American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard
Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) is a low‐cost remedial technology that has been used extensively for decades to treat soil contaminated with metals on Super fund sites. Increasingly, it is being used with success to remediate sites that contain higher molecular weight organic compounds. This case...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental progress 2002-07, Vol.21 (2), p.79-84 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 84 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Environmental progress |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Bates, Edward R. Akindele, Femi Sprinkle, Don |
description | Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) is a low‐cost remedial technology that has been used extensively for decades to treat soil contaminated with metals on Super fund sites. Increasingly, it is being used with success to remediate sites that contain higher molecular weight organic compounds. This case study describes the development of S/S formations and their application to remediate the American Creosote Superfund Site in Jackson, Tennessee.
The U.S. EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory conducted successful treatability tests of innovative solidification/stabilization (S/S) formulations to treat soils contaminated with dioxins, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and creosote from four wood preserving sites. Formulations developed during these studies were successful in reducing the mobility (leaching) of contaminants of concern by 95% to 99%. For one of these sites, the American Creosote Superfund site in Jackson, Tennessee, the U.S. EPA, in cooperation with the State of Tennessee, conducted a successful remediation of 45,000 cubic yards during 1998 and 1999. The costs to excavate, treat, replace, and cap soil contaminated with dioxin, PCP, and creosote averaged $64 per cubic yard (about $40 ton). Formulations, design, operations, performance specifications, and costs are presented in this paper. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ep.670210209 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27580702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>308263927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5119-cceb91cf694a2af16bc62592f425b408889ec5e4031a249fbbaa51ce236554e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVFrFDEQx4MoeFbf_ABB1KfbNpNNdje-laNWsZxXWhB8CdnsBFL3Nmuyiz0_vTmvtOKDvmQS-P1_ZGYIeQnsGBjjJzgeVzXjwDhTj8gCpKgLqTg8JgvG66YQQsFT8iylG8ZAQt0syHS6xeitGaiNGFKYkCafD2tSvk1zt3tHr0LvO-8yNfkwnKTJtL73P3-_aHC08-HWD2lJN6vNkpqhe3C5EOnrStARI7Vz6y3dmdg9J0-c6RO-uKtH5Pr92fXqQ3Hx-fzj6vSisBJAFdZiq8C6SgnDjYOqtRXP_TjBZStY0zQKrUTBSjBcKNe2xkiwyMtKSoHlEXl70I4xfJ8xTXrrk8W-NwOGOWley4blef0XBJW5BpoMvvoLvAlzHHIPmrNy_ze-h5YHyMaQUkSnx-i3Ju40ML3fk8ZR3-8p42_unCZZ07toBuvTQ6asBZQly5w8cD98j7t_OvXZ5k9_ccj5NOHtfc7EbzlQ1lJ_WZ_rr-v15dWnzUpflr8APxywmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203259228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Bates, Edward R. ; Akindele, Femi ; Sprinkle, Don</creator><creatorcontrib>Bates, Edward R. ; Akindele, Femi ; Sprinkle, Don</creatorcontrib><description>Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) is a low‐cost remedial technology that has been used extensively for decades to treat soil contaminated with metals on Super fund sites. Increasingly, it is being used with success to remediate sites that contain higher molecular weight organic compounds. This case study describes the development of S/S formations and their application to remediate the American Creosote Superfund Site in Jackson, Tennessee.
The U.S. EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory conducted successful treatability tests of innovative solidification/stabilization (S/S) formulations to treat soils contaminated with dioxins, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and creosote from four wood preserving sites. Formulations developed during these studies were successful in reducing the mobility (leaching) of contaminants of concern by 95% to 99%. For one of these sites, the American Creosote Superfund site in Jackson, Tennessee, the U.S. EPA, in cooperation with the State of Tennessee, conducted a successful remediation of 45,000 cubic yards during 1998 and 1999. The costs to excavate, treat, replace, and cap soil contaminated with dioxin, PCP, and creosote averaged $64 per cubic yard (about $40 ton). Formulations, design, operations, performance specifications, and costs are presented in this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4491</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-7442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ep.670210209</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENVPDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; creosote ; Decontamination. Miscellaneous ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Excavation ; Formulations ; Leaching ; Mobility ; Molecular weight ; Organic compounds ; pentachlorophenol ; Pollution ; Pollution abatement ; Pollution, environment geology ; Risk management ; Soil (material) ; Soil and sediments pollution ; Soil pollution ; Soil remediation ; Solidification ; Specifications ; Stabilization ; Wood</subject><ispartof>Environmental progress, 2002-07, Vol.21 (2), p.79-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Chemical Engineers Jul 2002</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5119-cceb91cf694a2af16bc62592f425b408889ec5e4031a249fbbaa51ce236554e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fep.670210209$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fep.670210209$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13741330$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bates, Edward R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akindele, Femi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprinkle, Don</creatorcontrib><title>American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard</title><title>Environmental progress</title><addtitle>Environ. Prog</addtitle><description>Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) is a low‐cost remedial technology that has been used extensively for decades to treat soil contaminated with metals on Super fund sites. Increasingly, it is being used with success to remediate sites that contain higher molecular weight organic compounds. This case study describes the development of S/S formations and their application to remediate the American Creosote Superfund Site in Jackson, Tennessee.
