Butterfly fragments in diaphyseal tibial fractures heal unpredictably: Should we be adopting other strategies for these high risk fractures?

The natural history of diaphyseal tibial butterfly fragments is poorly documented. Numerous studies have analyzed risk factors for nonunions in the tibial shaft with known factors including Gustilo classification, ASA class, and cortical contact. However, the healing potential and ideal management o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2023-02, Vol.54 (2), p.738-743
Hauptverfasser: Myhre, Luke, Steffenson, Lillia, Higgins, Thomas F., Rothberg, David L., Haller, Justin M., Marchand, Lucas S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 743
container_issue 2
container_start_page 738
container_title Injury
container_volume 54
creator Myhre, Luke
Steffenson, Lillia
Higgins, Thomas F.
Rothberg, David L.
Haller, Justin M.
Marchand, Lucas S.
description The natural history of diaphyseal tibial butterfly fragments is poorly documented. Numerous studies have analyzed risk factors for nonunions in the tibial shaft with known factors including Gustilo classification, ASA class, and cortical contact. However, the healing potential and ideal management of nonsegmental butterfly fragments in this setting remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the nonunion rate of diaphyseal tibial fractures with a butterfly fragment. A performed a retrospective review of patients at a single academic Level 1 Trauma Center from 2000-2020 who underwent intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. Those with non-segmental butterfly fragments (OTA/AO: 42-B) and minimum 12 month follow up were included. Morphologic measurements of butterfly fragments were performed to measure location, size, and displacement, and mRust scores at final follow up were calculated. Outcome measures were surgery to promote union, and mRust scores. A total of 99 patients were included with 21 patients requiring revision surgery to promote union. Thirty six patients had open fractures and 77% of patients were male with a mean age of 34 (range: 12-80). Average follow up was 19 months (3 months – 12 years). The most common location of the butterfly fragment was the anterior cortex (42%), with a mean length of 7.8cm (SD: 3.3) and width of 1.8cm (SD: 0.5cm). At final follow-up 37% of fractures had persistent lucency without callus at the site of the butterfly while only 31% of fractures had remodeled cortex. Average time to complete healing was 13.3 months. Open fractures with butterfly fragments were more likely to go on to nonunion than closed (44% vs 9.2%, p=
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2760172024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002013832200955X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2760172024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7d1932b5c41b1980f3509b0b60911526162b366a558df3f93c89eb55df9f2333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAQtRCIbgv_oEI-cknqj42TcAC1VVuQKnGgd8sf44232STYTqv8B340XqXAjdOMZt6bp3kPoXNKSkqouNiXftjPYSkZYaykrCRs-wptaFO3BWGifo02hDBSUN7wE3Qa454QWhPO36ITLqqmye0G_bqaU4Lg-gW7oHYHGFLEfsDWq6lbIqgeJ699Lnlt0hwg4u44nYcpgPUmKd0vn_CPbpx7i58Ba8DKjlPyww6PqYOAYwoqwc5nqhsDzrMIuPO7DgcfH_8d_vIOvXGqj_D-pZ6hh9ubh-uvxf33u2_Xl_eF4ZSmora05UxXZks1bRvieEVaTbQgLaUVE1QwzYVQVdVYx13LTdOCrirrWsc452fo43p2CuPPGWKSBx8N9L0aYJyjZLXITmVbtxm6XaEmjDEGcHIK_qDCIimRxxjkXq4xyGMMkjK50j68KMz6APYv6Y_vGfB5BUB-88lDkNF4GEx2NIBJ0o7-_wq_AZ2InUM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760172024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Butterfly fragments in diaphyseal tibial fractures heal unpredictably: Should we be adopting other strategies for these high risk fractures?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Myhre, Luke ; Steffenson, Lillia ; Higgins, Thomas F. ; Rothberg, David L. ; Haller, Justin M. ; Marchand, Lucas S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Myhre, Luke ; Steffenson, Lillia ; Higgins, Thomas F. ; Rothberg, David L. ; Haller, Justin M. ; Marchand, Lucas S.</creatorcontrib><description>The natural history of diaphyseal tibial butterfly fragments is poorly documented. Numerous studies have analyzed risk factors for nonunions in the tibial shaft with known factors including Gustilo classification, ASA class, and cortical contact. However, the healing potential and ideal management of nonsegmental butterfly fragments in this setting remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the nonunion rate of diaphyseal tibial fractures with a butterfly fragment. A performed a retrospective review of patients at a single academic Level 1 Trauma Center from 2000-2020 who underwent intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. Those with non-segmental butterfly fragments (OTA/AO: 42-B) and minimum 12 month follow up were included. Morphologic measurements of butterfly fragments were performed to measure location, size, and displacement, and mRust scores at final follow up were calculated. Outcome measures were surgery to promote union, and mRust scores. A total of 99 patients were included with 21 patients requiring revision surgery to promote union. Thirty six patients had open fractures and 77% of patients were male with a mean age of 34 (range: 12-80). Average follow up was 19 months (3 months – 12 years). The most common location of the butterfly fragment was the anterior cortex (42%), with a mean length of 7.8cm (SD: 3.3) and width of 1.8cm (SD: 0.5cm). At final follow-up 37% of fractures had persistent lucency without callus at the site of the butterfly while only 31% of fractures had remodeled cortex. Average time to complete healing was 13.3 months. Open fractures with butterfly fragments were more likely to go on to nonunion than closed (44% vs 9.2%, p=&lt;0.001). The length of the butterfly fragment was not different between the union and nonunion groups (7.7 vs 7.5, P=0.42). Open tibial shaft fractures with a butterfly fragment have a high risk of nonunion. Further research may seek to determine if adjunct treatment of butterfly fragments (ie inter-fragmentary compression) in the acute setting could improve healing rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36588033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animals ; Bone Nails ; Butterflies ; Butterfly fragment ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects ; Fracture Healing ; Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging ; Fractures, Open - etiology ; Fractures, Open - surgery ; Humans ; Intramedullary nail ; Male ; Non-union ; Retrospective Studies ; Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Tibial Fractures - surgery ; Tibial shaft fracture ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2023-02, Vol.54 (2), p.738-743</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7d1932b5c41b1980f3509b0b60911526162b366a558df3f93c89eb55df9f2333</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0471-7212 ; 0000-0002-8269-3925 ; 0000-0001-8373-8593 ; 0000-0002-7749-3662 ; 0000-0002-4499-6669</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Myhre, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffenson, Lillia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Justin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchand, Lucas S.</creatorcontrib><title>Butterfly fragments in diaphyseal tibial fractures heal unpredictably: Should we be adopting other strategies for these high risk fractures?</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>The natural history of diaphyseal tibial butterfly fragments is poorly documented. Numerous studies have analyzed risk factors for nonunions in the tibial shaft with known factors including Gustilo classification, ASA class, and cortical contact. However, the healing potential and ideal management of nonsegmental butterfly fragments in this setting remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the nonunion rate of diaphyseal tibial fractures with a butterfly fragment. A performed a retrospective review of patients at a single academic Level 1 Trauma Center from 2000-2020 who underwent intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. Those with non-segmental butterfly fragments (OTA/AO: 42-B) and minimum 12 month follow up were included. Morphologic measurements of butterfly fragments were performed to measure location, size, and displacement, and mRust scores at final follow up were calculated. Outcome measures were surgery to promote union, and mRust scores. A total of 99 patients were included with 21 patients requiring revision surgery to promote union. Thirty six patients had open fractures and 77% of patients were male with a mean age of 34 (range: 12-80). Average follow up was 19 months (3 months – 12 years). The most common location of the butterfly fragment was the anterior cortex (42%), with a mean length of 7.8cm (SD: 3.3) and width of 1.8cm (SD: 0.5cm). At final follow-up 37% of fractures had persistent lucency without callus at the site of the butterfly while only 31% of fractures had remodeled cortex. Average time to complete healing was 13.3 months. Open fractures with butterfly fragments were more likely to go on to nonunion than closed (44% vs 9.2%, p=&lt;0.001). The length of the butterfly fragment was not different between the union and nonunion groups (7.7 vs 7.5, P=0.42). Open tibial shaft fractures with a butterfly fragment have a high risk of nonunion. Further research may seek to determine if adjunct treatment of butterfly fragments (ie inter-fragmentary compression) in the acute setting could improve healing rates.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Butterfly fragment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Healing</subject><subject>Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fractures, Open - etiology</subject><subject>Fractures, Open - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intramedullary nail</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Non-union</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Tibial shaft fracture</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAQtRCIbgv_oEI-cknqj42TcAC1VVuQKnGgd8sf44232STYTqv8B340XqXAjdOMZt6bp3kPoXNKSkqouNiXftjPYSkZYaykrCRs-wptaFO3BWGifo02hDBSUN7wE3Qa454QWhPO36ITLqqmye0G_bqaU4Lg-gW7oHYHGFLEfsDWq6lbIqgeJ699Lnlt0hwg4u44nYcpgPUmKd0vn_CPbpx7i58Ba8DKjlPyww6PqYOAYwoqwc5nqhsDzrMIuPO7DgcfH_8d_vIOvXGqj_D-pZ6hh9ubh-uvxf33u2_Xl_eF4ZSmora05UxXZks1bRvieEVaTbQgLaUVE1QwzYVQVdVYx13LTdOCrirrWsc452fo43p2CuPPGWKSBx8N9L0aYJyjZLXITmVbtxm6XaEmjDEGcHIK_qDCIimRxxjkXq4xyGMMkjK50j68KMz6APYv6Y_vGfB5BUB-88lDkNF4GEx2NIBJ0o7-_wq_AZ2InUM</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Myhre, Luke</creator><creator>Steffenson, Lillia</creator><creator>Higgins, Thomas F.</creator><creator>Rothberg, David L.</creator><creator>Haller, Justin M.</creator><creator>Marchand, Lucas S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0471-7212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8269-3925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-8593</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7749-3662</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-6669</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Butterfly fragments in diaphyseal tibial fractures heal unpredictably: Should we be adopting other strategies for these high risk fractures?