A Comparison of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification in Spine Trauma Patients Among Neurosurgeons in East Africa Versus North America
Background In January 2021, we published findings evaluating the validity of thoracolumbar injury classification and biomechanical approach in the clinical outcome of operative and non-operative treatments. A notable result in our study was patients with unstable burst fractures received an Arbeitsg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31761-e31761 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e31761 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e31761 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Smith, Caitlyn J Bergene, Eyerusalem B Tadele, Abraham Mesfin, Fassil B |
description | Background In January 2021, we published findings evaluating the validity of thoracolumbar injury classification and biomechanical approach in the clinical outcome of operative and non-operative treatments. A notable result in our study was patients with unstable burst fractures received an Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen System (AO) score that recommended conservative treatment compared to a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale (TLICS) score that recommended surgical intervention. We designed a survey to determine reported differences in thoracolumbar injury classification, including the percentage of thoracolumbar spine fractures, type of classification system(s) used, use of classification system by board-certified neurosurgeons and neurosurgical residents, reliance on classification system to guide management, use of MRI in the evaluation of the posterior ligamentous complex, and readmission rate < 90 days at treating facilities. This study aims to determine which areas of neurosurgical practice in spine trauma patients differ among surgeons in North America and East Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sudan. Multiple classification systems have been proposed to describe thoracolumbar spine injuries. We hypothesized that there would be marked variability in the classification systems used to evaluate thoracolumbar spine injury among neurosurgeons in North America and East Africa. Methods The survey consisted of seven questions and was sent to 440 neurosurgeons practicing on the continents of North America and East Africa. Results A total of 67 surgeons responded, 50 from North America and 17 from East Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sudan. A significant percentage of African respondents reported a higher thoracolumbar spine fracture rate than respondents in North America (53% and 30%, respectively). Regarding the classification system used, 65% of surgeons in East Africa reported using TLICS, whereas 62% of surgeons in North America reported using Denis 3-column classification. For patients with spine trauma, surgeons in East Africa and North America reported a similar percentage of readmission |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.31761 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2758353801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2758353801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8f6df030aaf91c10ea573c2af924d56352bd7d7ca0aa17f1d6d306cb530066b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c9LwzAUB_Agioru5lkCXjw4TZo2aY9l-AtEBafXkqbJ1tEmNa85ePcPN3NTxFNeHp_3SPgidELJpRBZcaWC1wEuGRWc7qDDhPJ8mtM83f1TH6AJwIoQQolIiCD76IDxjBeCsUP0WeKZ6wfpW3AWO4PnS-elcl3oa-nxvV0F_4FnnQRoTavk2EbWWvwytFbjuZehl_g5trUdAZe9swv8qIN3EPxCOwtrfC1hxKXxcR6_aQ8B8KPz4zJ6vW4eoz0jO9CT7XmEXm-u57O76cPT7f2sfJiqJE3HaW54YwgjUpqCKkq0zARTSbwlaZNxliV1IxqhZBRUGNrwhhGu6owRwnnN2BE63-wdvHsPGsaqb0HprpNWuwBVIrKcZSwnNNKzf3TlgrfxdWtVCJ4LmkZ1sVEqfhi8NtXg2176j4qSah1QtQmo-g4o8tPt0lD3uvnFP3GwL7ufjeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2759768714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification in Spine Trauma Patients Among Neurosurgeons in East Africa Versus North America</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Smith, Caitlyn J ; Bergene, Eyerusalem B ; Tadele, Abraham ; Mesfin, Fassil B</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Caitlyn J ; Bergene, Eyerusalem B ; Tadele, Abraham ; Mesfin, Fassil B</creatorcontrib><description>Background In January 2021, we published findings evaluating the validity of thoracolumbar injury classification and biomechanical approach in the clinical outcome of operative and non-operative treatments. A notable result in our study was patients with unstable burst fractures received an Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen System (AO) score that recommended conservative treatment compared to a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale (TLICS) score that recommended surgical intervention. We designed a survey to determine reported differences in thoracolumbar injury classification, including the percentage of thoracolumbar spine fractures, type of classification system(s) used, use of classification system by board-certified neurosurgeons and neurosurgical residents, reliance on classification system to guide management, use of MRI in the evaluation of the posterior ligamentous complex, and readmission rate < 90 days at treating facilities. This study aims to determine which areas