Study of recovery model implementation in psychiatric hospitals: Clients and multidisciplinary staff perspective
The recovery model guides mental health services. However, the delivery of recovery‐oriented services in inpatient settings is still a challenge. Factors affecting recovery model implementation can be classified into three types: the hospital environment, the inpatient and the service provider. This...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of mental health nursing 2023-04, Vol.32 (2), p.603-614 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 614 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 603 |
| container_title | International journal of mental health nursing |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Biran‐Ovadia, Ateret Strous, Rael D. Bart, Orit Lipskaya‐Velikovsky, Lena |
| description | The recovery model guides mental health services. However, the delivery of recovery‐oriented services in inpatient settings is still a challenge. Factors affecting recovery model implementation can be classified into three types: the hospital environment, the inpatient and the service provider. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the impact of environment, inpatient and service provider factors on recovery model implementation in hospitals. Forty‐five service providers and 42 inpatients from three types of wards (acute locked, acute open and daycare) of two hospitals participated in this cross‐sectional study. We assessed inpatient cognition, functional capacity and illness severity. In addition, we retrieved information on service providers' professional status and evaluated the recovery model knowledge and attitudes. Implementation of the recovery model was measured using the Recovery Self‐Assessment, both the inpatient and service provider versions. Differences were found between the three types of wards in recovery orientation as reported by service providers (χ22 = 15.3, P 0.05). Providers' internalized knowledge and attitudes toward recovery, inpatients' functional capacity and age of illness onset were associated with recovery implementation (0.31 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/inm.13106 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2758113878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2758113878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-44a91305e2ec84211d75f3366b4b243f25eb542aeb968b5fc6aa2da338060c5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U9PHCEYBnBibNx124NfwJB4qYdRGP4M681sqjXZ1oPtecIw70QMMyAwmv32pa7toUm5wOHHkxcehE4ouaBlXdppvKCMEnmAlpTzpiKMrw_fzqJSjJEFOk7piRDarCk_QgsmhawFbZYoPOS532E_4AjGv0Dc4dH34LAdg4MRpqyz9RO2Ew5pZx6tztEa_OhTsFm7dIU3zhaVsJ56PM4u294mY4Ozky5hKethwAFiCmCyfYGP6MNQ7sGn932Fft58-bH5Wm3vb-8219vKMKVkxbleU0YE1GAUryntGzEwJmXHu5qzoRbQCV5r6NZSdWIwUuu614wpIokRwFbo8z43RP88Q8rtWOYC5_QEfk5t3QhFKVONKvTsH_rk5ziV6YpSgqiGCFbU-V6Z6FOKMLQh2rG8saWk_V1DW2po32oo9vQ9ce5G6P_KP_9ewOUevFoHu_8ntXffv-0jfwEJf5LT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785087053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Study of recovery model implementation in psychiatric hospitals: Clients and multidisciplinary staff perspective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Biran‐Ovadia, Ateret ; Strous, Rael D. ; Bart, Orit ; Lipskaya‐Velikovsky, Lena</creator><creatorcontrib>Biran‐Ovadia, Ateret ; Strous, Rael D. ; Bart, Orit ; Lipskaya‐Velikovsky, Lena</creatorcontrib><description>The recovery model guides mental health services. However, the delivery of recovery‐oriented services in inpatient settings is still a challenge. Factors affecting recovery model implementation can be classified into three types: the hospital environment, the inpatient and the service provider. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the impact of environment, inpatient and service provider factors on recovery model implementation in hospitals. Forty‐five service providers and 42 inpatients from three types of wards (acute locked, acute open and daycare) of two hospitals participated in this cross‐sectional study. We assessed inpatient cognition, functional capacity and illness severity. In addition, we retrieved information on service providers' professional status and evaluated the recovery model knowledge and attitudes. Implementation of the recovery model was measured using the Recovery Self‐Assessment, both the inpatient and service provider versions. Differences were found between the three types of wards in recovery orientation as reported by service providers (χ22 = 15.3, P < 0.001), but not by inpatients (χ22 = 2.34, P > 0.05). Providers' internalized knowledge and attitudes toward recovery, inpatients' functional capacity and age of illness onset were associated with recovery implementation (0.31 < r < 0.48, P < 0.05). The findings confirm quantitatively the multilevel nature of factors that affect the implementation of the recovery model in psychiatric hospitals. The inpatients' perspective should be incorporated into the service development process. Based on the study results, the reduction in the restrictive features of the wards' environment is recommended. Promotion of the recovery model implementation in the hospital setting requires the expansion of staff's internal positive attitudes toward recovery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-8330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1447-0349</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/inm.13106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36562517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitudes ; Cognition ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Environment ; Functional status ; Health promotion ; Hospitals, Psychiatric ; Humans ; Implementation ; Inpatient care ; inpatient perspective ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Internalization ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mental Health Services ; Mental institutions ; Multidisciplinary teams ; psychiatric hospital ; Psychiatric hospitals ; Psychiatric-mental health nursing ; Recovery ; Recovery (Medical) ; recovery self‐assessment ; recovery‐oriented services ; service provider perspective</subject><ispartof>International journal of mental health nursing, 2023-04, Vol.32 (2), p.603-614</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-44a91305e2ec84211d75f3366b4b243f25eb542aeb968b5fc6aa2da338060c5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-44a91305e2ec84211d75f3366b4b243f25eb542aeb968b5fc6aa2da338060c5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8361-8751</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Finm.13106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Finm.13106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36562517$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biran‐Ovadia, Ateret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strous, Rael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bart, Orit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipskaya‐Velikovsky, Lena</creatorcontrib><title>Study of recovery model implementation in psychiatric hospitals: Clients and multidisciplinary staff perspective</title><title>International journal of mental health nursing</title><addtitle>Int J Ment Health Nurs</addtitle><description>The recovery model guides mental health services. However, the delivery of recovery‐oriented services in inpatient settings is still a challenge. Factors affecting recovery model implementation can be classified into three types: the hospital environment, the inpatient and the service provider. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the impact of environment, inpatient and service provider factors on recovery model implementation in hospitals. Forty‐five service providers and 42 inpatients from three types of wards (acute locked, acute open and daycare) of two hospitals participated in this cross‐sectional study. We assessed inpatient cognition, functional capacity and illness severity. In addition, we retrieved information on service providers' professional status and evaluated the recovery model knowledge and attitudes. Implementation of the recovery model was measured using the Recovery Self‐Assessment, both the inpatient and service provider versions. Differences were found between the three types of wards in recovery orientation as reported by service providers (χ22 = 15.3, P < 0.001), but not by inpatients (χ22 = 2.34, P > 0.05). Providers' internalized knowledge and attitudes toward recovery, inpatients' functional capacity and age of illness onset were associated with recovery implementation (0.31 < r < 0.48, P < 0.05). The findings confirm quantitatively the multilevel nature of factors that affect the implementation of the recovery model in psychiatric hospitals. The inpatients' perspective should be incorporated into the service development process. Based on the study results, the reduction in the restrictive features of the wards' environment is recommended. Promotion of the recovery model implementation in the hospital setting requires the expansion of staff's internal positive attitudes toward recovery.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Functional status</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Hospitals, Psychiatric</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>inpatient perspective</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Internalization</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mental Health Services</subject><subject>Mental institutions</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary teams</subject><subject>psychiatric hospital</subject><subject>Psychiatric hospitals</subject><subject>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>recovery self‐assessment</subject><subject>recovery‐oriented services</subject><subject>service provider perspective</subject><issn>1445-8330</issn><issn>1447-0349</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U9PHCEYBnBibNx124NfwJB4qYdRGP4M681sqjXZ1oPtecIw70QMMyAwmv32pa7toUm5wOHHkxcehE4ouaBlXdppvKCMEnmAlpTzpiKMrw_fzqJSjJEFOk7piRDarCk_QgsmhawFbZYoPOS532E_4AjGv0Dc4dH34LAdg4MRpqyz9RO2Ew5pZx6tztEa_OhTsFm7dIU3zhaVsJ56PM4u294mY4Ozky5hKethwAFiCmCyfYGP6MNQ7sGn932Fft58-bH5Wm3vb-8219vKMKVkxbleU0YE1GAUryntGzEwJmXHu5qzoRbQCV5r6NZSdWIwUuu614wpIokRwFbo8z43RP88Q8rtWOYC5_QEfk5t3QhFKVONKvTsH_rk5ziV6YpSgqiGCFbU-V6Z6FOKMLQh2rG8saWk_V1DW2po32oo9vQ9ce5G6P_KP_9ewOUevFoHu_8ntXffv-0jfwEJf5LT</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Biran‐Ovadia, Ateret</creator><creator>Strous, Rael D.