Psychometric testing of a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – Neonatology questionnaire has confirmed validity
Aim Investigating parent satisfaction with care is important to guide quality development. In this study, we translated and validated a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – neonatology (EMPATHIC‐N) questionnaire to determine validity in Danish contexts. Method A psych...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta Paediatrica 2023-04, Vol.112 (4), p.708-718 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 718 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 708 |
| container_title | Acta Paediatrica |
| container_volume | 112 |
| creator | Weis, Janne Beck, Sanne Allermann Jensen, Andreas Brødsgaard, Anne Latour, Jos M. Greisen, Gorm |
| description | Aim
Investigating parent satisfaction with care is important to guide quality development. In this study, we translated and validated a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – neonatology (EMPATHIC‐N) questionnaire to determine validity in Danish contexts.
Method
A psychometric study design was applied. Translation was performed according to recommended international standards. Confirmatory factor analyses including standardised factor loadings, Cronbach's α reliability estimates, congruent validity and non‐differential validity testing were applied. The study was performed from June 2017 to November 2019 at a 33‐bed level IV neonatal intensive care unit.
Results
Participants were 311 parents (response rate = 42,8%). Confirmative factor analyses disclosed a moderate model fit of the instrument with Comparative Fit Index (CFI) values of 0.83–0.92. Cronbach's α showed good reliability (0.82–0.93). Congruent validity showed good positive correlations (0.48–0.71) between the instrument domains and four overall satisfaction indicators. In search of improved model fit, a version including 27 items was tested. This version showed a better model fit with CFI values of 0.92–0.99 and satisfactory Cronbach's α values.
Conclusions
Model fit for the Danish full EMPATIC‐N was moderate. The shorter version showed better psychometric properties. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/apa.16661 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2761985530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2761985530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-ed56b909b1a7d1b45d6e2e5817093a7e689107f716f5fe2cab2cff7709852b4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi1URLeFAy-ALPUCh7S2E__JcVWgIFW0h3KOHGfcdZXYwc5ulRuvUPUN-yT17hYOSPgy1nw_fTOjD6H3lJzS_M70qE-pEIK-QgsqOC0YY_IALYgiZcEZLw_RUUp3hLCyrsQbdFgKQSTjaoEertNsVmGAKTqDJ0iT87c4WKzxZ-1dWuENxOSC3_amFWAYxnAPcQA_bVujjvmXsPM71fkJfHIbwCYL-On3I_4Bwesp9OF2xr_W2wHBe-2yutIJm-Cty24d3ujedW6a36LXVvcJ3r3UY_Tz65eb82_F5dXF9_PlZWHKStECOi7amtQt1bKjbcU7AQy4opLUpZYgVE2JtJIKyy0wo1tmrJVZVZy1FZTH6OPed4xht1czuGSg77WHsE4Nk4Jmlpckoyf_oHdhHX3eLlOKU1VxoTL1aU-ZGFKKYJsxukHHuaGk2ebU5JyaXU6Z_fDiuG7z8X_JP8Fk4GwP3Lse5v87Ncvr5d7yGTZWn10</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785184568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric testing of a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – Neonatology questionnaire has confirmed validity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Weis, Janne ; Beck, Sanne Allermann ; Jensen, Andreas ; Brødsgaard, Anne ; Latour, Jos M. ; Greisen, Gorm</creator><creatorcontrib>Weis, Janne ; Beck, Sanne Allermann ; Jensen, Andreas ; Brødsgaard, Anne ; Latour, Jos M. ; Greisen, Gorm</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Investigating parent satisfaction with care is important to guide quality development. In this study, we translated and validated a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – neonatology (EMPATHIC‐N) questionnaire to determine validity in Danish contexts.
Method
A psychometric study design was applied. Translation was performed according to recommended international standards. Confirmatory factor analyses including standardised factor loadings, Cronbach's α reliability estimates, congruent validity and non‐differential validity testing were applied. The study was performed from June 2017 to November 2019 at a 33‐bed level IV neonatal intensive care unit.
