Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US

Historically, trust in biomedical research has been lower among minoritized racial and ethnic groups who are underrepresented in and excluded from research, with the same groups experiencing worse health outcomes. Unfortunately, instruments that measure trust may not capture components of trust rele...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA network open 2022-12, Vol.5 (12), p.e2248812-e2248812
Hauptverfasser: Stallings, Sarah C, Cunningham-Erves, Jennifer, Frazier, Carleigh, Ichimura, Jabári S, Hurd, Thelma C, Jurinsky, Jordan, Acquaye, Amber, Dalton, Jacquelyn S, Wilkins, Consuelo H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e2248812
container_issue 12
container_start_page e2248812
container_title JAMA network open
container_volume 5
creator Stallings, Sarah C
Cunningham-Erves, Jennifer
Frazier, Carleigh
Ichimura, Jabári S
Hurd, Thelma C
Jurinsky, Jordan
Acquaye, Amber
Dalton, Jacquelyn S
Wilkins, Consuelo H
description Historically, trust in biomedical research has been lower among minoritized racial and ethnic groups who are underrepresented in and excluded from research, with the same groups experiencing worse health outcomes. Unfortunately, instruments that measure trust may not capture components of trust relevant to minoritized racial and ethnic groups. To develop and validate a scale to measure trust in biomedical research among minoritized racial and ethnic groups. This cross-sectional, community-based survey study compared trust and distrust in biomedical research among Black, Latino, and White subgroups in the US using the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness (PoRT) scale. The scale was developed between March 22, 2016, and September 19, 2018, as part of this study, and its structure, reliability, and validity were examined during pilot (n = 381) and validation (n = 532) phases between February 4, 2019, and July 27, 2021. Convenience samples of adult participants (aged ≥18 years) were recruited locally (Nashville, Tennessee, and San Antonio, Texas) and nationally through the ResearchMatch and Cint online platforms. Overall and individual item Trust and Distrust subscale scores were compared. Overall Trust and Distrust scores were compared by race and ethnicity using a Kruskal-Wallis H test and individual item scores were compared using independent samples t test. Of the 532 participants in the scale validation study, 144 (27.1%) were Black, 90 (16.9%) were Latino, and 282 (53.0%) were White. Participants had a median age of 43 years (range, 18-90 years), 352 (66.2%) were women, and 198 (37.2%) had educational attainment levels less than a college degree. Factor analysis of the 18-item PoRT scale revealed a 2-factor structure with two 9-item PoRT subscales (Trust and Distrust), which demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.72 and 0.87, respectively). Mean (SD) Trust subscale scores were lower among Black (34.33 [2.02]) and Latino (34.55 [1.97]) participants compared with White participants (36.32 [1.81]; P < .001). Mean (SD) Distrust subscale scores were higher among Black (21.0 [2.15]) and Latino (20.53 [2.21]) participants compared with White participants (18.4 [2.03]; P < .001). Individual item results showed that Black and Latino participants were less trusting and more distrusting than White individuals on items related to risks, harms, secrecy, confidentiality, and privacy. These findings suggest that the PoRT scale incorporates trust and
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48812
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2759264304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2759218163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-c8c79412157355b9cc8bbedd9a4bad6ed3e57663715f043f1496e2ebda48e2133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUctu1DAUtSoQrYb-ArLaDZsZ_Ewcdm0pBakVqA-2kWPfdDwkdrAdEHwTH0nS6QN1ZevovHQPQgeUrCgh9N1G99pD_hXi9zCAXzHC2EooRdkO2mOyFEuuiHzx338X7ae0IYQwQnlVyFdolxdSEc7FHvr7AX5CF4YefMbaW_xNd87q7ILHocV5DfgrRAPDjKQZuoQEOpo1vo5jmnvktfOQEr4yugOcA74AncYIWwI-6oO_xRfOh-iy-wMWX2rjdHeXdprX3hl8FsM4JOw8PnahB-smq6egCZ573Fy9Ri9b3SXYv38X6Obj6fXJp-X5l7PPJ0fnSy2oykujTFkJyqgsuZRNZYxqGrC20qLRtgDLQZZFwUsqWyJ4S0VVAIPGaqGAUc4X6O3Wd4jhxwgp171LBrpuunwYU81KWbFC8Em8QIfPqJswRj-127KoosVs-H7LMjGkFKGth-h6HX_XlNTzrPWzWet51vpu1kn85j5ibKbbPEofRuT_AJ4Fpd8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2759218163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stallings, Sarah C ; Cunningham-Erves, Jennifer ; Frazier, Carleigh ; Ichimura, Jabári S ; Hurd, Thelma C ; Jurinsky, Jordan ; Acquaye, Amber ; Dalton, Jacquelyn S ; Wilkins, Consuelo H</creator><creatorcontrib>Stallings, Sarah C ; Cunningham-Erves, Jennifer ; Frazier, Carleigh ; Ichimura, Jabári S ; Hurd, Thelma C ; Jurinsky, Jordan ; Acquaye, Amber ; Dalton, Jacquelyn S ; Wilkins, Consuelo H</creatorcontrib><description>Historically, trust in biomedical research has been lower among minoritized racial and ethnic groups who are underrepresented in and excluded from research, with the same groups experiencing worse health outcomes. Unfortunately, instruments that measure trust may not capture components of trust relevant to minoritized racial and ethnic groups. To develop and validate a scale to measure trust in biomedical research among minoritized racial and ethnic groups. This cross-sectional, community-based survey study compared trust and distrust in biomedical research among Black, Latino, and White subgroups in the US using the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness (PoRT) scale. The scale was developed between March 22, 2016, and September 19, 2018, as part of this study, and its structure, reliability, and validity were examined during pilot (n = 381) and validation (n = 532) phases between February 4, 2019, and July 27, 2021. Convenience samples of adult participants (aged ≥18 years) were recruited locally (Nashville, Tennessee, and San Antonio, Texas) and nationally through the ResearchMatch and Cint online platforms. Overall and individual item Trust and Distrust subscale scores were compared. Overall Trust and Distrust scores were compared by race and ethnicity using a Kruskal-Wallis H test and individual item scores were compared using independent samples t test. Of the 532 participants in the scale validation study, 144 (27.1%) were Black, 90 (16.9%) were Latino, and 282 (53.0%) were White. Participants had a median age of 43 years (range, 18-90 years), 352 (66.2%) were women, and 198 (37.2%) had educational attainment levels less than a college degree. Factor analysis of the 18-item PoRT scale revealed a 2-factor structure with two 9-item PoRT subscales (Trust and Distrust), which demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.72 and 0.87, respectively). Mean (SD) Trust subscale scores were lower among Black (34.33 [2.02]) and Latino (34.55 [1.97]) participants compared with White participants (36.32 [1.81]; P &lt; .001). Mean (SD) Distrust subscale scores were higher among Black (21.0 [2.15]) and Latino (20.53 [2.21]) participants compared with White participants (18.4 [2.03]; P &lt; .001). Individual item results showed that Black and Latino participants were less trusting and more distrusting than White individuals on items related to risks, harms, secrecy, confidentiality, and privacy. These findings suggest that the PoRT scale incorporates trust and trustworthiness concepts relevant among Black and Latino individuals and may allow more precise assessment of trust in research among these groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48812</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36580334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomedical Research ; Black or African American ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Reproducibility of Results ; Trust ; White People ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2022-12, Vol.5 (12), p.e2248812-e2248812</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-c8c79412157355b9cc8bbedd9a4bad6ed3e57663715f043f1496e2ebda48e2133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-c8c79412157355b9cc8bbedd9a4bad6ed3e57663715f043f1496e2ebda48e2133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stallings, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham-Erves, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Carleigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichimura, Jabári S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurd, Thelma C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurinsky, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acquaye, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, Jacquelyn S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkins, Consuelo H</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>Historically, trust in biomedical research has been lower among minoritized racial and ethnic groups who are underrepresented in and excluded from research, with the same groups experiencing worse health outcomes. Unfortunately, instruments that