The role of surveillance imaging for resected high‐risk melanoma

Background Recommendations for surveillance imaging for resected melanoma vary considerably. This study examined the utility of imaging in patients with a high‐risk primary melanoma undergoing a protocolized imaging schedule. Methods This retrospective study involved data collection regarding imagin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology 2023-08, Vol.19 (4), p.566-573
Hauptverfasser: Yan, Mabel K., Adler, Nikki R., Wolfe, Rory, Pan, Yan, Chamberlain, Alexander, Kelly, John, Yap, Kenneth, Voskoboynik, Mark, Haydon, Andrew, Shackleton, Mark, Mar, Victoria J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 573
container_issue 4
container_start_page 566
container_title Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 19
creator Yan, Mabel K.
Adler, Nikki R.
Wolfe, Rory
Pan, Yan
Chamberlain, Alexander
Kelly, John
Yap, Kenneth
Voskoboynik, Mark
Haydon, Andrew
Shackleton, Mark
Mar, Victoria J.
description Background Recommendations for surveillance imaging for resected melanoma vary considerably. This study examined the utility of imaging in patients with a high‐risk primary melanoma undergoing a protocolized imaging schedule. Methods This retrospective study involved data collection regarding imaging, recurrence, and outcome characteristics for patients referred to the Victorian Melanoma Service from January 2016–April 2020 and managed for resected stage IIC or III melanoma. Patients with a T4b tumor who did not undergo a sentinel lymph node biopsy were included (T4bNX). Recurrences were “clinically detected” if they were primarily detected by patient symptoms or physical examination, or ‘imaging‐detected’ if the patient was asymptomatic. Cox regression models including time‐varying co‐variates were used to assess the impact of imaging‐detected versus clinically‐detected recurrence on overall survival. Results Over a median follow‐up time of 2.7 years, 199 patients underwent surveillance imaging (T4bNX:22, IIC:33, IIIA:22, IIIB:60, IIIC:61, IIID:1), and 44% (n = 88) experienced disease recurrence. Imaging detected over half (53%) of all recurrences. In adjusted analyses, mortality risk was reduced after an imaging‐detected compared to clinically‐detected recurrence at any given time from the start of surveillance (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.66, p = .005). Conclusion Our study indicates that routine imaging in the early follow‐up period of resected T4bNX, stage IIC and III melanoma plays an important role in the detection of asymptomatic recurrences. Imaging‐detected recurrence may be associated with a survival benefit and studies with more prolonged follow‐up are required to confirm these findings. In this retrospective study including 199 patients with high‐risk resected melanoma who underwent surveillance imaging, 88 individuals experienced disease recurrence. Imaging‐detected recurrence was associated with a reduced mortality risk compared to clinically detected recurrence at any given time from the start of surveillance in an adjusted Cox‐regression model.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajco.13913
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2756671133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2839081618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-88c697cef85de06373a93b7a07205bb7ebe6d645cdaf74e21199c847081bd8b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqWw8AAoEgtCSrHjxJexVFyF1KXMluOctClJXewG1I1H4Bl5ElxaOjBwlnOGT5_-8yN0SnCfhLnSM2P7hEpC91CX8JTGPGN0f3dnWQcdeT_DmMpEkkPUoSxLMSayi67HU4icrSGyZeRb9wZVXeu5gahq9KSaT6LSusiBB7OEIppWk-nXx6er_EvUQABto4_RQalrDyfb3UPPtzfj4X38NLp7GA6eYkMJo7EQhkluoBRZAZhRTrWkOdeYJzjLcw45sIKlmSl0yVNICJHSiJRjQfJC5AntoYuNd-Hsawt-qZrKG1jHBdt6lYSvGSeE0oCe_0FntnXzkE4lgsqgZEQE6nJDGWe9d1CqhQtfu5UiWK2bVetm1U-zAT7bKtu8gWKH_lYZALIB3qsaVv-o1OBxONpIvwFopYKv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2839081618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of surveillance imaging for resected high‐risk melanoma</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Yan, Mabel K. ; Adler, Nikki R. ; Wolfe, Rory ; Pan, Yan ; Chamberlain, Alexander ; Kelly, John ; Yap, Kenneth ; Voskoboynik, Mark ; Haydon, Andrew ; Shackleton, Mark ; Mar, Victoria J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yan, Mabel K. ; Adler, Nikki R. ; Wolfe, Rory ; Pan, Yan ; Chamberlain, Alexander ; Kelly, John ; Yap, Kenneth ; Voskoboynik, Mark ; Haydon, Andrew ; Shackleton, Mark ; Mar, Victoria J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Recommendations for surveillance imaging for resected melanoma vary considerably. This study examined the utility of imaging in patients with a high‐risk primary melanoma undergoing a protocolized imaging schedule. Methods This retrospective study involved data collection regarding imaging, recurrence, and outcome characteristics for patients referred to the Victorian Melanoma Service from January 2016–April 2020 and managed for resected stage IIC or III melanoma. Patients with a T4b tumor who did not undergo a sentinel lymph node biopsy were included (T4bNX). Recurrences were “clinically detected” if they were primarily detected by patient symptoms or physical examination, or ‘imaging‐detected’ if the patient was asymptomatic. Cox regression models including time‐varying co‐variates were used to assess the impact of imaging‐detected versus clinically‐detected