Comparison of the effects of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on hospital costs of care
Sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular block facilitates recovery of neuromuscular function after surgery, but the drug is expensive. We evaluated the effects of sugammadex on hospital costs of care. We analysed 79 474 adult surgical patients who received neuromuscular blocking agents and reversal fro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2023-02, Vol.130 (2), p.133-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA |
container_volume | 130 |
creator | Wachtendorf, Luca J. Tartler, Tim M. Ahrens, Elena Witt, Annika S. Azimaraghi, Omid Fassbender, Philipp Suleiman, Aiman Linhardt, Felix C. Blank, Michael Nabel, Sarah Y. Chao, Jerry Y. Goriacko, Pavel Mirhaji, Parsa Houle, Timothy T. Schaefer, Maximilian S. Eikermann, Matthias |
description | Sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular block facilitates recovery of neuromuscular function after surgery, but the drug is expensive. We evaluated the effects of sugammadex on hospital costs of care.
We analysed 79 474 adult surgical patients who received neuromuscular blocking agents and reversal from two academic healthcare networks between 2016 and 2021 to calculate differences in direct costs. We matched our data with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP–NIS) to calculate differences in total costs in US dollars. Perioperative risk profiles were defined based on ASA physical status and admission status (ambulatory surgery vs hospitalisation).
Based on our registry data analysis, administration of sugammadex vs neostigmine was associated with lower direct costs (–1.3% lower costs; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.5 to –2.2%; P=0.002). In the HCUP-NIS matched cohort, sugammadex use was associated with US$232 lower total costs (95% CI, –US$376 to –US$88; P=0.002). Subgroup analysis revealed that sugammadex was associated with US$1042 lower total costs (95% CI, –US$1198 to –US$884; P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bja.2022.10.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2758116891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0007091222005864</els_id><sourcerecordid>2758116891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-85b29b1deb22c3bc52b953584dbd81ed4fee22c6d2ba6cf253c1c2a3b8c344553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-CCfOSSxePETiJOaFWgUiUucLb8MWm9JPHiSary73HYwpGTNZ7nfaV5GHsDYg8C9Pvj3h3tXgopy7wXoJ6xHTQtVLpt4TnbCSHaSvQgL9gl0VEIaGWvXrKLWivdyEbv2OMhTSebI6WZp4Ev98hxGNAvtI203tlpsgEf-QNmWonPmGiJd1OckQ8p84zbwo4bPeOa07SSX0ebuRuT_8FL7X2iU1wK4kv0T623GV-xF4MdCV8_vVfs-6frb4cv1e3XzzeHj7eVr3u9VJ1ysncQ0Enpa-eVdL2qVdcEFzrA0AyIZaODdFb7Qarag5e2dp2vm0ap-oq9O_eecvq5Ii1miuRxHG05ZSUjW9UB6K6HgsIZ9TkRZRzMKcfJ5l8GhNmEm6Mpws0mfPsqwkvm7VP96iYM_xJ_DRfgwxnAcuRDxGzIR5w9hpiLZhNS_E_9b2dfk30</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758116891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the effects of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on hospital costs of care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wachtendorf, Luca J. ; Tartler, Tim M. ; Ahrens, Elena ; Witt, Annika S. ; Azimaraghi, Omid ; Fassbender, Philipp ; Suleiman, Aiman ; Linhardt, Felix C. ; Blank, Michael ; Nabel, Sarah Y. ; Chao, Jerry Y. ; Goriacko, Pavel ; Mirhaji, Parsa ; Houle, Timothy T. ; Schaefer, Maximilian S. ; Eikermann, Matthias</creator><creatorcontrib>Wachtendorf, Luca J. ; Tartler, Tim M. ; Ahrens, Elena ; Witt, Annika S. ; Azimaraghi, Omid ; Fassbender, Philipp ; Suleiman, Aiman ; Linhardt, Felix C. ; Blank, Michael ; Nabel, Sarah Y. ; Chao, Jerry Y. ; Goriacko, Pavel ; Mirhaji, Parsa ; Houle, Timothy T. ; Schaefer, Maximilian S. ; Eikermann, Matthias</creatorcontrib><description>Sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular block facilitates recovery of neuromuscular function after surgery, but the drug is expensive. We evaluated the effects of sugammadex on hospital costs of care.
We analysed 79 474 adult surgical patients who received neuromuscular blocking agents and reversal from two academic healthcare networks between 2016 and 2021 to calculate differences in direct costs. We matched our data with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP–NIS) to calculate differences in total costs in US dollars. Perioperative risk profiles were defined based on ASA physical status and admission status (ambulatory surgery vs hospitalisation).