measure trust may not capture components of trust relevant to minoritized racial and ethnic groups. To develop and validate a scale to measure trust in biomedical research among minoritized racial and ethnic groups. This cross-sectional, community-based survey study compared trust and distrust in biomedical research among Black, Latino, and White subgroups in the US using the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness (PoRT) scale. The scale was developed between March 22, 2016, and September 19, 2018, as part of this study, and its structure, reliability, and validity were examined during pilot (n = 381) and validation (n = 532) phases between February 4, 2019, and July 27, 2021. Convenience samples of adult participants (aged ≥18 years) were recruited locally (Nashville, Tennessee, and San Antonio, Texas) and nationally through the ResearchMatch and Cint online platforms. Overall and individual item Trust and Distrust subscale scores were compared. Overall Trust and Distrust scores were compared by race and ethnicity using a Kruskal-Wallis H test and individual item scores were compared using independent samples t test. Of the 532 participants in the scale validation study, 144 (27.1%) were Black, 90 (16.9%) were Latino, and 282 (53.0%) were White. Participants had a median age of 43 years (range, 18-90 years), 352 (66.2%) were women, and 198 (37.2%) had educational attainment levels less than a college degree. Factor analysis of the 18-item PoRT scale revealed a 2-factor structure with two 9-item PoRT subscales (Trust and Distrust), which demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.72 and 0.87, respectively). Mean (SD) Trust subscale scores were lower among Black (34.33 [2.02]) and Latino (34.55 [1.97]) participants compared with White participants (36.32 [1.81]; P &lt; .001). Mean (SD) Distrust subscale scores were higher among Black (21.0 [2.15]) and Latino (20.53 [2.21]) participants compared with White participants (18.4 [2.03]; P &lt; .001). Individual item results showed that Black and Latino participants were less trusting and more distrusting than White individuals on items related to risks, harms, secrecy, confidentiality, and privacy. These findings suggest that the PoRT scale incorporates trust and trustworthiness concepts relevant among Black and Latino individuals and may allow more precise assessment of trust in research among these groups.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biomedical Research</subject><subject>Black or African American</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>White People</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUctu1DAUtSoQrYb-ArLaDZsZ_Ewcdm0pBakVqA-2kWPfdDwkdrAdEHwTH0nS6QN1ZevovHQPQgeUrCgh9N1G99pD_hXi9zCAXzHC2EooRdkO2mOyFEuuiHzx338X7ae0IYQwQnlVyFdolxdSEc7FHvr7AX5CF4YefMbaW_xNd87q7ILHocV5DfgrRAPDjKQZuoQEOpo1vo5jmnvktfOQEr4yugOcA74AncYIWwI-6oO_xRfOh-iy-wMWX2rjdHeXdprX3hl8FsM4JOw8PnahB-smq6egCZ573Fy9Ri9b3SXYv38X6Obj6fXJp-X5l7PPJ0fnSy2oykujTFkJyqgsuZRNZYxqGrC20qLRtgDLQZZFwUsqWyJ4S0VVAIPGaqGAUc4X6O3Wd4jhxwgp171LBrpuunwYU81KWbFC8Em8QIfPqJswRj-127KoosVs-H7LMjGkFKGth-h6HX_XlNTzrPWzWet51vpu1kn85j5ibKbbPEofRuT_AJ4Fpd8</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Stallings, Sarah C</creator><creator>Cunningham-Erves, Jennifer</creator><creator>Frazier, Carleigh</creator><creator>Ichimura, Jabári S</creator><creator>Hurd, Thelma C</creator><creator>Jurinsky, Jordan</creator><creator>Acquaye, Amber</creator><creator>Dalton, Jacquelyn S</creator><creator>Wilkins, Consuelo H</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US</title><author>Stallings, Sarah C ; Cunningham-Erves, Jennifer ; Frazier, Carleigh ; Ichimura, Jabári S ; Hurd, Thelma C ; Jurinsky, Jordan ; Acquaye, Amber ; Dalton, Jacquelyn S ; Wilkins, Consuelo H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-c8c79412157355b9cc8bbedd9a4bad6ed3e57663715f043f1496e2ebda48e2133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biomedical Research</topic><topic>Black or African American</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>White People</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stallings, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham-Erves, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Carleigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichimura, Jabári S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurd, Thelma C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurinsky, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acquaye, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, Jacquelyn