Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey

Waste management has come to the fore in the whole world with the increasing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic along with concerns about human health, environmental threats, and socio-economic factors, etc. Medical waste is one of the waste types that need special management processes including partic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Socio-economic planning sciences 2023-04, Vol.86, p.101499, Article 101499
Hauptverfasser: Çelik, Sefa, Peker, İskender, Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu, Büyüközkan, Gülçin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 101499
container_title Socio-economic planning sciences
container_volume 86
creator Çelik, Sefa
Peker, İskender
Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu
Büyüközkan, Gülçin
description Waste management has come to the fore in the whole world with the increasing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic along with concerns about human health, environmental threats, and socio-economic factors, etc. Medical waste is one of the waste types that need special management processes including particularly collection, storage, separation, and disposal. Healthcare activities create a great amount of medical waste deriving from the hospitals. This study aims to determine the hospital that carries out medical waste management in the most effective way in Erzurum, Turkey. To handle intense uncertainty in the evaluation process, the case is analyzed by Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (IFMCDM) methods. The present study contributes to the literature by focusing on a real case problem under IF environment in a Group Decision-Making (GDM) framework. Additionally, based on the literature review and expert judgments, the evaluation criteria relevant to the case are defined in this paper. To this end, a four-phased integrated methodology that involves Intuitionistic Fuzzy Weighted Averaging (IFWA), IF Analytical Hierarchy Process (IFAHP), IF Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IFTOPSIS) and One-Dimensional Sensitivity Analysis, is conducted. Firstly, IFWA is aimed to express the significance levels of decision makers (DMs) based on their knowledge, qualifications and experiences. Secondly, IFAHP is used to calculate the importance weights of the decision criteria and IFTOPSIS is preferred to rank the available hospitals. Then, sensitivity analysis is employed to display robustness. According to the results, the most important criteria are Qualified personnel, Health institution infrastructure, and Control of waste, respectively and the most efficient hospital is determined. •Considers medical waste management emerged as a big problem during Covid-19 pandemic.•Searching waste management planning to ensure socio-economic and environmental sustainability.•Evaluating hospital services on medical waste management with a real-case study.•Handling a socio-economic problem within group decision framework by using IFMCDM.•Stating organizational criteria such as qualified personnel as the most important.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101499
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2756672580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038012122003068</els_id><sourcerecordid>2756672580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9cdff92536423ba8cbed3568d2f39a5df62d27bd06a6c4073411a6a97969d5073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2O1DAQhC0EYoeFF-CAfOSSwT-xkyAuqxV_0iIuy9ny2B3wkDiD257V7Bvw1jiahSOnVre-KqmrCHnJ2ZYzrt_stwgH3AomxHpoh-ER2fC-k41mLX9MNozJvmFc8AvyDHHPGBOtUE_JhdSqZWJQG_L7S5lyaFwKGVKwFI52KjaHJdJlpDP44OxE7yxmoLON9jvMEDM9pMUBIi3RQ6Ih5hJWTcAcHB3L_f2JQjyGtMQVf0uvqLMIFHPxJ1q9fyx4CNlOWLX0tqSfcHpOnoz1AC8e5iX59uH97fWn5ubrx8_XVzeNa6XMzeD8OA5CSd0KubO924GXSvdejHKwyo9aeNHtPNNWu5Z1suXcajt0gx68qvsleX32rT_8KoDZzAEdTJONsBQ0olNad0L1rKLijLq0ICYYzSGF2aaT4cysFZi9WSswawXmXEEVvXrwL7ua3z_J38wr8O4MQP3yGCAZdAGiq1kncNn4JfzP_w9XbZru</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756672580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Çelik, Sefa ; Peker, İskender ; Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu ; Büyüközkan, Gülçin</creator><creatorcontrib>Çelik, Sefa ; Peker, İskender ; Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu ; Büyüközkan, Gülçin</creatorcontrib><description>Waste management has come to the fore in the whole world with the increasing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic along with concerns about human health, environmental threats, and socio-economic factors, etc. Medical waste is one of the waste types that need special management processes including particularly collection, storage, separation, and disposal. Healthcare activities create a great amount of medical waste deriving from the hospitals. This study aims to determine the hospital that carries out medical waste management in the most effective way in Erzurum, Turkey. To handle intense uncertainty in the evaluation process, the case is analyzed by Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (IFMCDM) methods. The present study contributes to the literature by focusing on a real case problem under IF environment in a Group Decision-Making (GDM) framework. Additionally, based on the