Based on our registry data analysis, administration of sugammadex vs neostigmine was associated with lower direct costs (–1.3% lower costs; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.5 to –2.2%; P=0.002). In the HCUP-NIS matched cohort, sugammadex use was associated with US$232 lower total costs (95% CI, –US$376 to –US$88; P=0.002). Subgroup analysis revealed that sugammadex was associated with US$1042 lower total costs (95% CI, –US$1198 to –US$884; P<0.001) in patients with lower risk. In contrast, sugammadex was associated with US$620 higher total costs (95% CI, US$377 to US$865; P<0.001) in patients with a higher risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥3 and preoperative hospitalisation).
The effects of using sugammadex on costs of care depend on patient risk, defined based on comorbidities and admission status. We observed lower costs of care in patients with lower risk and higher costs of care in hospitalised surgical patients with severe comorbidities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.10.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36564246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; healthcare costs ; Hospital Costs ; Humans ; neostigmine ; Neostigmine - adverse effects ; Neuromuscular Blockade - adverse effects ; neuromuscular blocking agents ; Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents ; Rocuronium ; sugammadex ; Sugammadex - adverse effects ; vecuronium</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2023-02, Vol.130 (2), p.133-141</ispartof><rights>2022 British Journal of Anaesthesia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-85b29b1deb22c3bc52b953584dbd81ed4fee22c6d2ba6cf253c1c2a3b8c344553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-85b29b1deb22c3bc52b953584dbd81ed4fee22c6d2ba6cf253c1c2a3b8c344553</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2092-2056 ; 0000-0002-6249-4478 ; 0000-0001-8666-7583 ; 0000-0002-1932-7471 ; 0000-0001-8186-4748 ; 0000-0002-3770-498X ; 0000-0002-0264-5959 ; 0000-0001-6875-3082</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wachtendorf, Luca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tartler, Tim M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Annika S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azimaraghi, Omid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fassbender, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suleiman, Aiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linhardt, Felix C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blank, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabel, Sarah Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Jerry Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goriacko, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirhaji, Parsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houle, Timothy T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Maximilian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eikermann, Matthias</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the effects of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on hospital costs of care</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular block facilitates recovery of neuromuscular function after surgery, but the drug is expensive. We evaluated the effects of sugammadex on hospital costs of care.
We analysed 79 474 adult surgical patients who received neuromuscular blocking agents and reversal from two academic healthcare networks between 2016 and 2021 to calculate differences in direct costs. We matched our data with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP–NIS) to calculate differences in total costs in US dollars. Perioperative risk profiles were defined based on ASA physical status and admission status (ambulatory surgery vs hospitalisation).
Based on our registry data analysis, administration of sugammadex vs neostigmine was associated with lower direct costs (–1.3% lower costs; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.5 to –2.2%; P=0.002). In the HCUP-NIS matched cohort, sugammadex use was associated with US$232 lower total costs (95% CI, –US$376 to –US$88; P=0.002). Subgroup analysis revealed that sugammadex was associated with US$1042 lower total costs (95% CI, –US$1198 to –US$884; P<0.001) in patients with lower risk. In contrast, sugammadex was associated with US$620 higher total costs (95% CI, US$377 to US$865; P<0.001) in patients with a higher risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥3 and preoperative hospitalisation).
The effects of using sugammadex on costs of care depend on patient risk, defined based on comorbidities and admission status. We observed lower costs of care in patients with lower risk and higher costs of care in hospitalised surgical patients with severe comorbidities.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>healthcare costs</subject><subject>Hospital Costs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>neostigmine</subject><subject>Neostigmine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neuromuscular Blockade - adverse effects</subject><subject>neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents</subject><subject>Rocuronium</subject><subject>sugammadex</subject><subject>Sugammadex - adverse effects</subject><subject>vecuronium</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-CCfOSSxePETiJOaFWgUiUucLb8MWm9JPHiSary73HYwpGTNZ7nfaV5GHsDYg8C9Pvj3h3tXgopy7wXoJ6xHTQtVLpt4TnbCSHaSvQgL9gl0VEIaGWvXrKLWivdyEbv2OMhTSebI6WZp4Ev98hxGNAvtI203tlpsgEf-QNmWonPmGiJd1OckQ8p84zbwo4bPeOa07SSX0ebuRuT_8FL7X2iU1wK4kv0T623GV-xF4MdCV8_vVfs-6frb4cv1e3XzzeHj7eVr3u9VJ1ysncQ0Enpa-eVdL2qVdcEFzrA0AyIZaODdFb7Qarag5e2dp2vm0ap-oq9O_eecvq5Ii1miuRxHG05ZSUjW9UB6K6HgsIZ9TkRZRzMKcfJ5l8GhNmEm6Mpws0mfPsqwkvm7VP96iYM_xJ_DRfgwxnAcuRDxGzIR5w9hpiLZhNS_E_9b2dfk30</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Wachtendorf, Luca J.</creator><creator>Tartler, Tim M.</creator><creator>Ahrens, Elena</creator><creator>Witt, Annika S.</creator><creator>Azimaraghi, Omid</creator><creator>Fassbender, Philipp</creator><creator>Suleiman, Aiman</creator><creator>Linhardt, Felix C.</creator><creator>Blank, Michael</creator><creator>Nabel, Sarah Y.</creator><creator>Chao, Jerry Y.</creator><creator>Goriacko, Pavel</creator><creator>Mirhaji, Parsa</creator><creator>Houle, Timothy T.</creator><creator>Schaefer, Maximilian S.