recurrence on overall survival. Results Over a median follow‐up time of 2.7 years, 199 patients underwent surveillance imaging (T4bNX:22, IIC:33, IIIA:22, IIIB:60, IIIC:61, IIID:1), and 44% (n = 88) experienced disease recurrence. Imaging detected over half (53%) of all recurrences. In adjusted analyses, mortality risk was reduced after an imaging‐detected compared to clinically‐detected recurrence at any given time from the start of surveillance (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.66, p = .005). Conclusion Our study indicates that routine imaging in the early follow‐up period of resected T4bNX, stage IIC and III melanoma plays an important role in the detection of asymptomatic recurrences. Imaging‐detected recurrence may be associated with a survival benefit and studies with more prolonged follow‐up are required to confirm these findings. In this retrospective study including 199 patients with high‐risk resected melanoma who underwent surveillance imaging, 88 individuals experienced disease recurrence. Imaging‐detected recurrence was associated with a reduced mortality risk compared to clinically detected recurrence at any given time from the start of surveillance in an adjusted Cox‐regression model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-7555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-7563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13913</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36540019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Asymptomatic ; Biopsy ; diagnostic imaging ; Lymph nodes ; Melanoma ; Patients ; PET computed tomography ; Regression analysis ; staging ; Surveillance ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2023-08, Vol.19 (4), p.566-573</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-88c697cef85de06373a93b7a07205bb7ebe6d645cdaf74e21199c847081bd8b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4700-3781</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajco.13913$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajco.13913$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36540019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yan, Mabel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, Nikki R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voskoboynik, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haydon, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shackleton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mar, Victoria J.</creatorcontrib><title>The role of surveillance imaging for resected high‐risk melanoma</title><title>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Background Recommendations for surveillance imaging for resected melanoma vary considerably. This study examined the utility of imaging in patients with a high‐risk primary melanoma undergoing a protocolized imaging schedule. Methods This retrospective study involved data collection regarding imaging, recurrence, and outcome characteristics for patients referred to the Victorian Melanoma Service from January 2016–April 2020 and managed for resected stage IIC or III melanoma. Patients with a T4b tumor who did not undergo a sentinel lymph node biopsy were included (T4bNX). Recurrences were “clinically detected” if they were primarily detected by patient symptoms or physical examination, or ‘imaging‐detected’ if the patient was asymptomatic. Cox regression models including time‐varying co‐variates were used to assess the impact of imaging‐detected versus clinically‐detected recurrence on overall survival. Results Over a median follow‐up time of 2.7 years, 199 patients underwent surveillance imaging (T4bNX:22, IIC:33, IIIA:22, IIIB:60, IIIC:61, IIID:1), and 44% (n = 88) experienced disease recurrence. Imaging detected over half (53%) of all recurrences. In adjusted analyses, mortality risk was reduced after an imaging‐detected compared to clinically‐detected recurrence at any given time from the start of surveillance (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.66, p = .005). Conclusion Our study indicates that routine imaging in the early follow‐up period of resected T4bNX, stage IIC and III melanoma plays an important role in the detection of asymptomatic recurrences. Imaging‐detected recurrence may be associated with a survival benefit and studies with more prolonged follow‐up are required to confirm these findings. In this retrospective study including 199 patients with high‐risk resected melanoma who underwent surveillance imaging, 88 individuals experienced disease recurrence. Imaging‐detected recurrence was associated with a reduced mortality risk compared to clinically detected recurrence at any given time from the start of surveillance in an adjusted Cox‐regression model.</description><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>PET computed tomography</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>staging</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>1743-7555</issn><issn>1743-7563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqWw8AAoEgtCSrHjxJexVFyF1KXMluOctClJXewG1I1H4Bl5ElxaOjBwlnOGT5_-8yN0SnCfhLnSM2P7hEpC91CX8JTGPGN0f3dnWQcdeT_DmMpEkkPUoSxLMSayi67HU4icrSGyZeRb9wZVXeu5gahq9KSaT6LSusiBB7OEIppWk-nXx6er_EvUQABto4_RQalrDyfb3UPPtzfj4X38NLp7GA6eYkMJo7EQhkluoBRZAZhRTrWkOdeYJzjLcw45sIKlmSl0yVNICJHSiJRjQfJC5AntoYuNd-Hsawt-qZrKG1jHBdt6lYSvGSeE0oCe_0FntnXzkE4lgsqgZEQE6nJDGWe9d1CqhQtfu5UiWK2bVetm1U-zAT7bKtu8gWKH_lYZALIB3qsaVv-o1OBxONpIvwFopYKv</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Yan, Mabel K.