</title><author>Myhre, Luke ; Steffenson, Lillia ; Higgins, Thomas F. ; Rothberg, David L. ; Haller, Justin M. ; Marchand, Lucas S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7d1932b5c41b1980f3509b0b60911526162b366a558df3f93c89eb55df9f2333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Butterfly fragment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Healing</topic><topic>Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fractures, Open - etiology</topic><topic>Fractures, Open - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intramedullary nail</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Non-union</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Tibial shaft fracture</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Myhre, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffenson, Lillia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Justin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchand, Lucas S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Myhre, Luke</au><au>Steffenson, Lillia</au><au>Higgins, Thomas F.</au><au>Rothberg, David L.</au><au>Haller, Justin M.</au><au>Marchand, Lucas S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Butterfly fragments in diaphyseal tibial fractures heal unpredictably: Should we be adopting other strategies for these high risk fractures?</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>743</epage><pages>738-743</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>The natural history of diaphyseal tibial butterfly fragments is poorly documented. Numerous studies have analyzed risk factors for nonunions in the tibial shaft with known factors including Gustilo classification, ASA class, and cortical contact. However, the healing potential and ideal management of nonsegmental butterfly fragments in this setting remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the nonunion rate of diaphyseal tibial fractures with a butterfly fragment. A performed a retrospective review of patients at a single academic Level 1 Trauma Center from 2000-2020 who underwent intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. Those with non-segmental butterfly fragments (OTA/AO: 42-B) and minimum 12 month follow up were included. Morphologic measurements of butterfly fragments were performed to measure location, size, and displacement, and mRust scores at final follow up were calculated. Outcome measures were surgery to promote union, and mRust scores. A total of 99 patients were included with 21 patients requiring revision surgery to promote union. Thirty six patients had open fractures and 77% of patients were male with a mean age of 34 (range: 12-80). Average follow up was 19 months (3 months – 12 years). The most common location of the butterfly fragment was the anterior cortex (42%), with a mean length of 7.8cm (SD: 3.3) and width of 1.8cm (SD: 0.5cm). At final follow-up 37% of fractures had persistent lucency without callus at the site of the butterfly while only 31% of fractures had remodeled cortex. Average time to complete healing was 13.3 months. Open fractures with butterfly fragments were more likely to go on to nonunion than closed (44% vs 9.2%, p=&lt;0.001). The length of the butterfly fragment was not different between the union and nonunion groups (7.7 vs 7.5, P=0.42). Open tibial shaft fractures with a butterfly fragment have a high risk of nonunion. Further research may seek to determine if adjunct treatment of butterfly fragments (ie inter-fragmentary compression) in the acute setting could improve healing rates.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36588033</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.024</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0471-7212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8269-3925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-8593</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7749-3662</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-6669</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2023-02, Vol.54 (2), p.738-743
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2760172024
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Animals
Bone Nails
Butterflies
Butterfly fragment
Female
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects
Fracture Healing
Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging
Fractures, Open - etiology
Fractures, Open - surgery
Humans
Intramedullary nail
Male
Non-union
Retrospective Studies
Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Tibial Fractures - surgery
Tibial shaft fracture
Treatment Outcome
title Butterfly fragments in diaphyseal tibial fractures heal unpredictably: Should we be adopting other strategies for these high risk fractures?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A47%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Butterfly%20fragments%20in%20diaphyseal%20tibial%20fractures%20heal%20unpredictably:%20Should%20we%20be%20adopting%20other%20strategies%20for%20these%20high%20risk%20fractures?&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Myhre,%20Luke&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=743&rft.pages=738-743&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2760172024%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760172024&rft_id=info:pmid/36588033&rft_els_id=S002013832200955X&rfr_iscdi=true