</creator><creator>Eikermann, Matthias</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2092-2056</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-4478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8666-7583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1932-7471</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-4748</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3770-498X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0264-5959</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6875-3082</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Comparison of the effects of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on hospital costs of care</title><author>Wachtendorf, Luca J. ; Tartler, Tim M. ; Ahrens, Elena ; Witt, Annika S. ; Azimaraghi, Omid ; Fassbender, Philipp ; Suleiman, Aiman ; Linhardt, Felix C. ; Blank, Michael ; Nabel, Sarah Y. ; Chao, Jerry Y. ; Goriacko, Pavel ; Mirhaji, Parsa ; Houle, Timothy T. ; Schaefer, Maximilian S. ; Eikermann, Matthias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-85b29b1deb22c3bc52b953584dbd81ed4fee22c6d2ba6cf253c1c2a3b8c344553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>healthcare costs</topic><topic>Hospital Costs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>neostigmine</topic><topic>Neostigmine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neuromuscular Blockade - adverse effects</topic><topic>neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents</topic><topic>Rocuronium</topic><topic>sugammadex</topic><topic>Sugammadex - adverse effects</topic><topic>vecuronium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wachtendorf, Luca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tartler, Tim M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahrens, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Annika S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azimaraghi, Omid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fassbender, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suleiman, Aiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linhardt, Felix C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blank, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabel, Sarah Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Jerry Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goriacko, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirhaji, Parsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houle, Timothy T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Maximilian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eikermann, Matthias</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wachtendorf, Luca J.</au><au>Tartler, Tim M.</au><au>Ahrens, Elena</au><au>Witt, Annika S.</au><au>Azimaraghi, Omid</au><au>Fassbender, Philipp</au><au>Suleiman, Aiman</au><au>Linhardt, Felix C.</au><au>Blank, Michael</au><au>Nabel, Sarah Y.</au><au>Chao, Jerry Y.</au><au>Goriacko, Pavel</au><au>Mirhaji, Parsa</au><au>Houle, Timothy T.</au><au>Schaefer, Maximilian S.</au><au>Eikermann, Matthias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the effects of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on hospital costs of care</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>133-141</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><abstract>Sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular block facilitates recovery of neuromuscular function after surgery, but the drug is expensive. We evaluated the effects of sugammadex on hospital costs of care.
We analysed 79 474 adult surgical patients who received neuromuscular blocking agents and reversal from two academic healthcare networks between 2016 and 2021 to calculate differences in direct costs. We matched our data with data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample (HCUP–NIS) to calculate differences in total costs in US dollars. Perioperative risk profiles were defined based on ASA physical status and admission status (ambulatory surgery vs hospitalisation).
Based on our registry data analysis, administration of sugammadex vs neostigmine was associated with lower direct costs (–1.3% lower costs; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.5 to –2.2%; P=0.002). In the HCUP-NIS matched cohort, sugammadex use was associated with US$232 lower total costs (95% CI, –US$376 to –US$88; P=0.002). Subgroup analysis revealed that sugammadex was associated with US$1042 lower total costs (95% CI, –US$1198 to –US$884; P<0.001) in patients with lower risk. In contrast, sugammadex was associated with US$620 higher total costs (95% CI, US$377 to US$865; P<0.001) in patients with a higher risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥3 and preoperative hospitalisation).
The effects of using sugammadex on costs of care depend on patient risk, defined based on comorbidities and admission status. We observed lower costs of care in patients with lower risk and higher costs of care in hospitalised surgical patients with severe comorbidities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36564246</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bja.2022.10.015</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2092-2056</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-4478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8666-7583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1932-7471</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-4748</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3770-498X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0264-5959</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6875-3082</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0912 |
ispartof | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2023-02, Vol.130 (2), p.133-141 |
issn | 0007-0912 1471-6771 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2758116891 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult healthcare costs Hospital Costs Humans neostigmine Neostigmine - adverse effects Neuromuscular Blockade - adverse effects neuromuscular blocking agents Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents Rocuronium sugammadex Sugammadex - adverse effects vecuronium |
title | Comparison of the effects of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on hospital costs of care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T10%3A34%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20effects%20of%20sugammadex%20versus%20neostigmine%20for%20reversal%20of%20neuromuscular%20block%20on%20hospital%20costs%20of%20care&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Wachtendorf,%20Luca%20J.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=133-141&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bja.2022.10.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2758116891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758116891&rft_id=info:pmid/36564246&rft_els_id=S0007091222005864&rfr_iscdi=true |