of neurosurgical practice in spine trauma patients differ among surgeons in North America and East Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sudan. Multiple classification systems have been proposed to describe thoracolumbar spine injuries. We hypothesized that there would be marked variability in the classification systems used to evaluate thoracolumbar spine injury among neurosurgeons in North America and East Africa. Methods The survey consisted of seven questions and was sent to 440 neurosurgeons practicing on the continents of North America and East Africa. Results A total of 67 surgeons responded, 50 from North America and 17 from East Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sudan. A significant percentage of African respondents reported a higher thoracolumbar spine fracture rate than respondents in North America (53% and 30%, respectively). Regarding the classification system used, 65% of surgeons in East Africa reported using TLICS, whereas 62% of surgeons in North America reported using Denis 3-column classification. For patients with spine trauma, surgeons in East Africa and North America reported a similar percentage of readmission <90 days (47% and 52%, respectively). Conclusion Our findings vary in spine trauma classification for American and East African patients and still highlight crucial areas for improvement due to patient load, education, and resource accessibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31761</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36569733</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Classification ; Developing countries ; Hospitals ; LDCs ; Neurosurgery ; Patients ; Spinal cord injuries ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31761-e31761</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022, Smith et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, Smith et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8f6df030aaf91c10ea573c2af924d56352bd7d7ca0aa17f1d6d306cb530066b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36569733$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Caitlyn J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergene, Eyerusalem B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tadele, Abraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesfin, Fassil B</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification in Spine Trauma Patients Among Neurosurgeons in East Africa Versus North America</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Background In January 2021, we published findings evaluating the validity of thoracolumbar injury classification and biomechanical approach in the clinical outcome of operative and non-operative treatments. A notable result in our study was patients with unstable burst fractures received an Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen System (AO) score that recommended conservative treatment compared to a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale (TLICS) score that recommended surgical intervention. We designed a survey to determine reported differences in thoracolumbar injury classification, including the percentage of thoracolumbar spine fractures, type of classification system(s) used, use of classification system by board-certified neurosurgeons and neurosurgical residents, reliance on classification system to guide management, use of MRI in the evaluation of the posterior ligamentous complex, and readmission rate < 90 days at treating facilities. This study aims to determine which areas of neurosurgical practice in spine trauma patients differ among surgeons in North America and East Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sudan. Multiple classification systems have been proposed to describe thoracolumbar spine injuries. We hypothesized that there would be marked variability in the classification systems used to evaluate thoracolumbar spine injury among neurosurgeons in North America and East Africa. Methods The survey consisted of seven questions and was sent to 440 neurosurgeons practicing on the continents of North America and East Africa. Results A total of 67 surgeons responded, 50 from North America and 17 from East Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sudan. A significant percentage of African respondents reported a higher thoracolumbar spine fracture rate than respondents in North America (53% and 30%, respectively). Regarding the classification system used, 65% of surgeons in East Africa reported using TLICS, whereas 62% of surgeons in North America reported using Denis 3-column classification. For patients with spine trauma, surgeons in East Africa and North America reported a similar percentage of readmission <90 days (47% and 52%, respectively). Conclusion Our findings vary in spine trauma classification for American and East African patients and still highlight crucial areas for improvement due to patient load, education, and resource accessibility.