</creator><creator>Adler, Nikki R.</creator><creator>Wolfe, Rory</creator><creator>Pan, Yan</creator><creator>Chamberlain, Alexander</creator><creator>Kelly, John</creator><creator>Yap, Kenneth</creator><creator>Voskoboynik, Mark</creator><creator>Haydon, Andrew</creator><creator>Shackleton, Mark</creator><creator>Mar, Victoria J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-3781</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>The role of surveillance imaging for resected high‐risk melanoma</title><author>Yan, Mabel K. ; Adler, Nikki R. ; Wolfe, Rory ; Pan, Yan ; Chamberlain, Alexander ; Kelly, John ; Yap, Kenneth ; Voskoboynik, Mark ; Haydon, Andrew ; Shackleton, Mark ; Mar, Victoria J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-88c697cef85de06373a93b7a07205bb7ebe6d645cdaf74e21199c847081bd8b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>PET computed tomography</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>staging</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yan, Mabel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, Nikki R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfe, Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voskoboynik, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haydon, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shackleton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mar, Victoria J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yan, Mabel K.</au><au>Adler, Nikki R.</au><au>Wolfe, Rory</au><au>Pan, Yan</au><au>Chamberlain, Alexander</au><au>Kelly, John</au><au>Yap, Kenneth</au><au>Voskoboynik, Mark</au><au>Haydon, Andrew</au><au>Shackleton, Mark</au><au>Mar, Victoria J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of surveillance imaging for resected high‐risk melanoma</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>566</spage><epage>573</epage><pages>566-573</pages><issn>1743-7555</issn><eissn>1743-7563</eissn><abstract>Background Recommendations for surveillance imaging for resected melanoma vary considerably. This study examined the utility of imaging in patients with a high‐risk primary melanoma undergoing a protocolized imaging schedule. Methods This retrospective study involved data collection regarding imaging, recurrence, and outcome characteristics for patients referred to the Victorian Melanoma Service from January 2016–April 2020 and managed for resected stage IIC or III melanoma. Patients with a T4b tumor who did not undergo a sentinel lymph node biopsy were included (T4bNX). Recurrences were “clinically detected” if they were primarily detected by patient symptoms or physical examination, or ‘imaging‐detected’ if the patient was asymptomatic. Cox regression models including time‐varying co‐variates were used to assess the impact of imaging‐detected versus clinically‐detected recurrence on overall survival. Results Over a median follow‐up time of 2.7 years, 199 patients underwent surveillance imaging (T4bNX:22, IIC:33, IIIA:22, IIIB:60, IIIC:61, IIID:1), and 44% (n = 88) experienced disease recurrence. Imaging detected over half (53%) of all recurrences. In adjusted analyses, mortality risk was reduced after an imaging‐detected compared to clinically‐detected recurrence at any given time from the start of surveillance (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.66, p = .005). Conclusion Our study indicates that routine imaging in the early follow‐up period of resected T4bNX, stage IIC and III melanoma plays an important role in the detection of asymptomatic recurrences. Imaging‐detected recurrence may be associated with a survival benefit and studies with more prolonged follow‐up are required to confirm these findings. In this retrospective study including 199 patients with high‐risk resected melanoma who underwent surveillance imaging, 88 individuals experienced disease recurrence. Imaging‐detected recurrence was associated with a reduced mortality risk compared to clinically detected recurrence at any given time from the start of surveillance in an adjusted Cox‐regression model.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36540019</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajco.13913</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-3781</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-7555
ispartof Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2023-08, Vol.19 (4), p.566-573
issn 1743-7555
1743-7563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2756671133
source Wiley Journals
subjects Asymptomatic
Biopsy
diagnostic imaging
Lymph nodes
Melanoma
Patients
PET computed tomography
Regression analysis
staging
Surveillance
Survival
title The role of surveillance imaging for resected high‐risk melanoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A48%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20surveillance%20imaging%20for%20resected%20high%E2%80%90risk%20melanoma&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Yan,%20Mabel%20K.&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=566&rft.epage=573&rft.pages=566-573&rft.issn=1743-7555&rft.eissn=1743-7563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajco.13913&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2839081618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2839081618&rft_id=info:pmid/36540019&rfr_iscdi=true