</creator><creator>Bart, Orit</creator><creator>Lipskaya‐Velikovsky, Lena</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8361-8751</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Study of recovery model implementation in psychiatric hospitals: Clients and multidisciplinary staff perspective</title><author>Biran‐Ovadia, Ateret ; Strous, Rael D. ; Bart, Orit ; Lipskaya‐Velikovsky, Lena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-44a91305e2ec84211d75f3366b4b243f25eb542aeb968b5fc6aa2da338060c5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Functional status</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Hospitals, Psychiatric</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>inpatient perspective</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Internalization</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mental Health Services</topic><topic>Mental institutions</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary teams</topic><topic>psychiatric hospital</topic><topic>Psychiatric hospitals</topic><topic>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>recovery self‐assessment</topic><topic>recovery‐oriented services</topic><topic>service provider perspective</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biran‐Ovadia, Ateret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strous, Rael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bart, Orit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipskaya‐Velikovsky, Lena</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of mental health nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biran‐Ovadia, Ateret</au><au>Strous, Rael D.</au><au>Bart, Orit</au><au>Lipskaya‐Velikovsky, Lena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Study of recovery model implementation in psychiatric hospitals: Clients and multidisciplinary staff perspective</atitle><jtitle>International journal of mental health nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Ment Health Nurs</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>603</spage><epage>614</epage><pages>603-614</pages><issn>1445-8330</issn><eissn>1447-0349</eissn><abstract>The recovery model guides mental health services. However, the delivery of recovery‐oriented services in inpatient settings is still a challenge. Factors affecting recovery model implementation can be classified into three types: the hospital environment, the inpatient and the service provider. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the impact of environment, inpatient and service provider factors on recovery model implementation in hospitals. Forty‐five service providers and 42 inpatients from three types of wards (acute locked, acute open and daycare) of two hospitals participated in this cross‐sectional study. We assessed inpatient cognition, functional capacity and illness severity. In addition, we retrieved information on service providers' professional status and evaluated the recovery model knowledge and attitudes. Implementation of the recovery model was measured using the Recovery Self‐Assessment, both the inpatient and service provider versions. Differences were found between the three types of wards in recovery orientation as reported by service providers (χ22 = 15.3, P < 0.001), but not by inpatients (χ22 = 2.34, P > 0.05). Providers' internalized knowledge and attitudes toward recovery, inpatients' functional capacity and age of illness onset were associated with recovery implementation (0.31 < r < 0.48, P < 0.05). The findings confirm quantitatively the multilevel nature of factors that affect the implementation of the recovery model in psychiatric hospitals. The inpatients' perspective should be incorporated into the service development process. Based on the study results, the reduction in the restrictive features of the wards' environment is recommended. Promotion of the recovery model implementation in the hospital setting requires the expansion of staff's internal positive attitudes toward recovery.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36562517</pmid><doi>10.1111/inm.13106</doi><tpages>614</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8361-8751</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1445-8330 |
| ispartof | International journal of mental health nursing, 2023-04, Vol.32 (2), p.603-614 |
| issn | 1445-8330 1447-0349 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2758113878 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Attitudes Cognition Cross-Sectional Studies Environment Functional status Health promotion Hospitals, Psychiatric Humans Implementation Inpatient care inpatient perspective Interdisciplinary aspects Internalization Mental disorders Mental Disorders - psychology Mental Disorders - therapy Mental Health Services Mental institutions Multidisciplinary teams psychiatric hospital Psychiatric hospitals Psychiatric-mental health nursing Recovery Recovery (Medical) recovery self‐assessment recovery‐oriented services service provider perspective |
| title | Study of recovery model implementation in psychiatric hospitals: Clients and multidisciplinary staff perspective |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T00%3A08%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Study%20of%20recovery%20model%20implementation%20in%20psychiatric%20hospitals:%20Clients%20and%20multidisciplinary%20staff%20perspective&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20mental%20health%20nursing&rft.au=Biran%E2%80%90Ovadia,%20Ateret&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=603&rft.epage=614&rft.pages=603-614&rft.issn=1445-8330&rft.eissn=1447-0349&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/inm.13106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2758113878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785087053&rft_id=info:pmid/36562517&rfr_iscdi=true |