S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkins, Consuelo H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stallings, Sarah C</au><au>Cunningham-Erves, Jennifer</au><au>Frazier, Carleigh</au><au>Ichimura, Jabári S</au><au>Hurd, Thelma C</au><au>Jurinsky, Jordan</au><au>Acquaye, Amber</au><au>Dalton, Jacquelyn S</au><au>Wilkins, Consuelo H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e2248812</spage><epage>e2248812</epage><pages>e2248812-e2248812</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Historically, trust in biomedical research has been lower among minoritized racial and ethnic groups who are underrepresented in and excluded from research, with the same groups experiencing worse health outcomes. Unfortunately, instruments that measure trust may not capture components of trust relevant to minoritized racial and ethnic groups. To develop and validate a scale to measure trust in biomedical research among minoritized racial and ethnic groups. This cross-sectional, community-based survey study compared trust and distrust in biomedical research among Black, Latino, and White subgroups in the US using the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness (PoRT) scale. The scale was developed between March 22, 2016, and September 19, 2018, as part of this study, and its structure, reliability, and validity were examined during pilot (n = 381) and validation (n = 532) phases between February 4, 2019, and July 27, 2021. Convenience samples of adult participants (aged ≥18 years) were recruited locally (Nashville, Tennessee, and San Antonio, Texas) and nationally through the ResearchMatch and Cint online platforms. Overall and individual item Trust and Distrust subscale scores were compared. Overall Trust and Distrust scores were compared by race and ethnicity using a Kruskal-Wallis H test and individual item scores were compared using independent samples t test. Of the 532 participants in the scale validation study, 144 (27.1%) were Black, 90 (16.9%) were Latino, and 282 (53.0%) were White. Participants had a median age of 43 years (range, 18-90 years), 352 (66.2%) were women, and 198 (37.2%) had educational attainment levels less than a college degree. Factor analysis of the 18-item PoRT scale revealed a 2-factor structure with two 9-item PoRT subscales (Trust and Distrust), which demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.72 and 0.87, respectively). Mean (SD) Trust subscale scores were lower among Black (34.33 [2.02]) and Latino (34.55 [1.97]) participants compared with White participants (36.32 [1.81]; P &lt; .001). Mean (SD) Distrust subscale scores were higher among Black (21.0 [2.15]) and Latino (20.53 [2.21]) participants compared with White participants (18.4 [2.03]; P &lt; .001). Individual item results showed that Black and Latino participants were less trusting and more distrusting than White individuals on items related to risks, harms, secrecy, confidentiality, and privacy. These findings suggest that the PoRT scale incorporates trust and trustworthiness concepts relevant among Black and Latino individuals and may allow more precise assessment of trust in research among these groups.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>36580334</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48812</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-3805
ispartof JAMA network open, 2022-12, Vol.5 (12), p.e2248812-e2248812
issn 2574-3805
2574-3805
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2759264304
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biomedical Research
Black or African American
Cross-Sectional Studies
Ethnicity
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Minority & ethnic groups
Reproducibility of Results
Trust
White People
Young Adult
title Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T22%3A37%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Validation%20of%20the%20Perceptions%20of%20Research%20Trustworthiness%20Scale%20to%20Measure%20Trust%20Among%20Minoritized%20Racial%20and%20Ethnic%20Groups%20in%20Biomedical%20Research%20in%20the%20US&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Stallings,%20Sarah%20C&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e2248812&rft.epage=e2248812&rft.pages=e2248812-e2248812&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48812&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2759218163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2759218163&rft_id=info:pmid/36580334&rfr_iscdi=true