The U.S. EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory conducted successful treatability tests of innovative solidification/stabilization (S/S) formulations to treat soils contaminated with dioxins, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and creosote from four wood preserving sites. Formulations developed during these studies were successful in reducing the mobility (leaching) of contaminants of concern by 95% to 99%. For one of these sites, the American Creosote Superfund site in Jackson, Tennessee, the U.S. EPA, in cooperation with the State of Tennessee, conducted a successful remediation of 45,000 cubic yards during 1998 and 1999. The costs to excavate, treat, replace, and cap soil contaminated with dioxin, PCP, and creosote averaged $64 per cubic yard (about $40 ton). Formulations, design, operations, performance specifications, and costs are presented in this paper.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>creosote</subject><subject>Decontamination. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Excavation</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>pentachlorophenol</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution abatement</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Soil and sediments pollution</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil remediation</subject><subject>Solidification</subject><subject>Specifications</subject><subject>Stabilization</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>0278-4491</issn><issn>1944-7442</issn><issn>1547-5921</issn><issn>1944-7450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVFrFDEQx4MoeFbf_ABB1KfbNpNNdje-laNWsZxXWhB8CdnsBFL3Nmuyiz0_vTmvtOKDvmQS-P1_ZGYIeQnsGBjjJzgeVzXjwDhTj8gCpKgLqTg8JgvG66YQQsFT8iylG8ZAQt0syHS6xeitGaiNGFKYkCafD2tSvk1zt3tHr0LvO-8yNfkwnKTJtL73P3-_aHC08-HWD2lJN6vNkpqhe3C5EOnrStARI7Vz6y3dmdg9J0-c6RO-uKtH5Pr92fXqQ3Hx-fzj6vSisBJAFdZiq8C6SgnDjYOqtRXP_TjBZStY0zQKrUTBSjBcKNe2xkiwyMtKSoHlEXl70I4xfJ8xTXrrk8W-NwOGOWley4blef0XBJW5BpoMvvoLvAlzHHIPmrNy_ze-h5YHyMaQUkSnx-i3Ju40ML3fk8ZR3-8p42_unCZZ07toBuvTQ6asBZQly5w8cD98j7t_OvXZ5k9_ccj5NOHtfc7EbzlQ1lJ_WZ_rr-v15dWnzUpflr8APxywmg</recordid><startdate>200207</startdate><enddate>200207</enddate><creator>Bates, Edward R.</creator><creator>Akindele, Femi</creator><creator>Sprinkle, Don</creator><general>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</general><general>Willey</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200207</creationdate><title>American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard</title><author>Bates, Edward R. ; Akindele, Femi ; Sprinkle, Don</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5119-cceb91cf694a2af16bc62592f425b408889ec5e4031a249fbbaa51ce236554e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>creosote</topic><topic>Decontamination. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Excavation</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>pentachlorophenol</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution abatement</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Soil and sediments pollution</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil remediation</topic><topic>Solidification</topic><topic>Specifications</topic><topic>Stabilization</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bates, Edward R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akindele, Femi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprinkle, Don</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bates, Edward R.</au><au>Akindele, Femi</au><au>Sprinkle, Don</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard</atitle><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Prog</addtitle><date>2002-07</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>79-84</pages><issn>0278-4491</issn><issn>1944-7442</issn><eissn>1547-5921</eissn><eissn>1944-7450</eissn><coden>ENVPDI</coden><abstract>Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) is a low‐cost remedial technology that has been used extensively for decades to treat soil contaminated with metals on Super fund sites. Increasingly, it is being used with success to remediate sites that contain higher molecular weight organic compounds. This case study describes the development of S/S formations and their application to remediate the American Creosote Superfund Site in Jackson, Tennessee.
The U.S. EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory conducted successful treatability tests of innovative solidification/stabilization (S/S) formulations to treat soils contaminated with dioxins, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and creosote from four wood preserving sites. Formulations developed during these studies were successful in reducing the mobility (leaching) of contaminants of concern by 95% to 99%. For one of these sites, the American Creosote Superfund site in Jackson, Tennessee, the U.S. EPA, in cooperation with the State of Tennessee, conducted a successful remediation of 45,000 cubic yards during 1998 and 1999. The costs to excavate, treat, replace, and cap soil contaminated with dioxin, PCP, and creosote averaged $64 per cubic yard (about $40 ton). Formulations, design, operations, performance specifications, and costs are presented in this paper.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</pub><doi>10.1002/ep.670210209</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-4491 |
ispartof | Environmental progress, 2002-07, Vol.21 (2), p.79-84 |
issn | 0278-4491 1944-7442 1547-5921 1944-7450 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27580702 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Contaminants Contamination creosote Decontamination. Miscellaneous Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Exact sciences and technology Excavation Formulations Leaching Mobility Molecular weight Organic compounds pentachlorophenol Pollution Pollution abatement Pollution, environment geology Risk management Soil (material) Soil and sediments pollution Soil pollution Soil remediation Solidification Specifications Stabilization Wood |
title | American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A45%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=American%20creosote%20site%20case%20study:%20Solidification/stabilization%20of%20dioxins,%20PCP,%20and%20creosote%20for%20$64%20per%20cubic%20yard&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20progress&rft.au=Bates,%20Edward%20R.&rft.date=2002-07&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=79-84&rft.issn=0278-4491&rft.eissn=1547-5921&rft.coden=ENVPDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ep.670210209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E308263927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203259228&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |