Clinico‐genetic and prognostic analyses of 716 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia based on the 2022 International Consensus Classification

The 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) recategorized myeloid neoplasms based on recent advances in the understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, in which myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with blasts of 10%–19% is classified as MDS/acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MDS with m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hematology 2023-03, Vol.98 (3), p.398-407
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Wan‐Hsuan, Lin, Chien‐Chin, Tsai, Cheng‐Hong, Tien, Feng‐Ming, Lo, Min‐Yen, Ni, Sao‐Chih, Yao, Ming, Tseng, Mei‐Hsuan, Kuo, Yuan‐Yeh, Liu, Ming‐Chih, Tang, Jih‐Luh, Sun, Hsun‐I, Chuang, Yi‐Kuang, Chou, Wen‐Chien, Hou, Hsin‐An, Tien, Hwei‐Fang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 407
container_issue 3
container_start_page 398
container_title American journal of hematology
container_volume 98
creator Lee, Wan‐Hsuan
Lin, Chien‐Chin
Tsai, Cheng‐Hong
Tien, Feng‐Ming
Lo, Min‐Yen
Ni, Sao‐Chih
Yao, Ming
Tseng, Mei‐Hsuan
Kuo, Yuan‐Yeh
Liu, Ming‐Chih
Tang, Jih‐Luh
Sun, Hsun‐I
Chuang, Yi‐Kuang
Chou, Wen‐Chien
Hou, Hsin‐An
Tien, Hwei‐Fang
description The 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) recategorized myeloid neoplasms based on recent advances in the understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, in which myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with blasts of 10%–19% is classified as MDS/acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MDS with mutated SF3B1, irrespective of the number of ring sideroblasts, as MDS‐SF3B1, and those with multi‐hit TP53 mutations as MDS with mutated TP53. In the analysis of 716 patients with MDS diagnosed according to the 2016 WHO classification, we found that 75.3% of patients remained in the MDS group based on the ICC, while 24.7% of patients were reclassified to the MDS/AML group after the exclusion of 15 patients who were classified to the AML group. Patients with MDS/AML showed a distinct mutational landscape and had poorer outcomes, compared to those with MDS. In the MDS group, patients with MDS‐SF3B1 had higher frequencies of DNMT3A and TET2 mutations than those with MDS, not otherwise specified, with single lineage dysplasia or multilineage dysplasia. Patients with mutated TP53 were associated with dismal outcomes, irrespective of the blast percentage. In conclusion, this study showed that the ICC facilitates efficient segregation and risk‐stratification of MDS which can help guide the treatment choice of patients with the disease. Case allocation of MDS patients defined by 2016 WHO classification and 2022 ICC.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajh.26799
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2760173244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2760173244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-651ea1f537d3a83bde4fa4c7aff1c6e1e29088737f8dea26c3d1d55da8986e3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EokvhwAsgS1zgsF3_SRznWEVAiypxgXPktSddL469ZBJVufUReDCegifB3SwckHqyrfn8jT0_Ql5zdsEZExuz310IVdX1E7LirFZrrUrxlKyYVDzvWX1GXiDuGeO80Ow5OZOq1LrgfEV-NcFHb9Pv-5-3EGH0lpro6GFItzHhcjRhRkCaOlpxRQ9m9BBHpHd-3GXQ92aYaT9DSG7GQzDHWzhHN6QejrbHihtjpxGWsnc0wPQdem_o1iA4miIdd0AFE4JexxGGmDun_BrapIgQcULaZCP6zttj6SV51pmA8Oq0npNvHz98ba7WN18-XTeXN2srS1mvVcnB8K6UlZNGy62DojOFrUzXcauAg6iZ1pWsOu3ACGWl464sndG1ViC38py8W7x5TD8mwLHtPVoIwURIE7aiUoxXUhRFRt_-h-7TlH8SHqiMlUwVKlPvF8oOCXGArj3NteWsfYi4zRG3x4gz--ZknLY9uH_k30wzsFmAOx9gftzUXn6-WpR_AH1Rtrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2776050646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinico‐genetic and prognostic analyses of 716 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia based on the 2022 International Consensus Classification</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lee, Wan‐Hsuan ; Lin, Chien‐Chin ; Tsai, Cheng‐Hong ; Tien, Feng‐Ming ; Lo, Min‐Yen ; Ni, Sao‐Chih ; Yao, Ming ; Tseng, Mei‐Hsuan ; Kuo, Yuan‐Yeh ; Liu, Ming‐Chih ; Tang, Jih‐Luh ; Sun, Hsun‐I ; Chuang, Yi‐Kuang ; Chou, Wen‐Chien ; Hou, Hsin‐An ; Tien, Hwei‐Fang</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Wan‐Hsuan ; Lin, Chien‐Chin ; Tsai, Cheng‐Hong ; Tien, Feng‐Ming ; Lo, Min‐Yen ; Ni, Sao‐Chih ; Yao, Ming ; Tseng, Mei‐Hsuan ; Kuo, Yuan‐Yeh ; Liu, Ming‐Chih ; Tang, Jih‐Luh ; Sun, Hsun‐I ; Chuang, Yi‐Kuang ; Chou, Wen‐Chien ; Hou, Hsin‐An ; Tien, Hwei‐Fang</creatorcontrib><description>The 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) recategorized