Results
Participants were 311 parents (response rate = 42,8%). Confirmative factor analyses disclosed a moderate model fit of the instrument with Comparative Fit Index (CFI) values of 0.83–0.92. Cronbach's α showed good reliability (0.82–0.93). Congruent validity showed good positive correlations (0.48–0.71) between the instrument domains and four overall satisfaction indicators. In search of improved model fit, a version including 27 items was tested. This version showed a better model fit with CFI values of 0.92–0.99 and satisfactory Cronbach's α values.
Conclusions
Model fit for the Danish full EMPATIC‐N was moderate. The shorter version showed better psychometric properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0803-5253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/apa.16661</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36607258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norway: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Critical Care ; Denmark ; Empowerment ; family‐centred care ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; instrument validation ; Intensive care ; International standards ; Neonates ; Neonatology ; parent satisfaction questionnaire ; Parents ; preterm infant ; Psychometrics ; quality of healthcare ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Acta Paediatrica, 2023-04, Vol.112 (4), p.708-718</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Acta Paediatrica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-ed56b909b1a7d1b45d6e2e5817093a7e689107f716f5fe2cab2cff7709852b4e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4302-2982 ; 0000-0001-7874-4120 ; 0000-0001-8042-3262 ; 0000-0002-5029-9480</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fapa.16661$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fapa.16661$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,11561,27923,27924,45573,45574,46051,46475</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36607258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weis, Janne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Sanne Allermann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brødsgaard, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latour, Jos M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greisen, Gorm</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric testing of a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – Neonatology questionnaire has confirmed validity</title><title>Acta Paediatrica</title><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><description>Aim
Investigating parent satisfaction with care is important to guide quality development. In this study, we translated and validated a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – neonatology (EMPATHIC‐N) questionnaire to determine validity in Danish contexts.
Method
A psychometric study design was applied. Translation was performed according to recommended international standards. Confirmatory factor analyses including standardised factor loadings, Cronbach's α reliability estimates, congruent validity and non‐differential validity testing were applied. The study was performed from June 2017 to November 2019 at a 33‐bed level IV neonatal intensive care unit.
Results
Participants were 311 parents (response rate = 42,8%). Confirmative factor analyses disclosed a moderate model fit of the instrument with Comparative Fit Index (CFI) values of 0.83–0.92. Cronbach's α showed good reliability (0.82–0.93). Congruent validity showed good positive correlations (0.48–0.71) between the instrument domains and four overall satisfaction indicators. In search of improved model fit, a version including 27 items was tested. This version showed a better model fit with CFI values of 0.92–0.99 and satisfactory Cronbach's α values.
Conclusions
Model fit for the Danish full EMPATIC‐N was moderate. The shorter version showed better psychometric properties.</description><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>family‐centred care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>instrument validation</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>International standards</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Neonatology</subject><subject>parent satisfaction questionnaire</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>preterm infant</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>quality of healthcare</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0803-5253</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi1URLeFAy-ALPUCh7S2E__JcVWgIFW0h3KOHGfcdZXYwc5ulRuvUPUN-yT17hYOSPgy1nw_fTOjD6H3lJzS_M70qE-pEIK-QgsqOC0YY_IALYgiZcEZLw_RUUp3hLCyrsQbdFgKQSTjaoEertNsVmGAKTqDJ0iT87c4WKzxZ-1dWuENxOSC3_amFWAYxnAPcQA_bVujjvmXsPM71fkJfHIbwCYL-On3I_4Bwesp9OF2xr_W2wHBe-2yutIJm-Cty24d3ujedW6a36LXVvcJ3r3UY_Tz65eb82_F5dXF9_PlZWHKStECOi7amtQt1bKjbcU7AQy4opLUpZYgVE2JtJIKyy0wo1tmrJVZVZy1FZTH6OPed4xht1czuGSg77WHsE4Nk4Jmlpckoyf_oHdhHX3eLlOKU1VxoTL1aU-ZGFKKYJsxukHHuaGk2ebU5JyaXU6Z_fDiuG7z8X_JP8Fk4GwP3Lse5v87Ncvr5d7yGTZWn10</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Weis, Janne</creator><creator>Beck, Sanne Allermann</creator><creator>Jensen, Andreas</creator><creator>Brødsgaard, Anne</creator><creator>Latour, Jos M.</creator><creator>Greisen, Gorm</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4302-2982</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7874-4120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8042-3262</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5029-9480</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Psychometric testing of a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – Neonatology questionnaire has confirmed validity</title><author>Weis, Janne ; Beck, Sanne Allermann ; Jensen, Andreas ; Brødsgaard, Anne ; Latour, Jos M. ; Greisen, Gorm</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3481-ed56b909b1a7d1b45d6e2e5817093a7e689107f716f5fe2cab2cff7709852b4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>family‐centred care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>instrument validation</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>International standards</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Neonatology</topic><topic>parent satisfaction questionnaire</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>preterm infant</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>quality of healthcare</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weis, Janne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Sanne Allermann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brødsgaard, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latour, Jos M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greisen, Gorm</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weis, Janne</au><au>Beck, Sanne Allermann</au><au>Jensen, Andreas</au><au>Brødsgaard, Anne</au><au>Latour, Jos M.</au><au>Greisen, Gorm</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric testing of a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – Neonatology questionnaire has confirmed validity</atitle><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>708</spage><epage>718</epage><pages>708-718</pages><issn>0803-5253</issn><eissn>1651-2227</eissn><abstract>Aim
Investigating parent satisfaction with care is important to guide quality development. In this study, we translated and validated a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – neonatology (EMPATHIC‐N) questionnaire to determine validity in Danish contexts.
Method
A psychometric study design was applied. Translation was performed according to recommended international standards. Confirmatory factor analyses including standardised factor loadings, Cronbach's α reliability estimates, congruent validity and non‐differential validity testing were applied. The study was performed from June 2017 to November 2019 at a 33‐bed level IV neonatal intensive care unit.
Results
Participants were 311 parents (response rate = 42,8%). Confirmative factor analyses disclosed a moderate model fit of the instrument with Comparative Fit Index (CFI) values of 0.83–0.92. Cronbach's α showed good reliability (0.82–0.93). Congruent validity showed good positive correlations (0.48–0.71) between the instrument domains and four overall satisfaction indicators. In search of improved model fit, a version including 27 items was tested. This version showed a better model fit with CFI values of 0.92–0.99 and satisfactory Cronbach's α values.
Conclusions
Model fit for the Danish full EMPATIC‐N was moderate. The shorter version showed better psychometric properties.</abstract><cop>Norway</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36607258</pmid><doi>10.1111/apa.16661</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4302-2982</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7874-4120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8042-3262</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5029-9480</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0803-5253 |
| ispartof | Acta Paediatrica, 2023-04, Vol.112 (4), p.708-718 |
| issn | 0803-5253 1651-2227 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2761985530 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Critical Care Denmark Empowerment family‐centred care Humans Infant, Newborn instrument validation Intensive care International standards Neonates Neonatology parent satisfaction questionnaire Parents preterm infant Psychometrics quality of healthcare Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Validity |
| title | Psychometric testing of a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – Neonatology questionnaire has confirmed validity |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A45%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20testing%20of%20a%20Danish%20version%20of%20the%20empowerment%20of%20parents%20in%20the%20intensive%20care%20%E2%80%93%20Neonatology%20questionnaire%20has%20confirmed%20validity&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Paediatrica&rft.au=Weis,%20Janne&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=708&rft.epage=718&rft.pages=708-718&rft.issn=0803-5253&rft.eissn=1651-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/apa.16661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2761985530%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785184568&rft_id=info:pmid/36607258&rfr_iscdi=true |