literature review and expert judgments, the evaluation criteria relevant to the case are defined in this paper. To this end, a four-phased integrated methodology that involves Intuitionistic Fuzzy Weighted Averaging (IFWA), IF Analytical Hierarchy Process (IFAHP), IF Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IFTOPSIS) and One-Dimensional Sensitivity Analysis, is conducted. Firstly, IFWA is aimed to express the significance levels of decision makers (DMs) based on their knowledge, qualifications and experiences. Secondly, IFAHP is used to calculate the importance weights of the decision criteria and IFTOPSIS is preferred to rank the available hospitals. Then, sensitivity analysis is employed to display robustness. According to the results, the most important criteria are Qualified personnel, Health institution infrastructure, and Control of waste, respectively and the most efficient hospital is determined. •Considers medical waste management emerged as a big problem during Covid-19 pandemic.•Searching waste management planning to ensure socio-economic and environmental sustainability.•Evaluating hospital services on medical waste management with a real-case study.•Handling a socio-economic problem within group decision framework by using IFMCDM.•Stating organizational criteria such as qualified personnel as the most important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101499</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36540295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>GDM ; IFAHP ; IFMCDM ; IFTOPSIS ; Medical waste management</subject><ispartof>Socio-economic planning sciences, 2023-04, Vol.86, p.101499, Article 101499</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9cdff92536423ba8cbed3568d2f39a5df62d27bd06a6c4073411a6a97969d5073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9cdff92536423ba8cbed3568d2f39a5df62d27bd06a6c4073411a6a97969d5073</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6402-5117 ; 0000-0001-7594-4856</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012122003068$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36540295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Çelik, Sefa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peker, İskender</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büyüközkan, Gülçin</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey</title><title>Socio-economic planning sciences</title><addtitle>Socioecon Plann Sci</addtitle><description>Waste management has come to the fore in the whole world with the increasing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic along with concerns about human health, environmental threats, and socio-economic factors, etc. Medical waste is one of the waste types that need special management processes including particularly collection, storage, separation, and disposal. Healthcare activities create a great amount of medical waste deriving from the hospitals. This study aims to determine the hospital that carries out medical waste management in the most effective way in Erzurum, Turkey. To handle intense uncertainty in the evaluation process, the case is analyzed by Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (IFMCDM) methods. The present study contributes to the literature by focusing on a real case problem under IF environment in a Group Decision-Making (GDM) framework. Additionally, based on the literature review and expert judgments, the evaluation criteria relevant to the case are defined in this paper. To this end, a four-phased integrated methodology that involves Intuitionistic Fuzzy Weighted Averaging (IFWA), IF Analytical Hierarchy Process (IFAHP), IF Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IFTOPSIS) and One-Dimensional Sensitivity Analysis, is conducted. Firstly, IFWA is aimed to express the significance levels of decision makers (DMs) based on their knowledge, qualifications and experiences. Secondly, IFAHP is used to calculate the importance weights of the decision criteria and IFTOPSIS is preferred to rank the available hospitals. Then, sensitivity analysis is employed to display robustness. According to the results, the most important criteria are Qualified personnel, Health institution infrastructure, and Control of waste, respectively and the most efficient hospital is determined. •Considers medical waste management emerged as a big problem during Covid-19 pandemic.•Searching waste management planning to ensure socio-economic and environmental sustainability.•Evaluating hospital services on medical waste management with a real-case study.•Handling a socio-economic problem within group decision framework by using IFMCDM.•Stating organizational criteria such as qualified personnel as the most important.</description><subject>GDM</subject><subject>IFAHP</subject><subject>IFMCDM</subject><subject>IFTOPSIS</subject><subject>Medical waste management</subject><issn>0038-0121</issn><issn>1873-6041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc2O1DAQhC0EYoeFF-CAfOSSwT-xkyAuqxV_0iIuy9ny2B3wkDiD257V7Bvw1jiahSOnVre-KqmrCHnJ2ZYzrt_stwgH3AomxHpoh-ER2fC-k41mLX9MNozJvmFc8AvyDHHPGBOtUE_JhdSqZWJQG_L7S5lyaFwKGVKwFI52KjaHJdJlpDP44OxE7yxmoLON9jvMEDM9pMUBIi3RQ6Ih5hJWTcAcHB3L_f2JQjyGtMQVf0uvqLMIFHPxJ1q9fyx4CNlOWLX0tqSfcHpOnoz1AC8e5iX59uH97fWn5ubrx8_XVzeNa6XMzeD8OA5CSd0KubO924GXSvdejHKwyo9aeNHtPNNWu5Z1suXcajt0gx68qvsleX32rT_8KoDZzAEdTJONsBQ0olNad0L1rKLijLq0ICYYzSGF2aaT4cysFZi9WSswawXmXEEVvXrwL7ua3z_J38wr8O4MQP3yGCAZdAGiq1kncNn4JfzP_w9XbZru</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Çelik, Sefa</creator><creator>Peker, İskender</creator><creator>Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu</creator><creator>Büyüközkan, Gülçin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6402-5117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7594-4856</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey</title><author>Çelik, Sefa ; Peker, İskender ; Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu ; Büyüközkan, Gülçin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9cdff92536423ba8cbed3568d2f39a5df62d27bd06a6c4073411a6a97969d5073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>GDM</topic><topic>IFAHP</topic><topic>IFMCDM</topic><topic>IFTOPSIS</topic><topic>Medical waste management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Çelik, Sefa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peker, İskender</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büyüközkan, Gülçin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Socio-economic planning sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Çelik, Sefa</au><au>Peker, İskender</au><au>Gök-Kısa, A. Cansu</au><au>Büyüközkan, Gülçin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey</atitle><jtitle>Socio-economic planning sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Socioecon Plann Sci</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>101499</spage><pages>101499-</pages><artnum>101499</artnum><issn>0038-0121</issn><eissn>1873-6041</eissn><abstract>Waste management has come to the fore in the whole world with the increasing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic along with concerns about human health, environmental threats, and socio-economic factors, etc. Medical waste is one of the waste types that need special management processes including particularly collection, storage, separation, and disposal. Healthcare activities create a great amount of medical waste deriving from the hospitals. This study aims to determine the hospital that carries out medical waste management in the most effective way in Erzurum, Turkey. To handle intense uncertainty in the evaluation process, the case is analyzed by Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (IFMCDM) methods. The present study contributes to the literature by focusing on a real case problem under IF environment in a Group Decision-Making (GDM) framework. Additionally, based on the literature review and expert judgments, the evaluation criteria relevant to the case are defined in this paper. To this end, a four-phased integrated methodology that involves Intuitionistic Fuzzy Weighted Averaging (IFWA), IF Analytical Hierarchy Process (IFAHP), IF Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IFTOPSIS) and One-Dimensional Sensitivity Analysis, is conducted. Firstly, IFWA is aimed to express the significance levels of decision makers (DMs) based on their knowledge, qualifications and experiences. Secondly, IFAHP is used to calculate the importance weights of the decision criteria and IFTOPSIS is preferred to rank the available hospitals. Then, sensitivity analysis is employed to display robustness. According to the results, the most important criteria are Qualified personnel, Health institution infrastructure, and Control of waste, respectively and the most efficient hospital is determined. •Considers medical waste management emerged as a big problem during Covid-19 pandemic.•Searching waste management planning to ensure socio-economic and environmental sustainability.•Evaluating hospital services on medical waste management with a real-case study.•Handling a socio-economic problem within group decision framework by using IFMCDM.•Stating organizational criteria such as qualified personnel as the most important.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36540295</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.seps.2022.101499</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6402-5117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7594-4856</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0121
ispartof Socio-economic planning sciences, 2023-04, Vol.86, p.101499, Article 101499
issn 0038-0121
1873-6041
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2756672580
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects GDM
IFAHP
IFMCDM
IFTOPSIS
Medical waste management
title Multi-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T13%3A17%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-criteria%20evaluation%20of%20medical%20waste%20management%20process%20under%20intuitionistic%20fuzzy%20environment:%20A%20case%20study%20on%20hospitals%20in%20Turkey&rft.jtitle=Socio-economic%20planning%20sciences&rft.au=%C3%87elik,%20Sefa&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=101499&rft.pages=101499-&rft.artnum=101499&rft.issn=0038-0121&rft.eissn=1873-6041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101499&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2756672580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756672580&rft_id=info:pmid/36540295&rft_els_id=S0038012122003068&rfr_iscdi=true