Obstetrics and perinatal outcomes between elective single versus double blastocyst transfer in women younger than 35 years: A cross-sectional study
Clinicians have a positive attitude towards multiple embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, considering increased live birth rates compared to single embryo transfer. We aimed to evaluate obstetric and perinatal outcomes among young women who became clinically pregnant after single...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction 2023-02, Vol.52 (2), p.102527-102527, Article 102527 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 102527 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 102527 |
container_title | Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Ozmen, Sevinc Tola, Esra Nur Karahasanoğlu, Ayse |
description | Clinicians have a positive attitude towards multiple embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, considering increased live birth rates compared to single embryo transfer. We aimed to evaluate obstetric and perinatal outcomes among young women who became clinically pregnant after single & double blastocyst transfer.
545 women under 35 years who became clinically pregnant after fresh blastocyst transfer was evaluated retrospectively. The participants were divided11The participants divided into two groups according to.according to the transferred embryo number - the elective single blastocyst transfer group (eSBT) (n=112) and the double blastocyst transfer group (DBT group) (n=433). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were recorded.
Live birth and abortion rates per pregnancy and per gestational sac, having a fetus with congenital anomaly per pregnancy and per neonate, and gestational complications were comparable between the groups. Multiple pregnancy, Cesarean section, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and hospitalization day in NICU per neonate were higher in the DBT group than in the eSBT group. Mean gestational week, birth weight, birth height decreased with the embryo transfer number.
DBT transfer appears to be associated with increased multiple pregnancies, Cesarean section, prematurity, decreased fetal anthropometric measurements, and admission to NICU without an increase in live birth and abortion rates. Therefore, it will be easier for clinicians to choose eSBT by providing young couples undergoing IVF treatment with detailed information about multiple pregnancies and prematurity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102527 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2758115532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2468784722002094</els_id><sourcerecordid>2758115532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-1259ca005e725762cec3d24a8fedf03a42ecec61e3a4290bab64ff4d3e7d2eab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctuFDEQtBCIRCFfgIR85DIbP8aeWSQOUQQEKVIucLY8ds_Gq1l7cXs2mu_ID-PNBsSJU3eXqqvsLkLec7bijOur7WqbNulhJZgQFRFKdK_IuWh133R9273-pz8jl4hbxhjvhdZSvyVnUiut1kKdk6f7AQuUHBxSGz3dQw7RFjvRNBeXdoB0gPIIEClM4Eo4AMUQNxPQA2Sckfo0D3UaJosluQULLdlGHCHTEOljlYh0SXPcVKA82EilogvYjJ_oNXU5ITZ4FE6xmmKZ_fKOvBnthHD5Ui_Iz69fftzcNnf3377fXN81Tsh1abhQa2cZU9AJ1WnhwEkvWtuP4EcmbSugQprDsV2zwQ66HcfWS-i8ADvIC_LxpLvP6dcMWMwuoINpshHSjEZ0qudcKSkqVZ6ozw_OMJp9DjubF8OZOQZituY5EHMMxJwCqVsfXgzmYQf-786f81fC5xMB6jcPAbJBFyA68CHXmxifwn8NfgNQO6E6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758115532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Obstetrics and perinatal outcomes between elective single versus double blastocyst transfer in women younger than 35 years: A cross-sectional study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ozmen, Sevinc ; Tola, Esra Nur ; Karahasanoğlu, Ayse</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozmen, Sevinc ; Tola, Esra Nur ; Karahasanoğlu, Ayse</creatorcontrib><description>Clinicians have a positive attitude towards multiple embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, considering increased live birth rates compared to single embryo transfer. We aimed to evaluate obstetric and perinatal outcomes among young women who became clinically pregnant after single & double blastocyst transfer.
545 women under 35 years who became clinically pregnant after fresh blastocyst transfer was evaluated retrospectively. The participants were divided11The participants divided into two groups according to.according to the transferred embryo number - the elective single blastocyst transfer group (eSBT) (n=112) and the double blastocyst transfer group (DBT group) (n=433). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were recorded.
Live birth and abortion rates per pregnancy and per gestational sac, having a fetus with congenital anomaly per pregnancy and per neonate, and gestational complications were comparable between the groups. Multiple pregnancy, Cesarean section, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and hospitalization day in NICU per neonate were higher in the DBT group than in the eSBT group. Mean gestational week, birth weight, birth height decreased with the embryo transfer number.
DBT transfer appears to be associated with increased multiple pregnancies, Cesarean section, prematurity, decreased fetal anthropometric measurements, and admission to NICU without an increase in live birth and abortion rates. Therefore, it will be easier for clinicians to choose eSBT by providing young couples undergoing IVF treatment with detailed information about multiple pregnancies and prematurity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2468-7847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2468-7847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102527</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36565925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Cesarean Section ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Double blastocyst transfer ; Elective single blastocyst transfer ; Embryo Transfer ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Obstetric outcome ; Obstetrics ; Perinatal outcome ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2023-02, Vol.52 (2), p.102527-102527, Article 102527</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-1259ca005e725762cec3d24a8fedf03a42ecec61e3a4290bab64ff4d3e7d2eab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4606-9965</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36565925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozmen, Sevinc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tola, Esra Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karahasanoğlu, Ayse</creatorcontrib><title>Obstetrics and perinatal outcomes between elective single versus double blastocyst transfer in women younger than 35 years: A cross-sectional study</title><title>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</title><addtitle>J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>Clinicians have a positive attitude towards multiple embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, considering increased live birth rates compared to single embryo transfer. We aimed to evaluate obstetric and perinatal outcomes among young women who became clinically pregnant after single & double blastocyst transfer.