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c9LwzAUB_Agioru5lkCXjw4TZo2aY9l-AtEBafXkqbJ1tEmNa85ePcPN3NTxFNeHp_3SPgidELJpRBZcaWC1wEuGRWc7qDDhPJ8mtM83f1TH6AJwIoQQolIiCD76IDxjBeCsUP0WeKZ6wfpW3AWO4PnS-elcl3oa-nxvV0F_4FnnQRoTavk2EbWWvwytFbjuZehl_g5trUdAZe9swv8qIN3EPxCOwtrfC1hxKXxcR6_aQ8B8KPz4zJ6vW4eoz0jO9CT7XmEXm-u57O76cPT7f2sfJiqJE3HaW54YwgjUpqCKkq0zARTSbwlaZNxliV1IxqhZBRUGNrwhhGu6owRwnnN2BE63-wdvHsPGsaqb0HprpNWuwBVIrKcZSwnNNKzf3TlgrfxdWtVCJ4LmkZ1sVEqfhi8NtXg2176j4qSah1QtQmo-g4o8tPt0lD3uvnFP3GwL7ufjeg</recordid><startdate>20221121</startdate><enddate>20221121</enddate><creator>Smith, Caitlyn J</creator><creator>Bergene, Eyerusalem B</creator><creator>Tadele, Abraham</creator><creator>Mesfin, Fassil B</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221121</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification in Spine Trauma Patients Among Neurosurgeons in East Africa Versus North America</title><author>Smith, Caitlyn J ; Bergene, Eyerusalem B ; Tadele, Abraham ; Mesfin, Fassil B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-8f6df030aaf91c10ea573c2af924d56352bd7d7ca0aa17f1d6d306cb530066b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Caitlyn J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergene, Eyerusalem B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tadele, Abraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesfin, Fassil B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Caitlyn J</au><au>Bergene, Eyerusalem B</au><au>Tadele, Abraham</au><au>Mesfin, Fassil B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification in Spine Trauma Patients Among Neurosurgeons in East Africa Versus North America</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2022-11-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e31761</spage><epage>e31761</epage><pages>e31761-e31761</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Background In January 2021, we published findings evaluating the validity of thoracolumbar injury classification and biomechanical approach in the clinical outcome of operative and non-operative treatments. A notable result in our study was patients with unstable burst fractures received an Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen System (AO) score that recommended conservative treatment compared to a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale (TLICS) score that recommended surgical intervention. We designed a survey to determine reported differences in thoracolumbar injury classification, including the percentage of thoracolumbar spine fractures, type of classification system(s) used, use of classification system by board-certified neurosurgeons and neurosurgical residents, reliance on classification system to guide management, use of MRI in the evaluation of the posterior ligamentous complex, and readmission rate < 90 days at treating facilities. This study aims to determine which areas of neurosurgical practice in spine trauma patients differ among surgeons in North America and East Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sudan. Multiple classification systems have been proposed to describe thoracolumbar spine injuries. We hypothesized that there would be marked variability in the classification systems used to evaluate thoracolumbar spine injury among neurosurgeons in North America and East Africa. Methods The survey consisted of seven questions and was sent to 440 neurosurgeons practicing on the continents of North America and East Africa. Results A total of 67 surgeons responded, 50 from North America and 17 from East Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sudan. A significant percentage of African respondents reported a higher thoracolumbar spine fracture rate than respondents in North America (53% and 30%, respectively). Regarding the classification system used, 65% of surgeons in East Africa reported using TLICS, whereas 62% of surgeons in North America reported using Denis 3-column classification. For patients with spine trauma, surgeons in East Africa and North America reported a similar percentage of readmission <90 days (47% and 52%, respectively). Conclusion Our findings vary in spine trauma classification for American and East African patients and still highlight crucial areas for improvement due to patient load, education, and resource accessibility.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>36569733</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.31761</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2022-11, Vol.14 (11), p.e31761-e31761 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2758353801 |
source | PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Classification Developing countries Hospitals LDCs Neurosurgery Patients Spinal cord injuries Trauma |
title | A Comparison of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification in Spine Trauma Patients Among Neurosurgeons in East Africa Versus North America |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T09%3A34%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Thoracolumbar%20Injury%20Classification%20in%20Spine%20Trauma%20Patients%20Among%20Neurosurgeons%20in%20East%20Africa%20Versus%20North%20America&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Smith,%20Caitlyn%20J&rft.date=2022-11-21&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e31761&rft.epage=e31761&rft.pages=e31761-e31761&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.31761&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2758353801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2759768714&rft_id=info:pmid/36569733&rfr_iscdi=true |