myeloid neoplasms based on recent advances in the understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, in which myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with blasts of 10%–19% is classified as MDS/acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MDS with mutated SF3B1, irrespective of the number of ring sideroblasts, as MDS‐SF3B1, and those with multi‐hit TP53 mutations as MDS with mutated TP53. In the analysis of 716 patients with MDS diagnosed according to the 2016 WHO classification, we found that 75.3% of patients remained in the MDS group based on the ICC, while 24.7% of patients were reclassified to the MDS/AML group after the exclusion of 15 patients who were classified to the AML group. Patients with MDS/AML showed a distinct mutational landscape and had poorer outcomes, compared to those with MDS. In the MDS group, patients with MDS‐SF3B1 had higher frequencies of DNMT3A and TET2 mutations than those with MDS, not otherwise specified, with single lineage dysplasia or multilineage dysplasia. Patients with mutated TP53 were associated with dismal outcomes, irrespective of the blast percentage. In conclusion, this study showed that the ICC facilitates efficient segregation and risk‐stratification of MDS which can help guide the treatment choice of patients with the disease. Case allocation of MDS patients defined by 2016 WHO classification and 2022 ICC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-8609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26799</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36588411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia ; Blood cancer ; Classification ; Consensus ; Dysplasia ; Genetic analysis ; Hematology ; Humans ; Leukemia ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - pathology ; Malignancy ; Mutation ; Myelodysplastic syndrome ; Myelodysplastic syndromes ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes - diagnosis ; Myeloproliferative Disorders ; p53 Protein ; Prognosis ; Sideroblasts</subject><ispartof>American journal of hematology, 2023-03, Vol.98 (3), p.398-407</ispartof><rights>2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-651ea1f537d3a83bde4fa4c7aff1c6e1e29088737f8dea26c3d1d55da8986e3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-651ea1f537d3a83bde4fa4c7aff1c6e1e29088737f8dea26c3d1d55da8986e3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4795-9844 ; 0000-0003-2780-4845 ; 0000-0003-4513-2472 ; 0000-0002-6090-9000 ; 0000-0001-8208-353X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajh.26799$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajh.26799$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588411$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Wan‐Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chien‐Chin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Cheng‐Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tien, Feng‐Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Min‐Yen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Sao‐Chih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Mei‐Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Yuan‐Yeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ming‐Chih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jih‐Luh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Hsun‐I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Yi‐Kuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Wen‐Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Hsin‐An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tien, Hwei‐Fang</creatorcontrib><title>Clinico‐genetic and prognostic analyses of 716 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia based on the 2022 International Consensus Classification</title><title>American journal of hematology</title><addtitle>Am J Hematol</addtitle><description>The 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) recategorized myeloid neoplasms based on recent advances in the understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, in which myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with blasts of 10%–19% is classified as MDS/acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MDS with mutated SF3B1, irrespective of the number of ring sideroblasts, as MDS‐SF3B1, and those with multi‐hit TP53 mutations as MDS with mutated TP53. In the analysis of 716 patients with MDS diagnosed according to the 2016 WHO classification, we found that 75.3% of patients remained in the MDS group based on the ICC, while 24.7% of patients were reclassified to the MDS/AML group after the exclusion of 15 patients