545 women under 35 years who became clinically pregnant after fresh blastocyst transfer was evaluated retrospectively. The participants were divided11The participants divided into two groups according to.according to the transferred embryo number - the elective single blastocyst transfer group (eSBT) (n=112) and the double blastocyst transfer group (DBT group) (n=433). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were recorded.
Live birth and abortion rates per pregnancy and per gestational sac, having a fetus with congenital anomaly per pregnancy and per neonate, and gestational complications were comparable between the groups. Multiple pregnancy, Cesarean section, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and hospitalization day in NICU per neonate were higher in the DBT group than in the eSBT group. Mean gestational week, birth weight, birth height decreased with the embryo transfer number.
DBT transfer appears to be associated with increased multiple pregnancies, Cesarean section, prematurity, decreased fetal anthropometric measurements, and admission to NICU without an increase in live birth and abortion rates. Therefore, it will be easier for clinicians to choose eSBT by providing young couples undergoing IVF treatment with detailed information about multiple pregnancies and prematurity.</description><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Double blastocyst transfer</subject><subject>Elective single blastocyst transfer</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Obstetric outcome</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Perinatal outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>2468-7847</issn><issn>2468-7847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctuFDEQtBCIRCFfgIR85DIbP8aeWSQOUQQEKVIucLY8ds_Gq1l7cXs2mu_ID-PNBsSJU3eXqqvsLkLec7bijOur7WqbNulhJZgQFRFKdK_IuWh133R9273-pz8jl4hbxhjvhdZSvyVnUiut1kKdk6f7AQuUHBxSGz3dQw7RFjvRNBeXdoB0gPIIEClM4Eo4AMUQNxPQA2Sckfo0D3UaJosluQULLdlGHCHTEOljlYh0SXPcVKA82EilogvYjJ_oNXU5ITZ4FE6xmmKZ_fKOvBnthHD5Ui_Iz69fftzcNnf3377fXN81Tsh1abhQa2cZU9AJ1WnhwEkvWtuP4EcmbSugQprDsV2zwQ66HcfWS-i8ADvIC_LxpLvP6dcMWMwuoINpshHSjEZ0qudcKSkqVZ6ozw_OMJp9DjubF8OZOQZituY5EHMMxJwCqVsfXgzmYQf-786f81fC5xMB6jcPAbJBFyA68CHXmxifwn8NfgNQO6E6</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Ozmen, Sevinc</creator><creator>Tola, Esra Nur</creator><creator>Karahasanoğlu, Ayse</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4606-9965</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Obstetrics and perinatal outcomes between elective single versus double blastocyst transfer in women younger than 35 years: A cross-sectional study</title><author>Ozmen, Sevinc ; Tola, Esra Nur ; Karahasanoğlu, Ayse</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-1259ca005e725762cec3d24a8fedf03a42ecec61e3a4290bab64ff4d3e7d2eab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Double blastocyst transfer</topic><topic>Elective single blastocyst transfer</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Obstetric outcome</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Perinatal outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozmen, Sevinc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tola, Esra Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karahasanoğlu, Ayse</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozmen, Sevinc</au><au>Tola, Esra Nur</au><au>Karahasanoğlu, Ayse</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Obstetrics and perinatal outcomes between elective single versus double blastocyst transfer in women younger than 35 years: A cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</jtitle><addtitle>J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>102527</spage><epage>102527</epage><pages>102527-102527</pages><artnum>102527</artnum><issn>2468-7847</issn><eissn>2468-7847</eissn><abstract>Clinicians have a positive attitude towards multiple embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, considering increased live birth rates compared to single embryo transfer. We aimed to evaluate obstetric and perinatal outcomes among young women who became clinically pregnant after single & double blastocyst transfer.
545 women under 35 years who became clinically pregnant after fresh blastocyst transfer was evaluated retrospectively. The participants were divided11The participants divided into two groups according to.according to the transferred embryo number - the elective single blastocyst transfer group (eSBT) (n=112) and the double blastocyst transfer group (DBT group) (n=433). Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were recorded.
Live birth and abortion rates per pregnancy and per gestational sac, having a fetus with congenital anomaly per pregnancy and per neonate, and gestational complications were comparable between the groups. Multiple pregnancy, Cesarean section, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and hospitalization day in NICU per neonate were higher in the DBT group than in the eSBT group. Mean gestational week, birth weight, birth height decreased with the embryo transfer number.
DBT transfer appears to be associated with increased multiple pregnancies, Cesarean section, prematurity, decreased fetal anthropometric measurements, and admission to NICU without an increase in live birth and abortion rates. Therefore, it will be easier for clinicians to choose eSBT by providing young couples undergoing IVF treatment with detailed information about multiple pregnancies and prematurity.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>36565925</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102527</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4606-9965</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2468-7847 |
ispartof | Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2023-02, Vol.52 (2), p.102527-102527, Article 102527 |
issn | 2468-7847 2468-7847 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2758115532 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cesarean Section Cross-Sectional Studies Double blastocyst transfer Elective single blastocyst transfer Embryo Transfer Female Humans Infant, Newborn Obstetric outcome Obstetrics Perinatal outcome Pregnancy Retrospective Studies |
title | Obstetrics and perinatal outcomes between elective single versus double blastocyst transfer in women younger than 35 years: A cross-sectional study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A41%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Obstetrics%20and%20perinatal%20outcomes%20between%20elective%20single%20versus%20double%20blastocyst%20transfer%20in%20women%20younger%20than%2035%20years:%20A%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gynecology%20obstetrics%20and%20human%20reproduction&rft.au=Ozmen,%20Sevinc&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=102527&rft.epage=102527&rft.pages=102527-102527&rft.artnum=102527&rft.issn=2468-7847&rft.eissn=2468-7847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102527&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2758115532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758115532&rft_id=info:pmid/36565925&rft_els_id=S2468784722002094&rfr_iscdi=true |