American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard

Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) is a low‐cost remedial technology that has been used extensively for decades to treat soil contaminated with metals on Super fund sites. Increasingly, it is being used with success to remediate sites that contain higher molecular weight organic compounds. This case...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental progress 2002-07, Vol.21 (2), p.79-84
Hauptverfasser: Bates, Edward R., Akindele, Femi, Sprinkle, Don
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 2
container_start_page 79
container_title Environmental progress
container_volume 21
creator Bates, Edward R.
Akindele, Femi
Sprinkle, Don
description Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) is a low‐cost remedial technology that has been used extensively for decades to treat soil contaminated with metals on Super fund sites. Increasingly, it is being used with success to remediate sites that contain higher molecular weight organic compounds. This case study describes the development of S/S formations and their application to remediate the American Creosote Superfund Site in Jackson, Tennessee. The U.S. EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory conducted successful treatability tests of innovative solidification/stabilization (S/S) formulations to treat soils contaminated with dioxins, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and creosote from four wood preserving sites. Formulations developed during these studies were successful in reducing the mobility (leaching) of contaminants of concern by 95% to 99%. For one of these sites, the American Creosote Superfund site in Jackson, Tennessee, the U.S. EPA, in cooperation with the State of Tennessee, conducted a successful remediation of 45,000 cubic yards during 1998 and 1999. The costs to excavate, treat, replace, and cap soil contaminated with dioxin, PCP, and creosote averaged $64 per cubic yard (about $40 ton). Formulations, design, operations, performance specifications, and costs are presented in this paper.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ep.670210209
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27580702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>308263927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5119-cceb91cf694a2af16bc62592f425b408889ec5e4031a249fbbaa51ce236554e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVFrFDEQx4MoeFbf_ABB1KfbNpNNdje-laNWsZxXWhB8CdnsBFL3Nmuyiz0_vTmvtOKDvmQS-P1_ZGYIeQnsGBjjJzgeVzXjwDhTj8gCpKgLqTg8JgvG66YQQsFT8iylG8ZAQt0syHS6xeitGaiNGFKYkCafD2tSvk1zt3tHr0LvO-8yNfkwnKTJtL73P3-_aHC08-HWD2lJN6vNkpqhe3C5EOnrStARI7Vz6y3dmdg9J0-c6RO-uKtH5Pr92fXqQ3Hx-fzj6vSisBJAFdZiq8C6SgnDjYOqtRXP_TjBZStY0zQKrUTBSjBcKNe2xkiwyMtKSoHlEXl70I4xfJ8xTXrrk8W-NwOGOWley4blef0XBJW5BpoMvvoLvAlzHHIPmrNy_ze-h5YHyMaQUkSnx-i3Ju40ML3fk8ZR3-8p42_unCZZ07toBuvTQ6asBZQly5w8cD98j7t_OvXZ5k9_ccj5NOHtfc7EbzlQ1lJ_WZ_rr-v15dWnzUpflr8APxywmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203259228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Bates, Edward R. ; Akindele, Femi ; Sprinkle, Don</creator><creatorcontrib>Bates, Edward R. ; Akindele, Femi ; Sprinkle, Don</creatorcontrib><description>Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) is a low‐cost remedial technology that has been used extensively for decades to treat soil contaminated with metals on Super fund sites. Increasingly, it is being used with success to remediate sites that contain higher molecular weight organic compounds. This case study describes the development of S/S formations and their application to remediate the American Creosote Superfund Site in Jackson, Tennessee. The U.S. EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory conducted successful treatability tests of innovative solidification/stabilization (S/S) formulations to treat soils contaminated with dioxins, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and creosote from four wood preserving sites. Formulations developed during these studies were successful in reducing the mobility (leaching) of contaminants of concern by 95% to 99%. For one of these sites, the American Creosote Superfund site in Jackson, Tennessee, the U.S. EPA, in cooperation with the State of Tennessee, conducted a successful remediation of 45,000 cubic yards during 1998 and 1999. The costs to excavate, treat, replace, and cap soil contaminated with dioxin, PCP, and creosote averaged $64 per cubic yard (about $40 ton). Formulations, design, operations, performance specifications, and costs are presented in this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4491</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-7442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ep.670210209</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENVPDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; creosote ; Decontamination. Miscellaneous ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Excavation ; Formulations ; Leaching ; Mobility ; Molecular weight ; Organic compounds ; pentachlorophenol ; Pollution ; Pollution abatement ; Pollution, environment geology ; Risk management ; Soil (material) ; Soil and sediments pollution ; Soil pollution ; Soil remediation ; Solidification ; Specifications ; Stabilization ; Wood</subject><ispartof>Environmental progress, 2002-07, Vol.21 (2), p.79-84</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Chemical Engineers Jul 2002</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5119-cceb91cf694a2af16bc62592f425b408889ec5e4031a249fbbaa51ce236554e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fep.670210209$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fep.670210209$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13741330$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bates, Edward R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akindele, Femi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprinkle, Don</creatorcontrib><title>American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard</title><title>Environmental progress</title><addtitle>Environ. Prog</addtitle><description>Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) is a low‐cost remedial technology that has been used extensively for decades to treat soil contaminated with metals on Super fund sites. Increasingly, it is being used with success to remediate sites that contain higher molecular weight organic compounds. This case study describes the development of S/S formations and their application to remediate the American Creosote Superfund Site in Jackson, Tennessee. The U.S. EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory conducted successful treatability tests of innovative solidification/stabilization (S/S) formulations to treat soils contaminated with dioxins, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and creosote from four wood preserving sites. Formulations developed during these studies were successful in reducing the mobility (leaching) of contaminants of concern by 95% to 99%. For one of these sites, the American Creosote Superfund site in Jackson, Tennessee, the U.S. EPA, in cooperation with the State of Tennessee, conducted a successful remediation of 45,000 cubic yards during 1998 and 1999. The costs to excavate, treat, replace, and cap soil contaminated with dioxin, PCP, and creosote averaged $64 per cubic yard (about $40 ton). Formulations, design, operations, performance specifications, and costs are presented in this paper.