who were classified to the AML group. Patients with MDS/AML showed a distinct mutational landscape and had poorer outcomes, compared to those with MDS. In the MDS group, patients with MDS‐SF3B1 had higher frequencies of DNMT3A and TET2 mutations than those with MDS, not otherwise specified, with single lineage dysplasia or multilineage dysplasia. Patients with mutated TP53 were associated with dismal outcomes, irrespective of the blast percentage. In conclusion, this study showed that the ICC facilitates efficient segregation and risk‐stratification of MDS which can help guide the treatment choice of patients with the disease. Case allocation of MDS patients defined by 2016 WHO classification and 2022 ICC.</description><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia</subject><subject>Blood cancer</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Dysplasia</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - pathology</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic syndrome</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic syndromes</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic Syndromes - diagnosis</subject><subject>Myeloproliferative Disorders</subject><subject>p53 Protein</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Sideroblasts</subject><issn>0361-8609</issn><issn>1096-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EokvhwAsgS1zgsF3_SRznWEVAiypxgXPktSddL469ZBJVufUReDCegifB3SwckHqyrfn8jT0_Ql5zdsEZExuz310IVdX1E7LirFZrrUrxlKyYVDzvWX1GXiDuGeO80Ow5OZOq1LrgfEV-NcFHb9Pv-5-3EGH0lpro6GFItzHhcjRhRkCaOlpxRQ9m9BBHpHd-3GXQ92aYaT9DSG7GQzDHWzhHN6QejrbHihtjpxGWsnc0wPQdem_o1iA4miIdd0AFE4JexxGGmDun_BrapIgQcULaZCP6zttj6SV51pmA8Oq0npNvHz98ba7WN18-XTeXN2srS1mvVcnB8K6UlZNGy62DojOFrUzXcauAg6iZ1pWsOu3ACGWl464sndG1ViC38py8W7x5TD8mwLHtPVoIwURIE7aiUoxXUhRFRt_-h-7TlH8SHqiMlUwVKlPvF8oOCXGArj3NteWsfYi4zRG3x4gz--ZknLY9uH_k30wzsFmAOx9gftzUXn6-WpR_AH1Rtrw</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Lee, Wan‐Hsuan</creator><creator>Lin, Chien‐Chin</creator><creator>Tsai, Cheng‐Hong</creator><creator>Tien, Feng‐Ming</creator><creator>Lo, Min‐Yen</creator><creator>Ni, Sao‐Chih</creator><creator>Yao, Ming</creator><creator>Tseng, Mei‐Hsuan</creator><creator>Kuo, Yuan‐Yeh</creator><creator>Liu, Ming‐Chih</creator><creator>Tang, Jih‐Luh</creator><creator>Sun, Hsun‐I</creator><creator>Chuang, Yi‐Kuang</creator><creator>Chou, Wen‐Chien</creator><creator>Hou, Hsin‐An</creator><creator>Tien, Hwei‐Fang</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4795-9844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2780-4845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4513-2472</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6090-9000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-353X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Clinico‐genetic and prognostic analyses of 716 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia based on the 2022 International Consensus Classification</title><author>Lee, Wan‐Hsuan ; Lin, Chien‐Chin ; Tsai, Cheng‐Hong ; Tien, Feng‐Ming ; Lo, Min‐Yen ; Ni, Sao‐Chih ; Yao, Ming ; Tseng, Mei‐Hsuan ; Kuo, Yuan‐Yeh ; Liu, Ming‐Chih ; Tang, Jih‐Luh ; Sun, Hsun‐I ; Chuang, Yi‐Kuang ; Chou, Wen‐Chien ; Hou, Hsin‐An ; Tien, Hwei‐Fang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-651ea1f537d3a83bde4fa4c7aff1c6e1e29088737f8dea26c3d1d55da8986e3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acute myeloid leukemia</topic><topic>Blood cancer</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Dysplasia</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - pathology</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic syndrome</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic syndromes</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic Syndromes - diagnosis</topic><topic>Myeloproliferative Disorders</topic><topic>p53 Protein</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Sideroblasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Wan‐Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chien‐Chin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Cheng‐Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tien, Feng‐Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Min‐Yen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Sao‐Chih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Mei‐Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Yuan‐Yeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ming‐Chih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jih‐Luh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Hsun‐I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Yi‐Kuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Wen‐Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Hsin‐An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tien, Hwei‐Fang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of hematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Wan‐Hsuan</au><au>Lin, Chien‐Chin</au><au>Tsai, Cheng‐Hong</au><au>Tien, Feng‐Ming</au><au>Lo, Min‐Yen</au><au>Ni, Sao‐Chih</au><au>Yao, Ming</au><au>Tseng, Mei‐Hsuan</au><au>Kuo, Yuan‐Yeh</au><au>Liu, Ming‐Chih</au><au>Tang, Jih‐Luh</au><au>Sun, Hsun‐I</au><au>Chuang, Yi‐Kuang</au><au>Chou, Wen‐Chien</au><au>Hou, Hsin‐An</au><au>Tien, Hwei‐Fang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinico‐genetic and prognostic analyses of 716 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia based on the 2022 International Consensus Classification</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hematology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Hematol</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>398</spage><epage>407</epage><pages>398-407</pages><issn>0361-8609</issn><eissn>1096-8652</eissn><abstract>The 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) recategorized myeloid neoplasms based on recent advances in the understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, in which myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with blasts of 10%–19% is classified as MDS/acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MDS with mutated SF3B1, irrespective of the number of ring sideroblasts, as MDS‐SF3B1, and those with multi‐hit TP53 mutations as MDS with mutated TP53. In the analysis of 716 patients with MDS diagnosed according to the 2016 WHO classification, we found that 75.3% of patients remained in the MDS group based on the ICC, while 24.7% of patients were reclassified to the MDS/AML group after the exclusion of 15 patients who were classified to the AML group. Patients with MDS/AML showed a distinct mutational landscape and had poorer outcomes, compared to those with MDS. In the MDS group, patients with MDS‐SF3B1 had higher frequencies of DNMT3A and TET2 mutations than those with MDS, not otherwise specified, with single lineage dysplasia or multilineage dysplasia. Patients with mutated TP53 were associated with dismal outcomes, irrespective of the blast percentage. In conclusion, this study showed that the ICC facilitates efficient segregation and risk‐stratification of MDS which can help guide the treatment choice of patients with the disease. Case allocation of MDS patients defined by 2016 WHO classification and 2022 ICC.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36588411</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajh.26799</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4795-9844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2780-4845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4513-2472</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6090-9000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-353X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-8609
ispartof American journal of hematology, 2023-03, Vol.98 (3), p.398-407
issn 0361-8609
1096-8652
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2760173244
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Acute myeloid leukemia
Blood cancer
Classification
Consensus
Dysplasia
Genetic analysis
Hematology
Humans
Leukemia
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - pathology
Malignancy
Mutation
Myelodysplastic syndrome
Myelodysplastic syndromes
Myelodysplastic Syndromes - diagnosis
Myeloproliferative Disorders
p53 Protein
Prognosis
Sideroblasts
title Clinico‐genetic and prognostic analyses of 716 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia based on the 2022 International Consensus Classification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T10%3A19%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinico%E2%80%90genetic%20and%20prognostic%20analyses%20of%20716%20patients%20with%20primary%20myelodysplastic%20syndrome%20and%20myelodysplastic%20syndrome/acute%20myeloid%20leukemia%20based%20on%20the%202022%20International%20Consensus%20Classification&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hematology&rft.au=Lee,%20Wan%E2%80%90Hsuan&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=398&rft.epage=407&rft.pages=398-407&rft.issn=0361-8609&rft.eissn=1096-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajh.26799&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2760173244%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2776050646&rft_id=info:pmid/36588411&rfr_iscdi=true