pollution on a watershed basis often involves watershed stakeholders. However, success in engaging stakeholders in collaborative decision making processes varies, as watershed managers are faced with the challenges inherent to finding the right process for the decisions needed and in successfully engaging stakeholders in that process. Two characteristics that may provide guidance for determining the appropriateness of applying a collaborative process to a watershed problem are the need to collaborate and the willingness of stakeholders to engage in a collaborative decision making process. By examining seven attributes of the issues confronted by stakeholders in a collaborative process, the consequences of these attributes on the need for collaboration and stakeholders' willingness to engage can be estimated. The issue attributes include: level of uncertainty, balance of information, risk, time horizon of effects, urgency of decision, distribution of effects, and clarity of problem. The issue attribute model was applied to two collaborative decision making processes conducted by the same watershed stakeholder group in a North Carolina coastal watershed. Need and willingness to engage did not coincide for either issue; that is, stakeholders were more willing to engage on the issue that required less need for their involvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb05540.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27623611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>199178901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i310t-8a350877d7797d2029d35a0dd0e50d3aae61fb5727bfa4360c5c80fde41dbefc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9Lw0AQxYMoWP98h6Wgt8TZ3Ww29RabtY3GpDRpK16WbbKB1NpqtgX99i5YPHhxLjPD-70HwzhOH4OHbd2sPMwZcXEQhh4BIN5uCYz54H0eOb1f6djOMKCuz_3nU-fMmBUAZjikPUcm2TxP50k2QouoFNNiLGJUlNGjGOdpbPdbFGUoKYqZQFFZTpO7WWmnyWSaR8MxKnMUC2t7SjKBFkma2qBMFIU1xSgTIr5wThq1Nvry0M-d2b0oh2M3zUfJMErdlmLYuaGiDELOa84HvCZABjVlCuoaNIOaKqUD3CwZJ3zZKJ8GULEqhKbWPq6XuqnouXP9k_vebT_22uzkW2sqvV6rjd7ujSQ8IDTA-H8QAo5JCBbs_wFX2323sUdYBlOCccgtdHWAlKnUuunUpmqNfO_aN9V9SUwHlNp_WM794Vqz05-_uupeZcApZ3KRjWQJLwvyUDzKOf0GdmuHCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201321187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>INVOLVING WATERSHED STAKEHOLDERS: AN ISSUE ATTRIBUTE APPROACH TO DETERMINE WILLINGNESS AND NEED</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Smutko, L. Steven ; Kimek, Suzanne H. ; Perrin, Christy A. ; Danielson, Leon E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smutko, L. Steven ; Kimek, Suzanne H. ; Perrin, Christy A. ; Danielson, Leon E.</creatorcontrib><description>The development of effective solutions for addressing nonpoint source pollution on a watershed basis often involves watershed stakeholders. However, success in engaging stakeholders in collaborative decision making processes varies, as watershed managers are faced with the challenges inherent to finding the right process for the decisions needed and in successfully engaging stakeholders in that process. Two characteristics that may provide guidance for determining the appropriateness of applying a collaborative process to a watershed problem are the need to collaborate and the willingness of stakeholders to engage in a collaborative decision making process. By examining seven attributes of the issues confronted by stakeholders in a collaborative process, the consequences of these attributes on the need for collaboration and stakeholders' willingness to engage can be estimated. The issue attributes include: level of uncertainty, balance of information, risk, time horizon of effects, urgency of decision, distribution of effects, and clarity of problem. The issue attribute model was applied to two collaborative decision making processes conducted by the same watershed stakeholder group in a North Carolina coastal watershed. Need and willingness to engage did not coincide for either issue; that is, stakeholders were more willing to engage on the issue that required less need for their involvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-474X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-1688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb05540.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWRAF5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Coastal environments ; collaborative decision making ; Decision analysis ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; environmental conflict resolution ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Marine ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Resources ; USA, North Carolina ; water policy/regulation/decision making ; water quality ; Water resources ; watershed management ; watershed stakeholders ; Watersheds ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2002-08, Vol.38 (4), p.995-1006</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Water Resources Association Aug 2002</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13933554$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smutko, L. Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimek, Suzanne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Christy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danielson, Leon E.</creatorcontrib><title>INVOLVING WATERSHED STAKEHOLDERS: AN ISSUE ATTRIBUTE APPROACH TO DETERMINE WILLINGNESS AND NEED</title><title>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><description>The development of effective solutions for addressing nonpoint source pollution on a watershed basis often involves watershed stakeholders. However, success in engaging stakeholders in collaborative decision making processes varies, as watershed managers are faced with the challenges inherent to finding the right process for the decisions needed and in successfully engaging stakeholders in that process. Two characteristics that may provide guidance for determining the appropriateness of applying a collaborative process to a watershed problem are the need to collaborate and the willingness of stakeholders to engage in a collaborative decision making process. By examining seven attributes of the issues confronted by stakeholders in a collaborative process, the consequences of these attributes on the need for collaboration and stakeholders' willingness to engage can be estimated. The issue attributes include: level of uncertainty, balance of information, risk, time horizon of effects, urgency of decision, distribution of effects, and clarity of problem. The issue attribute model was applied to two collaborative decision making processes conducted by the same watershed stakeholder group in a North Carolina coastal watershed. Need and willingness to engage did not coincide for either issue; that is, stakeholders were more willing to engage on the issue that required less need for their involvement.</description><subject>Coastal environments</subject><subject>collaborative decision making</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>environmental conflict resolution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>USA, North Carolina</subject><subject>water policy/regulation/decision making</subject><subject>water quality</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>watershed management</subject><subject>watershed stakeholders</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1093-474X</issn><issn>1752-1688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9Lw0AQxYMoWP98h6Wgt8TZ3Ww29RabtY3GpDRpK16WbbKB1NpqtgX99i5YPHhxLjPD-70HwzhOH4OHbd2sPMwZcXEQhh4BIN5uCYz54H0eOb1f6djOMKCuz_3nU-fMmBUAZjikPUcm2TxP50k2QouoFNNiLGJUlNGjGOdpbPdbFGUoKYqZQFFZTpO7WWmnyWSaR8MxKnMUC2t7SjKBFkma2qBMFIU1xSgTIr5wThq1Nvry0M-d2b0oh2M3zUfJMErdlmLYuaGiDELOa84HvCZABjVlCuoaNIOaKqUD3CwZJ3zZKJ8GULEqhKbWPq6XuqnouXP9k_vebT_22uzkW2sqvV6rjd7ujSQ8IDTA-H8QAo5JCBbs_wFX2323sUdYBlOCccgtdHWAlKnUuunUpmqNfO_aN9V9SUwHlNp_WM794Vqz05-_uupeZcApZ3KRjWQJLwvyUDzKOf0GdmuHCQ</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Smutko, L. Steven</creator><creator>Kimek, Suzanne H.</creator><creator>Perrin, Christy A.</creator><creator>Danielson, Leon E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Water Resources Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>INVOLVING WATERSHED STAKEHOLDERS: AN ISSUE ATTRIBUTE APPROACH TO DETERMINE WILLINGNESS AND NEED</title><author>Smutko, L. Steven ; Kimek, Suzanne H. ; Perrin, Christy A. ; Danielson, Leon E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i310t-8a350877d7797d2029d35a0dd0e50d3aae61fb5727bfa4360c5c80fde41dbefc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Coastal environments</topic><topic>collaborative decision making</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>environmental conflict resolution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>USA, North Carolina</topic><topic>water policy/regulation/decision making</topic><topic>water quality</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>watershed management</topic><topic>watershed stakeholders</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smutko, L. Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimek, Suzanne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Christy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danielson, Leon E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smutko, L. Steven</au><au>Kimek, Suzanne H.</au><au>Perrin, Christy A.</au><au>Danielson, Leon E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>INVOLVING WATERSHED STAKEHOLDERS: AN ISSUE ATTRIBUTE APPROACH TO DETERMINE WILLINGNESS AND NEED</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>995</spage><epage>1006</epage><pages>995-1006</pages><issn>1093-474X</issn><eissn>1752-1688</eissn><coden>JWRAF5</coden><abstract>The development of effective solutions for addressing nonpoint source pollution on a watershed basis often involves watershed stakeholders. However, success in engaging stakeholders in collaborative decision making processes varies, as watershed managers are faced with the challenges inherent to finding the right process for the decisions needed and in successfully engaging stakeholders in that process. Two characteristics that may provide guidance for determining the appropriateness of applying a collaborative process to a watershed problem are the need to collaborate and the willingness of stakeholders to engage in a collaborative decision making process. By examining seven attributes of the issues confronted by stakeholders in a collaborative process, the consequences of these attributes on the need for collaboration and stakeholders' willingness to engage can be estimated. The issue attributes include: level of uncertainty, balance of information, risk, time horizon of effects, urgency of decision, distribution of effects, and clarity of problem. The issue attribute model was applied to two collaborative decision making processes conducted by the same watershed stakeholder group in a North Carolina coastal watershed. Need and willingness to engage did not coincide for either issue; that is, stakeholders were more willing to engage on the issue that required less need for their involvement.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb05540.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1093-474X
ispartof Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2002-08, Vol.38 (4), p.995-1006
issn 1093-474X
1752-1688
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27623611
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Coastal environments
collaborative decision making
Decision analysis
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
environmental conflict resolution
Exact sciences and technology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Marine
Pollution
Pollution, environment geology
Resources
USA, North Carolina
water policy/regulation/decision making
water quality
Water resources
watershed management
watershed stakeholders
Watersheds
Wildlife conservation
title INVOLVING WATERSHED STAKEHOLDERS: AN ISSUE ATTRIBUTE APPROACH TO DETERMINE WILLINGNESS AND NEED
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A38%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=INVOLVING%20WATERSHED%20STAKEHOLDERS:%20AN%20ISSUE%20ATTRIBUTE%20APPROACH%20TO%20DETERMINE%20WILLINGNESS%20AND%20NEED&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Water%20Resources%20Association&rft.au=Smutko,%20L.%20Steven&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=995&rft.epage=1006&rft.pages=995-1006&rft.issn=1093-474X&rft.eissn=1752-1688&rft.coden=JWRAF5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb05540.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E199178901%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201321187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true