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>creosote</subject><subject>Decontamination. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Excavation</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>pentachlorophenol</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution abatement</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Soil and sediments pollution</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Soil remediation</subject><subject>Solidification</subject><subject>Specifications</subject><subject>Stabilization</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>0278-4491</issn><issn>1944-7442</issn><issn>1547-5921</issn><issn>1944-7450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVFrFDEQx4MoeFbf_ABB1KfbNpNNdje-laNWsZxXWhB8CdnsBFL3Nmuyiz0_vTmvtOKDvmQS-P1_ZGYIeQnsGBjjJzgeVzXjwDhTj8gCpKgLqTg8JgvG66YQQsFT8iylG8ZAQt0syHS6xeitGaiNGFKYkCafD2tSvk1zt3tHr0LvO-8yNfkwnKTJtL73P3-_aHC08-HWD2lJN6vNkpqhe3C5EOnrStARI7Vz6y3dmdg9J0-c6RO-uKtH5Pr92fXqQ3Hx-fzj6vSisBJAFdZiq8C6SgnDjYOqtRXP_TjBZStY0zQKrUTBSjBcKNe2xkiwyMtKSoHlEXl70I4xfJ8xTXrrk8W-NwOGOWley4blef0XBJW5BpoMvvoLvAlzHHIPmrNy_ze-h5YHyMaQUkSnx-i3Ju40ML3fk8ZR3-8p42_unCZZ07toBuvTQ6asBZQly5w8cD98j7t_OvXZ5k9_ccj5NOHtfc7EbzlQ1lJ_WZ_rr-v15dWnzUpflr8APxywmg</recordid><startdate>200207</startdate><enddate>200207</enddate><creator>Bates, Edward R.</creator><creator>Akindele, Femi</creator><creator>Sprinkle, Don</creator><general>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</general><general>Willey</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200207</creationdate><title>American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard</title><author>Bates, Edward R. ; Akindele, Femi ; Sprinkle, Don</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5119-cceb91cf694a2af16bc62592f425b408889ec5e4031a249fbbaa51ce236554e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>creosote</topic><topic>Decontamination. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Excavation</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>pentachlorophenol</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution abatement</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Soil and sediments pollution</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Soil remediation</topic><topic>Solidification</topic><topic>Specifications</topic><topic>Stabilization</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bates, Edward R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akindele, Femi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprinkle, Don</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bates, Edward R.</au><au>Akindele, Femi</au><au>Sprinkle, Don</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard</atitle><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Prog</addtitle><date>2002-07</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>79-84</pages><issn>0278-4491</issn><issn>1944-7442</issn><eissn>1547-5921</eissn><eissn>1944-7450</eissn><coden>ENVPDI</coden><abstract>Solidification/Stabilization (S/S) is a low‐cost remedial technology that has been used extensively for decades to treat soil contaminated with metals on Super fund sites. Increasingly, it is being used with success to remediate sites that contain higher molecular weight organic compounds. This case study describes the development of S/S formations and their application to remediate the American Creosote Superfund Site in Jackson, Tennessee. The U.S. EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory conducted successful treatability tests of innovative solidification/stabilization (S/S) formulations to treat soils contaminated with dioxins, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and creosote from four wood preserving sites. Formulations developed during these studies were successful in reducing the mobility (leaching) of contaminants of concern by 95% to 99%. For one of these sites, the American Creosote Superfund site in Jackson, Tennessee, the U.S. EPA, in cooperation with the State of Tennessee, conducted a successful remediation of 45,000 cubic yards during 1998 and 1999. The costs to excavate, treat, replace, and cap soil contaminated with dioxin, PCP, and creosote averaged $64 per cubic yard (about $40 ton). Formulations, design, operations, performance specifications, and costs are presented in this paper.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</pub><doi>10.1002/ep.670210209</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-4491
ispartof Environmental progress, 2002-07, Vol.21 (2), p.79-84
issn 0278-4491
1944-7442
1547-5921
1944-7450
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27580702
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Contaminants
Contamination
creosote
Decontamination. Miscellaneous
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Exact sciences and technology
Excavation
Formulations
Leaching
Mobility
Molecular weight
Organic compounds
pentachlorophenol
Pollution
Pollution abatement
Pollution, environment geology
Risk management
Soil (material)
Soil and sediments pollution
Soil pollution
Soil remediation
Solidification
Specifications
Stabilization
Wood
title American creosote site case study: Solidification/stabilization of dioxins, PCP, and creosote for $64 per cubic yard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A45%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=American%20creosote%20site%20case%20study:%20Solidification/stabilization%20of%20dioxins,%20PCP,%20and%20creosote%20for%20$64%20per%20cubic%20yard&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20progress&rft.au=Bates,%20Edward%20R.&rft.date=2002-07&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=79-84&rft.issn=0278-4491&rft.eissn=1547-5921&rft.coden=ENVPDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ep.670210209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E308263927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203259228&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true